TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Incannex Healthcare Limited Sponsored ADR (IXHL) Risk Analysis

Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning. Incannex Healthcare Limited Sponsored ADR disclosed 68 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Incannex Healthcare Limited Sponsored ADR reported the most risks in the “Tech & Innovation” category.

Risk Overview Q1, 2026

Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Mar 31, 2026, filed May 15, 2026

Risk Distribution
68Risks
Sector Avg.Finance & CorporateTech & InnovationLegal & RegulatoryProductionAbility to SellMacro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Risk Change Over Time

Incannex Healthcare Limited Sponsored ADR disclosed risks per quarterNo. of Risks455055606570Q2Q3Q4Q12025Q2Q3Q4Q12026Showing: Q2, 2025
Risks removedRisks addedRisks changedIncannex Healthcare Limited Sponsored ADR Risk Factors
  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
    In May 2025, our stockholders authorized us to complete a reverse stock split of our common stock which our board of directors may elect to do in an effort to regain compliance with the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirements (the "Minimum Bid Price Rule"). Following a reverse stock split, the resulting market price of our Common Stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors and may decline in greater proportion than the ratio of a reverse stock split. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our Common Stock may be adversely affected if we complete a reverse stock split.

    Although we believe that a higher market price of our Common Stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, and we may be required to complete a reverse stock split in an effort to comply with the Minimum Bid Price Rule, there can be no assurance that a reverse stock split, including any reverse stock split that we may complete in an effort to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Rule, would actually result in a sustained or proportional share price increase sufficient to attract new investors, including institutional investors or to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Rule. Any sustained proportionate increase in the market price of our Common Stock is dependent upon many factors, including the success of our research and development efforts, general market conditions, trading activity in our Common Stock and prospects for future success, which are unrelated to the number of shares of our common stock outstanding. It is not uncommon for the market price of a company's common stock to disproportionately decline in the period following a reverse stock split.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
    If we are unable to maintain or regain compliance with the requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq"), this could result in the delisting of our common stock. A delisting of our common stock from Nasdaq could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital through the public or private sale of equity securities, the ability of investors to dispose shares of our common stock or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock and the price and value of our common stock.

    Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The requirements for all Nasdaq market tiers, including the Nasdaq Capital Market, impose a minimum $1.00 per share bid price requirement. To comply with this requirement, the closing price for our common stock must not fall below $1.00 for a 30 consecutive trading day period. Since early March of 2025, the closing bid price for our common stock has consistently been below $1.00 per share, and on April 23, 2025, we received a written notice (the "Notice") from the Listing Qualifications Department (the "Staff") of Nasdaq notifying the us that, because the closing bid price for our common stock, closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days, we no longer met the minimum bid price requirement for continued inclusion on Nasdaq pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) (the "Bid Price Requirement"). The Staff provided us with an initial grace period expiring on October 20, 2025. To regain compliance the closing price of our common stock must exceed a minimum of $1.00 per share for at least 10 consecutive trading days and potentially 20 consecutive trading days in the discretion of the Staff. On or following October 20, 2025, the Staff may provide us with an additional 180-day compliance period in which we may seek to regain compliance with the Minium Bid Price Rule, but there can be no guarantee that such an additional compliance period will be granted or that we will regain compliance within this additional 180-day compliance period. In the event of a delisting notice, we would typically have an opportunity to appeal such decision to the Nasdaq Hearing Panel or take other measures to preserve the listing of our common stock on Nasdaq, but these measures and any appeal may not be successful. If our common stock is delisted by Nasdaq, our common stock may be eligible to trade on an over-the-counter quotation system, where an investor may find it more difficult to sell our common stock or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock. In the event we are delisted from Nasdaq, the only established trading market for our common stock would be eliminated, and we would be forced to list our shares on the OTC Markets or another quotation medium, depending on our ability to meet the specific listing requirements of those quotation systems. As a result, an investor would likely find it more difficult to trade or obtain accurate price quotations for our shares. Delisting would likely also reduce the visibility, liquidity, and value of our common stock, reduce institutional investor interest in our company, and may increase the volatility of our common stock. Delisting could also cause a loss of confidence of potential industry partners, lenders, and employees, which could further harm our business and our future prospects. Unless our common stock is listed on a national securities exchange, such as Nasdaq, our common stock may also be subject to the regulations and restrictions regarding trading in "penny stocks," which are those securities trading for less than $5.00 per share, and that are not otherwise exempted from the definition of a penny stock under other exemptions provided for in the applicable regulations. These penny stock requirements and regulations could severely limit the liquidity of our common stock in the secondary market because fewer brokers or dealers would likely to be willing to undertake related compliance activities to trade in our common stock. If our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange, the rules and restrictions regarding penny stock transactions may limit an investor's ability to sell to a third-party and our trading activity in the secondary market may be reduced. Delisting from Nasdaq would also likely limit the range and attractiveness of strategic alternatives that we are able to consider, adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital through the public or private sale of equity securities, significantly affect the ability of investors to trade our securities, and/or negatively affect the value and liquidity of our common stock.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
    We cannot guarantee that our share repurchase program will be utilized to the full value approved, if at all, or that it will enhance long-term stockholder value. Any repurchases we consummate could increase the volatility of the price of our common stock and could have a negative impact on our available cash balance.

    Our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up to $20 million of our common stock. The manner, timing and amount of any share repurchases may fluctuate and will be determined by us based on a variety of factors, including the market price of our common stock, our priorities for the use of cash to support our business operations and plans, general business and market conditions, tax laws, and alternative investment opportunities. The share repurchase program authorization does not obligate us to acquire any specific number or dollar value of shares. Further, our share repurchases could have an impact on our share trading prices, increase the volatility of the price of our common stock, or reduce our available cash balance such that we will be required to seek financing to support our operations. Our share repurchase program may be modified, suspended, or terminated at any time, which may result in a decrease in the trading prices of our common stock. Even if our share repurchase program is fully implemented, it may not enhance long-term stockholder value. Additionally, repurchases are subject to the 1% share repurchase excise tax enacted by the IRA, which may be offset by shares newly issued during that fiscal year. We have and will continue to take the share repurchase excise tax into account with respect to our decisions to repurchase shares.

  • Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 4
    If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

    Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules and regulations of the SEC require annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent fraud. Ineffective internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock. Our internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements because of inherent limitations. Additionally, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with our policies and procedures. Any failure to design and implement an effective system of internal controls may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls that are deemed to be material weaknesses. A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has concluded that we did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures due to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting which existed as of June 30, 2025, relating to the documentation of accounting policies and procedures, particularly relating to the correct application of complex accounting measures. The measures that we are undertaking to remediate the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting have and will include: (i) hiring qualified internal control personnel or consultants to manage the implementation of internal control policies, procedures and improvement of the internal audit function, as applicable; (ii) developing and implementing written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting that meet the standards applied to public companies listed in the United States; and (iii) conducting internal control training to management, key operations personnel and the accounting department, so that management and relevant personnel understand the requirements and elements of internal control over financial reporting mandated by the U.S. securities laws. This material weakness will not be considered remediated until we have completed implementing the necessary additional applicable controls and operate with these controls for a sufficient period of time to allow management and our auditors to conclude that these controls are operating effectively. While we believe we have made progress in accordance with our remediation plan, we cannot determine when our remediation plan will be fully completed, and we cannot provide any assurance that these remediation efforts will be successful or that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective as a result of these efforts. If we cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence in the reliability of our financial reports may be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

  • Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 5
    We have a history of operating losses and may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future. Our ability to achieve profitability depends on the successful development of our drug candidates.

    We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, and the success of our drug candidates is therefore uncertain. None of our drug candidates has been approved for commercial sale in any jurisdiction, and we expect it to be several years before any of them may be approved, if ever. We will not be able to generate product revenue unless and until our drug candidates, alone or with future partners, successfully complete clinical trials, receive regulatory approval and are successfully commercialized. Although we have entered into a joint venture with respect to PSX-001 and may again seek to obtain revenue from collaboration or licensing agreements with third parties, these agreements and joint ventures may not provide us with material or ongoing revenues. We have experienced significant recurring operating losses and negative cash flows from operating activities since inception. For example, for the fiscal years ended June 2024 and 2025, we had total comprehensive losses of $46.7 million and $18.5 million, respectively, and we had negative cash flows from operating activities of $12.5 million and $5.8 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2025, we had accumulated comprehensive losses of $157.6 million. We expect to continue to incur losses from operations for the foreseeable future and expect the costs of drug development to increase in the future as more patients are recruited for our clinical trials. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the research, development and manufacturing of our drug candidates, we may experience larger than expected future losses and, particularly if we fail to successfully develop one or more of our drug candidates, we may never become profitable or if we become profitable, main profitability.

  • Debt & Financing - Risk 6
    We expect that we will need substantial additional funding to continue the development of our drug candidates. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or to do so on terms that are favorable to us, we could again be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our development programs or commercialization efforts or reduce or scale back our operations.

    To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales to customers and none of our drug candidates have been approved for commercialization by any regulatory body. We do not expect to receive any material revenue from any drug candidates that we develop, including IHL-42X, PSX-001, and IHL-675A, unless and until we obtain regulatory approval for these candidates. Our future net losses will depend, in large part, on our success in developing our drug candidates. Correspondingly, the amount of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of our future expenditures. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially for the foreseeable future if, and as, we: - continue our research and preclinical and clinical development of our drug candidates;- expand the scope of our current proposed clinical studies for our drug candidates;- initiate additional preclinical, clinical or other studies for our drug candidates;- change or add manufacturers or suppliers;- seek regulatory and marketing approvals for our drug candidates that successfully complete clinical studies;- seek to identify and validate additional drug candidates;- acquire or in-license other drug candidates and technologies;- maintain, protect and expand our intellectual property portfolio;- attract and retain skilled personnel;- create additional infrastructure to support our operations as a publicly quoted company and our product development and planned future commercialization efforts; and - experience any delays or encounter issues with any of the above. We will need to obtain additional funding in connection with the further development of our drug candidates. Any additional equity fundraising in the capital markets may be dilutive for our stockholders. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity, convertible debt or other securities convertible into equity, the ownership interest of our stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of new securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect rights of our stockholders. Debt financing, if available at all, would likely involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, completing acquisitions or declaring or paying dividends. If we raise additional funds through strategic collaborations or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our drug candidates or future revenue streams or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. As noted above, we also have historically received, and may receive in the future, tax incentives for R&D. These tax incentives have been, and any future government grants and contracts we may receive may be, subject to the risks and contingencies set forth above this section in the risk factor titled "We rely on R&D tax incentives to provide resources to conduct our business operations. If the amount of R&D tax incentives decreases our business operations may be materially affected." Although we might apply for additional tax incentives, government contracts or grants in the future, we cannot assure that we will be successful in obtaining these for any drug candidates or programs. Our ability to obtain additional financing will be subject to a number of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance and investor sentiment. As such, additional financing may not be available to us when needed, on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, disruptions and volatility in recent years in the financial markets have made equity and debt financing more difficult to obtain and may have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our fundraising needs. During the past year, we delayed the development of our drug candidate IHL-675A due to a lack of financial resources. If we are again unable to secure sufficient capital to fund our operations, then we may be required to again delay, limit, reduce or terminate our drug development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to third parties to develop and market drug candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves. Moreover, we could also have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or drug candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. In addition, securing additional financing requires a substantial amount of time and attention from our management and may divert a disproportionate amount of their attention away from day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our management's ability to oversee the development of our drug candidates. Any of these circumstances or the failure to obtain funding, when and as needed, and on favorable terms would adversely affect our business, results of operations, R&D efforts, prospects and potentially the value of our common stock.

  • Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 7
    Our existing and any future joint ventures may limit our flexibility with jointly owned investments and we may not realize the benefits we expect from these arrangements. We are currently party to a joint venture, and we may in the future sell or contribute additional assets or acquire, develop or recapitalize assets to or in this joint venture or other joint ventures that we may enter.

    Our participation in our existing joint venture is, and our participation in future joint ventures may be, subject to risks, including the following: - We share approval rights over certain major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any assets owned by the joint venture;- We may need to contribute additional capital in order to preserve, maintain or grow the joint venture and its investments;- Our joint venture collaborators may have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals and that could affect our ability to fully benefit from the assets owned by the joint venture;- Our joint venture collaborators may be subject to different laws or regulations than us, which could create conflicts of interest;- Disagreements with our joint venture investors could result in litigation or arbitration that could be expensive and distracting to management and could delay important decisions. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Read and Evaluate the RiskReserved for Ultimate MembersUpgrade

Risk Highlights Q1, 2026

Main Risk Category
Tech & Innovation
With 24 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
68
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
0Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Mar 2026
Number of Risk Changed
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 1

Risk Word Cloud

our business is subject to complex and evolving u.s. federal and state, and international laws and regulations, imposing obligations on how we collect, use, disclose, store and process personal data. we are also subject to information security policies and contractual obligations relating to privacy and data protection, including the use, processing, and cross-border transfer of personal data. the actual or perceived failure by us or vendors to comply with these laws and regulations, policies and contractual obligations could harm our business and/or reputation, and subject us to significant fines and liability.contractual obligations relating to privacyif we are unable to maintain or regain compliance with the requirements of the nasdaq stock market ("nasdaq"), this could result in the delisting of our common stock. a delisting of our common stock from nasdaq could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital through the public or private sale of equity securities, the ability of investors to dispose shares of our common stock or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock and the price and value of our common stock.delisting of our common stockour relationships with customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, substantial civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.expose us to criminal sanctionsour relationships with customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, substantial civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.subject to applicable anti-kickbackwe are and may continue to be subject to short selling strategies.subject to short selling strategiesour business is subject to complex and evolving u.s. federal and state, and international laws and regulations, imposing obligations on how we collect, use, disclose, store and process personal data. we are also subject to information security policies and contractual obligations relating to privacy and data protection, including the use, processing, and cross-border transfer of personal data. the actual or perceived failure by us or vendors to comply with these laws and regulations, policies and contractual obligations could harm our business and/or reputation, and subject us to significant fines and liability.cross-border transfer of personal dataif we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.effective system of internal controlclinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain outcomes. the results of earlier preclinical studies or trials may not be predictive of the results of later clinical trials. clinical trials are difficult to design and implement, and any of our clinical trials could produce unsuccessful results or fail at any stage in the process.results of earlier preclinical studiesif we are unable to maintain or regain compliance with the requirements of the nasdaq stock market ("nasdaq"), this could result in the delisting of our common stock. a delisting of our common stock from nasdaq could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital through the public or private sale of equity securities, the ability of investors to dispose shares of our common stock or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock and the price and value of our common stock.private sale of equity securitieswe do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future; capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain as a holder of our common stock.holder of our common stock

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 68

Innovation / R&D9 | 13.2%
  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 1
    Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain outcomes. The results of earlier preclinical studies or trials may not be predictive of the results of later clinical trials. Clinical trials are difficult to design and implement, and any of our clinical trials could produce unsuccessful results or fail at any stage in the process.

    Clinical trials conducted on humans are expensive and can take many years to complete, and outcomes are inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the process. Additionally, any positive results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of a drug candidate may not be predictive of the results of later stage clinical trials, such that drug candidates may reach later stages of clinical trials and fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having shown indications of those traits in preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier phases of the trials. Therefore, the results of any ongoing or future clinical trials we conduct may not be successful. Our ongoing or planned clinical trials may also again be delayed, suspended or prematurely terminated because costs are greater than we anticipate or for a variety of other reasons, such as: - delay or failure in reaching agreement with the FDA or a comparable international regulatory authority on a trial design that we are able to execute;- delay or failure in obtaining authorization to commence a trial, including approval from the appropriate IRB to conduct testing of a candidate on human subjects, or inability to comply with conditions imposed by a regulatory authority regarding the scope or design of a clinical trial;- delay in reaching, or failure to reach, agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs, and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;- inability, delay or failure in identifying and maintaining a sufficient number of trial sites, many of which may already be engaged in other clinical programs;- delay or failure in recruiting and enrolling suitable volunteers or patients to participate in a trial such as occurred in our prior trial investigating IHL-675A;- delay or failure in developing and validating companion diagnostics, if they are deemed necessary, on a timely basis;- failure of trial participants to complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;- inability to monitor trial participants adequately during or after treatment;- clinical sites and investigators deviating from trial protocols, failing to conduct the trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or dropping out of a trial;- failure to initiate or delay of or inability to complete a clinical trial as a result of a clinical hold imposed by the FDA or comparable international regulatory authority due to observed safety findings or other reasons;- negative or inconclusive results in our clinical trials, and our decision to or regulators' requirement that we conduct additional non-clinical studies, clinical trials or that we abandon one or more of our product development programs; or - inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of a drug candidate of acceptable quality for use in clinical trials. We rely and plan to continue to rely on third-party CROs, CMOs and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials. Although we have and expect that we will continue to have agreements in place with CROs and CMOs governing their contracted activities and conduct, we have limited influence over their actual performance. As a result, we ultimately do not and will not have control over a CRO's or CMO's compliance with the terms of any agreement it may have with us, its compliance with applicable regulatory requirements or its adherence to agreed-upon time schedules and deadlines, and a future CRO's or CMO's failure to perform those obligations could subject any of our clinical trials to delays or failure. Further, we may also again encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by any IRB or ethics committee, or by the FDA, EMA, MHRA, or other regulatory authority. A suspension or termination may occur due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA, EMA, MHRA or other regulatory authorities, exposing participants to health risks caused by unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, development of previously unseen safety issues, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug candidate or changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions. We cannot predict with any certainty the schedule for commencement or completion of any currently ongoing, planned or future clinical trials. Many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval for our drug candidates. If we experience additional delays in the commencement or completion of, or suspension or termination of, any clinical trial for our drug candidates, the commercial prospects of the drug candidate could be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from the drug candidate may be delayed or eliminated. In addition, any additional delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow down our drug candidate development and approval process and jeopardize regulatory approval of our drug candidates and our ability to commence sales and generate revenues. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 2
    We have in the past and may in the future find it difficult to enroll patients in our clinical trials and patients could discontinue their participation in our clinical trials, which could delay or prevent our current and any future clinical trials of our drug candidates and make those trials more expensive to undertake.

    The timely completion of clinical trials in accordance with their protocols depends on, among other things, our ability to enroll a sufficient number of research participants who remain in the trial until its conclusion. Our Phase 2 clinical trial in Australia to assess the safety and efficacy of IHL-675A was terminated prior to completion due to challenges with patient recruitment. Insufficient data was collected to make any conclusions on safety or efficacy of IHL-675A We may again encounter delays in enrolling, or be unable to enroll, a sufficient number of individuals to complete any of our clinical trials, and even once enrolled we may again be unable to retain a sufficient number of participants to complete any of our trials. Subject enrollment and retention in clinical trials depends on many factors, including: - the eligibility criteria defined in the protocol;- the size of the patient population required for analysis of the trial's primary endpoints;- the nature of the trial protocol;- the proximity of potential subjects to clinical sites;- the existing body of safety and efficacy data with respect to the drug candidate;- side effects or adverse events caused by our drug candidates;- our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience;- clinicians' and patients' perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies;- competing clinical trials being conducted by other companies or institutions;- the risk that participants enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before completion;- the occurrence of epidemics or pandemics and other similar events; and - the operational efficiency of trial sites, including sufficient staffing. In addition, the U.S. Congress recently amended the FDCA to require sponsors of a Phase 3 clinical trial, or other "pivotal study" of a new drug or biologic to support marketing authorization, to design and submit a diversity action plan for such clinical trial. The action plan must describe appropriate diversity goals for enrollment, as well as a rationale for the goals and a description of how the sponsor will meet them. We or our licensing partners must submit a diversity action plan to the FDA by the time a Phase 3 trial, or pivotal study, protocol is submitted to the agency for review, unless we or our licensing partners are able to obtain a waiver for some or all of the requirements for a diversity action plan. Initiation of such trials may be delayed if the FDA objects to a proposed diversity action plans for any future Phase 3 trial of our drug candidates, and we or our licensing partners may experience difficulties recruiting a diverse population of patients in attempting to fulfill the requirements of any approved diversity action plan. Furthermore, any negative results we may report in clinical trials may make it difficult or impossible to recruit and retain subjects in other clinical trials of that same drug candidate. Delays or failures in planned enrollment or retention of clinical trial subjects may again result in increased costs or program delays, which could have a harmful effect on our ability to develop a drug candidate or could render further development impossible.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 3
    Our drug candidates may cause undesirable side effects that could delay or prevent their marketing approval, limit their commercial potential, or result in significant negative consequences following marketing approval, if marketing approval is obtained.

    Undesirable side effects caused by our drug candidates could cause us or the FDA, EMA, MHRA or other regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt our clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of marketing approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities of our drug candidates. In the event that our clinical trials produce undesirable side effects, our trials could be suspended or terminated and the FDA, EMA or MHRA or comparable international regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of or deny approval of our drug candidates for any or all targeted indications. In addition to this, any drug-candidate-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the potential patient population. With a limited number of patients, rare and severe side effects of our drug candidates may only be uncovered with a significantly larger number of patients exposed to the drug candidate. If our drug candidates receive marketing approval, and we or others identify undesirable side effects caused by these drug candidates (or any other similar products) after this approval, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including: - regulatory authorities may withdraw or limit their approval of our drug candidates;- regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, specific warnings or a contraindication;- we may be required to create a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients, or we may be required to implement a REMS in the United States or a comparable risk mitigation plan in other jurisdictions to ensure that the benefits of the drug candidate outweigh the risks;- we may be required to change the way the drug candidates are distributed or administered, or change the labeling of the drug candidates;- we may be subject to regulatory investigations and government enforcement actions;- the FDA or a comparable international regulatory authority may require us to conduct additional clinical trials or costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the drug candidate;- we may decide to recall or withdraw drug candidates from the marketplace after they are approved;- we could be sued and held liable for injury caused to individuals exposed to or taking our drug candidates; and - our reputation may suffer. In addition, adverse side effects caused by any drugs that may be similar in nature to our drug candidates could delay or prevent regulatory approval of our drug candidates, limit the commercial profile of an approved label for our drug candidates, or result in significant negative consequences for our drug candidates following and assuming marketing authorization. If a drug candidate is approved, any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected drug candidates and could substantially increase the costs of commercializing our drug candidates, and significantly impact our or a partner's ability to successfully commercialize drug candidates and generate revenues.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 4
    Topline, interim or preliminary data from our trials may not be representative of final results.

    From time to time, we have published and may again publish or report topline, interim or preliminary data from our clinical trials. Topline, interim or preliminary data from clinical trials that we may conduct may not be indicative of the final results of the trial and are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and/or more patient data become available. Topline, interim or preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the interim or preliminary data. As a result, topline, interim or preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 5
    A potential breakthrough therapy designation by the FDA for our drug candidates may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, and it does not increase the likelihood that our drug candidates will receive marketing approval.

    We may seek a breakthrough therapy designation from the FDA for one or more of our drug candidates. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug product that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug product may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For drug products that have been designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of a clinical trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens. Drug products designated as breakthrough therapies by the FDA could also be eligible for accelerated approval. Designation as a breakthrough therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our drug candidates meets the criteria for designation as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of a breakthrough therapy designation for a drug candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approval, compared to drugs considered for approval under conventional or other accelerated FDA procedures and does not ensure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our drug candidates qualify and are designated as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may later decide that the drug products no longer meet the conditions for designation and the designation may be rescinded.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 6
    We may seek Fast Track designation for one or more of our other drug candidates in the future. Even if we apply for Fast Track designation in the future, we might not receive such designation, and even if we do, such designation may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process.

    If a drug candidate is intended for the treatment of a serious condition and nonclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address an unmet medical need for this condition, a product sponsor may request an FDA Fast Track designation from the FDA. If we seek Fast Track designation for a drug candidate, we may not receive it from the FDA. However, even if we receive Fast Track designation, Fast Track designation does not ensure that we will receive marketing approval or that approval will be granted within any particular time frame. We may not experience a faster development or regulatory review or approval process with Fast Track designation compared to conventional FDA procedures. In addition, the FDA may withdraw Fast Track designation if the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program. Fast Track designation alone does not guarantee qualification for the FDA's priority review procedures.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 7
    We expect to utilize the FDA's Section 505(b)(2) pathway for certain of our drug candidates and if that pathway is not available, the development of our drug candidates will likely take significantly longer, cost significantly more and entail significantly greater complexity and risk than currently anticipated, and, in any case, may not be successful.

    We plan to seek approval to use the FDA's Section 505(b)(2) pathway for certain of our drug candidates. However, if the FDA subsequently determines that we may not use this regulatory pathway, then we would need to seek regulatory approval for the drug candidates via a "full" or "stand-alone" NDA under Section 505(b)(1) of the FDCA. This would require us to conduct additional clinical trials, provide additional safety and efficacy data and other information, and meet additional standards for regulatory approval including possibly nonclinical data. If this were to occur, the time and financial resources required to obtain FDA approval, as well as the development complexity and risk associated with these programs, would likely substantially increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, informally known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, added Section 505(b)(2) to the FDCA. Section 505(b)(2) permits the filing of an NDA where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies and information that were not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference. Section 505(b)(2), if applicable to us under the FDCA, would allow an NDA we submit to the FDA to rely in part on data in the public domain or the FDA's prior conclusions regarding the safety and effectiveness of approved compounds, which could expedite our development programs relative to seeking approval under the 505(b)(1) regulatory pathway. Notwithstanding the approval of an increasing number of products by the FDA under Section 505(b)(2) over the last decade, certain brand-name pharmaceutical companies and others have objected to the FDA's interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If the FDA's interpretation of Section 505(b)(2) is successfully challenged, or Congress were to amend the statute to alter the currently available regulatory pathway, the FDA may change its 505(b)(2) policies and practices, which could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any NDA we submit under Section 505(b)(2). In addition, the pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive, and Section 505(b)(2) NDAs are subject to special requirements designed to protect the patent rights of sponsors of previously approved drugs referenced in a Section 505(b)(2) NDA. Even if we are able to utilize the Section 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for one or more of our drug candidates, there is no guarantee this would ultimately lead to faster product development or earlier approval. Moreover, any delay resulting from our inability to pursue the FDA's 505(b)(2) pathway could result in new competitive products reaching the market more quickly than our drug candidates, which may have a material adverse impact our competitive position and prospects. Even if we are allowed to pursue the FDA's 505(b)(2) pathway, we cannot assure you that our drug candidates will receive the requisite approvals for commercialization.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 8
    We may use our financial and human resources to pursue a particular research program or drug candidate and fail to capitalize on programs or drug candidates that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

    Because we have limited financial and human resources, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with certain programs or drug candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or more profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future R&D programs and future drug candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products. We may also enter into additional strategic collaboration agreements to develop and commercialize some of our programs and potential drug candidates in indications with potentially large commercial markets. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular drug candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that drug candidate through strategic collaborations, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such drug candidate.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 9
    We have conducted, and intend to conduct, clinical trials for certain of our drug candidates at sites outside of the United States, and the U.S. regulatory agencies may not accept data from trials conducted in such locations.

    As noted above, we have conducted trials for our drug candidates pursuant to Australian law and intend to conduct future and current trials for these candidates pursuant to FDA regulations in an effort to obtain FDA approval. The FDA's acceptance of data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all, and other comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities may have similar restrictions and conditions with respect to clinical trials conducted outside of their respective jurisdictions. In cases where data from clinical trials conducted wholly outside of the United States are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not accept such non-U.S. trial data unless (i) the data are determined to be applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations; and (iii) the FDA is able to validate the data through an onsite inspection or other appropriate means, if necessary. Additionally, the FDA's clinical trial requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met. Furthermore, even where the non-U.S. trial data are not intended to serve as the sole basis for approval, the FDA will not accept the data as support for an application for marketing approval unless the study is well-designed and well-conducted in accordance with GCP requirements and the FDA is able to validate the data from the study through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary. Many comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, while these clinical trials are subject to the applicable local laws, the FDA acceptance of the data will be dependent upon its determination that the trials also complied with all applicable U.S. laws and regulations. There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept future data from trials conducted outside of the United States. If the FDA does not accept the data from any of our clinical trials that we determine to conduct or have conducted outside the United States, it would likely result in the need for additional trials that would be costly and time-consuming and delay or permanently halt the development of a drug candidate. Conducting clinical trials outside the United States may also expose us to additional risks, including risks associated with the following, among other things: additional international regulatory requirements; international exchange fluctuations; compliance with international manufacturing, customs, shipment and storage requirements; the failure of enrolled subjects in international countries to adhere to clinical protocol as a result of differences in standard-of-care; cultural differences in medical practice and clinical research; diminished protection of intellectual property rights; and compliance with general local legal requirements.

See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment. They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result. It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process. Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”. Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report. According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing. You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector. Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements. A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below. 1. Financial & Corporate Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results. Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing. Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments. Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances. 2. Legal & Regulatory Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company. Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation. Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy. Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives. 3. Production Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory. Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers. Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls. Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation. 4. Technology & Innovation Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development. Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology. Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks. Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying. 5. Ability to Sell Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers. Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes. Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration. Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation. 6. Macro & Political Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions. Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19. International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company. Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.