Perdoceo Education (PRDO) Risk Analysis

Our institutions must maintain systems and processes to identify and prevent fraudulent applications for enrollment and financial aid. We cannot be certain that our institutions' systems and processes will continue to be adequate in the face of increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes, or that we will be able to expand such systems and processes at a pace consistent with the changing nature of these fraud schemes. We believe the risk of outside parties attempting to perpetrate fraud in connection with the award and disbursement of Title IV Program funds, including as a result of identity theft, is heightened at our institutions that are exclusively online education providers. The Department requires institutions that participate in Title IV Programs to refer to the Department's Office of the Inspector General ("OIG") credible information about fraud or other illegal conduct involving Title IV Programs. If the systems and processes that our institutions have established to detect and prevent fraud are inadequate, the Department may find that our institutions do not satisfy the Department's administrative capability requirements, which could have the adverse effects described in the risk factor captioned "A failure to demonstrate "financial responsibility" or "administrative capability" or meet new "certification" requirements would have negative impacts on our operations." In addition, our ability to participate in Title IV Programs is conditioned on maintaining accreditation by an accrediting agency that is recognized by the Department. Any significant failure to adequately detect fraudulent activity related to student enrollment and financial aid could cause us to fail to meet accreditors' standards. Furthermore, accrediting agencies that evaluate institutions offering online programs must require such institutions to have processes through which the institution establishes that a student who registers for such a program is the same student who participates in and receives credit for the program. Failure to meet the requirements of our institutions' accrediting agencies could result in the loss of accreditation of one or more of our institutions, which could result in their loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs. See Item 1, "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations – Fraudulent Applications for Enrollment and Financial Aid."

A portion of our student population relies on education-related benefits provided through employer-sponsored tuition assistance programs and programs administered for military members and veterans, including benefits offered through the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Participation in these programs is subject to separate eligibility requirements, oversight, and compliance obligations that are distinct from, and in some cases in addition to, the requirements applicable to Title IV student financial aid programs. If our institutions were to lose eligibility, experience delays in approval, or become subject to limitations or adverse determinations affecting participation in any employer-sponsored, military, or veterans' education benefit programs, students' ability to utilize these benefits could be reduced or eliminated. Such outcomes could result from regulatory changes, compliance findings, changes in program policies, or determinations by the administering agencies. Any reduction in access to these benefits could materially reduce student enrollments and revenue and adversely affect our operating results. In addition, adverse determinations, or heightened oversight in connection with these programs could result in increased compliance costs, operational restrictions, reputational harm, or other adverse consequences for our business.

Our institutions frequently need to obtain approvals from regulatory agencies in the regular conduct of their business. For example, to establish a new educational program or make substantive changes to existing programs, we are required to obtain the appropriate approvals from the Department and applicable state and accrediting regulatory agencies. Staffing levels at the Department and other regulatory agencies and the volume of applications and other requests may delay our receipt of necessary approvals. Further, approvals may be conditioned or denied in a manner that could significantly affect our strategic plans and future growth. Approval by these regulatory agencies may also be negatively impacted due to regulatory inquiries or reviews and any adverse publicity relating to such matters or the industry generally.

A substantial majority of our students rely upon Title IV Programs to assist in financing their education, and we derive a substantial majority of our revenue and cash flows from Title IV Programs. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2025, a majority of our students who were in a program of study at any time during that year participated in Title IV Programs, which resulted in Title IV Program cash receipts of approximately $615 million. As a result, any legislative or regulatory action that significantly reduces Title IV Program funding or the ability of our institutions to participate, or that places significant additional burdens on or eliminates our ability to participate, would materially reduce the number of students who enroll at our institutions, and we would be unable to continue our business as it currently is conducted, which would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, cash flows and results of operations.

Under the HEA, an institution must apply to the Department for continued certification to participate in Title IV Programs at least every six years or whenever it undergoes a change of control. Generally, the recertification process includes a review by the Department of an institution's educational programs and locations, administrative capability, financial responsibility, and other regulatory oversight categories. USAHS is operating under a temporary provisional program participation agreement as a result of its change of ownership at the end of 2024. Pursuant to applicable regulations, if the change of ownership is approved, USAHS will then participate under provisional certification for up to three years. During the period of provisional certification, an institution must obtain prior Department approval to add an educational program, open a new location, increase the credential level of its offerings, or shorten or lengthen its programs, which could negatively impact USAHS's ability to undertake any of these actions. Institutions may be given provisional program participation agreements for any number of reasons, and we have seen in some instances without justification, including the existence of an open and pending audit or review within the Department's discretion or unspecified issues arising out of past administrative capability issues. Recently, the Department has imposed additional reporting, limiting, and monitoring conditions on continued participation against institutions it has previously recertified. As indicated above, in February 2025, both CTU and AIUS received renewals of their program participation agreements through June 30, 2027. AIUS was removed from provisional certification, leaving both AIUS and CTU with full certification. By March 31, 2027, CTU and AIUS will each be required to submit applications for recertification to continue participation in Title IV Programs. If the Department finds that any of our institutions do not fully satisfy all required eligibility and certification standards, the Department could deny recertification or limit, suspend, or terminate the institution's participation in Title IV Programs. Continued Title IV Program eligibility is critical to the operation of our business. If any of our institutions becomes ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs or have its participation significantly conditioned, it could not operate its business as currently conducted, and we would experience a dramatic decline in revenue.

The Reconciliation Act made significant changes to federal student loan programs under the HEA, including imposing new annual, aggregate, and lifetime borrowing limits across multiple loan programs and eliminating or restricting certain loan options previously available to graduate and professional students. Many of these changes are scheduled to take effect beginning July 1, 2026, and generally apply prospectively to new borrowers, subject to further implementation through Department regulations. These changes may materially reduce the amount of Title IV Program loan funding available to students seeking to enroll in, continue, or complete their educational programs. Students who are unable to access sufficient federal loan funds may be required to rely more heavily on personal savings, private loans, employer assistance, or other sources of financing, which may be unavailable, more expensive, or less predictable. As a result, some prospective students may choose not to enroll, delay enrollment, enroll part-time, select shorter or lower-cost programs, or discontinue their studies before completion. Reduced borrowing capacity may have a disproportionate impact on students enrolled in longer-duration, higher-cost, in-person or graduate-level programs, as well as on students with limited financial resources. In addition, uncertainty regarding the availability of federal loan funding, evolving regulatory guidance, or changes in borrower eligibility may negatively affect student decision-making and demand for our programs. Any sustained reduction in students' ability or willingness to finance their education through federal loan programs could materially reduce student enrollments, persistence and completion rates, increase price sensitivity, and adversely affect our revenue, operating results, and growth prospects. We cannot predict the extent to which these loan program changes, individually or in combination with other regulatory developments, will affect student behavior or our institutions' enrollment trends. See Item 1, "Business - Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives – 2025 Negotiated Rulemakings," for more information.

Our institutions must maintain institutional accreditation from an accrediting agency recognized by the Department in order to participate in Title IV Programs. See Item 1, "Business – Accreditation, Jurisdictional Authorizations and Other Compliance Matters – Institutional Accreditation." Failure to comply with applicable accreditation standards may subject an institution to additional oversight and reporting requirements, adverse accreditation actions, including show-cause directives, probation, deferral or denial of accreditation actions, suspension or loss of an institution's accreditation or a program's approval, or other negative actions. Future inquiries or actions by state or federal agencies could negatively impact our accreditation status. If any of our institutions or programs were to be subject to negative accreditation actions or placed on probationary or other negative accreditation status, we could experience adverse publicity, impaired ability to attract and retain students, increased compliance costs, and substantial expense to restore good standing. The inability to obtain reaccreditation following periodic reviews or any final loss of institutional accreditation after exhaustion of the administrative agency processes would result in a loss of Title IV Program funds for the affected institution and its students. In addition, if an accrediting agency that accredits one of our institutions were to lose recognition by the Department, that institution could lose its ability to participate in Title IV Programs. See Item 1,"Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Eligibility and Certification by the Department," for more information. In addition to institutional accreditation, many states, licensing bodies, and professional associations require certain educational programs to be accredited by specialized accrediting agencies. While programmatic accreditation alone is not a sufficient basis to qualify for institutional Title IV Program certification, it may be required for graduates to obtain professional licensure or employment in their chosen field. Those of our programs that do not have such programmatic accreditation, where available, or fail to maintain such accreditation, particularly in programs in the health sciences field, may experience adverse publicity, declining enrollments, litigation or other claims from students or suffer other adverse impacts, which could result in it being impractical for us to continue offering such programs.

See Item 1, "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations" above for an overview of the current rules relating to Borrower Defense to Repayment. Federal "borrower defense to repayment" regulations, including closed school loan discharge provisions, permit the discharge of certain federal student loans under specified circumstances and may result in the assertion of repayment liability against institutions for discharged amounts. In addition, these regulations may require institutions to post letters of credit or other forms of financial protection, which could restrict liquidity and limit our ability to make investments in our business. We cannot predict the effect that current or future borrower defense and loan discharge regulations will have on student enrollments, the volume of claims submitted by borrowers for loan discharge (including closed school discharge claims), the number or amount of claims for loan discharge the Department approves, the extent to which the Department may seek to recover discharged loan amounts from us, our future financial responsibility as determined by the Department, or any sanctions, conditions, or enforcement actions that may be taken or imposed by the Department against our institutions based on loans discharged, including any requirement to post a letter of credit. Any such developments could require significant cash outlays, increase compliance costs, constrain capital resources, and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future growth.

See Item 1, "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Negotiated Rulemaking: Financial Responsibility," "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations," "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Negotiated Rulemaking: Administrative Capability" and "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Negotiated Rulemaking: Certification Procedures" above for an overview of the current rules relating to the financial responsibility, administrative capability and certification procedures. If our institutions fail to maintain financial responsibility or administrative capability, they could lose their eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, have that eligibility adversely conditioned or be subject to similar negative consequences under accreditor and state regulatory requirements, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. In particular, limitations on participation in Title IV Programs resulting from the failure to demonstrate financial responsibility or administrative capability could materially reduce the enrollments and revenue at the impacted institution, and a termination of participation would cause a dramatic decline in revenue, and we would be unable to continue our business as it currently is conducted.

Our business is subject to extensive federal, state, and accreditor regulatory requirements that change frequently, are subject to differing interpretations, and may be applied retroactively or differently over time. Regulatory interpretations may also shift as a result of changes in presidential administrations or agency leadership. As a result, compliance obligations applicable to our institutions may become more complex, burdensome, or costly, and may require material changes to our operations. In recent years, the Department has adopted or revised numerous regulations affecting Title IV participation, including the Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment Rule, financial responsibility, administrative capability, the 90-10 Rule, distance education and certification regulations. Depending on the rule, these regulations became effective, or are scheduled to become effective, on July 1 of 2023, 2024 or 2026. In July 2025, President Trump signed into law the Reconciliation Act, which made broad changes to federal spending, including significant amendments to federal student programs under the HEA. Among other things, the Act eliminates and replaces Grad PLUS loans for new graduate and professional students, imposes new annual and lifetime borrowing limits across multiple loan programs, establishing a new earnings-based eligibility requirement for federal student loans that applies equally to all higher education institutions, and adopts new loan repayment options. The changes generally take effect beginning July 1, 2026, and apply prospectively to new borrowers. Some of the changes are the subject of current rulemaking by the Department. For more information, see Item 1, "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation" for more information on changes to federal student aid programs We anticipate that a number of other regulatory changes may be forthcoming. We have been operating with dramatic shifts in regulatory approaches across different presidential administrations, resulting in a significant number of regulations being adopted, subsequently rescinded, or revised, then re-adopted. The HEA governs the federal government's support of postsecondary education and requires periodic reauthorization by Congress, which last occurred in 2008. The reauthorization of the HEA historically has resulted in significant changes to program requirements and institutional participation in Title IV Programs. Additionally, funding levels for student financial assistance programs are determined annually through the appropriations process and may be affected by broader federal budgetary or policy priorities. See Item 1, "Business-Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation-Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives," for more information about the reauthorization of the HEA. In recent years, Congress, the Department, states, accrediting agencies, the CFPB, the FTC, state attorneys general, consumer advocacy groups, and the media have scrutinized the for-profit postsecondary education sector. See Item 1, "Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector," for more information about the focus on our industry. This scrutiny has resulted in significant regulatory changes and increased enforcement efforts designed to target and limit for-profit postsecondary education. See Item 1, "Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Legislative Action and Recent Department Regulatory Initiatives," for an overview of regulatory initiatives by the Department. In addition, ongoing efforts by states and activist groups to change state authorization regulations, State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement ("SARA") reciprocity rules, and other state-by-state standards could further increase regulatory compliance burdens and operational complexity related to our business. See Item 1, "Business - Accreditation, State Regulation and Other Compliance Matters - State Regulation," for more information about state regulation and SARA. As in the past, recent and future regulatory changes-whether arising from legislation, rulemaking, enforcement actions, or shifts in regulatory interpretation-may have significant impacts on our business, potentially requiring a large number of operational changes, changes to and elimination of certain educational programs, or other fundamental changes to our business. These actions could reduce our student enrollments and profitability or limit our ability to maintain or grow our business. These recent and future regulatory changes may also make compliance with regulatory requirements even more complex and difficult.

Our institutions, like all proprietary institutions of higher education, are subject to the "90-10 Rule" under the HEA. Under this rule, a proprietary institution will be ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs for at least two fiscal years if, for any two consecutive fiscal years, it derives more than 90% of its cash basis revenue, as defined in the rule, from federal funds, including Title IV Program funds or other qualifying federal funding sources, including tuition assistance programs offered by the U.S. Department of Defense (military tuition assistance) and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (veterans education benefits). An institution that derives more than 90% of its cash receipts from qualifying federal funding sources for any fiscal year will be placed on provisional participation status for its next two fiscal years and must provide notices to existing students about the potential loss of Title IV funding. If the institution violates the 90-10 Rule for two consecutive fiscal years and becomes ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs, but continues to disburse Title IV Program funds, the Department would require the repayment of all Title IV Program funds received by it after the effective date of the loss of eligibility. The issuance of any required notice could deter prospective students from enrolling at our institutions and current students from continuing in their programs. We have limited ability to control the amount of Title IV Program funds, military or veteran education benefits, or other federal funds sought by or awarded to our students. Additionally, the lack of visibility into federal fund sources that students utilize, the timing of the identification of the federal fund sources applicable to the 90-10 Rule, and the lack of clarity regarding the definition of federal funds make it difficult to predict future compliance with the 90-10 Rule. Although we have implemented various measures intended to reduce the percentage of our institutions' cash basis revenue attributable to federal funding sources, including efforts to diversify the sources of our revenue, these measures may not be sufficient to ensure our compliance with the 90-10 Rule in the future. We may be required to modify our business operations, including reducing investments in prospective student outreach, recruitment, and enrollment growth in order to preserve Title IV eligibility for our existing students. In addition to the consequences described above, the financial responsibility rule, discussed further below, imposes mandatory consequences for failure to comply for one year of the 90-10 Rule. A one-year violation triggers a requirement to provide financial protection equal to at least 10 percent of the institution's prior-year Title IV funding, which must remain in place until the institution passes the 90-10 Rule for two consecutive fiscal years. The Department has discretion to impose a wide range of additional conditions as part of its provisional certification. These conditions may include but are not limited to restrictions on the total amount of Title IV Program funds that may be distributed to students attending the institutions; restrictions on programmatic, enrollment, and geographic expansion; requirements to obtain and post letters of credit; and additional reporting requirements to include additional interim financial or enrollment reporting. See Item 1, "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation – Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations - ‘90-10 Rule,'" for more information about the 90-10 Rule and the measures we have implemented to improve our compliance. If any of our institutions were to lose eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs due to violation of the 90-10 Rule, the institution would experience a dramatic decline in revenue and would be unable to continue its business as it currently is conducted. Past and future efforts to manage compliance with the 90-10 Rule for institutions may require actions that reduce our revenue, increase our operating expenses, or rely on interpretations of the 90-10 Rule or other Title IV regulations that are without clear precedent, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Federal accountability regulations governing eligibility for Title IV student financial aid impose program-level accountability standards and disclosure obligations that could result in required warnings to students, limitations, or loss of federal aid eligibility, or required program closures. These requirements include: the existing Gainful Employment ("GE") rule, which applies only to proprietary institutions and to certain non-degree programs at other institutions; a statutory earnings premium measure that applies to all degree programs at all institutions; and a proposed revision to the GE rule that would apply the statutory earnings premium as the sole GE measure. Collectively, these requirements could materially and adversely affect programs offered by AIUS, CTU and USAHS, and our enrollments, revenues, operating results and growth prospects. For a discussion of the Department's October 2023 GE and Financial Value Transparency ("FVT") regulations, see Item 1, "Business - Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation - Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations - Gainful Employment and Financial Value Transparency." The Reconciliation Act established an earnings premium measure that applies to all degree programs at all institutions that participate in the Direct Loan Program. Through the Accountability in Higher Education and Access through Demand-driven Workforce Pell ("AHEAD") rulemaking, the Department has proposed regulations to implement that statutory earnings premium measure and to harmonize the existing GE framework with that statutory earnings premium measure, including by eliminating the current debt-to-earnings metric. Under the proposal, covered programs at participating institutions would be evaluated under an earnings-premium measure that compares program-level median earnings to statutory benchmarks, rather than under the existing GE rule's dual metrics applicable to proprietary institutions. Programs that repeatedly fail the statutory measure or the new GE requirements would lose eligibility to participate in the Direct Loan Program, but, unlike the current GE rule, this failure would not generally by itself terminate Pell Grant eligibility. To implement the statutory approach, the Department's proposal would: (i) eliminate the debt-to-earnings metric in the GE rule; (ii) establish earnings premium thresholds based on reference to statutory benchmarks; and (iii) narrow institutional reporting obligations to data needed to calculate the earnings-premium measure and produce required net-price disclosures. In addition, the proposal would shorten the period of ineligibility for programs that fail the earnings-premium measure from three years to two years and revise required student warning requirements to track statutory notice language. Finally, the Department would expand its administrative capability authority for institutions with persistent low-earning program outcomes. An institution would be deemed administratively incapable if, in two of three consecutive award years, at least half of its Title IV aid recipients or Title IV funds are tied to programs that fail applicable earnings thresholds, resulting in provisional certification and Title IV ineligibility for the affected programs. These proposals have not yet been implemented through final regulations and may be revised, delayed or not adopted. We continue to evaluate the potential impact of the new earnings-premium requirement and to monitor the ongoing rulemaking process. Given the complexity of the statutory and regulatory framework, the absence of final implementing regulations, and limited visibility into the underlying earnings data used to calculate the applicable metrics, we are unable to predict the timing or ultimate impact of these requirements on our business. Any failure to comply with applicable accountability requirements, including the existing GE rule or a final earnings premium rule, or an expansion of accountability standards, disclosure obligations, or adverse program-level determinations, could result in limitations or loss of Title IV eligibility and materially and adversely affect our student enrollments, profitability, business viability, financial condition and results of operations. See Item 1, "Business – Student Financial Aid and Related Federal Regulation -- Compliance with Federal Regulatory Standards and Effect of Federal Regulatory Violations - Gainful Employment and Financial Value Transparency," above, for additional information regarding the statutory and regulatory changes to federal accountability standards and related timelines.