Xunlei (XNET) Risk Analysis

We realized growth of the revenue from our online advertising services from US$16.9 million in 2016 to US$27.8 million in 2018. However, revenue from our online advertising service decreased to US$15.6 million in 2019, and further decreased to US$13.2 million in 2020, primarily due to a generally decreased demand for our online advertising services. In May of 2020, we entered into an advertising revenue sharing agreement with a subsidiary of Itui International Inc., our largest shareholder. Itui provides Xunlei with online traffic monetization services, including the operation and placement of advertisements, research and technology support with respect to advertising systems, business algorithm platform as well as content recommendation and other optimization services. By outsourcing our advertising business to Itui, we hope to take advantage of Itui's advanced precision targeting algorithm to achieve better placement of advertisement. However, we cannot assure you that we can improve the results of operations of regarding online advertising through such cooperation. In our cooperation with Itui, we require Itui to comply with all relevant laws and regulations regarding advertising business. However, we have no control over Itui and we cannot assure you that Itui will be able to operate the advertising business and its advertising platform legally and successfully. We may still be liable for certain circumstances in connection with Itui that are beyond our control, and our business may also be negatively affected. In addition, if we are unable to maintain our cooperation with Itui for whatever reasons and we are unable to find a suitable replacement in a timely manner, or at all, our advertising revenue may experience significant declines. As a result, our business and financial condition may be negatively affected.

LinkToken was developed in 2017. It was essentially a type of digital ticket. The underlying technology of LinkToken was blockchain technology. Users of OneThing Cloud could be rewarded with LinkTokens by voluntarily participating in OneThing Cloud reward program to share idle uplink bandwidth capacities and external storage to us. The amount of LinkTokens awarded depended on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the size of bandwidth and external storage users contribute, the length of time online, and the usage of computing resources. Rewarded LinkTokens could be used to redeem for a variety of products and services offered in the LinkToken Mall. In 2018, we disposed of the LinkToken operations and the related assets and liabilities to an independent third party. Upon the completion of the disposal in April 2019, the independent third party obtained the exclusive right to carry out LinkToken operations inside and outside mainland China, including without limitation, the formulation, amendment and execution of the rules governing the rewarding of LinkToken to users, operations of LinkToken Pocket and the LinkToken Mall. After the disposal, subject to rewarding rules determined by the independent third party, users of OneThing Cloud could still voluntarily participate in OneThing Cloud reward program to share idle uplink bandwidth capacities and external storage and be rewarded with LinkToken. In May 2019, we terminated our technical support to the independent third party with respect to its LinkToken operations. In April 2020, the independent third party terminated OneThing Cloud reward program, as a result of which users can no longer be rewarded with LinkTokens. Meanwhile, we launched our own reward program, which allows users to share idle uplink bandwidth capacities and external storage with us in exchange for a small amount of cash rewards. Although we have no longer been operating OneThing Cloud reward program since our disposal of LinkToken, we periodically receive user complaints regarding LinkToken, including the termination of OneThing Cloud reward program, which could cause reputational harm to our business operations and might also have a negatively impact on our business and results of operations. Although we have no longer been operating LinkTokens after our disposal of such business to the independent third party, new laws, regulations and governmental policies regarding virtual coins may still be interpreted or even retroactively enforced against us regarding our previous dealings with LinkToken. On September 4, 2017, People's Bank of China, the Office of the Central Leading Group for Cyberspace Affairs, the MIIT, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the China Insurance Regulatory Commission jointly promulgated the Announcement on Prevention of Token Fundraising Risks to strengthen the administration of the initial coin offerings activities. Pursuant to the announcement, "fundraising through token offerings" is referred to as a type of fundraising activities where an issuer raises "virtual currencies" such as Bitcoin or Ether from investors through the illegal issuance and subsequent circulation of tokens. Pursuant to the announcement, token fundraising activity is essentially an illegal public fundraising activity without obtaining government's approval. It is a suspected illegal offering of tokens, illegal offering of securities, illegal fundraising, financial fraud, pyramid scheme, which are criminal offenses under the PRC law. The announcement prohibits fundraising activities through token issuance. In addition, the announcement also provides that token trading platform should not be engaged in (i) the exchange between any statutory currency with tokens and "virtual currencies," (ii) the trading, either as a central counterparty or not, of the tokens or "virtual currencies," and (iii) token or "virtual currency" pricing, information intermediary services or other services for tokens or "virtual currencies." To date, no governmental financial regulators have imposed any administrative penalties against us relating to LinkTokens on the basis that we engaged in token fundraising activities. However, we cannot assure you that going forward, relevant PRC authorities would have the same view with us and would not impose retroactive regulatory restrictions or penalties on us for our prior dealings with LinkToken. Were that to happen, we might be subject to additional regulatory risks, and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our live streaming services enable users to interact and chat with broadcasters and other users and engage in various other online activities. Although we require our broadcasters to register their real name, we are unable to independently verify the accuracy and authenticity of the identity information provided by them. For the registration of users before they become broadcasters, we rely on third-party organizations to verify their identities through mobile phone numbers or ID card number, which may not always be reliable. In addition, we have put in place measures to monitor content on our platform generated by our users, but it is impossible for us to detect every piece of inappropriate or illegal content on our platform due to the immense quantity of user-generated content on our platform. Therefore, it is possible that broadcasters and/or users may engage in illegal, obscene or incendiary conversations or activities, including the publishing of inappropriate or illegal content that may be deemed unlawful under PRC laws and regulations on our platforms. For example, we received a notice from CAC in 2020, pointing out that there was certain inappropriate information discovered on our platform. We promptly fixed the issue and managed to avoid the risk of being removed from app stores by regulatory authorities. If any content on our platforms is deemed illegal, obscene or incendiary, or if appropriate licenses and third-party consents have not been obtained, claims may also be brought against us for defamation, libel, negligence, copyright, patent or trademark infringement, other unlawful activities or other theories and claims based on the nature and content of the materials that are provided, uploaded, shared, published or otherwise accessed by users or us through our platforms. Defending any such actions could be costly and involve significant time and attention of our management and other resources. In addition, PRC authorities may impose legal sanctions on us, including, in serious cases, suspending or revoking the licenses necessary to operate our platforms if they find that we have not adequately managed the content on our platforms. Any such claims or sanctions against us could materially and adversely affect our business and our brand. We believe that maintaining and enhancing our Xunlei brand is of significant importance to the success of our business. A well-recognized brand is critical to increasing our user base and, in turn, enhancing our attractiveness to advertisers, subscribers and paying users. If we fail to sustain or improve the strength of our brand, we may subsequently experience difficulty in maintaining market share. We have developed our reputation and established a leading position by providing our users with superior acceleration services and cloud computing services. We will continue to conduct various marketing and brand promotion activities. We cannot assure you, however, that these activities will be successful and achieve the brand promotion effects we expect. In addition, any negative publicity in relation to our services or our marketing or promotion practices, regardless of its veracity, could harm our brand image and, in turn, result in a reduced number of users and advertisers. Historically, there has been negative publicity about our company, our products and services and certain key members of our management team, which has adversely affected our brand, public image and reputation. If we fail to maintain and enhance our brand, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our business is subject to governmental supervision and regulations by the relevant PRC governmental authorities including the State Council, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (formerly the Ministry of Information Industry), or MIIT, the State Administration of Radio and Television, or SAPPRFT, (formerly the General Administration of Press and Publication, Radio, Film and Television (established in March 2013 as a result of institutional reform integrating the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, and the General Administration of Press and Publication), or GAPPRFT), Ministry of Culture and Tourism (established in March 2018 as a result of institutional reform integrating the Ministry of Culture, and the Ministry of Tourism), or MOCT and other relevant government authorities. Together these government authorities promulgate and enforce regulations that cover many aspects of operation of telecommunications and internet information services, including entry into the telecommunications industry, the scope of permissible business activities, licenses and permits for various business activities and foreign investment. We are advised by our PRC legal counsel that a license for online transmission of audio-visual programs is required for the display of video content, including live streaming content, on our platform. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Regulation-Regulation on online transmission of audio-visual programs." We used to be a registered owner of such license when we were operating Xunlei Kankan business. However, when we disposed of Xunlei Kankan business to a purchaser in July 2015, the registered owner of such license was also changed to the purchaser. After the disposal, Shenzhen Wangwenhua started to operate a live streaming business and a short video business. As advised by our PRC legal counsel, a license for online transmission of audio-visual programs is required for operating short video business and live streaming business. In June 2018, Shenzhen Wangwenhua acquired 80% of the equity interest of Henan Tourism Information Co., Ltd., or Henan Tourism, from an independent third party. Henan Tourism is a registered owner of the license for online transmission of audio-visual programs. However, Shenzhen Wangwenhua, the entity that operates both license-required businesses, is not a registered owner of the license for online transmission of audio-visual programs. As a result, relevant PRC government authorities may find that we are operating license-required business without obtaining a proper license, and thus may issue warnings, order us to rectify our violating operations and impose fines on us. In the case of serious violations as determined by relevant authorities at its discretion, they may ban the violating operations, seize our equipment in connection with such operations and impose a penalty of one to two times of the amount of the