TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

SPI Energy Co (SPIEQ) Risk Analysis

Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning. SPI Energy Co disclosed 120 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. SPI Energy Co reported the most risks in the “Production” category.

Risk Overview Q4, 2022

Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Dec 31, 2022, filed Apr 14, 2023

Risk Distribution
120Risks
Sector Avg.Finance & CorporateTech & InnovationLegal & RegulatoryProductionAbility to SellMacro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Risk Change Over Time

SPI Energy Co disclosed risks per quarterNo. of Risks120Q4Showing: Q4, 2022
Risks removedRisks addedRisks changedSPI Energy Co Risk Factors
New Risk (54)
  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
    Our ordinary shares may be delisted under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act ("HCFAA") if the PCAOB is unable to adequately inspect audit documentation located in China. The delisting of our ordinary shares or the threat of their being delisted, may have a material adverse impact on our listing and trading in the U.S. and the trading prices of our ordinary shares.

    Pursuant to the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (the "HFCA Act"), if the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the "PCAOB"), is unable to inspect an issuer's auditors for two consecutive years, the issuer's securities are prohibited to trade on a U.S. stock exchange. The PCAOB issued a Determination Report on December 16, 2021 (the "Determination Report") which found that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in: (1) mainland China of the People's Republic of China because of a position taken by one or more authorities in mainland China; and (2) Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region and dependency of the PRC, because of a position taken by one or more authorities in Hong Kong. Furthermore, the Determination Report identified the specific registered public accounting firms which are subject to these determinations ("PCAOB Identified Firms"). The Company's current auditor, Marcum Asia CPAs LLP ("MarcumAsia"), the independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included elsewhere in this annual report, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is subject to laws in the U.S. pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. MarcumAsia, whose audit report is included in this annual report, is headquartered in New York, New York, and, as of the date of this annual report, was not included in the list of PCAOB Identified Firms in the Determination Report. On August 26, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it had signed a Statement of Protocol (the "Protocol") with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the "CSRC") and the Ministry of Finance ("MOF") of the People's Republic of China, governing inspections and investigations of audit firms based in mainland China and Hong Kong. Pursuant to the Protocol, the PCAOB conducted inspections on select registered public accounting firms subject to the Determination Report in Hong Kong between September and November 2022. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB board announced that it has completed the inspections, determined that it had complete access to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong, and voted to vacate the Determination Report. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company's ability to retain an auditor subject to the PCAOB inspection and investigation, including but not limited to inspection of the audit working papers related to us, may depend on the relevant positions of U.S. and Chinese regulators. Marcum Asia CPAs LLP's audit working papers related to us are located in China. With respect to audits of companies with operations in China, there are uncertainties about the ability of its auditor to fully cooperate with a request by the PCAOB for audit working papers in China without the approval of Chinese authorities. If the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely the Company's auditor because of a position taken by an authority in a foreign jurisdiction, or the PCAOB re-evaluates its determination as a result of any obstruction with the implementation of the Statement of Protocol, then such lack of inspection or re-evaluation could cause trading in the Company's securities to be prohibited under the HFCA Act, and ultimately result in a determination by a securities exchange to delist the Company's securities. Accordingly, the HFCA Act calls for additional and more stringent criteria to be applied to emerging market companies upon assessing the qualification of their auditors, especially the non-U.S. auditors who are not inspected by the PCAOB. On December 29, 2022, the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the AHFCA Act, was signed into law, which reduced the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the HFCA Act from three years to two. As a result, the risks mentioned above have been heightened. If our ordinary shares are subject to a trading prohibition under the HFCA Act or the AHFCA Act, the price of our ordinary shares may be adversely affected, and the threat of such a trading prohibition would also adversely affect their price. If we are unable to be listed on another securities exchange that provides sufficient liquidity, such a trading prohibition may substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase our ordinary shares when you wish to do so.

