Want to see NVCT full AI Analyst Report?
Nuvectis Pharma (NVCT) Risk Analysis
Risk Overview Q2, 2026
Risk Change Over Time
- Innovation / R&D - Risk 1We are early in our development efforts and are substantially dependent on our ability to advance NXP100, NXP200, NXP900 or any of our other future product candidates through preclinical and clinical development, identify safe and effective doses and dosing schedules for our drug candidates, obtain regulatory approval and ultimately commercialize NXP100, NXP200, NXP900 or any of our other future product candidates; if we experience delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.
Our ability to generate product revenues from NXP100, NXP200, NXP900 or any of our other future product candidates depends heavily on the successful clinical development and eventual commercialization of these drug candidates. In addition, our drug development programs may contemplate the development of companion diagnostics, which are assays or tests to identify an appropriate patient population based on genetic mutations and other alterations. Companion diagnostics are subject to regulation as medical devices and must themselves receive marketing authorization from the FDA or certain other foreign regulatory agencies before they may be marketed. If a companion diagnostic is essential to the safe and effective use of any of our current and future product candidates, the FDA may require that the companion diagnostic meets the applicable standard for safety and effectiveness or for substantial equivalence for use with our product candidates before either the product candidates or companion diagnostic may be marketed in the United States. Negative preclinical or clinical results in the development of our product candidates may prevent or delay our ability to advance our product candidates, initiate or continue clinical programs or receive regulatory approvals. For example, although we believe, based on preclinical studies of SRC/YES1 related carcinoma models that demonstrated tumor growth inhibition, these cancer types might be particularly sensitive to treatment with NXP900, this may not prove true in clinical testing, due to safety and tolerability issues and/or insufficient efficacy, and this may hold true for any or all of the potential target indications that we are pursuing or will pursue in the future with our product candidates. Moreover, anti-tumor activity may be different in each tumor type that we plan to evaluate in clinical trials. As a result, we may be required to discontinue development of our drug candidates or invest significant additional resources and delay our clinical trials and ultimately the approval, if any, of any of our other future product candidates. Our current or future product candidates may not show favorable results in early clinical trials due to safety, tolerability and/or insufficient efficacy findings. In addition, positive results of early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results, and any product candidate that we advance may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval. For example,following a preliminary analysis of safety and efficacy data results from the Phase 1b study of NXP800 in platinum-resistant ARID1a-mutated ovarian carcinoma, we decided to cease the clinical development of NXP800 in this indication. We may experience setbacks that could delay or prevent regulatory approval of, or our ability to commercialize, NXP100, NXP200 and NXP900, or future product candidates, including: - negative or inconclusive preclinical or clinical results, including adverse safety findings and efficacy findings;- approval of competing product candidates based on clinical trial results generated by others;- a decision by us or requirement by regulatory authorities to conduct additional preclinical testing or clinical trials or abandon a program;- adverse events or side effects experienced by patients or subjects in our clinical trials that we, the FDA, or other regulators may view as relevant to the development of our current or future product candidates;- issues related to combination regimens, including tolerability concerns, drug-drug interactions, or lack of efficacy;- delays in submitting IND applications or comparable foreign applications or delays or failure in obtaining the necessary approvals from regulators to commence a clinical trial, or a suspension or termination of a clinical trial once commenced;- requirements imposed by the FDA or comparable foreign authorities regarding the scope and design of our clinical trials, including our clinical endpoints;- delays in enrolling subjects in clinical trials, including difficulty or delays in identifying appropriate patients, and timely completion of clinical trials, including under GCP or GLP requirements;- inability to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, including our contract manufacturers' compliance with cGMPs, and complying effectively with other requirements pertaining to the quality of our current or future product candidates;- high drop-out rates of subjects from clinical trials due to safety and tolerability issues or insufficient efficacy;- inadequate supply or quality of our current or future product candidates or other materials necessary for the clinical trials and to satisfy analytical testing requirements necessary for drug approval;- higher than anticipated clinical trial costs;- competitive developments by others in our target indications;- insufficient efficacy, safety, or tolerability concerns, or the requirement to modify dosing levels for our current or future product candidates;- trial results taking longer than anticipated;- trials being subjected to fraud or data integrity issues or operational failures that compromises trial data;- the results of our trials not supporting marketing authorization outside of the United States, including the European Union;- unfavorable FDA or other regulatory agency inspection of a clinical trial site;- failure of our third-party contractors or investigators to comply with regulatory requirements or otherwise meet their contractual obligations in a timely manner, or at all;- delays and changes in regulatory requirements, policy and guidelines, including the imposition of additional regulatory oversight around clinical development generally or with respect to our technology in particular; or - varying interpretations of data by the FDA and similar foreign regulatory agencies. In addition, because we have limited financial and personnel resources and are focusing primarily on developing NXP100, NXP200 and NXP900, we may forgo or delay pursuit of other future product candidates that may prove to have greater commercial potential and may fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a future product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to those future product candidates through collaboration, licensing, or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such future product candidates.
- Trade Secrets - Risk 2We currently hold a license to certain intellectual property rights relating to our product candidates, NXP100, NXP200 and NXP900, as well as intellectual property rights relating to other compounds that modulate the SRC and YES1 kinases. If we are unable to maintain patent and other intellectual property protection for NXP100, NXP200 and NXP900, and to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protections for our other current or future product candidates and technology, or if the scope of intellectual property protection obtained or maintained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products and technology similar or identical to ours, and our ability to commercialize NXP100, NXP200, NXP900, or any other current or future product candidates or technology may be adversely affected.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection in the United States and other countries with respect to our current or future product candidates, their respective components, formulations, combination therapies, methods used to manufacture them and methods of treatment and development that are important to our business, as well as successfully defending these patents against third-party challenges. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property rights, or if the intellectual property rights we are able to obtain are insufficiently broad and exclusive, competitors may be able to erode or negate any competitive advantage we may have, which could harm our business and ability to achieve profitability. We intend to rely upon a combination of patents, patent applications, confidentiality agreements, trade secret protection and license agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our current or future product candidates and technologies. Any disclosure to or misappropriation by third parties of our confidential proprietary information could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market. We, or any current or future partners, collaborators, or licensees, may fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them. We may be also unable to exclusively license relevant technology and associated intellectual property developed by others. Therefore, we may miss potential opportunities to establish our patent position. If we are unable to secure additional patent protection or maintain existing or future patent protection with respect to NXP100, NXP200, NXP900, or any other proprietary products and technology we develop, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects would be materially harmed. We currently hold a license to certain intellectual property relating to NXP100, NXP200 and NXP900. We have licensed one patent family covering the composition of matter for NXP100, NXP200 and NXP900, which have been granted in key territories including the U.S., EU, Japan, and China. The statutory expiration for patents is March 2042 for NXP100, July 2042 for NXP200 and April 2036 for NXP900, without considering any possible patent term extension. If the scope of our patent protection, whether now or in the future, with respect to NXP100, NXP200, NXP900, or our future product candidates and technology is not sufficiently broad, we will be unable to prevent others from using our technology or from developing or commercializing technology and products similar or identical to ours or other competing products and technologies. Any failure to obtain or maintain patent protection, through our own patents or through in-licensing, with respect to NXP100, NXP200, NXP900 and our future product candidates would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Even if they are unchallenged, our patent applications, if issued, and any patents we may own or in-license now or in the future, may not provide us with any meaningful protection or prevent competitors from designing around our patent claims to circumvent any patents we may own or in-license in the future by developing similar or alternative technologies or therapeutics in a non-infringing manner. If the patent protection provided by our patent applications or any patents we may pursue with respect to our current or future product candidates is not sufficiently broad to impede competition, our ability to successfully commercialize our current or future product candidates could be negatively affected, which would harm our business. Additionally, we cannot be certain that the claims in our patent applications covering composition of matter (or other related aspects) of our current or future product candidates or technology will be considered patentable by the USPTO, or by patent offices in foreign countries, or that the claims in any issued patents we may own or in-license in the future will be considered patentable by courts in the United States or foreign countries. The issuance of a patent does not foreclose challenges to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability. Therefore, our owned and in-licensed patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and elsewhere. Such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part. Successful patent challenges could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such product candidates might expire before or shortly after such product candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and in-licensed patents may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours. Moreover, patents or patent applications owned or filed by us, or by our licensors or other collaborators, may be challenged or narrowed by third-party pre-issuance submissions of prior art to the USPTO, or by opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter parties review, post-grant review or interference proceedings. An adverse determination in any such submission, Patent Trial and Appeal Board trial, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, render unenforceable, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates.
Risk Highlights Q2, 2026
Risk Word Cloud
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 52
- Innovation / R&D - Risk 1ChangedWe are early in our development efforts and are substantially dependent on our ability to advance NXP100, NXP200, NXP900 or any of our other future product candidates through preclinical and clinical development, identify safe and effective doses and dosing schedules for our drug candidates, obtain regulatory approval and ultimately commercialize NXP100, NXP200, NXP900 or any of our other future product candidates; if we experience delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.
Our ability to generate product revenues from NXP100, NXP200, NXP900 or any of our other future product candidates depends heavily on the successful clinical development and eventual commercialization of these drug candidates. In addition, our drug development programs may contemplate the development of companion diagnostics, which are assays or tests to identify an appropriate patient population based on genetic mutations and other alterations. Companion diagnostics are subject to regulation as medical devices and must themselves receive marketing authorization from the FDA or certain other foreign regulatory agencies before they may be marketed. If a companion diagnostic is essential to the safe and effective use of any of our current and future product candidates, the FDA may require that the companion diagnostic meets the applicable standard for safety and effectiveness or for substantial equivalence for use with our product candidates before either the product candidates or companion diagnostic may be marketed in the United States. Negative preclinical or clinical results in the development of our product candidates may prevent or delay our ability to advance our product candidates, initiate or continue clinical programs or receive regulatory approvals. For example, although we believe, based on preclinical studies of SRC/YES1 related carcinoma models that demonstrated tumor growth inhibition, these cancer types might be particularly sensitive to treatment with NXP900, this may not prove true in clinical testing, due to safety and tolerability issues and/or insufficient efficacy, and this may hold true for any or all of the potential target indications that we are pursuing or will pursue in the future with our product candidates. Moreover, anti-tumor activity may be different in each tumor type that we plan to evaluate in clinical trials. As a result, we may be required to discontinue development of our drug candidates or invest significant additional resources and delay our clinical trials and ultimately the approval, if any, of any of our other future product candidates. Our current or future product candidates may not show favorable results in early clinical trials due to safety, tolerability and/or insufficient efficacy findings. In addition, positive results of early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results, and any product candidate that we advance may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval. For example,following a preliminary analysis of safety and efficacy data results from the Phase 1b study of NXP800 in platinum-resistant ARID1a-mutated ovarian carcinoma, we decided to cease the clinical development of NXP800 in this indication. We may experience setbacks that could delay or prevent regulatory approval of, or our ability to commercialize, NXP100, NXP200 and NXP900, or future product candidates, including: - negative or inconclusive preclinical or clinical results, including adverse safety findings and efficacy findings;- approval of competing product candidates based on clinical trial results generated by others;- a decision by us or requirement by regulatory authorities to conduct additional preclinical testing or clinical trials or abandon a program;- adverse events or side effects experienced by patients or subjects in our clinical trials that we, the FDA, or other regulators may view as relevant to the development of our current or future product candidates;- issues related to combination regimens, including tolerability concerns, drug-drug interactions, or lack of efficacy;- delays in submitting IND applications or comparable foreign applications or delays or failure in obtaining the necessary approvals from regulators to commence a clinical trial, or a suspension or termination of a clinical trial once commenced;- requirements imposed by the FDA or comparable foreign authorities regarding the scope and design of our clinical trials, including our clinical endpoints;- delays in enrolling subjects in clinical trials, including difficulty or delays in identifying appropriate patients, and timely completion of clinical trials, including under GCP or GLP requirements;- inability to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, including our contract manufacturers' compliance with cGMPs, and complying effectively with other requirements pertaining to the quality of our current or future product candidates;- high drop-out rates of subjects from clinical trials due to safety and tolerability issues or insufficient efficacy;- inadequate supply or quality of our current or future product candidates or other materials necessary for the clinical trials and to satisfy analytical testing requirements necessary for drug approval;- higher than anticipated clinical trial costs;- competitive developments by others in our target indications;- insufficient efficacy, safety, or tolerability concerns, or the requirement to modify dosing levels for our current or future product candidates;- trial results taking longer than anticipated;- trials being subjected to fraud or data integrity issues or operational failures that compromises trial data;- the results of our trials not supporting marketing authorization outside of the United States, including the European Union;- unfavorable FDA or other regulatory agency inspection of a clinical trial site;- failure of our third-party contractors or investigators to comply with regulatory requirements or otherwise meet their contractual obligations in a timely manner, or at all;- delays and changes in regulatory requirements, policy and guidelines, including the imposition of additional regulatory oversight around clinical development generally or with respect to our technology in particular; or - varying interpretations of data by the FDA and similar foreign regulatory agencies. In addition, because we have limited financial and personnel resources and are focusing primarily on developing NXP100, NXP200 and NXP900, we may forgo or delay pursuit of other future product candidates that may prove to have greater commercial potential and may fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a future product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to those future product candidates through collaboration, licensing, or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such future product candidates.
- Innovation / R&D - Risk 2Our development approach may never lead to marketable products.
The patient populations for our product candidates and potential future product candidates may be limited to those with specific molecular alterations and be substantially smaller than the general population of cancer patients. Successful identification of patients is dependent on several factors, including achieving certainty as to how diseases with specific molecular alterations respond to our current product candidates or any future product candidates and, if necessary, developing companion diagnostics to identify such molecular alterations. Furthermore, even if we are successful in identifying patients, we cannot be certain that the resulting patient populations for our target indications will be large enough to achieve profitability. In addition, even if our approach is successful, we may never successfully identify additional diseases in which our product candidates may be effective. We do not know if our approach of treating patients with genetically defined cancers will be successful; and if our approach is unsuccessful, our business will suffer.
- Innovation / R&D - Risk 3Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain outcomes, clinical trials are difficult to design and implement, and any of our clinical trials could produce unsuccessful results or fail at any stage in the process.
Clinical trials are conducted on humans, are expensive, can take many years to complete, and outcomes are inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the process. Additionally, any positive results of preclinical studies and early clinical data of a drug candidate may not be predictive of the final results of the early clinical trial or of later-stage clinical trials. Drug candidates may not reach later-stage clinical trials based on results from an early-stage clinical trial or may reach later stages of clinical trials and fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having shown indications of those traits in preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in early and advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in preclinical studies or preliminary clinical findings. Therefore, the results of any existing and future clinical trials we conduct may not be successful. Clinical trials may be delayed, suspended or prematurely terminated because costs are greater than we anticipate or for a variety of reasons, such as: - delay or failure in reaching agreement with the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority on a clinical trial design that we are able to execute;- delay or failure in obtaining authorization to commence a clinical trial, including approval from the appropriate institutional review board ("IRB") to conduct testing of a candidate on human subjects, or inability to comply with conditions imposed by a regulatory authority regarding the scope or design of a clinical trial;- delay in reaching, or failure to reach, agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and clinical trial sites;- inability, delay or failure in identifying and maintaining a sufficient number of clinical trial sites, many of which may already be engaged in other clinical programs;- delay or failure in identifying, recruiting and enrolling suitable volunteers or patients to participate in a trial;- delay or failure in developing and validating companion diagnostics, if they are deemed necessary, on a timely basis;- failure of patients to complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;- inability to monitor patients adequately during or after treatment;- clinical sites and investigators deviating from trial protocols, failing to conduct the trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or dropping out of a trial;- failure to initiate, delay of, or inability to complete a clinical trial as a result of a clinical hold imposed by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority due to observed safety findings or other reasons;- negative or inconclusive results in our clinical trials, and our decision to our regulators' requirement that we conduct additional preclinical studies, clinical trials or that we abandon one or more of our product development programs; or - inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of a drug candidate of acceptable quality for use in clinical trials. We rely, and plan to continue to rely, on CROs, contract manufacturing organizations ("CMOs") and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials. Although we have and expect that we will have agreements in place with CROs and CMOs governing their contracted activities and conduct, we will have limited influence over their actual performance. As a result, we ultimately do not and will not have control over a CRO's or CMO's compliance with the terms of any agreement it may have with us, its compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, or its adherence to agreed-upon time schedules and deadlines, and a future CRO's or CMO's failure to perform those obligations could subject any of our clinical trials to delays or failure. Further, we may also encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended, is put on clinical hold or terminated by us, by any IRB or ethics committee, by a Data Safety Monitoring Board, or by the FDA or European Medicines Agency ("EMA"), or other regulatory authority. A suspension or termination may be due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities, exposing participants to health risks caused by unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, development of previously unseen safety issues, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug candidate, or changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions. Therefore, we cannot predict with any certainty the schedule for commencement or completion of any currently ongoing, planned or future clinical trials. Many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval for our current or future product candidates. If we experience delays in the commencement or completion of, or suspension, hold or termination of, any clinical trial for our drug candidates, the commercial prospects of the drug candidate could be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from the drug candidate may be delayed or eliminated. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow down our drug candidate development and approval process and jeopardize regulatory approval of our drug candidates and our ability to commence sales and generate revenues. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects significantly.
- Innovation / R&D - Risk 4Difficulty in enrolling patients could delay or prevent clinical trials of our current or future product candidates.
Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical studies of our current or future product candidates is critical to our success. The timing of completion of our clinical studies depends in part on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in testing our current or future product candidates and we may experience delays in our clinical trials if we encounter difficulties in enrollment. Further, because we are currently focused on patients with specific and rare diseases, our ability to enroll eligible patients may be limited and may result in slower enrollment than we anticipate. Our clinical trials will compete with other clinical trials for current or future product candidates that are in the same therapeutic areas as our current or future product candidates, which may reduce the number and types of patients available to us. Clinical trials may be subject to delays as a result of patient enrollment taking longer than anticipated or greater than anticipated subject withdrawal. We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for our current or future product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities. We cannot predict how successful we will be at enrolling subjects in future clinical trials. The enrollment of patients depends on many factors, including: - patient identification and eligibility and inclusion/exclusion criteria defined in the protocol, including based on the presence of specific genetic/molecular alterations;- the size of the target disease patient population or the size of the patient population required to be enrolled for analysis of the clinical trial's primary and secondary endpoints and the process for identifying patients;- potential disruptions caused by major public health issues, including difficulties in initiating clinical sites, enrolling and retaining participants, diversion of health care resources away from clinical trials, travel or quarantine policies that may be implemented, and other factors;- we are developing our drug candidates for certain rare diseases which may require us to engage clinical sites outside of the US in order to enroll appropriate patients into clinical trials. This can prolong the clinical trial process and increase the costs associated with the clinical trials - the proximity of patients to clinical trial sites;- the design of the trial;- our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and expertise;- clinicians' and patients' perceptions as to the potential advantages and risks of the product candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new products that may be approved for the indications we are investigating;- the availability of competing commercially available therapies and other competing product candidates' clinical trials;- our ability to obtain and maintain IRB approvals for clinical sites and clinical trial subject informed consents; and - the risk that subjects enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before completion. If we are unable to locate and enroll sufficient eligible patients to participate, as required by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities, we may be unable to initiate or continue clinical trials for our current or future product candidates. If necessary, we intend to engage third parties to develop companion diagnostics for use in our clinical trials. If such third parties are unsuccessful, our difficulty in identifying patients with the targeted genetic mutations for our clinical trials would be increased. If we are unable to include patients with the targeted genetic mutations or patients with well-defined serious unmet medical needs, we may be unable to participate in the FDA's expedited review and development programs, including breakthrough therapy designation and fast track designation, or otherwise seek to accelerate clinical development and regulatory timelines.
- Innovation / R&D - Risk 5Our clinical studies, preclinical, manufacturing and other studies conducted as part of the development of our current or future product candidates may fail to adequately demonstrate the safety, potency, purity, efficacy or any other necessary pharmacological properties of any efficacy, or any other required properties of our current or future product candidates, which would prevent or delay development, regulatory approval and commercialization.
Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of our current or future product candidates, including NXP100, NXP200, and NXP900, we must demonstrate through lengthy, complex and expensive studies that our current or future product candidates are both safe and effective for use in each target indication. Preclinical and clinical testing are expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the preclinical study and clinical trial processes, and, because our current product candidates are in an early stage of development, there is a high risk of failure. The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of a drug candidate may not be predictive of the final results of later-stage clinical trials. Results of our trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of adverse safety issues which may result in suspension or termination, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could, through a clinical hold or otherwise, require us to halt or suspend further development of our product candidates or deny approval. Drug-related side effects could also affect patient recruitment into the study or patient willingness to remain in the study and therefore affect our ability to complete clinical trials. Drug-related side effects could also result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly. Moreover, our product or product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or pharmacological properties, either as single agent treatment or in combination with approved drugs, that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval or impact their availability and commercial potential after approval.
- Innovation / R&D - Risk 6We may not be able to submit IND applications to commence additional clinical trials based on the timelines that we expect, and even if we are able to do so, the FDA may not permit us to proceed.
Our IND for NXP900 is in effect. However, we may be unable to submit additional IND or similar applications or other clinical research on our expected timelines for NXP100 and NXP200. Moreover, while we have previously obtained Clinical Trial Application ("CTA") and IND, we cannot be sure that issues will not arise that may lead to the delay, suspension or termination of such clinical trials. Any failure to file, IND or similar applications or other clinical research authorizations will adversely impact our expected timelines to obtain regulatory acceptance for the commencement of our trials and may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our products on a timely basis, if at all.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.