HAP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP)
HAP, the VanEck Natural Resources ETF, has a solid but not top-tier overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong and more challenged holdings in the natural resources space. High-quality positions like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell, BHP, and Corteva support the fund’s rating through strong financial performance, positive earnings calls, and generally stable profitability, while weaker names such as Bayer, with its financial struggles and weak valuation, hold the score back. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in cyclical energy and commodity-related companies, which can lead to higher volatility when oil, gas, and commodity prices move sharply.
HAP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 327.51M
- Region
- Global
- Expense Ratio
- 0.41%
- Beta
- 0.50
- Issuer
- VanEck
- Inception Date
- Aug 29, 2008
- Dividend Yield
- 1.83%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index
HAP Summary
The VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index and focuses on companies tied to energy, agriculture, metals, and other raw materials. It holds well-known names like Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with firms that help grow food, mine metals, and produce power. Someone might invest in HAP to diversify their portfolio and benefit from long-term demand for resources that fuel the global economy. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to commodity-related businesses, so its price can swing a lot as oil, metal, and crop prices rise and fall.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.42%, which means you’ll pay about $4.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the cost of a typical broad, passively managed index ETF because this is a more specialized, sector-focused fund that requires more research and management.
What would affect this ETF?
HAP could benefit if global growth and infrastructure spending increase demand for energy, metals, and agriculture, supporting companies like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Deere, and BHP, and if clean-energy policies help utilities such as NextEra and Iberdrola. On the other hand, weaker economic conditions, falling commodity prices, stricter environmental rules, or rapid shifts away from fossil fuels could hurt its energy and materials holdings and weigh on overall performance.
HAP Top 10 Holdings
HAP is very much a natural-resources play, with a global mix of U.S. heavyweights and overseas names. Deere has been one of the fund’s key engines, rising on solid demand and innovation in farm equipment, while Exxon and Chevron have stayed generally supportive despite some recent choppiness in energy prices. On the flip side, NextEra Energy has been losing steam, acting as a mild drag. Bayer and BHP have shown mixed but improving trends, underscoring the fund’s tilt toward materials, energy, and agriculture rather than broad-market tech darlings.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 DE | Deere | 4.92% | $16.12M | $170.46B | 38.43% | 66Neutral |
 XOM | Exxon Mobil | 5.71% | $18.70M | $731.34B | 58.01% | 74Outperform |
 CVX | Chevron | 5.57% | $18.23M | $445.95B | 47.46% | 71Outperform |
 ES:IBE | Iberdrola | 4.16% | $13.62M | EUR 140.00B | 26.26% | 67Neutral |
 DE:BAYN | Bayer | 3.25% | $10.62M | EUR 42.72B | 63.15% | 54Neutral |
 NEE | NextEra Energy | 3.36% | $11.00M | $164.50B | -6.80% | 71Outperform |
 BHP | BHP Group | 2.80% | $9.18M | $212.24B | 44.40% | 73Outperform |
 CTVA | Corteva | 0.41% | $1.35M | $8.61B | -79.47% | 75Outperform |
 SHEL | Shell | 2.48% | $8.12M | $296.96B | 44.98% | 78Outperform |
 NTR | Nutrien | 2.14% | $7.01M | $32.93B | 21.62% | ―― |
HAP Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For HAP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 74.56 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 74.19, below the 50-day MA of 75.47, and above the 200-day MA of 71.86, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.16 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 49.05 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 53.76 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for HAP.
HAP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAP | $74.56 | $76.00(1.93% Upside) | $327.51M | 0.41% | 58Neutral |
 GII | $73.22 | $82.07(12.09% Upside) | $938.53M | 0.40% | 63Neutral |
 CCNR | $38.54 | $48.60(26.09% Upside) | $437.62M | 0.39% | 58Neutral |
 TURF | $34.30 | $40.34(17.59% Upside) | $345.01M | 0.44% | 57Neutral |
 CSNR | $37.22 | $45.12(21.23% Upside) | $129.93M | 0.50% | 60Neutral |
 FTRI | $17.05 | $20.00(17.34% Upside) | $115.63M | 0.70% | 67Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAP | VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 74.56 | 18.28 | 32.48% | |
| GII | SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 73.22 | 4.73 | 6.91% | |
| CCNR | CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 38.54 | 7.89 | 25.75% | |
| TURF | T. Rowe Price Natural Resource ETF | 34.30 | 7.21 | 26.61% | |
| CSNR | Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 37.22 | 8.48 | 29.52% | |
| FTRI | First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 17.05 | 2.01 | 13.39% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.