DRES - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES)
DRES, the GMO Domestic Resilience ETF, appears to be a solid, quality-focused fund supported by several financially strong companies with positive growth outlooks. Key holdings like EQT, Northrop Grumman, and Vulcan Materials contribute positively through robust financial performance, strategic initiatives, and generally supportive technical trends, while names such as Jacobs Solutions, Regal Rexnord, and Huntington Ingalls introduce some risk due to bearish technical signals and valuation concerns. The main risk factor is that several holdings show signs of potential overvaluation and short-term technical weakness, which could increase volatility even though the overall portfolio remains fundamentally strong.
DRES vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 150.61M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.50%
- Beta
- 0.46
- Issuer
- GMO
- Inception Date
- Oct 01, 2025
- Dividend Yield
- 0.67%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- No Underlying Index
DRES Summary
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) is an actively managed fund that focuses on U.S. companies expected to benefit from more production and supply chains moving back to the United States. It mainly invests in industrial, materials, and energy businesses, aiming to tap into the theme of “domestic resilience” rather than tracking a traditional index. Well-known holdings include Union Pacific and Northrop Grumman. Investors might consider DRES for growth potential tied to a long-term shift toward U.S.-based manufacturing and infrastructure. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in industrial and related sectors, so performance can swing with economic cycles and manufacturing trends.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.50%, which means you’ll pay about $5 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average low-cost index ETF because DRES is actively managed, with a team selecting specific companies rather than simply tracking a market index.
What would affect this ETF?
DRES could benefit if U.S. onshoring, infrastructure spending, and defense and energy projects continue to grow, since it is heavily invested in industrials, materials, and energy companies like Union Pacific, Martin Marietta Materials, and Northrop Grumman. On the downside, higher interest rates, slower U.S. economic growth, or policy changes that reduce support for domestic manufacturing and energy production could hurt demand for these sectors and weigh on the ETF’s performance.
DRES Top 10 Holdings
DRES is essentially a bet on America’s industrial backbone, with railroads, construction materials, and engineering firms steering the ship. Union Pacific has been rising and looks like a key engine for returns, while Jacobs Solutions and Allegion are also climbing steadily, helping power the fund’s momentum. On the flip side, Martin Marietta and Vulcan Materials have seen more mixed, recently lagging action, occasionally putting a brake on performance. With heavy exposure to U.S. industrials and materials and very little tech, this ETF is tightly tied to the story of domestic infrastructure and onshoring.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 UNP | Union Pacific | 6.46% | $9.73M | $180.65B | 38.92% | 72Outperform |
 MLM | Martin Marietta Materials | 5.00% | $7.54M | $38.38B | -11.84% | 73Outperform |
 J | Jacobs Solutions | 4.35% | $6.56M | $18.10B | -2.28% | 70Outperform |
 ALLE | Allegion | 4.18% | $6.29M | $15.72B | 12.80% | 72Outperform |
 EQT | EQT | 3.55% | $5.35M | $34.64B | 5.59% | 76Outperform |
 NOC | Northrop Grumman | 3.64% | $5.49M | $79.21B | -3.64% | 76Outperform |
 RRX | Regal Rexnord | 3.39% | $5.11M | $10.47B | 8.39% | 69Neutral |
 VMC | Vulcan Materials | 3.45% | $5.20M | $36.10B | -3.02% | 77Outperform |
 CSL | Carlisle Companies | 3.48% | $5.24M | $14.54B | 15.56% | 70Outperform |
 HII | Huntington Ingalls | 3.28% | $4.95M | $12.49B | -0.69% | 69Neutral |
DRES Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DRES, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 30.70 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.26, above the 50-day MA of 29.38, and above the 200-day MA of 29.57, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.36 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 70.47 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 95.59 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for DRES.
DRES Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRES | $30.70 | $32.00(4.25% Upside) | $150.61M | 0.50% | 72Outperform |
 SEUS | $25.65 | $30.94(20.62% Upside) | $946.37M | 0.30% | 73Outperform |
 BGDV | $31.27 | $37.25(19.11% Upside) | $877.55M | 0.45% | 74Outperform |
 AAUB | $49.94 | $60.90(21.95% Upside) | $845.51M | 0.10% | 66Neutral |
 AVTM | $53.85 | $64.49(19.75% Upside) | $779.89M | 0.22% | 60Neutral |
 XCHG | $27.13 | $33.33(22.85% Upside) | $716.83M | 0.50% | 70Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRES | GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 30.70 | 5.65 | 22.54% | |
| SEUS | SEI QiM U.S. Equity Factor Allocation Active ETF | 25.65 | 0.39 | 1.53% | |
| BGDV | Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF | 31.27 | 5.03 | 19.16% | |
| AAUB | Alpha Architect US Equity 4 ETF | 49.94 | 0.45 | 0.91% | |
| AVTM | Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 53.85 | 4.21 | 8.47% | |
| XCHG | AB US Equity ETF | 27.13 | 2.28 | 9.18% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.