total investment in such operations. The cloud computing services we provide to the internet users may be deemed to have included the content distribution network (CDN) services. Pursuant to the Notice of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on Cleaning up and Standardizing the Internet Network Access Service Market, we have to update our existing value-added telecommunication services license, or VATS License, to specifically cover the CDN services. Shenzhen Onething Technologies Co., Ltd., or Shenzhen Onething, a subsidiary of Shenzhen Xunlei, and a subsidiary of Shenzhen Onething have obtained the VATS Licenses that cover the CDN services. If the relevant PRC authority decides that we are operating certain business without the proper licenses or approvals, we may be warned, fined, ordered to rectify our violations or be imposed restrictions or even suspension on our relevant business. In addition to the above, if the PRC government promulgates new laws and regulations that require additional licenses or imposes additional restrictions on the operation of any part of our business, it has the power to, among other things, levy fines, confiscate our income, revoke our business licenses, and require us to discontinue our business or impose restrictions on the affected portion of our business. Any of these actions by the PRC government may have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations. Furthermore, for our cloud computing business, we are operating under the shared economy business model and therefore face certain risks related to this business model. We cannot assure you that our cooperation with all third parties for our cloud computing business complies with all laws and regulations. For example, we cannot assure you that our third-party service providers have obtained or applied for all permits and licenses required for providing relevant services to us. We cooperate with various third-party service providers to provide Internet Data Center (IDC) and Internet Service Provider (ISP) services for our CDN services. As PRC laws and regulations require IDC and ISP service providers to obtain the corresponding IDC licenses and ISP licenses, we require our third-party service providers to obtain such licenses. However, we cannot assure you that these third-party services providers maintain or are able to obtain in a timely manner or at all the required licenses. If our third-party service providers fail to obtain or maintain relevant approvals, licenses or permits required for operating such businesses, our third-party service providers could be subject to liabilities, penalties and operational disruptions. Even if these service providers are able to maintain proper licenses, it is possible that the services and bandwidth resources they provide may not meet our requirements.

Current PRC laws and regulations place certain restrictions on foreign ownership of companies that engage in internet businesses, including the provision of online game and online advertising services. For example, foreign investors' equity interests in value-added telecommunication service providers, other than e-commerce service providers, may not exceed 50%, and the Provisions on the Administration of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises (2016 Revision) requires that the major foreign investor in a value-added telecommunication service provider in China must have experience in providing value-added telecommunications services overseas and maintain a good track record. In addition, foreign investors are prohibited from investing in or operating entities engaged in, among others, internet cultural operating service, internet news service, and online transmission of audio-visual programs service. We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and Giganology (Shenzhen) Ltd., or Giganology Shenzhen and Xunlei Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., or Xunlei Computer, our PRC subsidiaries, are considered foreign-invested enterprises. Accordingly, neither of these two PRC subsidiaries is eligible to provide value-added telecommunication services and the aforementioned internet related services in China. As a result, we conduct our operations in China principally through contractual arrangements among Giganology Shenzhen and Shenzhen Xunlei and its shareholders. Shenzhen Xunlei or its subsidiaries hold the licenses and permits necessary to conduct our resource discovery network, online advertising, online games, cloud computing and related businesses in China, and Shenzhen Xunlei hold various operating subsidiaries that conduct a majority of our operations in China. Our contractual arrangements with Shenzhen Xunlei and its shareholders enable us to exercise effective control over Shenzhen Xunlei and Shenzhen Xunlei's operating subsidiaries and hence treat them as our consolidated entities and consolidate their results. For a detailed discussion of these contractual arrangements, see "Item 4. Information on the Company-C. Organizational Structure." We cannot assure you, however, that we will be able to enforce these contracts. Although we have been advised by King & Wood Mallesons, our PRC legal counsel, that each contract under these contractual arrangements with Shenzhen Xunlei and its shareholders is valid, binding and enforceable under current PRC laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that the PRC government would agree that these contractual arrangements comply with PRC licensing, registration or other regulatory requirements, with existing policies or with requirements or policies that may be adopted in the future. PRC laws and regulations governing the validity of these contractual arrangements are uncertain and the relevant government authorities have broad discretion in interpreting these laws and regulations. If the PRC government determines that we do not comply with applicable laws and regulations, it could revoke our business and operating licenses, require us to discontinue or restrict our operations, impose fines, restrict our right to collect revenues, block our website, require us to restructure our operations, impose additional conditions or requirements with which we may not be able to comply, or take other regulatory or enforcement actions against us that could be harmful to our business. The imposition of any of these penalties would result in a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.

On March 15, 2019, the National People's Congress enacted the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replace the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. However, since it is relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation. For instance, under the Foreign Investment Law, "foreign investment" refers to the investment activities directly or indirectly conducted by foreign individuals, enterprises or other entities in China. Though it does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, there is no assurance that foreign investment via contractual arrangement would not be interpreted as a type of indirect foreign investment activities under the definition in the future. In addition, the definition contains a catch-all provision which includes investments made by foreign investors through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions promulgated by the State Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. In any of these cases, it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment under the PRC laws and regulations. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.

We may (i) make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, (ii) establish new PRC subsidiaries and make capital contributions to these new PRC subsidiaries, (iii) make loans to our PRC subsidiaries or variable interest entity and its subsidiaries, or (iv) acquire offshore entities with business operations in China in an offshore transaction. However, most of these uses are subject to PRC regulations and approvals. For example: - loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries, which are foreign-invested enterprises, to finance their respective activities cannot exceed statutory limits and must be registered with the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, or its local branches; and - loans by us to our variable interest entity, which is a domestic PRC entity, may not exceed the statutory limit, and any medium or long-term loan we extend to our variable interest entity must be recorded and registered by the National Development and Reform Commission and SAFE or its local branches. On August 29, 2008, SAFE promulgated the Circular on the Relevant Operating Issues Concerning the Improvement of the Administration of the Payment and Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular No. 142, regulating the conversion by a foreign-invested enterprise of foreign currency registered capital into Renminbi by restricting how the converted Renminbi may be used. SAFE Circular No. 142 provides that the Renminbi capital converted from foreign currency registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise may only be used for purposes within the business scope approved by the applicable governmental authority and unless otherwise provided by law, such Renminbi capital may not be used for equity investments within the PRC. SAFE also strengthened its oversight of the flow and use of the Renminbi capital converted from foreign currency registered capital of a foreign-invested company. The use of such Renminbi capital may not be altered without SAFE approval, and such Renminbi capital may not in any case be used to repay Renminbi loans if the proceeds of such loans have not been used. Violations of SAFE Circular No. 142 could result in severe monetary or other penalties. On March 30, 2015, SAFE issued SAFE Circular No. 19, which took effect and replaced SAFE Circular No. 142 as of June 1, 2015 and the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Policy on the Management of Foreign Exchange Settlement under Capital Account, or SAFE Circular No. 16, which became effective on June 9, 2016. Although SAFE Circular No. 19 and SAFE Circular No. 16 allow for the use of RMB converted from the foreign currency denominated capital for equity investments in the PRC, the restrictions will continue to apply as to foreign-invested enterprises' use of the converted RMB for purposes beyond the business scope, for the loans to non-associated companies or issuing inter-company RMB loans.

We are subject to rules and regulations by various governing bodies, including, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and the various regulatory authorities in China and the Cayman Islands, and to new and evolving regulatory measures under applicable law. Our efforts to comply with new and changing laws and regulations have resulted in and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Moreover, because these laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. If we fail to address and comply with these regulations and any subsequent changes, we may be subject to penalty and our business may be harmed.

