TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Solitario Resources (XPL) Risk Analysis

Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning. Solitario Resources disclosed 12 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Solitario Resources reported the most risks in the “Production” category.

Risk Overview Q2, 2026

Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 06, 2026

Risk Distribution
12Risks
Sector Avg.Finance & CorporateTech & InnovationLegal & RegulatoryProductionAbility to SellMacro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Risk Change Over Time

Solitario Resources disclosed risks per quarterNo. of Risks02468101214Q2Q3Q4Q12026Q2Showing: Q2, 2026
Risks removedRisks addedRisks changedSolitario Resources Risk Factors
No changes from previous report

Risk Highlights Q2, 2026

Main Risk Category
Production
With 6 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
12
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
1Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Jun 2026
Number of Risk Changed
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 1

Risk Word Cloud

pre-zazu drillingpre-zazu drillingchambara zinc property (peru)chambara zinc propertycat creek molybdenum-rhenium project (colorado)cat creek molybdenum-rhenium projectbright angel gold-copper project (colorado)bright angel gold-copper project

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 12

Manufacturing6 | 50.0%
  • Manufacturing - Risk 1
    Cat Creek Molybdenum-Rhenium Project (Colorado)

    The Cat Creek property is situated in south-central Colorado. The geologic target is a potential molybdenum-rhenium porphyry system. The project was originally discovered by Anaconda Copper Company (“Anaconda”) (formerly one of the largest mining companies in the world) in the early 1980’s. Anaconda conducted significant surface exploration, including detailed geologic mapping, geochemical sampling and an Induced Polarization (“IP”) geophysical survey (see figure below). The project was slated for drilling in mid-1983, but due to the sale of Anaconda by its parent, Atlantic Richfield (ARCO), all company-wide exploration activities were shut down in early 1983. The property was never drill tested and no further exploration activities were subsequently conducted on the property. Solitario signed a lease to acquire a 100% interest in the property from a private third party in May 2023. The next annual payment is $20,000. Confirmatory surface exploration work was conducted on the property in 2023 to validate the existing Anaconda database. Solitario initiated permitting for exploration drilling with the US Forest Service in late-2023 and completed the process in late-2024. Permitting on both the Federal and State levels has been completed, and all permits necessary for core drilling have been obtained. Colorado is home to two of the three largest and highest-grade primary molybdenum mines in the world, Freeport McMoran’s operating Climax and Henderson mines. Cat Creek is situated less than 150 miles south of these two mines, and 80 miles north of the Questa molybdenum mine, a significant past producer. Anaconda’s IP geophysical survey revealed a strong circular-shaped conductive body at depth underlain by a very resistive body. This mushroom-shaped geophysical pattern is consistent with an underlying mineralized porphyry system approximately 800 meters in diameter, comparable to other large productive molybdenum mines in Colorado. In addition to the molybdenum potential, this system appears to be exceptionally well endowed with rhenium. Both molybdenum and rhenium have been designated as critical metals by the U.S. government. Solitario plans to conduct a 1000-meter maiden drilling program in mid-summer 2026.  41Cat Creek Project Induced-Polarization Geophysical Section

  • Manufacturing - Risk 2
    Bright Angel Gold-Copper Project (Colorado)

    The Bright Angel property is located in north-central Colorado. Solitario signed a lease to acquire a 100% interest in the property in September 2025. The Bright Angel geologic target is a gold-copper porphyry system. At Bright Angel, mineralized porphyry stockwork at surface contains significant values of gold and copper, with minor silver values. Surface mineralization has been traced over an area approximately 750 meters by 600 meters. Bright Angel was originally discovered in the late-1960’s when a private party completed 186 very shallow (~15 meters) and widely spaced drill holes. Twelve of the more mineralized holes were deepened to depths of up to 200 meters. Two of the holes reportedly intersected significant grades of gold and copper but are not reported here as Solitario is unable to verify the historic drill hole assay results. However, Solitario’s select surface rock grab samples (see “Surface Rock Assays” table below) produced gold/copper grades consistent with the grades in the upper 15 meters of the reported historic drill holes. Drilling will be required to confirm drill hole grades reported in the historic files. Anaconda leased the property in 1970 and drilled eleven widely spaced core holes ranging in depth from 270 to 783 meters. Anaconda intersected thick sections of 0.1% to 0.3% Cu in six of their core holes but generally did not assay for gold as gold price was fixed at $38 per ounce at that time and its exploration priority was a primary copper resource. Anaconda continued to hold the lease for 10 years before exiting the mineral exploration business, when the property was dropped. The property has sat idle for the past 50 years until Solitario acquired the rights to earn 100% interest in the minerals from a private entity in September 2025. To date, Solitario has completed a surface reconnaissance rock sampling program and has initiated drill hole permitting. Results of the surface sampling program have been encouraging with consistently anomalous to strong values of gold and copper. Solitario has submitted a Notice of Intent to the U.S. Forest Service to commence an exploration drilling program at Bright Angel and has recently submitted a Plan of Operations. Plans are also underway to conduct a drone magnetic survey and possibly an Induced Polarization geophysical survey in the upcoming field season.  42Surface Rock Assays Sample #  Cu %   Au ppm   Ag ppm   Sample #  Cu %   Au ppm   Ag ppm TBST-1   0.38    1.16    2.17   5942   0.43    0.07    0.47 TBST-2   0.044   0.04    0.3   5943   0.09    0.08    1.49 TBST-3   0.57    0.14    0.96   5944   0.73    0.35    4.95 TBST-4   0.85    0.74    1.35   5945   0.53    0.13    3.59 TBST-5   1.12    2.15    1.56   5946   0.15    0.31    1.47 TBST-6   1.17    0.37    3.04   5947   0.06    0.15    1.01 TBST-7   3.22    0.29    15     5948   3.30    0.37    27.00 TBST-8   8.45    0.67    38.8   5949   0.26    0.31    1.50 TBST-9   3.97    0.16    38     5950   0.57    0.10    0.62 5937    0.03    0.27    1.27   5951   0.02    0.02    0.24 5938    0.19    0.03    0.18   5952   0.34    0.09    1.08 5939    0.22    0.09    0.67   5953   1.00    0.12    8.88 5940    0.43    0.12    0.56   4747   0.00    0.03    0.17 5941    0.49    0.09    0.58

  • Manufacturing - Risk 3
    Pre-Zazu Drilling

    Core recoveries were typically high within the massive sulfides, but lower, more variable recoveries were obtained in the unmineralized and weakly mineralized sections. The entire core obtained from the Lik deposit, usually NQ-size, was logged on site. All of the core containing sulfide mineralization was cut using diamond saws and half of the core was sent for assay. Reference samples were not included in the sample stream. Sample lengths in massive sulfides were typically from two to three feet, but occasionally up to nine feet. Sample lengths were controlled by geology and the location of depth markers in the core boxes. Most of the samples were assayed by Bondar Clegg Laboratory Group (“Bondar Clegg”) of Vancouver British Columbia. At various times, the laboratory-maintained preparation facilities in Anchorage and Fairbanks Alaska. In the initial years, when the bulk of the drilling was completed, it is believed that sample preparation and analysis were carried out in Vancouver. Bondar Clegg was not a registered laboratory at that time. However, Bondar Clegg was a recognized, reputable laboratory and was experienced in the use of atomic absorption spectrophotometry. As the entire core was logged and sampled in an isolated field camp, security was not a major concern because access to the camp was closely controlled. It is noted that four different companies (WGM, GCO, Noranda and Moneta Gold Inc.) have completed drilling programs at the Lik property and all of them have obtained consistent results. The work was considered completed to industry standards in use at the time of the work. Sample preparation was completed in the assay laboratory.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 4
    Zazu Drilling

    Drill core obtained during the 2007, 2008 and 2011 drilling campaigns was logged on site. The entire core containing sulfide mineralization was sawn using diamond saws and half of the core was sent for assay. All massive and high-sulfide cores were sampled. Visual methods were used to select sample boundaries and lengths. The mineralization at Lik is considered to be appropriately logged and sampled. It is not evident that logging or sampling is leading to any bias in the sample results. An examination of logging showed that core recovery in sulfide areas was generally very high. Core drilled in 2007 was placed in the sample bags, the air was evacuated and replaced with nitrogen. The samples were sent to Kotzebue by charter and then by licensed carrier to Anchorage. The samples were stored under refrigeration in Anchorage. The samples were dispatched to G & T Metallurgical Services Ltd. (“G & T”) of Kamloops, British Columbia, an ISO 9001:2000 certified laboratory for precious metals and base metals. As well as completing metallurgical testing, G & T crushed and analyzed the samples. The 2008 diamond drill core was not required for metallurgical testing and core was handled normally. Sawn samples were securely bagged and boxed on site and dispatched to a facility of ALS Laboratory Group (“ALS Chemex”) located in Fairbanks, Alaska, for sample preparation. Transportation of the samples was through third-party companies that provided secure transportation services. The pulps were analyzed at ALS Chemex located in Fairbanks or Elko, Nevada. Zazu did not participate in any part of the sample preparation or analysis except for cutting core and selecting sample intervals. 38Check samples from the 2007 drilling program and all samples from the 2008 drilling campaign were sent to the preparation and assaying facilities of ALS Chemex (ISO 17025 accreditation). Other QA/QC procedures employed by Zazu included the use of blanks (unmineralized core from outside of the mineralized zone) and quartered core duplicates. Zazu was unable to obtain acceptable reference samples for the 2007 field season and reference samples were not included as part of the 2007 ongoing QA/QC program. Reproducibility between G & T and ALS Chemex was found to be good.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 5
    11. Metallurgical Testing and Mineral Processing

    There have been five metallurgical test work reports issued to date on the Lik ores. The most recent and comprehensive processing and metallurgical testing programs include work performed by G&T and by SGS. Samples collected during drilling in 2007 and 2008 were composited into one Master Composite for testing at G&T in 2008, and later testing by SGS was carried out in 2010 on the remainder of the Master Composite. These key testing results have formed the basis for this economic evaluation of the Lik deposit. Results are summarized in the table below: Summary of SGS 2010 and G&T 2008 Metallurgical Test Results TestElementFeedLead ConcentrateZinc ConcentrateGradeGradeRecoveryGradeRecovery SGS 2010Pb%2.8352.0069.101.889.70Zn%9.567.392.9154.6083.10Ag gpt37555.56826.6 G&T 2008Pb%2.3670.3070.31.579.4Zn%8.474.171.2052.2086.9Ag gpt34684.86426.9 Average Used for Mass Balance and NSR EstimatesPb%2.6061.1569.71.739.6Zn%9.025.782.0653.4085.0Ag gpt36625.26626.8 The metallurgical flowsheet for this PEA includes conventional crushing, grinding, and floatation processing methods. Run-of–Mine (ROM) ore will be delivered to a primary crushing plant and stored in a coarse ore stockpile awaiting reclaim into the grinding circuit. Crusher ore will be reclaimed and delivered to a two-stage grinding circuit equipped with a Semi-Autogenous Grinding (SAG) mill and a ball mill in closed circuit with cyclones. 39Recoveries from these modeled methods and metallurgical testing conducted to date are anticipated to be 85% of zinc to the zinc concentrate and 69.7% of the lead to the lead concentrate. Silver may also be recovered and payable at times in the zinc concentrate and, more significantly, in the lead concentrate. Silver recoveries may improve if a pyrite circuit was utilized.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 6
    13. Mining Operations

    No commercial mining operations to recover metals have occurred on the project.

See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment. They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result. It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process. Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”. Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report. According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing. You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector. Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements. A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below. 1. Financial & Corporate Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results. Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing. Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments. Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances. 2. Legal & Regulatory Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company. Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation. Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy. Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives. 3. Production Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory. Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers. Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls. Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation. 4. Technology & Innovation Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development. Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology. Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks. Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying. 5. Ability to Sell Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers. Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes. Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration. Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation. 6. Macro & Political Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions. Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19. International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company. Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.