Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) Risk Analysis

The Company is incorporated in a jurisdiction outside the U.S. In addition, certain of the directors and officers are non-residents of the U.S., and all or a substantial portion of the assets of these non-residents will be located outside the U.S. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for U.S. investors to serve process within the U.S. upon the Company or certain directors and officers or to enforce a judgment against the Company for civil liabilities in U.S. courts. In addition, investors should not assume that courts in the country in which the Company is incorporated (1) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against the Company based upon the civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws or (2) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against the Company based on those laws.

As described above, pursuant to the U.S. Tax Ruling received from the IRS, it has been expected that the receipt of Common Shares by the Company's shareholders pursuant to the Arrangement would be tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 355(a) of the Code. To preserve the intended U.S. federal income tax treatment of the receipt of Common Shares by the Company's shareholders pursuant to the Arrangement, Lithium Argentina and the Company agreed in the Tax Indemnity and Cooperation Agreement to be restricted, except in specific circumstances, from taking or failing to take certain actions that could cause the receipt of Common Shares by the Company's shareholders pursuant to the Arrangement to be taxed in a manner that is inconsistent with the manner provided for in the U.S. Tax Ruling. These restrictions may limit the ability of the Company to pursue certain strategic transactions or other transactions that it believes to be in the best interests of its shareholders or that might increase the value of its business for three years following the completion of the Arrangement.

The U.S. Mining Act and other federal and state laws govern the Company's ability to develop, mine and process the minerals on the unpatented mining claims and/or mill site claims that form Thacker Pass, which are locatable under the U.S. Mining Act. There can be no assurance of title to any of the Company's property interests, or that such title will ultimately be secured. The Company's property interests may also be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers or other land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects and adverse laws and regulations. The Company cannot guarantee that the validity of its unpatented mining claims will not be contested. A successful contest of the unpatented mining claims could result in the Company being unable to develop minerals on the contested unpatented mining claims or being unable to exercise its rights as the owner or locater of the unpatented mining claims. The Company must apply for and obtain approvals and permits from federal and state agencies to conduct exploration, development and mining on its properties. Although the Company has applied for and has received, or anticipates receipt of, such approvals and permits for certain areas where the Company owns mineral rights, there is no assurance that the Company's rights under them will not be affected by legislation or amendment of regulations governing the approvals and permits, or that applicable government agencies will not seek to revoke or significantly alter the conditions of the applicable exploration and mining approvals or permits, or that they will not be challenged or impugned by third parties, resulting in delays.

Changes to government laws and regulations may affect the development of Thacker Pass. Such changes could include laws relating to taxation, royalties, restrictions on production, export controls, tariffs, environmental, biodiversity and ecological compliance, mine development and operations, labor, mine safety, permitting and numerous other aspects of the Company's business. For example, President Trump in a suite of Executive Orders, has directed the pause, modification or revocation of various previous Executive Orders and regulations that directly and indirectly affect the development of Thacker Pass; federal agencies subsequently revised their approach to complying with environmental reviews and federal agencies have taken steps to eliminate an electric vehicle "mandate" which may adversely affect demand for lithium. The Company's business and results of operations may be adversely affected by uncertainty and changes in U.S. trade policies, including tariffs, trade agreements or other trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments. Although the Supreme Court recently invalidated the tariffs imposed by the administration under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA"), certain tariff rates and obligations established through trade agreements that were negotiated during active IEEPA tariffs remain in effect, and the administration announced additional tariffs pursuant to the Trade Act of 1974. The administration has indicated that it will continue seeking to implement tariffs through other statutory authorities as well. These actions are unprecedented and have caused substantial uncertainty and volatility in financial markets, including uncertainty about the availability of refunds for prior tariffs and the imposition of new tariffs to replace those imposed under IEEPA. It remains unclear to what extent, upon which countries, and upon which terms, tariffs may be levied. Because of this, uncertainty remains elevated, as the administration continues to adjust tariff structures and consider additional country specific tariffs. The Company's business requires access to steel and other raw materials for use in the construction of Thacker Pass. Much equipment and construction material has been sourced from Canada, China, India, UAE, Turkey and the European Union, and may be subject to tariffs. The Company has been working toward limiting the effect of any potential tariffs on its construction supply chain, with approximately 75% of the total capital project cost structure related to labor, contractors and other services not expected to be directly affected by any potential tariffs. Any imposition of or increase in tariffs on imports of steel or other raw materials, as well as corresponding price increases for such materials available domestically, could increase the Company's construction costs and negatively impact the Company's ability to complete the construction of Thacker Pass on budget. Higher materials costs could also diminish the Company's ability to develop new projects at acceptable returns, particularly during times of economic uncertainty, and limit the Company's ability to pursue growth opportunities that may otherwise be available to the Company. The imposition of further tariffs by the U.S. on a broader range of imports, or further retaliatory trade measures taken in response to additional tariffs, could increase costs in the Company's supply chain or reduce demand for the Company's or the Company's customers' products, either of which could adversely affect the Company's results of operations. To the extent any such tariffs remain in place for a sustained period of time, or in the event of a global or domestic recession resulting therefrom, the Company's customers could decide to delay currently planned growth projects or forego them entirely, each of which could result in decreased demand for the Company's products and adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition. Changes in tariffs and trade restrictions can be announced with little or no advance notice. The adoption and expansion of tariffs or other trade restrictions, increasing trade tensions, or other changes in governmental policies related to taxes, tariffs, trade agreements or policies, are difficult to predict, which makes attendant risks difficult to anticipate and mitigate. The ultimate impact of these trade measures on the Company's business operations and financial results is uncertain and may be affected by various factors, including whether and when such trade measures are implemented, the timing when such measures may become effective, and the amount, scope or nature of such trade measures, and the Company's ability to execute strategies to mitigate the potential negative impacts resulting therefrom. If the Company is unable to navigate further changes in U.S. or international trade policy, it could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business and results of operations.