DRES - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, indicating that its overall strategy has worked well in the recent market environment.
Resilient Industrial and Materials Holdings
Many of the largest positions in industrials and materials, such as Union Pacific, Fluor, ConocoPhillips, and Clean Harbors, have shown strong performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Focused Exposure to U.S. Economy
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund offers clear, targeted exposure to the domestic economy for investors who want to focus on the United States.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration in Industrials
A large majority of the portfolio is in industrials, which increases the risk that a downturn in this single sector could hurt the fund more than a broadly diversified ETF.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several key positions, including Jacobs Solutions, Martin Marietta Materials, Vulcan Materials, and Northrop Grumman, have shown weak or lagging performance, which can drag on overall returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning investors give up a noticeable portion of returns each year to fees compared with cheaper index ETFs.
DRES vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM36.07M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.50%
Beta0.52
IssuerGMO
Inception DateOct 01, 2025
Dividend Yield0.55%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,720
30 Day Avg. Volume2,093
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
36.96Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering38
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
DRES Summary
The GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) is an actively managed fund that focuses on U.S. companies expected to benefit from factories, supply chains, and production moving back to the United States. It leans heavily toward industrial, materials, and energy businesses, with well-known names like Union Pacific and ConocoPhillips among its top holdings. Someone might invest in DRES to seek growth from the long-term trend of rebuilding American manufacturing and infrastructure while getting broad exposure across many U.S. companies. A key risk is that it’s concentrated in industrial-related stocks, so its value can rise or fall sharply with that part of the market.
How much will it cost me?The GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) has an expense ratio of 0.50%, meaning you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, which typically involves more research and trading compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) could benefit from trends like increased onshoring of production and supply chain realignment, which favor U.S.-based industrial and materials companies. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as higher borrowing costs could impact the growth of capital-intensive sectors like Industrials and Materials. Additionally, economic slowdowns or regulatory changes affecting domestic manufacturing could negatively impact its performance.
DRES Top 10 Holdings
DRES is essentially a bet on America’s industrial comeback, with heavy exposure to U.S. railroads, engineers, and energy producers. Union Pacific and ConocoPhillips are doing much of the heavy lifting, with rising share prices that reflect strong cash flows and solid demand. Jacobs Solutions and Carlisle are also pulling their weight, adding steady momentum from infrastructure and industrial projects. On the flip side, Martin Marietta and Vulcan Materials have been lagging, acting as a bit of a brake on returns. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric, industrial-heavy portfolio tied closely to domestic rebuilding and onshoring themes.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Union Pacific | 6.34% | $2.29M | $172.06B | 34.05% | 72 Outperform | |
| Martin Marietta Materials | 4.34% | $1.57M | $36.56B | -17.91% | 73 Outperform | |
| Jacobs Solutions | 4.30% | $1.56M | $17.11B | 1.02% | 70 Outperform | |
| Fluor | 3.76% | $1.36M | $7.51B | 37.61% | 64 Neutral | |
| EQT | 3.71% | $1.34M | $34.51B | 8.69% | 76 Outperform | |
| Allegion | 3.55% | $1.28M | $13.36B | -7.56% | 72 Outperform | |
| Northrop Grumman | 3.50% | $1.27M | $73.16B | -9.91% | 76 Outperform | |
| Vulcan Materials | 3.30% | $1.19M | $34.03B | -12.14% | 77 Outperform | |
| Carlisle Companies | 3.28% | $1.19M | $13.98B | -10.32% | 70 Outperform | |
| Regal Rexnord | 3.23% | $1.17M | $10.85B | 13.32% | 69 Neutral |
DRES Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
30.90
Negative
30.55
Negative
29.02
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.32
Positive
32.58
Neutral
19.49
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DRES, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.69, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.90, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.02, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.32 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 32.58 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 19.49 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for DRES.
DRES Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
29.65
4.72
18.93%
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
―
―
―
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
―
―
―
PFOE
Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
YALL
God Bless America ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents