FPWR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR)
FPWR’s rating suggests it is a reasonably solid but not top-tier ETF, supported by strong core holdings like Enterprise Products Partners and National Fuel Gas, which bring stable profitability, strategic growth plans, and supportive earnings calls. However, several utilities and energy names such as Duke Energy, Kinder Morgan, WEC Energy, PPL, CMS, and Xcel Energy face bearish technical trends, cash flow or leverage concerns, and only fair valuations, which collectively weigh on the fund’s overall appeal. The main risk is its concentration in power and energy-related companies, making the ETF sensitive to sector-specific issues like commodity price swings, regulatory changes, and capital-intensive projects.
FPWR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 33.86M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.96%
- Beta
- 0.19
- Issuer
- First Trust
- Inception Date
- Aug 19, 2019
- Dividend Yield
- 2.07%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
FPWR Summary
FPWR (First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF) is a U.S.-focused fund that follows a power and energy solutions theme, with no specific underlying index. It mainly holds utility and energy companies that help move, deliver, and manage power across the country. Well-known names in the fund include Duke Energy and Kinder Morgan. Investors might consider FPWR for exposure to essential power infrastructure and potential long-term growth as energy demand and grid needs evolve. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in utility and energy stocks, so its value can rise or fall with that sector.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.96%, which means you’ll pay about $9.60 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s more specialized and actively managed within the energy and utilities sectors, which typically costs more to run than broad, passive index funds.
What would affect this ETF?
This ETF is heavily focused on U.S. utilities and energy companies, so it could benefit if demand for power grows, clean energy policies expand, and regulated utilities are allowed to raise rates enough to cover new investments. On the negative side, higher interest rates, stricter regulations on pipelines and fossil fuels, or slower economic growth in North America could pressure profits for its major holdings like Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, and Duke Energy.
FPWR Top 10 Holdings
FPWR is powered by a heavy tilt toward U.S. utilities and energy infrastructure, with names like Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, and Kinder Morgan doing much of the heavy lifting as they’ve been steadily rising this year. On the utility side, WEC Energy has been a bright spot, while Duke Energy and Xcel Energy have shown more mixed, stop-and-go progress, occasionally losing steam. Overall, the fund is a North America–centric play on pipelines and power providers, so a handful of midstream and regulated utility giants largely set the tone for performance.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 ET | Energy Transfer | 4.86% | $1.64M | $72.00B | 20.86% | 70Outperform |
 EPD | Enterprise Products Partners | 4.81% | $1.62M | $82.38B | 21.37% | 73Outperform |
 DUK | Duke Energy | 3.63% | $1.23M | $99.33B | 3.28% | 70Outperform |
 NFG | National Fuel Gas Company | 3.27% | $1.11M | $7.56B | 0.96% | 77Outperform |
 WEC | WEC Energy Group | 3.20% | $1.08M | $37.82B | 4.63% | 67Neutral |
 KMI | Kinder Morgan | 3.06% | $1.04M | $75.45B | 24.89% | 68Neutral |
 PPL | PPL | 3.02% | $1.02M | $26.83B | -1.04% | 66Neutral |
 XEL | Xcel Energy | 2.87% | $969.17K | $51.23B | -2.27% | 61Neutral |
 IDA | IdaCorp | 2.91% | $984.67K | $8.56B | 13.94% | 64Neutral |
FPWR Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FPWR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 37.60 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.34, above the 50-day MA of 35.98, and above the 200-day MA of 36.46, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.50 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 69.98 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 95.87 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FPWR.
FPWR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPWR | $37.60 | $39.00(3.72% Upside) | $33.86M | 0.96% | 66Neutral |
 PSR | $101.73 | $114.86(12.91% Upside) | $57.48M | 0.35% | 69Neutral |
 REIT | $29.27 | $33.08(13.03% Upside) | $55.57M | 0.68% | 68Neutral |
 GABF | $44.10 | $52.76(19.64% Upside) | $49.84M | 1.24% | 66Neutral |
 SEMI | $35.13 | $50.00(42.34% Upside) | $41.34M | 0.75% | 75Outperform |
 USNG | $34.07 | $42.19(23.83% Upside) | $10.67M | 0.59% | 69Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPWR | First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 37.60 | 5.06 | 15.55% | |
| PSR | Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund | 101.73 | 13.09 | 14.77% | |
| REIT | ALPS Active REIT ETF | 29.27 | 3.57 | 13.91% | |
| GABF | Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 44.09 | -1.26 | -2.77% | |
| SEMI | Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF | 35.13 | 4.12 | 13.30% | |
| USNG | Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF | 34.07 | 6.83 | 25.06% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.