EFAS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS)
Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum.
Well-Performing Top Holdings
The largest positions in the fund have shown solid price gains, helping support overall returns.
Broad International Diversification
Exposure across multiple developed markets in Europe, Asia, and Australia helps spread risk beyond any single country.
Negative Factors
High Country Concentration
A large share of assets is concentrated in just a few countries like France, the UK, Hong Kong, Italy, and Spain, which can magnify the impact of local economic or political issues.
Sector Imbalance
Nearly half of the portfolio is grouped in a broad 'General' category with additional weight in financials and real estate, which may leave the fund less balanced across sectors than some investors might prefer.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of going to investors.
EFAS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM57.78M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.55%
Beta0.37
IssuerGlobal X
Inception DateNov 14, 2016
Dividend Yield4.55%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume11,058
30 Day Avg. Volume18,575
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
25.50Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering50
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
EFAS Summary
EFAS is the Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF, which follows the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. It invests in high-dividend companies from developed markets outside North America, mainly in Europe and Asia. The fund holds well-known names like Sodexo and Legal & General, giving investors broad international exposure in one investment. Someone might consider EFAS if they want regular income from dividends plus diversification beyond U.S. stocks. A key risk is that these international dividend stocks can go up and down with global markets, and high-yield companies may be more sensitive to economic slowdowns.
How much will it cost me?The Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF (EFAS) has an expense ratio of 0.56%, meaning you’ll pay $5.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed to focus on high-dividend-yield stocks in developed markets outside North America.
What would affect this ETF?The EFAS ETF, with its focus on high-dividend stocks in developed markets outside North America, could benefit from stable economic growth in Europe and Asia, as well as favorable interest rate environments that encourage dividend-paying companies. However, it may face challenges from sector-specific risks, such as potential downturns in financial or real estate markets, and broader economic uncertainties like geopolitical tensions or regulatory changes in its key regions.
EFAS Top 10 Holdings
EFAS leans heavily on international financials and real estate, with European banks like Banca Monte dei Paschi, Banco BPM, and CAIXABANK quietly powering the fund thanks to rising share prices and rich dividends. UK insurers Admiral and Aviva add more financial muscle, with Admiral looking particularly strong while Aviva’s momentum is steadier. Hong Kong’s SITC International has been a bright spot, helping performance from Asia. The main drag comes from Australian REIT Stockland, which has been losing steam this year. Overall, it’s a developed-markets, ex-North America income play with a clear tilt toward financials.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. | 2.64% | $1.53M | HK$129.29B | 68.48% | 72 Outperform | |
| Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SPA | 2.52% | $1.46M | €34.64B | 45.35% | 69 Neutral | |
| Sodexo SA | 2.44% | $1.41M | €8.54B | 13.94% | 75 Outperform | |
| Banco BPM S.p.A. | 2.35% | $1.36M | €24.15B | 36.29% | 72 Outperform | |
| Admiral | 2.31% | $1.34M | £12.33B | 10.98% | 74 Outperform | |
| Standard Life plc | 2.30% | $1.33M | £9.42B | 37.93% | 67 Neutral | |
| CAIXABANK | 2.27% | $1.31M | €91.64B | 55.14% | 76 Outperform | |
| Aviva plc | 2.25% | $1.30M | £21.85B | 12.09% | 73 Outperform | |
| Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. | 2.24% | $1.30M | €67.44B | 32.28% | 63 Neutral | |
| Land Securities Group plc REIT | 2.23% | $1.29M | £5.08B | 23.92% | 73 Outperform |
EFAS Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
22.38
Positive
21.92
Positive
20.71
Positive
Market Momentum
0.19
Positive
64.51
Neutral
9.77
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EFAS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 23.05, equal to the 50-day MA of 22.38, and equal to the 200-day MA of 20.71, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.19 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 64.51 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 9.77 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EFAS.
EFAS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
23.24
5.52
31.15%
DIVI
Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF
―
―
―
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
―
―
―
DTH
WisdomTree International High Dividend Fund
―
―
―
XIDV
Franklin International Dividend Multiplier Index ETF
―
―
―
JHID
John Hancock International High Dividend ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents