TipRanks
Advertisement

EWN - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

EWN

iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
EWN, the iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF, has a solid overall rating driven largely by its heavy exposure to ASML and other strong names like Prosus, ASM International, and Aercap, all of which show robust financial performance and generally supportive technical and valuation trends. However, weaker holdings such as Nebius, which faces declining revenues, weak cash flow, and signs of overvaluation, along with some stocks showing bearish technical signals or cash flow challenges, hold the fund back somewhat. The main risk factor is the concentration in a few large Dutch companies and sectors, which can amplify the impact of any company-specific or sector-specific downturns on the ETF.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The fund has delivered strong gains so far this year and over the past three months, showing solid recent momentum.
Leading Semiconductor Holdings
Major positions in Dutch chip-related companies have shown very strong performance, helping drive the ETF’s returns.
Focused Yet Varied Sector Mix
While heavily tilted toward a general Dutch market basket, the fund still includes exposure to areas like communication services, consumer sectors, and technology, adding some diversification across industries.
Negative Factors
High Stock Concentration
A single company makes up a large share of the portfolio, which increases the impact that one stock’s moves can have on the entire fund.
Country Concentration Risk
Most of the ETF’s assets are invested in the Netherlands, so it is heavily exposed to economic and market conditions in just one country.
Underperforming Top Holding
One of the larger positions in the top 10 has shown weak performance this year, which can drag on overall fund results if the weakness continues.

EWN vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

EWN Summary

The iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) is a fund that follows the MSCI Netherlands IMI 25-50 Index, giving you broad exposure to companies based in the Netherlands. It holds many types of businesses, including technology, banks, consumer goods, and industrial firms. Well-known holdings include ASML Holding and Heineken. Someone might invest in EWN to add international diversification and gain from the growth of the Dutch economy in a single, easy-to-buy investment. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the Dutch market and a few big companies, so its price can move up and down sharply.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has an expense ratio of 0.5%, which means you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it tracks a niche market and is passively managed, focusing on Dutch equities. While it’s not the cheapest option, it provides specialized exposure to the Netherlands' dynamic economy.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) could benefit from growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, especially with companies like ASML leading in semiconductor innovation. However, economic challenges in Europe, such as rising interest rates or slowing growth, could negatively impact financial and industrial sectors, which are also key components of the ETF. Additionally, regulatory changes or global competition could affect the performance of top holdings like Prosus and Adyen.

EWN Top 10 Holdings

EWN is very much a Dutch story powered by a few big names, with ASML and ASM International doing most of the heavy lifting as their chip-making businesses keep rising and anchoring the fund’s returns. Financials like ING and ABN AMRO are also in an upswing, adding a steady tailwind. On the flip side, Prosus and Adyen are more of a mixed bag, with recent weakness acting as a brake on performance. With all holdings rooted in the Netherlands, this ETF is both geographically focused and tilted toward tech and financial heavyweights.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
ASML Holding NV22.24%$143.13M€552.35B80.63%
76
Outperform
ING GROEP9.39%$60.40M€88.41B49.99%
61
Neutral
Prosus4.81%$30.97M€71.41B-37.24%
77
Outperform
Nebius Group4.70%$30.26M$60.77B118.39%
46
Neutral
ASM International NV4.10%$26.39M€39.60B66.03%
75
Outperform
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V.3.10%$19.96M€27.63B-5.83%
62
Neutral
ABN AMRO Group N.V.3.06%$19.72M€35.39B70.38%
74
Outperform
Adyen2.61%$16.80M€27.85B-36.98%
66
Neutral
NN Group N.V.2.53%$16.30M€20.21B39.18%
68
Neutral
Aercap Holdings2.47%$15.91M$21.87B16.87%
77
Outperform

EWN Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
68.19
Positive
100DMA
67.38
Positive
200DMA
63.48
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.34
Negative
RSI
53.87
Neutral
STOCH
63.21
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EWN, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 67.96, equal to the 50-day MA of 68.19, and equal to the 200-day MA of 63.48, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of -0.34 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 53.87 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 63.21 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EWN.

EWN Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$643.83M0.50%
66
Neutral
$867.90M0.09%
72
Outperform
$778.03M0.45%
64
Neutral
$734.07M0.51%
69
Neutral
$721.24M0.07%
63
Neutral
$350.54M0.50%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
67.85
12.89
23.45%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
SPEU
SPDR Portfolio Europe ETF
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement