MasterBrand Inc (MBC) Risk Analysis

The existence of some provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation ("our charter"), our amended and restated bylaws ("our bylaws") and Delaware law may discourage a future takeover attempt not approved by our Board of Directors but which our shareholders may deem to be in their best interests or in which shareholders may receive a substantial premium for their shares over then current market prices. These provisions include but are not limited to: a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms (however, beginning with our 2030 annual meeting, all directors will be elected annually); the right of our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval; no shareholder ability to fill director vacancies; elimination of the rights of our shareholders to act by written consent and call special shareholder meetings; until our Board of Directors is no longer classified, prohibiting shareholders from removing directors other than "for cause"; and rules regarding how shareholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at shareholder meetings. In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL"), which may have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by our Board of Directors, including discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for shares of our common stock. These provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our Board of Directors determines is not in our best interests or the best interests of our shareholders.

Our charter provides that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the state courts within the State of Delaware (or, if no state court located within the State of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware) will be the sole and exclusive forum for (1) any state derivative action or proceeding brought or purporting to be brought on our behalf, (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director or officer of ours to us or our shareholders, (3) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, our charter or our bylaws, (4) any action asserting a claim relating to or involving us governed by the internal affairs doctrine or (5) any action asserting an "internal corporate claim" as that term is defined in Section 115 of the DGCL. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our charter further provides that the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty of liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, and as a result, the exclusive forum provision does not apply to actions arising under the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. While the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions purporting to require claims under the Securities Act be brought in federal court are "facially valid" under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts will enforce our federal forum provision described above. Our shareholders will not be deemed to have waived compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. This exclusive forum provision may limit the ability of our shareholders to bring a claim in a judicial forum that such shareholders find favorable for disputes with us or our directors or officers, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors and officers. Alternatively, if a court were to find this exclusive forum provision inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings described above, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could negatively affect our financial performance.