CGVV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Generally Strong Recent Performance
The fund’s returns over the year to date and recent months have been positive, suggesting its strategy has been working in the current market.
Several Strong Top Holdings
Key positions such as Intel, Applied Materials, Amazon, and Starbucks have shown strong gains, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers very limited international diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions like GE Healthcare, Apollo Global Management, JPMorgan Chase, and Berkshire Hathaway have been weak, which can drag on returns if that trend continues.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low for a large-cap value ETF, meaning fees take a noticeable, though not extreme, bite out of returns over time.
CGVV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM145.75M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.33%
Beta0.88
IssuerCapital Group
Inception DateJun 24, 2025
Dividend Yield0.86%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume60,580
30 Day Avg. Volume51,148
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
35.69Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering65
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
CGVV Summary
CGVV is the Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF, an actively managed fund that focuses on large, established U.S. companies that its managers believe are undervalued. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead picks individual stocks across many sectors like financials, technology, and industrials. Well-known holdings include Amazon, Starbucks, Intel, JPMorgan Chase, and Berkshire Hathaway. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth from solid, blue-chip companies while staying diversified across industries. A key risk is that these value stocks can still fall in price and move up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) has an expense ratio of 0.33%, which means you’ll pay $3.30 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it’s actively managed, meaning professional managers select stocks rather than following a passive index. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) could benefit from a stable U.S. economy and favorable conditions for undervalued large-cap stocks, especially in sectors like Financials and Industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or economic uncertainty could negatively impact its performance, particularly for companies in cyclical sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Energy. Regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges in top holdings like Berkshire Hathaway and Alphabet could also influence the ETF's future returns.
CGVV Top 10 Holdings
CGVV leans heavily into U.S. value names with a tech twist, and Intel plus Applied Materials are doing much of the heavy lifting as chip-related bets keep rising. Alphabet is also pulling its weight, helped by steady enthusiasm around AI, while Amazon looks more mixed, with recent weakness taking a bit of shine off its earlier gains. On the flip side, Meta has been losing steam and acting as a drag. Financials like JPMorgan and Wells Fargo provide a solid, if steady, backbone, underscoring the fund’s U.S.-centric, tech-and-banks flavor.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon | 6.46% | $9.26M | $2.61T | 12.14% | 71 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 3.93% | $5.64M | $4.34T | 110.50% | 85 Outperform | |
| Intel | 3.79% | $5.44M | $604.88B | 367.95% | 64 Neutral | |
| Meta Platforms | 3.63% | $5.21M | $1.48T | -14.58% | 76 Outperform | |
| Starbucks | 3.24% | $4.65M | $118.84B | 9.04% | 56 Neutral | |
| Wells Fargo | 3.04% | $4.36M | $261.68B | 6.20% | 80 Outperform | |
| Uber Technologies | 3.00% | $4.31M | $151.51B | -25.71% | 74 Outperform | |
| APi Group | 2.83% | $4.06M | $18.35B | 24.90% | 79 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 2.83% | $4.06M | $896.22B | 19.96% | 72 Outperform | |
| Berkshire Hathaway B | 2.59% | $3.72M | $1.10T | 6.10% | 66 Neutral |
CGVV Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
30.10
Positive
28.96
Positive
27.90
Positive
Market Momentum
0.19
Positive
48.91
Neutral
40.62
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CGVV, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.52, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.10, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.90, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.19 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.91 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 40.62 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for CGVV.
CGVV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
CGVV
Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF
30.32
4.76
18.62%
TVAL
T. Rowe Price Value ETF
―
―
―
JDVL
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF
―
―
―
BASV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF
―
―
―
FLV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
BLCV
BlackRock Large Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents