CHPS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS)
CHPS, the Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to its heavy exposure to leading chip makers like Nvidia, Micron, and Broadcom, which benefit from strong financial performance and growth in AI and data center markets. This strength is balanced by weaker names such as Intel, where profitability and cash flow challenges weigh on the fund. The main risk is the ETF’s concentrated focus on the semiconductor sector, where high valuations and cyclical or geopolitical pressures could impact returns.
CHPS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 129.57M
- Region
- Global
- Expense Ratio
- 0.15%
- Beta
- 1.80
- Issuer
- Xtrackers
- Inception Date
- Jul 13, 2023
- Dividend Yield
- 0.42%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- Solactive Semiconductor Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross
CHPS Summary
CHPS is the Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF, which follows the Solactive Semiconductor Focus Index. It invests in companies that design and make computer chips used in smartphones, cars, and artificial intelligence. The fund holds well-known names like Nvidia and AMD, along with other major chip makers from the U.S., Europe, and Asia. Someone might invest in CHPS to tap into the long-term growth of the semiconductor industry while spreading their money across many leading chip companies. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on semiconductor and tech stocks, so its price can rise and fall sharply with that sector.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.15%, which means you’ll pay about $1.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s lower than the average stock ETF because it’s passively managed and simply tracks a semiconductor index instead of paying a team to actively pick stocks.
What would affect this ETF?
CHPS could benefit from growing global demand for chips used in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and advanced electronics, especially given its focus on leading semiconductor companies like Nvidia, AMD, and ASML across multiple regions. On the downside, the ETF may be hurt by rising interest rates, economic slowdowns that reduce tech spending, or government trade and export restrictions that disrupt the global semiconductor supply chain.
CHPS Top 10 Holdings
CHPS is a pure play on the global chip boom, with U.S. heavyweights like AMD, Micron, and Nvidia doing most of the heavy lifting. AMD and Micron have been rising on the back of AI and memory demand, while Nvidia’s momentum is still solid but starting to look more mature. Marvell is another bright spot, adding juice with strong AI and data center exposure. On the flip side, SK hynix and Broadcom are more mixed, occasionally dragging on returns. Overall, it’s a tightly focused semiconductor bet with meaningful U.S. and international exposure.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 5.41% | $6.84M | $4.93T | -0.21% | 76Outperform | |
| Texas Instruments | 5.46% | $6.91M | $274.90B | 87.06% | 78Outperform | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | 4.92% | $6.23M | $824.07B | 82.27% | 73Outperform | |
| Micron | 4.80% | $6.07M | $1.00T | 272.52% | 79Outperform | |
| ASML Holding NV | 4.93% | $6.23M | EUR 539.67B | 53.36% | 76Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 4.52% | $5.72M | $1.56T | -12.82% | 76Outperform | |
| Analog Devices | 4.51% | $5.70M | $202.12B | 76.33% | 78Outperform | |
| SK hynix Inc. | 4.32% | $5.46M | KRW 1033.53T | 163.33% | ―― | |
| Lam Research | 3.72% | $4.71M | $298.69B | 44.52% | 77Outperform | |
| KLA | 3.78% | $4.78M | $205.75B | 26.67% | 77Outperform |
CHPS Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CHPS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 73.13 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 81.89, below the 50-day MA of 83.95, and below the 200-day MA of 76.24, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -2.75 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 34.85 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 32.14 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for CHPS.
CHPS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $73.13 | $91.00(24.44% Upside) | $129.57M | 0.15% | 62Neutral | |
| $37.54 | $56.97(51.75% Upside) | $499.16M | 0.63% | 65Neutral | |
| $27.35 | $33.55(22.68% Upside) | $399.32M | 0.68% | 66Neutral | |
| $25.57 | $47.87(87.23% Upside) | $291.05M | 0.45% | 54Neutral | |
| $19.43 | $33.08(70.27% Upside) | $280.26M | 0.35% | 72Outperform | |
| $28.39 | $43.87(54.51% Upside) | $247.94M | 0.65% | 68Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 73.13 | 27.88 | 61.63% | |
| TTEQ | T. Rowe Price Technology ETF | 37.54 | 4.08 | 12.19% | |
| CLOU | Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 27.35 | 4.01 | 17.18% | |
| WQTM | WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 25.57 | -2.12 | -7.66% | |
| EUV | Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | 19.43 | -7.06 | -26.65% | |
| FRWD | Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF | 28.39 | 3.48 | 13.99% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.