TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

TeraWulf Inc (WULF) AI Stock Analysis

MX:WULF

TeraWulf Inc

(BMV:WULF)

Rating:―N/A
Action:N/A
Date:―

No summary available

Positive Factors
Contracted HPC RevenueThe long-term Anthropic lease materially improves revenue visibility and supports TeraWulf’s transition toward contracted high-performance computing infrastructure. A large committed customer relationship can underpin future utilization, financing access, and recurring lease economics as additional capacity is delivered.
Negative Factors
Persistent UnprofitabilityStrong gross margins have not translated into sustainable profitability because operating costs and other charges remain much larger than gross profit. Continued deep losses reduce internally generated capital, increase dependence on external financing, and make execution of the expansion plan more financially sensitive.

TeraWulf Inc (WULF) vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

-40%-20%0%20%40%60%80%MX:WULF-22.01%SPY+11.79%Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Market Cap
MXN 5.85B
Dividend Yield
―
Average Volume (3M)
3,318
Price to Earnings (P/E)
-2.7
Beta (1Y)
0.87
Revenue Growth
4.45%
EPS Growth
-1042.40%
Country
Mexico
Employees
141
Sector
Financial
Sector Strength
68
Industry
Financial - Capital Markets

TeraWulf Inc Business Overview & Revenue Model

Company Description

TeraWulf Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates digital infrastructure in the United States. It also develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities for bitcoin mining and high-performance computing workloads, leveraging clean...

TeraWulf Inc Earnings Call Summary

Earnings Call Date:Aug 04, 2026(Q2-2026)|% Change Since:-32.98%|Next Earnings Date:Feb 16, 2022
Earnings Call SentimentPositive

The call emphasizes strong execution milestones, meaningful contracted revenue growth (notably the 401 MW Anthropic lease representing ~$19B), improved liquidity and project-level economics (FluidStack amendments, pro forma capitalization moving toward more equity). At the same time, the company faces near-term headwinds including large noncash GAAP losses from warrant revaluation, negative adjusted EBITDA driven by pre-revenue costs, elevated cash interest payments, and execution constraints around skilled electrical labor and tenant-driven design changes. On balance, the operational progress, sizable contracted backlog, solid liquidity and constructive financing posture outweigh the near-term accounting and execution challenges.

Positive Updates

CB-3 Delivery and Operating Capacity
CB-3 fully delivered and generating lease revenue, bringing total revenue-generating critical IT capacity at Lake Mariner to 102 MW; completion satisfied conditions making $600M of Google credit support effective. CB-4 is in commissioning (Level 2) with first data hall expected to hit Level 4 and begin revenue late September; CB-5 first data hall expected to begin energizing in very early January.

Negative Updates

Large GAAP Net Loss Driven by Noncash Warrant Revaluation
GAAP net loss attributable to TeraWulf was $939.9M in Q2 versus $427.6M in Q1, primarily driven by a $755.7M noncash loss from the change in fair value of Google warrants (Q1 loss was $216.3M). The change had no liquidity impact but materially increased reported net loss.

Company Guidance

Management reaffirmed a target to contract an incremental 250–500 MW of critical IT capacity per year and provided detailed operational and financial guidance: Lake Mariner entered Q3 with 102 operating critical MW (CB‑3 online), CB‑4 is in Level‑2 commissioning (Level‑3 mid‑August, Level‑4 late September) and CB‑5 is expected to begin energizing its first data hall in very early January; the Anthropic lease is ~401 MW (~$19 billion over an initial 20‑year term) and the Abernathy JV sale is ~ $530 million (with $250M received, ~$150M due by 12/31/26 and ~$130M by 4/30/27). Liquidity and project finance targets: cash and restricted cash $3.0B (parent unrestricted cash ~$1.2B, pro forma ~$1.45B including Abernathy), WULF Compute gross cash ~$1.9B (~$1.5B net), ~$2.3B of project capex completed and ~$1.7B remaining, pro forma capitalization ~32% equity / 68% debt (vs ~26%/74% at financing), and estimated total project cost ~ $9.1M per critical IT MW (within prior $8–10M guidance). Financial cadence and margins: Q2 revenue $44.8M with HPC lease revenue $31.9M (+52% QoQ, ~71% of revenue), reported HPC leasing margin ~28% (adjusted to ~80% after removing tenant fit‑out, pre‑revenue and development items) vs a long‑term target of ~85%; TeraWulf will contribute ~$150M of tenant fit‑out costs (expected to generate >$300M incremental lease revenue over 10 years and, together with capacity increases from 162→168 MW, >$500M incremental lease revenue over initial terms). Other guidance items: peak electrician workforce scaled to ~1,000 to meet schedules, full‑year adjusted SG&A expected $75–100M, adjusted EBITDA was negative $18.3M in Q2, and management expects existing liquidity plus Abernathy proceeds to fund Lake Mariner commitments, Justified equity, Muskie LOCs, the Chesapeake acquisition and near‑term growth without returning to the equity markets.

TeraWulf Inc Risk Analysis

TeraWulf Inc disclosed 42 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. TeraWulf Inc reported the most risks in the "Finance & Corporate" category.

Higher RiskSector Avg.Lower RiskFinance & CorporateTech & InnovationLegal & RegulatoryProductionAbility to SellMacro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Latest Risks Added

1 New Risk
1.Our business faces many risks. Before deciding whether to invest in our Common Stock, in addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, which is incorporated herein by reference. If any of the risks or uncertainties described therein actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow could be materially and adversely affected. This could cause the trading price of our Common Stock to decline, resulting in a loss of all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties we have described are not the only ones facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business operations. There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.Q1, 2026

TeraWulf Inc Peers Comparison

Overall Rating

UnderperformOutperform
Sector (68)

Financial Indicators

MX:WULF against its peers
NameOverall RatingMarket CapP/E RatioROEDividend YieldRevenue GrowthEPS Growth
Sector *68Neutral$18.00B11.429.92%3.81%9.73%1.22%
RIOTRIOT53Neutral$4.81B-3.48-48.36%―24.51%-842.33%
HUTHUT50Neutral$7.32B-11.17-39.50%―129.50%-441.42%
BTBTBTBT49Neutral$288.51M-0.93-46.72%―23.36%-150.86%
MARAMARA48Neutral$2.62B-0.72-110.39%―0.73%-642.27%
CLSKCLSK47Neutral$1.97B-2.05-75.24%―7.49%-468.86%

* Financial Sector Average

Performance Comparison

-50%0%50%100%MX:WULFRIOTMARABTBTHUTCLSKDec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
MX:WULF and its peers over the selected period
Show on chartTickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
MX:WULFTerawulf Inc.219.14-81.86-27.20%
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.12.81-7.91-38.18%
MARAMARA Holdings, Inc6.77-11.04-61.99%
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.0.80-2.62-76.61%
HUTHut 8 Corp.59.404.408.00%
CLSKCleanspark, Inc.7.67-9.75-55.97%
Glossary
BuyA stock rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the stock is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other stocks in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldA stock rated as a "Hold" is expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the stock is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellA stock rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the stock may deliver lower returns compared to other stocks in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst Stock Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in stocks carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.