Read and Evaluate the RiskReserved for Ultimate MembersUpgrade

Risk Highlights Q4, 2022

Main Risk Category
Production
With 43 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
120
+27
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
54Risks added
27Risks removed
7Risks changed
Since Dec 2022
Number of Risk Changed
7
+7
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 1

Risk Word Cloud

we may not be able to acquire additional solar projects to grow our project portfolio or effectively integrate or realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions.anticipated benefits of our acquisitionswe might not be able to obtain sufficient raw materials in a timely manner or on commercially reasonable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.to obtain sufficient raw materialsphoenix is highly dependent on the services of liang lance zhou, its chief executive officer.services of liang lance zhouwe are in default on a number of our obligations, which could result in our being forced to cease operations if we are unable to reach satisfactory settlement with applicable counterparties.unable to reach satisfactory settlementour ordinary shares may be delisted under the holding foreign companies accountable act ("hcfaa") if the pcaob is unable to adequately inspect audit documentation located in china. the delisting of our ordinary shares or the threat of their being delisted, may have a material adverse impact on our listing and trading in the u.s. and the trading prices of our ordinary shares.holding foreign companies accountable actphoenix's success may be dependent on its development and protection of intellectual property rights.protection of intellectual property rightstechnological advances in the solar industry could render our pv solutions uncompetitive or obsolete.render our pv solutions uncompetitivewe may not be able to obtain long-term contracts for the sale of electricity generated by our solar projects under our ipp model at prices and on other terms favorable to attract financing and other investments.to obtain long-term contractsphoenix has yet to achieve positive cash flow and, given its projected funding needs, its ability to generate positive cash flow is uncertain.to achieve positive cash flowa material reduction in the retail price of electricity charged by electric utilities or other retail electricity providers would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.retail price of electricity charged

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 120

Manufacturing14 | 11.7%
  • Manufacturing - Risk 1
    Our sales may be subject to risks associated with construction, delays and other contingencies, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and the results of operations.

    Historically, we have generated a significant portion of our revenue from sales of PV products. We generally enter into a sales contract under which we act as the supplier in connection with the supply of solar and battery systems. In addition, delays in supply of PV module or components, construction delays, pandemic delays, labor, unexpected performance problems in electricity generation or other events may cause us unanticipated and severe revenue and earnings losses and financial penalties.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 2
    All of Phoenix's current range of products are built on Ford's E-450 chassis. A decision by Ford to offer an electric version of this chassis, directly, would impact the viability of Phoenix's current products.

    Phoenix currently builds all its products on Ford's E-450 chassis. Ford does not offer an electric version of this chassis, due to the relatively small market size for medium-duty electric vehicles. As volumes increase, there is a potential risk of Ford's launching an electric version of Ford's E-450 chassis directly from the factory, negating the need for Phoenix's current range of products. Additionally, a shortage in the availability of this chassis would impact Phoenix's capability to produce and fulfill customer's orders in a timely manner.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 3
    Phoenix EVs use lithium-ion batteries, which, if not appropriately managed and controlled, have caught fire or released smoke and flames. Such events could result in liability under Phoenix's warranties, for damage or injury, adverse publicity and a potential safety recall, any of which would hurt Phoenix's prospects.

    The battery packs in Phoenix's EVs use lithium-ion cells, which, if not appropriately managed and controlled can rapidly release energy by venting smoke and flames that can ignite nearby materials. Highly publicized incidents of laptop computers and cell phones bursting into flames have focused attention on the safety of these cells. These events also have raised questions about the suitability of lithium-ion cells for automotive applications. There can be no assurance that a field failure of Phoenix's battery packs will not occur, which would damage the vehicle or lead to personal injury or death that subject Phoenix to lawsuits. Furthermore, there is some risk of electrocution if individuals who attempt to repair battery packs do not follow applicable maintenance and repair protocols. Any such damage or injury would likely lead to adverse publicity and potentially a safety recall. Any such adverse publicity could adversely affect Phoenix's business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 4
    The operation of solar projects involves significant inherent risks and hazards that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

    The operation of solar projects involves numerous hazardous activities, including delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. We are subject to natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, snow obscuration, high temperatures, lightning, hurricanes, long-term climate changes, volcanoes and wind risks, as well as other inherent risks affecting resource availability such as fire, explosion, soil and ice buildup, structural collapse and equipment failure. Moreover, we may suffer from negligent acts by our PPA counterparties or other third parties. Our rooftop projects could cause damage to the building roof, resulting in claims due to water damages or replacement of roofing materials. These and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to, and destruction of, property and equipment and contamination of, or damage to, the environment, wildlife takes or fatalities and suspension of operations. The occurrence of any of these events may result in lawsuits against us asserting claims for substantial damages, including for environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and property damage and fines and/or penalties. In addition, the ongoing operation of solar projects face risks that include the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes or performance below expected levels of output or efficiency due to wear and tear, latent defect, design error or operator error or force majeure events, among others. Unplanned outages, including extensions of scheduled outages, occur from time to time and are an inherent risk of our business. Unplanned outages typically increase our operation and maintenance expenses and may reduce our revenues as a result of generating and selling less electricity. If we fail to properly operate and maintain our solar projects, these projects may experience decreased performance, shortened operating life or shut downs. Our solar projects may also require periodic upgrading and improvement. Changes in our own operation or local conditions may increase the costs of operating the project, including costs related to labor, equipment, insurance and taxes. If we cause damage to third parties, we may become liable for the consequences of any resulting damage. We may also experience equipment malfunction or failure, leading to unexpected maintenance needs, unplanned outages or other operational issues. In addition, inconsistencies in the quality of solar panels, PV modules, balance-of-system components or maintenance services for our solar projects may affect the system efficiency of our projects. Any unexpected operational or mechanical failure, including failure associated with breakdowns and forced outages, and any decreased operational or management performance, could reduce our solar projects' power generating capacity below expected levels, reducing our revenues and profitability. Degradation of the performance of our solar projects above levels provided for in the relevant PPAs may also reduce our revenues. Unanticipated capital expenditures associated with maintaining, upgrading or repairing our projects may also reduce our profitability. In addition, damage to our reputation due to system failure or accidents could negatively impact our relationships with customers and local government authorities, which could also materially adversely affect our business. Negative public or community response to solar energy projects could adversely affect the approval for and construction of our projects. We maintain insurance coverage that we consider adequate but we cannot assure you that our insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 5
    Our solar projects have short operating histories and may not perform up to our expectations.

    The projects in our solar project portfolio are relatively new with expected operating life of more than 20 years. The majority of our projects in operation as of December 31, 2022 commenced operations since 2014. In addition, the projects we acquire in the future may not have commenced construction or operation or otherwise have a limited operating history. As a result, our assumptions and estimates regarding the future performance of these projects are, and will be, made without the benefit of a meaningful operating history, which may impair our ability to accurately assess the potential profitability of the projects. The performance of these projects will also be subject to risks inherent in newly constructed renewable energy projects, including breakdowns and outages, latent defects, equipment that performs below our expectations and system failures. Failure of some or all of our projects to perform up to our expectations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 6
    Successful completion of a particular solar project may be adversely affected by numerous factors, including, without limitation:

    - unanticipated delays or changes in project plans;         - changes to laws and regulations requiring additional permits, licenses and approvals, or difficulties in obtaining and maintaining existing governmental permits, licenses and approvals;         - the inability to obtain adequate financing with acceptable terms;- unforeseeable engineering problems, construction or other unexpected delays and contractor performance issues;         - delays, disruptions or shortages of the supply of labor, equipment and materials, including work stoppages;         - defective PV module or other components sourced from our suppliers;         - adverse weather, environmental and geological conditions, force majeure and other events out of our control; and         - cost overruns due to any one or more of the foregoing factors. Accordingly, some of the solar projects in our portfolio may not eventually commence operation and connect to the grid, or even proceed to construction. If a number of our solar projects are not completed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 7Added
    Failure to maintain safe work sites could result in significant losses.

    Construction and maintenance sites are potentially dangerous workplaces and often put our employees and others in close proximity with mechanized equipment, moving vehicles, chemical and manufacturing processes, and highly regulated materials.  We are often responsible for safety and must implement safety procedures. Should our safety procedures prove ineffective or incomplete, we might suffer injury to our employees, and expose the company to litigation. Our failure to maintain adequate safety standards through our safety programs could result in reduced profitability or the loss of projects or clients, and could have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 8Added
    Our solar business installs solar energy systems, and many factors can prevent us from completing installations on time or on budget.

    Factors that might prevent us from completing installations on time or on budget include: - shortages of materials;         - shortages of skilled labor;         - unforeseen installation scheduling, engineering, excavation, environmental or geological problems;         - job site issues that were not apparent during site inspection;         - natural disasters, hurricanes, weather interference, fires, earthquakes or other casualty losses or delays;         - delays in obtaining or inability to obtain or maintain necessary licenses or permits;         - changes to plans or specifications;         - performance by subcontractors;         - disputes with subcontractors; and         - unanticipated cost increases in materials, labor or other elements of our projects beyond budgets and allowances for contingencies. Our installation projects expose us to risks of cost overruns due to typical uncertainties associated with any project or changes in the designs, plans or concepts of such projects, and installation costs might exceed estimated costs of completion.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 9Added
    Failure to achieve satisfactory production volumes of our solar module products could result in higher unit production costs.

    The production of solar modules involves complex processes. Deviations in the manufacturing process can cause a substantial decrease in output and, in some cases, disrupt production significantly or result in no output. From time to time, we have experienced lower-than-anticipated manufacturing output during the ramp-up of production lines, which can occur during the introduction of new products, the installation of new equipment or the implementation of new process technologies. As we bring additional lines or facilities into production, we might operate at less than intended capacity during the ramp-up period, and the demand in global solar power product markets might decrease, including the demand for solar modules, which could cause us to operate at less than intended capacity, and result in higher marginal production costs and lower output, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 10Added
    Performance shortcomings in our products might cause us to incur additional expenses and warranty costs, damage our reputation and cause our sales to decline.

    Our products might contain defects that are not detected until after they are shipped or inspected by our customers. Our solar modules are typically sold with a 10-year warranty for material and workmanship and a 25-year (30-year for dual glass module) linear power output warranty against the maximum degradation of the actual power output for each year after the warranty start date, and if a solar module is defective during the relevant warranty period, we will either repair or replace the solar module. As we continue to increase our sales to the major export markets, we might be exposed to increased warranty claims. Product defects could cause significant damage to our market reputation and reduce our product sales and market share, and our failure to maintain the consistency and quality throughout our production process could result in substandard quality or performance of our products. If we deliver our products with defects, or if there is a perception that our products are of substandard quality, we might incur substantially increased costs associated with returns or replacements of our products, our credibility and market reputation could be harmed and our sales and market share may be materially adversely affected.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 11Added
    The range of Phoenix's existing EVs is limited, compared with that of traditional vehicles.

    Whereas traditional combustion engine medium-duty vehicles may travel from 240 to 350 miles before refueling, Phoenix's existing EVs have a maximum range of 160 miles and minimum recharging time of five to six hours. Currently, Phoenix's EVs can be charged only at the owner's location or select public charging locations using compatible charging equipment, further limiting the EVs to local use. Accordingly, potential customers needing vehicles with longer ranges or quicker turnaround of depleted electric energy supply may find Phoenix's products relatively less attractive.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 12Added
    Phoenix may experience delays in launching and ramping up production or Phoenix may be unable to control its manufacturing costs.

    Phoenix has previously experienced and may in the future experience launch and production ramp-up delays. In addition, Phoenix may introduce in the future new or unique manufacturing processes and design features for its products including enhancements under development relating to production assembly efficiency, material component availability, cost reduction and customer feedback. There is no guarantee Phoenix will be able to successfully and timely introduce and scale such processes or features. Phoenix has limited experience to date in manufacturing electric vehicles at low volumes. To be successful, Phoenix will need to implement, maintain, and ramp-up efficient and cost-effective manufacturing capabilities, processes and supply chains, high quality and output rates planned at its Anaheim manufacturing facility. Phoenix also needs to hire, train, and compensate skilled employees for operations. Bottlenecks and other unexpected challenges such as those experienced in the past may arise during its production ramps, and Phoenix must address them promptly while continuing to improve manufacturing processes and reducing costs. If Phoenix is not successful in achieving these goals, Phoenix could face delays in establishing and/or sustaining its vehicle production ramp-ups or be unable to meet its related cost and profitability targets. Any delay or other complication in ramping up the production of its current products or the development, manufacture, launch and production ramp-ups of its future products, features and services, or in doing so cost-effectively and with high quality, may harm its brand, business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 13Added
    If Phoenix's vehicles fail to perform as expected, its ability to develop, market and sell or lease its electric vehicles could be harmed.

    If Phoenix's vehicles were to contain defects in design and/or manufacture that cause them not to perform as expected or that require repair, its ability to develop, market and sell or lease its vehicles could be harmed. For example, the operation of its vehicles is highly dependent on software that will require modification and updates over time. Software products are inherently complex and often contain defects and errors when first introduced. Phoenix currently has a limited frame of reference by which to evaluate the long-term quality, reliability and performance characteristics of its buses, trucks, and other products. There can be no assurance that Phoenix will be able to detect and repair any defects in its products before commencing the sale of its vehicles. Any product defects or any other failure of its vehicles to perform as expected could harm its reputation and result in adverse publicity, lost revenue, delivery delays, product recalls, product liability claims or significant warranty and other expenses, and could have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

  • Manufacturing - Risk 14Added
    Phoenix faces various challenges in scaling manufacturing, assembling, and converting processes effectively and quickly from low volume production to high volume production for its Gen 4 drivetrain products.

    Phoenix has no experience to date in high volume manufacturing, assembling, and converting to commercial electric vehicles. Phoenix does not know whether Phoenix will be able to develop efficient, low-cost manufacturing, assembly and converting capability and processes, and reliable sources of component supply that will enable us to meet the quality, price, engineering, design and production standards, as well as the production volumes Phoenix targets. Any failure to develop such manufacturing, assembly and converting processes and capabilities and reliable sources of component supply within its projected costs and timelines could have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. Even if Phoenix is successful in developing its high-volume manufacturing, assembly and converting capability and processes, and reliable sources of component supply, Phoenix does not know whether Phoenix will be able to do so in a manner that avoids significant delays and cost overruns, including as a result of factors beyond its control such as problems with suppliers and vendors, or in time to meet its commercialization schedules or to satisfy the requirements of customers. In addition, certain components Phoenix integrates may not be available on a consistent basis or in large quantities. its business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected if Phoenix experiences disruptions in its supply chain or if Phoenix cannot obtain materials of sufficient quality at reasonable prices.

See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment. They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result. It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process. Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”. Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report. According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing. You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector. Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements. A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below. 1. Financial & Corporate Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results. Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing. Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments. Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances. 2. Legal & Regulatory Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company. Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation. Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy. Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives. 3. Production Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory. Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers. Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls. Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation. 4. Technology & Innovation Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development. Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology. Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks. Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying. 5. Ability to Sell Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers. Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes. Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration. Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation. 6. Macro & Political Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions. Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19. International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company. Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.