We conduct our business primarily through our PRC subsidiaries and variable interest entity and its subsidiaries in China. Our operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. Giganology Shenzhen is a foreign-invested enterprise and is subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment in China and, in particular, laws applicable to foreign-invested enterprises. The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions under the civil law system may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. Over the past three decades, the PRC government has enacted legislation that has significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, China has not developed a fully integrated legal system, and recently enacted laws and regulations may not sufficiently cover all aspects of economic activities in China. In particular, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy. These uncertainties may affect our judgment on the relevance of legal requirements and our ability to enforce our contractual or tort rights. In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited or frivolous legal actions or threats in attempts to extract payments or benefits from us. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely basis or at all and may have retroactive effect. Regulatory authorities may also stretch the interpretations of existing laws and regulations. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of any of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation or the stretched interpretation, which may subject us to liabilities and can materially and adversely affect our business. In addition, any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention. We believe that our patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and other intellectual property are important to our business. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection laws in China and other jurisdictions, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property and our brand. Protection of intellectual property rights in China may not be as effective as in the United States or other jurisdictions, and as a result, we may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, which could adversely affect our revenues and competitive position.

The PRC government extensively regulates the internet industry, including foreign ownership of, and the licensing and permit requirements pertaining to, companies in the internet industry. These internet-related laws and regulations are relatively new and evolving, and their interpretation and enforcement involve significant uncertainty. As a result, in certain circumstances it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violations of applicable laws and regulations. Issues, risks and uncertainties relating to PRC regulation of the internet business include, but are not limited to, the following: - We only have contractual control over our resource discovery network and cloud computing. We do not own the resource discovery network and cloud computing due to the restriction of foreign investment in businesses providing value-added telecommunication services in China, including internet content provision or CDN services. This may significantly disrupt our business, subject us to sanctions, compromise enforceability of related contractual arrangements, or have other harmful effects on us. - There are uncertainties relating to the regulation of the internet business in China, including evolving licensing practices and the requirement for real-name registrations. This means that permits, licenses or operations at some of our companies may be subject to challenge, or we may fail to obtain permits or licenses that may be deemed necessary for our operations or we may not be able to obtain or renew certain permits or licenses. If we fail to maintain any of these required licenses or approvals, we may be subject to various penalties, including fines and discontinuation of or restriction on our operations. Any such disruption in our business operations may have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations. - New laws and regulations may be promulgated that will regulate internet activities, including live streaming, online games and online advertising businesses. If these new laws and regulations are promulgated, additional licenses may be required for our operations. If our operations do not comply with these new regulations after they become effective, or if we fail to obtain any licenses required under these new laws and regulations, we could be subject to penalties. The interpretation and application of existing PRC laws, regulations and policies and possible new laws, regulations or policies relating to the internet industry have created substantial uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, internet businesses in China, including our business. For example, in September 2009, GAPPRFT and the National Office of Combating Pornography and Illegal Publications jointly published a notice, or Circular 13, which expressly prohibits foreign investors from participating in online game operating business via wholly owned, equity joint venture or cooperative joint venture investments in China, and from controlling and participating in such businesses directly or indirectly through contractual or technical support arrangements. Other government agencies with substantial regulatory authority over online game operations and foreign investment entities in China, such as MIIT and MOCT, did not join GAPPRFT in issuing Circular 13. While Circular 13 is applicable to us and our online game business on an overall basis, to date, GAPPRFT or SAPPRFT has not issued any interpretation of Circular 13 and, to our knowledge, has not taken any enforcement action under Circular 13 against any company that relies on contractual arrangements with affiliated entities to operate online games in China. We cannot assure you that we have obtained all the permits or licenses required for conducting our business in China or will be able to maintain our existing licenses or obtain any new licenses required under any new laws or regulations. There are also risks that we may be found to violate the existing or future laws and regulations given the uncertainty and complexity of China's regulation of internet business. Subject to interpretation by the relevant authorities, it may not be possible for us to determine in all cases the type of content that could result in liability for us, especially if the Chinese government continues to maintain or strengthen its heightened scrutiny on internet content in China. We may not be able to control or restrict all of the digital media content generated. transmitted or placed on our network by our users, despite our attempt to monitor and filter such content. To the extent that regulatory authorities find any portion of our content on our network or website objectionable or requiring any license or permit that we have not obtained, they may require us to limit or eliminate the dissemination of such information or otherwise curtail the nature of such content, and keep records and report to relevant authorities, which may reduce our user traffic. In addition, we may be subject to significant penalties for violations of those regulations arising from prohibited content displayed on, retrieved from or uploaded to our network or website, including a suspension or shutdown of our operations. The enforcement activities may be intensified in connection with any ongoing government campaigns. In addition, while we maintain a regular internal monitoring and compliance protocol, we cannot ascertain that we would not fall foul of any changing or new government regulations or standards in the future. If we receive a public warning from the relevant government authorities or our licenses for acceleration services are revoked, our reputation would be harmed and if the operation of our acceleration services or other products is suspended or shut down entirely or in part, our revenues and results of operation may be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, the internal compliance investigation and the removal of content may have a material impact on our cloud acceleration services, which in turn may lead to a decrease in users and have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. To date, we have not been able to quantify the magnitude and extent of such impact.

The Notice on the Reinforcement of the Administration of Online Games issued by the Ministry of Culture and other governmental authorities on February 15, 2007 directs the People's Bank of China to strengthen the administration of virtual currency to avoid any adverse impact on the PRC economic and financial system. This notice provides that the total amount of virtual currency issued by an operator and the amount of purchased by individual users should be strictly limited, with a strict and clear division between virtual transactions and real transactions carried out by way of electronic commerce. This notice also provides that virtual currency should only be used to purchase virtual items. We created virtual currency "Golden Coins" for the operation of our live streaming services. Users can purchase "Golden Coins" from us so that they can purchase virtual gifts on our living streaming platforms to reward broadcasters they like. "Golden Coins" can also be used to purchase other value-added services on our live streaming platforms. Other than virtual gifts and value-added services, "Golden Coins" cannot be used for any other purposes. On June 4, 2009, the Ministry of Culture and the MOFCOM jointly issued the Notice on Strengthening the Administration of Online Game Virtual Currency, or the Virtual Currency Notice. The Virtual Currency Notice requires that the operators who engage in issuance of online game virtual currency or offering of online game virtual currency transaction services shall apply for approval from the MOC through its provincial branches. The term "virtual currency" is widely used in the live streaming industry, such term as used in the live streaming industry does not fall under the definition under the Virtual Currency Notice. Although we do not think Virtual Currency Notice applies to the operation of our live streaming platform, given the wide discretion of relevant governmental authorities and uncertainties in the regulatory environment, we cannot assure you that relevant governmental authorities will not in the future interpret the Virtual Currency Notice in a different way and subject our operation to the scope of the Virtual Currency Notice or issue new rules to regulate the virtual currency in our industry. In that case, our operation may be adversely affected.

The PRC government has, in recent years, intensified regulation on various aspects of the internet industry in China. For example, in January 2011, MIIT and seven other PRC central government authorities jointly issued a circular entitled Implementation Scheme regarding Parental Guardianship Project for Minors Playing Online Games, under which online game operators are required to adopt various measures to maintain a system to communicate with the parents or other guardians of minors playing their online games and are required to monitor online game activities of minors and suspend the accounts of minors if so required by their parents or guardians. In October 2019, General Administration of Press and Publication issued the Anti-indulgence Notice which imposed an array of restrictions on online game operators to prevent underage users from indulging in online games. The Anti-indulgence Notice also requires online game operators to take effective measures to restrict minors from using paid services that are inconsistent with their capacity for civil conduct. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Regulation-Regulation on anti-fatigue system, real-name registration system and parental guardianship project." While we support these measures, these restrictions could also limit our ability to grow our user base for our online game business. Furthermore, if these restrictions are expanded to apply to adult game players in the future, our ability to grow our user base could be further limited and online games business could be materially and adversely affected. Further, the PRC government has tightened its regulation of internet cafes in recent years. In particular, a large number of unlicensed internet cafes have been closed. The PRC government has imposed higher capital and facility requirements for the establishment of internet cafes. Furthermore, the PRC government's policy, which encourages the development of a limited number of national and regional internet cafe chains and discourages the establishment of independent internet cafes, may slow down the growth of internet cafes in China. In June 2002, the Ministry of Culture, together with other government authorities, issued a joint notice, and in February 2004, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce issued another notice, suspending the issuance of new internet cafe licenses. In May 2007, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce reiterated its position not to register any new internet cafes in 2007. In 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Ministry of Culture, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and other relevant government authorities, individually or jointly, issued several notices that provide various ways to strengthen the regulation of internet cafes, including investigating and punishing internet cafes that accept minors, cracking down on internet cafes without sufficient and valid licenses, limiting the total number of internet cafes and approving internet cafes within the planning made by relevant authorities, screening unlawful and adverse games and websites, and improving the coordination of regulation over internet cafes and online games. Although currently most of our users access and consume our products and services from their own devices, if internet cafes become one of the main venues for our users to access our website or online games, any reduction in the number, or any slowdown in the growth, of internet cafes in China could limit our ability to maintain or increase our user base. In addition, the Chinese government has in recent years intensified its efforts to remove inappropriate content disseminated over the internet and wireless networks. In April 2014, the Chinese government initiated a campaign to enhance and enforce its scrutiny over internet content in China, particularly for pornographic content, and various websites were subject to penalties and in some cases outright suspension of website operations. In August 2017, the CAC promulgated the Provisions on the Administration of Internet Comments Posting Services, and the Provisions on the Administration of Internet Forum and Community Services, both of which require providers of relevant services to establish information review and inspection mechanism. As we implemented programs to comply with these regulations, we saw our subscriber numbers decline and may see more subscriber or user decline in the future. See "-Regulation and censorship of information disseminated over the internet in China have adversely affected our business and may continue to adversely affect our business, and we may be liable for the digital media content on our platform."

We launched ThunderChain, a blockchain infrastructure platform, in 2018. Currently, our strategic focus in the blockchain sector is on the development of blockchain infrastructure. The blockchain industry in China is an emerging industry. The PRC government has yet to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework. The laws and regulations governing the operation of blockchain products and services in China are also rapidly developing and evolving. On January 10, 2019, the Cyberspace Administration of China, or CAC, issued the Provisions on the Administration of Blockchain Information Services, or the Blockchain Provisions, which came into effect on February 15, 2019. Pursuant to the Blockchain Provisions, a blockchain information service provider is required to file particulars of such service provider including its name, service category, service form, application field, and server address with the blockchain information service filing management system managed by the CAC and go through filing procedures within ten business days after it starts to provide services. After completing the filing procedure, the blockchain information service provider should display the filing number in a conspicuous position on the service provider's websites and applications through which it provides services. Our subsidiaries providing blockchain information services have completed these filing procedures with relevant regulatory authorities and obtained the filing numbers. In addition, the operations of our blockchain services are still at an early stage. We may be required to make additional filings if we make further adjustments to our business operations. We cannot assure you that we will always be able to timely obtain or renew relevant permits, approvals or licenses that may be viewed necessary for our blockchain operations. If we fail to maintain any of these required permits, approvals or licenses in a timely manner, or at all, we may be subject to various penalties, including fines and discontinuation of or restriction on our operations. Any such disruptions in our business operations may have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition to filing requirements, the Blockchain Provisions also imposed an array of other requirements on the providers of blockchain information services. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Regulation-Regulation on Blockchain Information Services" for more details. Failure to comply with relevant requirements in the Blockchain Provisions may subject us to administrative penalties such as warning, being ordered to temporarily suspend relevant business operations to rectify within prescribed time period, or fines, or criminal liabilities, depending on which provisions are violated. Since the blockchain technology and other related technologies are evolving rapidly, new laws, regulations and governmental policies are expected to be adopted from time to time by relevant PRC authorities to impose additional restrictions or require licenses or permits for operating blockchain related business. We are unable to predict with certainty the impact, if any, that future legislation, judicial interpretations or regulations relating to the blockchain industry will have on our business, financial condition and results of operations. To the extent that we are not able to fully comply with any new laws or regulations when they are promulgated, our business, financial condition and results of operations as well as the price of our ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

Among other things, the M&A Rules and certain regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex. For example, the M&A Rules require that the Ministry of Commerce be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise or a foreign company with substantial PRC operations, if certain thresholds under the Provisions on Thresholds for Prior Notification of Concentrations of Undertakings, issued by the State Council on August 3, 2008 and amended by the State Council on September 18, 2018, are triggered. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law promulgated by the SCNPC on August 30, 2007 and took effect on August 1, 2008 requires that transactions which are deemed concentrations and involve parties with specified turnover thresholds (i.e., during the previous fiscal year, (i) the total global turnover of all operators participating in the transaction exceeds RMB10 billion and at least two of these operators each had a turnover of more than RMB400 million within China, or (ii) the total turnover within China of all the operators participating in the concentration exceeded RMB2 billion, and at least two of these operators each had a turnover of more than RMB400 million within China) must be cleared by the Ministry of Commerce before they can be completed. In addition, according to the Implementing Rules Concerning Security Review on the Mergers and Acquisitions by Foreign Investors of Domestic Enterprises issued by the Ministry of Commerce in August 2011, mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors involved in an industry related to national security are subject to strict review by the Ministry of Commerce. These rules also prohibit any transactions attempting to bypass such security review, including by controlling entities through contractual arrangements. We believe that our business is not in an industry related to national security. However, we cannot preclude the possibility that the Ministry of Commerce or other government agencies may publish interpretations contrary to our understanding or broaden the scope of such security review in the future. Although we have no current definitive plans to make any acquisitions, we may elect to grow our business in the future in part by directly acquiring complementary businesses in China. Complying with the requirements of these regulations to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the Ministry of Commerce, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions.

SAFE has promulgated several regulations that require PRC residents and PRC corporate entities to register with local branches of SAFE in connection with their direct or indirect offshore investment activities. These regulations apply to our shareholders who are PRC residents and may apply to any offshore acquisitions that we make in the future. SAFE promulgated the Circular on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents' Offshore Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE No. Circular No. 37, on July 4, 2014. SAFE Circular No. 37 requires PRC residents to register with local branches of SAFE in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore entity, for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC residents' legally owned assets or equity interests in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests, referred to in SAFE Circular No. 37 as a "special purpose vehicle." The term "control" under SAFE Circular No. 37 is broadly defined as the operation rights, beneficiary rights or decision-making rights acquired by the PRC residents in the offshore special purpose vehicles or PRC companies by such means as acquisition, trust, proxy, voting rights, repurchase, convertible bonds or other arrangements. SAFE Circular No. 37 further requires amendment to the registration in the event of any changes with respect to the basic information of the special purpose vehicle, such as changes in a PRC resident individual shareholder, name or operation period; or any significant changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle, such as increase or decrease of capital contributed by PRC individuals, share transfer or exchange, merger, division or other material event. If the shareholders of an offshore holding company who are PRC residents do not complete their registration with the local SAFE branches, the PRC subsidiaries of the offshore holding company may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to the offshore company, and the offshore company may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital to its PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with SAFE registration and amendment requirements described above could result in liability under PRC law for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions. In addition, on February 13, 2015, SAFE issued SAFE Circular No. 13, which took effect on June 1, 2015. SAFE Circular No. 13 delegates to the qualified banks the authority to register all PRC residents' investment in "special purpose vehicle" pursuant to SAFE Circular No. 37, except that those PRC residents who have failed to comply with SAFE Circular No. 37 will continue to fall within the jurisdiction of the relevant local SAFE branches and must continue to make their supplementary registration applications with the such local SAFE branches. We have requested PRC residents holding direct or indirect interest in our company to our knowledge to make the necessary applications, filings and amendments as required under SAFE regulations. Mr. Sean Shenglong Zou, Mr. Hao Cheng and Ms. Fang Wang have completed the initial registration with the local SAFE branch as required by the SAFE regulations. However, we cannot assure you that these shareholders have completed and will complete all subsequent amendment registrations as required by the SAFE regulations as we do not have control over these shareholders. We may also not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents holding direct or indirect interest in our company, and we cannot provide any assurances that these PRC residents will comply with our request to make or obtain any applicable registrations or comply with other requirements required by SAFE regulations since we do not have control over these the PRC resident shareholders. The failure or inability of our PRC resident shareholders or our future PRC resident shareholders to make any required registrations or comply with other requirements under SAFE regulations may subject such PRC residents or our PRC subsidiaries to fines and legal sanctions and may also limit our ability to raise additional financing and contribute additional capital into or provide loans to (including using the proceeds from our initial public offering) our PRC subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute profits to us, or otherwise adversely affect us. Furthermore, because of the uncertainty over how the SAFE regulations will be interpreted and implemented, and how SAFE will apply them to us, we cannot predict how these regulations will affect our business operations or future strategies. For example, we may be subject to a more stringent review and approval process with respect to our foreign exchange activities, such as remittance of dividends and foreign-currency-denominated borrowings, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we decide to acquire a PRC domestic company, we cannot assure you that we or the owners of such company, as the case may be, will be able to obtain the necessary approvals or complete the necessary filings and registrations required by the foreign exchange regulations. This may restrict our ability to implement our acquisition strategy and could adversely affect our business and prospects.