BMVP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP)
BMVP’s rating suggests it is a solid, but not top-tier, multi-factor ETF, supported by several strong, diversified holdings. High-quality names like Apple, Gilead Sciences, Expeditors International, and Leidos contribute positively through strong financial performance, growth initiatives, and generally favorable outlooks, while weaker momentum and valuation concerns in holdings like Best Buy and some technically cautious names slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk factor is that several holdings show short-term technical or valuation caution, which could add volatility even though the overall mix remains broadly diversified.
BMVP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 104.80M
- Region
- North America
- Expense Ratio
- 0.29%
- Beta
- 0.53
- Issuer
- Invesco
- Inception Date
- May 01, 2003
- Dividend Yield
- 1.75%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- Bloomberg MVP Index - USD - Benchmark TR Gross
BMVP Summary
BMVP is the Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF, which follows the Bloomberg MVP Index. It invests in large U.S. companies across many sectors, including technology, financials, health care, and consumer businesses. Well-known holdings include Best Buy and Allstate. The fund uses a rules-based approach that looks at things like company quality and stock momentum, aiming to find strong, established firms and provide broad diversification for long-term growth. A key risk is that, like most stock funds, its value can go up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?
This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.29%, which means you’ll pay about $2.90 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That cost is a bit higher than the average low-cost index ETF because it uses an actively designed multi-factor strategy rather than simple passive market-cap weighting.
What would affect this ETF?
BMVP could benefit if the U.S. economy stays healthy, supporting large companies in technology, financials, and consumer sectors, and if its multi-factor strategy is rewarded in a market that favors quality and value stocks. On the downside, rising interest rates, economic slowdowns, or sector-specific issues in areas like energy or financials could hurt performance, and changes in regulations or market conditions that reduce the effectiveness of its factor approach may also weigh on returns.
BMVP Top 10 Holdings
BMVP leans into steady, U.S. large caps, with performance powered by industrial and energy names rather than flashy tech. Marathon Petroleum has been a key engine, rising strongly and giving the fund a boost, while CSX and Nucor add solid momentum from transportation and materials. Financials like Allstate and Travelers are more mixed, with strong fundamentals but choppier trading that occasionally slows the ride. CDW and ADP are steady contributors, helping round out a diversified, North America–focused portfolio that spreads risk across sectors instead of betting on a single theme.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 CDW | CDW | 2.08% | $2.17M | $19.23B | -1.92% | 62Neutral |
 NUE | Nucor | 2.03% | $2.12M | $62.13B | 82.90% | 74Outperform |
 UPS | United Parcel | 2.01% | $2.09M | $92.10B | 13.88% | 72Outperform |
 BALL | Ball | 2.06% | $2.14M | $17.59B | 40.56% | 59Neutral |
 ALL | Allstate | 2.03% | $2.12M | $65.71B | 35.43% | 74Outperform |
 DRI | Darden Restaurants | 1.98% | $2.06M | $24.91B | 23.55% | 76Outperform |
 CSX | CSX | 1.94% | $2.02M | $95.84B | 45.88% | 78Outperform |
 MPC | Marathon Petroleum | 1.95% | $2.03M | $124.89B | 127.33% | 66Neutral |
 ADP | Automatic Data Processing | 1.98% | $2.06M | $116.43B | 12.35% | 70Outperform |
 TRV | Travelers Companies | 1.93% | $2.01M | $81.20B | 46.20% | 78Outperform |
BMVP Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BMVP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of 54.29 is above the 20-day moving average (MA) of 53.53, above the 50-day MA of 53.42, and above the 200-day MA of 51.85, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.40 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 58.41 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 53.94 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for BMVP.
BMVP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMVP | $54.29 | $58.00(6.84% Upside) | $104.80M | 0.29% | 72Outperform |
 INFO | $27.73 | $34.10(22.96% Upside) | $961.91M | 0.35% | 74Outperform |
 AFLG | $44.27 | $53.19(20.15% Upside) | $933.48M | 0.55% | 74Outperform |
 XVV | $57.72 | $71.35(23.61% Upside) | $902.08M | 0.08% | 74Outperform |
 PTL | $269.36 | $343.57(27.55% Upside) | $888.20M | 0.09% | 70Neutral |
 ROCY | $54.69 | $67.44(23.31% Upside) | $890.97M | 0.35% | 73Outperform |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMVP | Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 54.29 | 7.30 | 15.54% | |
| INFO | Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF | 27.73 | 3.30 | 13.53% | |
| AFLG | First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 44.27 | 5.48 | 14.14% | |
| XVV | iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF | 57.72 | 5.42 | 10.37% | |
| PTL | Inspire 500 ETF | 269.36 | 20.84 | 8.38% | |
| ROCY | JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF | 54.69 | 6.65 | 13.83% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.