TipRanks
Advertisement

IWD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

IWD

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
IWD, the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, has a solid overall rating, largely supported by strong, diversified holdings like Apple, Microsoft, and Johnson & Johnson, which show robust financial performance, growth in areas such as cloud, AI, and services, and generally positive technical trends. Amazon and Walmart also add to the fund’s strength with growing businesses in AWS, advertising, and e-commerce, though Amazon’s premium valuation and short-term technical weakness, along with more mixed profiles like Intel and Berkshire Hathaway B, slightly temper the picture. The main risk factor is the fund’s meaningful exposure to a handful of large tech and consumer names, which can increase sensitivity to market swings in those sectors.
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating solid momentum.
Leading Blue-Chip Holdings
Many of the largest positions, including major technology, financial, energy, and healthcare companies, have delivered strong or steady results that support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which helps reduce the impact if any single industry faces a downturn.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Market Dependence
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the ETF is highly sensitive to the health of the U.S. market and offers very limited international diversification.
Concentration in a Few Large Stocks
A small number of big names make up a significant share of the portfolio, increasing the risk if any of these companies run into trouble.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions have recently shown weak or lagging performance, which could weigh on future returns if the trend continues.

IWD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

IWD Summary

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index, which focuses on large U.S. companies that appear to be “on sale” based on their current prices. It owns many well-known names like Amazon and Apple, along with banks, health care firms, and energy companies, giving investors a broad mix of industries in one fund. Someone might invest in IWD to diversify their portfolio and seek long-term growth from established businesses that may be undervalued. A key risk is that these stocks can still rise and fall with the overall stock market, so their value is not guaranteed.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has an expense ratio of 0.18%, which means you’ll pay $1.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because it’s a passively managed fund that tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index, keeping costs down compared to actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF could benefit from a stable U.S. economy and favorable conditions for large-cap value stocks, such as rising interest rates that may boost financial sector performance, which is the fund's largest sector exposure. However, economic slowdowns or regulatory changes affecting key holdings like Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, or Exxon Mobil could negatively impact the ETF's returns. Additionally, shifts in consumer behavior or technological disruptions could influence sectors like consumer cyclical and technology, which are significant parts of the portfolio.

IWD Top 10 Holdings

IWD leans heavily on U.S. large-cap value names, but its top lineup has a growth flavor. Big Tech—Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple—acts as the main engine, with Microsoft and Amazon rising lately and giving the fund much of its spark, while Apple looks a bit tired and has lost some steam in the short term. Financials add ballast, with JPMorgan and Berkshire Hathaway providing steady, if unspectacular, support. Defensive health care and energy names like Johnson & Johnson and Exxon Mobil are quietly helping, making the fund a diversified, U.S.-centric value play with a tech tilt.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Amazon6.09%$5.07B$2.77T12.55%
71
Outperform
Apple5.88%$4.89B$4.85T41.95%
79
Outperform
Microsoft4.91%$4.09B$3.68T-2.80%
79
Outperform
JPMorgan Chase2.54%$2.12B$946.93B16.07%
72
Outperform
Berkshire Hathaway B2.54%$2.11B$982.67B3.37%
66
Neutral
Exxon Mobil1.84%$1.54B$682.54B47.99%
74
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson1.71%$1.42B$640.02B49.15%
78
Outperform
Intel1.25%$1.04B$544.15B327.49%
64
Neutral
Cisco Systems1.18%$984.47M$442.08B68.54%
77
Outperform
Walmart1.15%$955.41M$850.10B3.54%
78
Outperform

IWD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
252.91
Negative
100DMA
244.60
Positive
200DMA
230.12
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.20
Positive
RSI
46.00
Neutral
STOCH
18.42
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IWD, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 255.34, equal to the 50-day MA of 252.91, and equal to the 200-day MA of 230.12, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.20 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 46.00 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 18.42 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for IWD.

IWD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$81.82B0.18%
72
Outperform
$190.25B0.03%
72
Outperform
$49.47B0.18%
72
Outperform
$36.29B0.04%
72
Outperform
$22.01B0.06%
72
Outperform
$21.89B0.15%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
252.82
52.82
26.41%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement