tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

DRES - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

DRES

GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
DRES, the GMO Domestic Resilience ETF, has an overall rating that suggests it is a solid but not flawless fund, supported by several strong, resilient companies. Key holdings like Vulcan Materials, Clean Harbors, Northrop Grumman, and ConocoPhillips boost the fund’s quality through strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and generally supportive technical trends, though some face valuation or momentum concerns. At the same time, names like Fluor and WillScot Mobile Mini introduce some drag due to mixed financial results, leverage, and bearish or uneven technical signals, and the fund’s focus on a relatively narrow group of industrial and infrastructure-related businesses can increase sector-specific risk.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and in recent months, showing solid momentum.
Resilient Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions, including companies in transportation, energy, and industrial services, have shown strong or steady performance, supporting the fund’s returns.
Focused Resilience Theme
The portfolio is heavily tilted toward industrials and related sectors that can benefit from ongoing infrastructure and domestic resilience spending.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With most assets in industrials and limited exposure to other sectors, the fund is vulnerable if this single area of the market weakens.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not especially low, which can slightly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper ETFs.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is heavily invested in U.S. companies with only small exposure to Canada and the UK, offering little international diversification.

DRES vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

DRES Summary

The GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) is an actively managed fund that focuses on U.S. companies expected to benefit from factories, supply chains, and production moving back to the United States. It mainly holds industrial, materials, and energy businesses tied to American infrastructure and manufacturing. Well-known holdings include Union Pacific and ConocoPhillips. Someone might invest in DRES if they want exposure to the long-term growth of U.S. industry and a more self-reliant domestic economy. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in industrial and related sectors, so its price can swing more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) has an expense ratio of 0.50%, meaning you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, which typically involves more research and trading compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) could benefit from trends like increased onshoring of production and supply chain realignment, which favor U.S.-based industrial and materials companies. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as higher borrowing costs could impact the growth of capital-intensive sectors like Industrials and Materials. Additionally, economic slowdowns or regulatory changes affecting domestic manufacturing could negatively impact its performance.

DRES Top 10 Holdings

DRES is leaning hard into U.S. industrial muscle, with names like Union Pacific and Fluor helping anchor the portfolio as America reshuffles its supply chains. WillScot Mobile Mini and Vulcan Materials have been rising, acting like fresh fuel for the fund’s domestic infrastructure theme, while Carlisle and Clean Harbors add steady, resilient growth to the mix. On the flip side, Northrop Grumman has been lagging and Jacobs Solutions looks a bit tired, modestly dragging on returns. With heavy exposure to industrials and materials and a purely U.S. footprint, this ETF is a direct play on onshoring and rebuilding at home.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Union Pacific6.03%$2.20M$167.58B20.07%
72
Outperform
Carlisle Companies3.84%$1.40M$14.84B-11.68%
70
Outperform
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings3.82%$1.39M$4.83B-10.06%
69
Neutral
Vulcan Materials3.75%$1.37M$39.34B14.17%
77
Outperform
Martin Marietta Materials3.71%$1.35M$35.99B6.27%
73
Outperform
Jacobs Solutions3.64%$1.33M$15.10B-2.03%
70
Outperform
Clean Harbors3.60%$1.31M$15.39B28.31%
78
Outperform
Fluor3.60%$1.31M$6.91B-5.11%
64
Neutral
Northrop Grumman3.55%$1.30M$77.98B8.75%
76
Outperform
Acuity Brands3.16%$1.15M$10.75B11.56%
77
Outperform

DRES Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
30.32
Positive
100DMA
29.49
Positive
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.19
Positive
RSI
49.21
Neutral
STOCH
23.98
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DRES, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.82, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.32, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.19 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 49.21 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 23.98 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for DRES.

DRES Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$36.55M0.50%
71
Outperform
$96.79M0.89%
72
Outperform
$96.27M0.75%
68
Neutral
$91.70M0.65%
66
Neutral
$86.31M0.52%
71
Outperform
$79.77M0.59%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
30.60
5.67
22.74%
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
YALL
God Bless America ETF
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
PFOE
Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement