BLES - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES)
Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing positive momentum for investors.
Broad Global Diversification
Holdings spread across many countries, with meaningful exposure outside the U.S., help reduce the impact of problems in any single market.
Mixed Sector Exposure
The fund invests across a wide range of sectors like technology, industrials, financials, energy, and health care, which can smooth out returns when one industry is struggling.
Negative Factors
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are on the higher side for an ETF, which can slightly reduce the net returns investors receive over time.
Underperforming Top Holding
Coinbase Global, one of the larger positions, has shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall results.
Meaningful Single-Country Concentration
Over half of the portfolio is invested in U.S. companies, so the fund is still heavily influenced by the direction of the U.S. market.
BLES vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM167.13M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.73
IssuerInspire
Inception DateFeb 27, 2017
Dividend Yield1.75%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedInspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume7,946
30 Day Avg. Volume9,650
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
56.49Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering374
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
BLES Summary
BLES, the Inspire Global Hope ETF, follows the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index and invests in large, well-established companies around the world, mainly in the U.S. It focuses on businesses that meet certain ethical and moral standards, aiming to combine financial returns with a positive social impact. The fund spreads money across many sectors, including technology, energy, and industrials, and holds well-known names like Valero Energy and Coinbase. Someone might invest in BLES for global diversification and values-based investing. A key risk is that its stock prices can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Inspire Global Hope ETF (Ticker: BLES) has an expense ratio of 0.58%, which means you’ll pay $5.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on ethical and values-based investments that require more research and oversight.
What would affect this ETF?The Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) could benefit from global economic growth and increased interest in socially responsible investing, as its focus on ethical large-cap companies aligns with growing investor demand for values-based strategies. However, potential risks include sector-specific challenges, such as volatility in technology and financial industries, and broader economic uncertainties like rising interest rates or geopolitical tensions that could impact global markets. The ETF’s diversified sector exposure and global focus provide stability, but its performance may be influenced by shifts in investor sentiment or regulatory changes affecting its top holdings.
BLES Top 10 Holdings
BLES is leaning on a mix of rising tech and health names, with Manhattan Associates, CSL, and Pure Storage doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares trend higher on solid results and upbeat outlooks. Veeva Systems is also contributing, though its momentum looks a bit choppier. On the softer side, Procore and AppFolio have been more mixed this year, occasionally losing steam despite decent business trends. With holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia and no single mega-cap dominating, the fund feels globally diversified rather than tied to one sector or superstar stock.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSL | 0.38% | $624.09K | AU$83.72B | -6.56% | 75 Outperform | |
| Veeva Systems | 0.37% | $615.65K | $44.54B | 0.79% | 66 Neutral | |
| Manhattan Associates | 0.37% | $610.95K | $12.46B | -0.72% | 75 Outperform | |
| Clariant AG | 0.35% | $582.67K | CHF3.49B | 9.21% | 62 Neutral | |
| Epam Systems | 0.35% | $576.89K | $6.04B | -30.93% | 70 Neutral | |
| Procore Technologies | 0.34% | $558.17K | $8.81B | -17.28% | 71 Outperform | |
| Super Micro Computer | 0.33% | $554.85K | $26.01B | -2.03% | 58 Neutral | |
| Wheaton Precious Metals | 0.33% | $552.18K | $70.37B | 48.68% | 79 Outperform | |
| Valero Energy | 0.33% | $549.04K | $106.74B | 136.47% | 69 Neutral | |
| EDENRED | 0.33% | $546.40K | €7.20B | 27.86% | 62 Neutral |
BLES Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
48.90
Positive
48.02
Positive
46.07
Positive
Market Momentum
0.25
Positive
54.86
Neutral
41.30
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BLES, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 49.91, equal to the 50-day MA of 48.90, and equal to the 200-day MA of 46.07, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.25 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.86 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 41.30 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for BLES.
BLES Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
49.86
8.29
19.94%
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
―
―
―
DGT
SPDR Global Dow ETF
―
―
―
AQEC
AQE Core ETF
―
―
―
BBHL
BBH Select Large Cap ETF
―
―
―
TEQI
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents