Want to see IR full AI Analyst Report?
Ingersoll Rand (IR) Risk Analysis
Risk Overview Q2, 2026
Risk Change Over Time
- Debt & Financing - Risk 1If the syndicate of financial institutions which are parties to our New Revolving Credit Facility (as defined herein) fail to extend credit under our New Revolving Credit Facility, our liquidity and results of operations may be adversely affected.
We have access to capital through our Revolving Credit Facility. Each financial institution which is part of the syndicate for our Revolving Credit Facility is responsible on a several, but not joint, basis for providing a portion of the loans to be made under our facility. If any participant or group of participants with a significant portion of the commitments in our Revolving Credit Facility fails to satisfy its or their respective obligations to extend credit under the facility and we are unable to find a replacement for such participant or participants on a timely basis (if at all), our liquidity may be adversely affected.
Risk Highlights Q2, 2026
Risk Word Cloud
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 31
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1Shareholder, customer and regulatory agency emphasis on environmental, social, and governance responsibility may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new risks.
Certain of our shareholders, customers and employees and regulators in certain countries continue to expect a more comprehensive response to environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") matters. We may incur increased costs and may be exposed to new risks responding to these higher expectations and requirements, including the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. The Company has emphasized its commitment to making a positive impact on our environment with the announcement of environmental goals with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy, water usage and landfill waste. We may face reputational challenges in the event that we are unable to achieve these goals or our ESG standards do not meet those set by certain constituencies. These reputational challenges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Conversely, anti-ESG sentiment has gained momentum across the United States, especially at the Federal executive branch and the executive branches of certain states as well as with certain non-government organizations ("NGOs"). Various presidential executive orders issued in early 2025 implement new obligations for Federal contractors/subcontractors to certify compliance with existing Federal anti-discrimination laws, encourages private employers to end programs supporting illegal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ("DEI") discrimination and preferences, and directs Federal agencies to formulate enforcement plans to deter DEI programs in the private sector that advance unlawful discrimination or preferences. Moreover, several states have enacted or proposed "anti-ESG" policies or legislation. In addition, NGOs may criticize our sustainability initiatives or take actions against us like boycotts or adverse media campaigns. Failure to successfully manage divergent ESG-related expectations across stakeholders, including regulators, could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation, result in regulatory fines or other adverse action, and otherwise adversely affect our business.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.