tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GRW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GRW

TCW Compounders ETF (GRW)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
GRW, the TCW Compounders ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to its heavy exposure to high-quality growth leaders like Alphabet, Microsoft, ASML, Nvidia, and Broadcom, all benefiting from strong financial performance and long-term tailwinds in AI, cloud, and advanced semiconductors. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as McKesson and O’Reilly Auto, where leverage, lower profitability, and bearish technical signals introduce more risk. The main risk factor for the fund is its concentration in richly valued, tech- and AI-focused companies, which could be vulnerable if growth expectations or market sentiment weaken.
Positive Factors
Strong Leading Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including major technology and industrial names, have shown strong recent performance, helping support the ETF’s overall returns.
Sector Diversification Across Growth Areas
The fund spreads its assets across multiple sectors such as industrials, technology, financials, and consumer-related companies, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Broad U.S. Focus with Select International Exposure
While the ETF is primarily invested in U.S. companies, it also includes a small allocation to developed international markets, adding a bit of geographic diversification.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Positions
A meaningful share of the portfolio is tied up in a handful of large holdings, which can increase the impact if any one of those companies struggles.
Heavy Tilt Toward Industrials and Technology
With a large portion of assets in industrial and technology stocks, the fund may be more sensitive to downturns in these specific sectors.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The ETF’s ongoing fee is on the higher side for an exchange-traded fund, which can modestly reduce investors’ net returns over time.

GRW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GRW Summary

The TCW Compounders ETF (GRW) is an actively managed fund that looks for “compounder” companies—businesses that steadily grow and reinvest their profits over time. It doesn’t track a specific index, but focuses on growth across the total market, with most holdings in U.S. industrial and technology firms. Well-known companies in the fund include Broadcom and Alphabet (Google’s parent company). Someone might invest in GRW for long-term growth and diversification across several sectors. A key risk is that growth-focused stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can rise and fall sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The TCW Compounders ETF (GRW) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting high-quality growth companies rather than tracking a passive index.
What would affect this ETF?The TCW Compounders ETF (GRW) could benefit from continued growth in the technology and industrial sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings, especially if innovation and infrastructure spending remain strong globally. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact growth-focused companies, particularly in sectors like consumer cyclical and financials. Additionally, global regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions could pose risks to its diversified portfolio.

GRW Top 10 Holdings

GRW leans heavily on a mix of global tech and aerospace “compounders,” with names like Microsoft and ASML doing much of the heavy lifting lately as their AI and chip stories keep gaining traction. Nvidia is still a key engine, but its ride has been a bit bumpier, while Alphabet has been steady-to-mixed as investors weigh AI upside against higher costs. On the industrial side, GE Aerospace is helping, but TransDigm is losing altitude and holding back returns. Overall, it’s a growth-heavy, globally diversified portfolio with notable concentration in a handful of tech and aerospace leaders.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Transdigm Group7.28%$4.74M$66.72B-15.13%
69
Neutral
Nvidia6.44%$4.19M$5.07T26.54%
76
Outperform
Broadcom6.18%$4.02M$1.69T20.38%
76
Outperform
GE Aerospace5.87%$3.82M$367.70B24.18%
72
Outperform
Microsoft5.59%$3.64M$3.69T-2.60%
79
Outperform
ASML Holding5.19%$3.38M$666.46B127.26%
81
Outperform
HEICO4.49%$2.92M$40.74B5.95%
77
Outperform
Alphabet Class A4.33%$2.82M$4.17T64.84%
85
Outperform
McKesson3.67%$2.39M$104.54B31.18%
62
Neutral
Visa3.35%$2.18M$716.76B8.52%
70
Outperform

GRW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
31.86
Negative
100DMA
31.15
Positive
200DMA
30.70
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.09
Positive
RSI
45.08
Neutral
STOCH
32.76
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GRW, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 32.16, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.86, and equal to the 200-day MA of 30.70, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.09 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.08 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 32.76 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for GRW.

GRW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$65.08M0.75%
69
Neutral
$93.66M0.73%
70
Neutral
$81.79M0.65%
68
Neutral
$77.82M0.75%
56
Neutral
$75.11M0.60%
65
Neutral
$69.47M0.59%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GRW
TCW Compounders ETF
31.61
-1.11
-3.39%
GOP
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF
SAGP
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF
MNVT
Moonvest ETF
MVPA
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement