Want to see INFY full AI Analyst Report?
Risk Overview Q1, 2026
Risk Distribution
36% Finance & Corporate
36% Production
14% Legal & Regulatory
14% Ability to Sell
0% Tech & Innovation
0% Macro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.
Risk Change Over Time
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Infosys Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
Risk Highlights Q1, 2026
Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 5 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 5 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
14
-44
From last reportS&P 500 Average: 31
14
-44
From last reportS&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
0Risks added
5Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Mar 2026
0Risks added
5Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Mar 2026
Number of Risk Changed
0
-19
From last reportS&P 500 Average: 1
0
-19
From last reportS&P 500 Average: 1
See the risk highlights of Infosys in the last period.
Risk Word Cloud
The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 14
Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 5/14 (36%)Below Sector Average
Debt & Financing1 | 7.1%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
VIII. Risks related to the ADSsCorporate Activity and Growth4 | 28.6%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
VI. Risks related to our operationsCorporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
II. Risks related to the investments we make for our growthOur business will suffer if we fail to anticipate and develop new services and enhance existing services in order to keep pace with rapid changes in technology and in the industries on which we focus.
The technology services market is characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, changing client preferences and frequent introductions of new products and services. Increased adoption of AI and other emerging technologies has and may continue to reduce demand for certain existing services, accelerate pricing and productivity pressures and increase demand for new AI-enabled offerings. In some cases, we may need to transition existing client engagements to more automated or AI-enabled services, which may reduce revenues from certain traditional services or adversely affect our margins. Our ability to maintain our competitive position, market share and revenues depends on our ability to anticipate and respond to evolving technologies and client demands, develop and commercialize new offerings, effectively execute our go-to-market strategies and enhance our delivery capabilities. If we fail to adapt to technological changes, develop competitive offerings or bring new solutions to market in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, revenues and profitability could be adversely affected. In addition, the development and deployment of new technologies and service offerings may require significant upfront investments and we may be unable to recover some or all of these investments if the related offerings are unsuccessful, fail to achieve market acceptance or become obsolete due to competing technologies or services developed by our competitors.
Evolving regulatory frameworks in the technology sector may impact our new service offerings and may require us to incur additional compliance and operational costs.
Additionally, macroeconomic conditions, changes in tariffs, trade restrictions, geopolitical uncertainties or economic downturns may cause us to reduce expenditures on ideating, incubating, developing and marketing new service offerings, which could adversely affect our long-term growth prospects.
Our investments in or use of AI technologies may not be successful and may present business, financial, legal, and reputational risks.
The proliferation of AI technologies continues to significantly impact our industry, and our ability to effectively develop, integrate and deploy AI-enabled solutions will be critical to our competitive position, financial performance and long-term growth prospects. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant costs to develop and operate our AI capabilities, including investments in technology, infrastructure, talent, compliance and risk management. Failure to successfully develop commercialize or scale AI-enabled solutions to compete effectively with competitors, our clients or new market entrants could materially adversely affect our revenues, competitive position, and long-term growth prospects.
Increased adoption of AI and automation technologies has and may continue to reduce demand for certain traditional technology services, alter client purchasing behavior, compress pricing and margins, reduce demand for labor-based delivery models and increase expectations for productivity improvements and outcome-based pricing. In addition, clients may increasingly develop in-house AI capabilities or rely on lower-cost competitors, open-source technologies or AI platform providers, which could further reduce demand for our services.
Our AI-related offerings and internal use of AI technologies may expose us to operational, legal, regulatory and reputational risks. AI technologies may generate inaccurate, flawed, biased or unreliable outputs, and failures or perceived failures of AI systems could result in reputational harm, client disputes, regulatory scrutiny or legal liability. The use of AI technologies may also increase risks relating to intellectual property infringement, confidentiality, cybersecurity, privacy, data protection and misuse of sensitive information.
Additionally, employees may independently use unauthorized AI tools or large language model applications to process client or proprietary data outside of our approved systems and information security controls. Such unauthorized use could lead to the unintended exposure of sensitive information to third-party platforms, potentially resulting in violations of applicable data protection laws and breaches of contractual obligations with our clients. Any incident arising from unauthorized employee use of AI tools that results in the exposure of client data may require notification to affected clients and applicable regulators and adversely affect our reputation and business.
We also rely on third-party AI providers, cloud providers and technology partners in connection with certain AI-enabled offerings. We may be subject to risks associated with outages, performance limitations, licensing restrictions, changes in pricing or terms, regulatory developments or insufficient indemnification protections from such providers. At the same time, clients may seek broader contractual protections, warranties, indemnities or liability commitments from us in connection with AI-related services, which could increase our legal and financial exposure. If partnerships with third-party AI providers are unsuccessful, or if such providers begin offering competing services, it could adversely affect our business.
AI-related laws and regulations, including the EU AI Act and emerging regulations in other jurisdictions, are evolving rapidly and may be inconsistent across jurisdictions. Compliance with such laws and regulations may increase our costs, restrict our ability to develop or deploy AI-enabled offerings and expose us to investigations, litigation, fines, penalties, remediation costs or reputational harm in the event of actual or alleged non-compliance.
In addition, AI technologies may significantly alter workforce requirements and delivery models within the technology services industry. If we are unable to effectively adapt our workforce, delivery capabilities and service offerings to evolving market expectations and technological changes, our business, revenues, profitability and competitive position could be adversely affected.
We may be unable to recoup investment costs incurred in developing our software products and platforms.
The development of our software products and platforms requires significant investments. The markets for our suite of software products and platforms are competitive. Our current software products and platforms or any new software products and platforms that we develop may not be commercially successful and the costs of developing such new software products and platforms may not be recouped. Since software product and platform revenues typically occur in periods subsequent to the periods in which the costs are incurred for the development of such software products and platforms, delayed revenues may cause periodic fluctuations in our results of operations.
We may engage in acquisitions, strategic investments, strategic partnerships or alliances or other ventures that may or may not be successful.
We have in the past, and may in the future, seek to acquire or make strategic investments in complementary businesses, new and emerging technologies, services or products, or enter into strategic partnerships or alliances with third parties in order to enhance our business.
It is possible that we may not be able to identify suitable acquisition targets, candidates for strategic investment or strategic partnerships which align with our overall strategy including AI strategy or if we do identify suitable targets, we may not complete those transactions on terms commercially acceptable to us. Our inability to identify suitable acquisition targets or investments or our inability to complete such transactions may affect our competitiveness, growth prospects and ability to evolve as an AI service provider at scale.
Even if we are able to identify an acquisition that we would like to consummate, we may not be able to complete the acquisition on commercially reasonable terms or the target may be acquired by another company. Furthermore, in the event that we are able to identify and consummate any future acquisitions, we could:
- issue equity securities which would dilute current shareholders' percentage ownership;- incur substantial debt;- incur significant acquisition-related expenses;- assume contingent liabilities; or - expend significant cash.
These financing activities or expenditures could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition or the price of our equity shares and ADSs. Alternatively, due to possible difficulties in the capital and credit markets, we may be unable to secure capital on acceptable terms, if at all, to complete acquisitions.
The synergies that we expect from our acquisitions may not materialize as intended for many reasons, including due to inadequate business alignment or if assumptions made at the time of acquisition do not hold good due to internal or external factors. Moreover, even if we do obtain benefits from acquisitions in the form of increased sales and earnings, there may be a delay between the time when the expenses associated with an acquisition are incurred and the time when we recognize such benefits.
Further, if we acquire a company, we could have difficulty in assimilating that company's personnel, operations, products, services, solutions, technology and software. In addition, the key personnel of the acquired company may decide not to work for us. These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees and increase our expenses.
We have made, and may in the future make, strategic investments in early-stage technology start-up companies to gain experience in or exploit niche technologies. However, our investments may not generate expected returns if the demand, supply and cash flow of these companies are adversely affected due to economic uncertainty, changes in tariffs, trade restrictions or geopolitical conflicts. The lack of profitability of any of our investments could adversely affect our results of operations.
We have entered into alliances with many technology companies to enhance services offered to our clients. Most of the alliances are non-exclusive and alliance partners are not prevented from entering into agreements with our competition and/or compete against us. If we are not able to enter into alliances with new partners, it may impact our ability to enhance service offerings. We may not be able to obtain expected benefits if there is a reduced demand for services or products offered by the alliance partners which in turn may impact our revenue growth.
Goodwill and acquired intangibles that we carry on our balance sheet could give rise to significant impairment charges in the future.
Goodwill and acquired intangibles are subject to impairment review. Impairment testing under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as issued by International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") has resulted in impairment charges for intangibles and may lead to additional impairment charges in the future. Any significant impairment charges could adversely affect our results of operations.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
II. Risks related to the investments we make for our growtha.Our business will suffer if we fail to anticipate and develop new services and enhance existing services in order to keep pace with rapid changes in technology and in the industries on which we focus.
b.Our investments in or use of AI technologies may not be successful and may present business, financial, legal, and reputational risks.
c.We may engage in acquisitions, strategic investments, strategic partnerships or alliances or other ventures that may or may not be successful.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 4
VI. Risks related to our operationsMaintaining a hybrid working model may continue to expose us to various risks.
We continue to operate under a hybrid model of work for our employees and service providers. As we hire, train, and deploy talent remotely in this hybrid working model, we may experience the following risks:
- While we have adopted a hybrid hiring process in India where the majority of our employees are hired, virtual hiring continues to be utilized in locations outside India. Our ability to assess the candidates effectively through virtual hiring processes may be adversely affected by risks such as fake profiles, candidates employing fraudulent mechanisms to respond to virtual interview questions, limited in-person interaction with the candidate, and technical infrastructure issues. This may lead to the hiring of unqualified or unsuitable candidates and lead to service delivery disruptions impacting our business operations. Increased potential for fraud with virtual hiring processes could delay completion of background verification, impacting our ability to deploy talent in a timely manner, as well as our client satisfaction and reputation.
- If we are not able to effectively train our employees in the hybrid working model due to a lack of physical training sessions and personal connects, it may impact our ability to deploy talent on projects to meet our business requirements which could lead to service delivery disruptions, productivity loss, adverse client sentiments and additional costs.
- We may have difficulty integrating employees working out of remote locations on a long-term basis into our existing corporate culture and build social capital, which may impact our ability to engage with and retain our high performing employees.
- We may have greater exposure to cybersecurity and data privacy breach incidents with a large number of employees working remotely, which could hinder our ability to continue services and operations, impacting revenue, profitability and reputation.
- Continued remote working exposes the company to the risk of some employees working for multiple employers simultaneously (moonlighting) without obtaining required prior approvals and this may result in potential conflict of interests, confidentiality breach, and reduced productivity.
- Continued employee preferences to work out of remote locations, on a long-term basis, together with expectations from clients to return to office, if not managed adequately, may impact attrition, client satisfaction, and our ability to grow profitably.
In addition, while working remotely in the hybrid work model, if any of our employees change their locations without informing us, it may impact our ability to comply with local tax laws and other regulatory requirements.
Our reputation could be at risk and we may be liable to our clients or to regulators for damages caused by unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and sensitive data.
We are dependent on our information technology networks and systems to process, transmit, host and securely store electronic information and to communicate among our locations around the world and with our clients, suppliers and partners. We are often required to collect and store sensitive or confidential client data. Security breaches, employee misappropriation, unauthorized access, human or technological error could lead, and in some cases has led, to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data. Any such events could jeopardize projects that are critical to the operations of our clients' businesses. The theft and/or unauthorized use or publication of our, or our clients, confidential information or other proprietary business information as a result of such an incident could adversely affect our reputation and competitive position. Any failure in the networks or computer systems used by us or our clients could result in a claim for substantial damages against us and significant reputational harm. Many of our client agreements do not limit our potential liability for breaches of confidentiality.
As a global service provider with clients in a broad range of industries, we often have access to or are required to manage, utilize, collect and store sensitive data subject to various regulatory regimes, including but not limited to U.S. federal and state laws governing the protection of personal financial and health data and the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") . These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number and change frequently. Scope and coverage of these regulations are vast and include various stakeholders that do not necessarily restrict applicability to a certain geography in which we operate, which may result in greater compliance risk and cost. If any person, including any of our employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to our data or client data, or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates that data, we could be subject to significant litigation, monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions, fines and/or criminal prosecution in one or more jurisdictions in addition to significant damage to our reputation. The monetary damages might not be subject to a contractual limit of liability or an exclusion of consequential or indirect damages and could be significant. In addition,our liability insurance, which includes cyber insurance, might not be sufficient in type or amount to cover us against claims related to security breaches, cyberattacks and other related breaches. Similarly, many of our contracts involve projects that are critical to the operation of our clients' businesses and provide benefits which may be difficult to quantify.
Any failure in a client's system or breaches of security, regardless of our responsibility for such failure or breach, could result in a claim for substantial damages against us and force us to incur significant expenses for our defense or could require that we pay large sums in settlement. If unauthorized access to or disclosure of such data in our possession or control occurs or we otherwise fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations in this regard, we could be exposed to civil or criminal enforcement actions and penalties in connection with any violation of applicable data protection laws, as well as lawsuits brought by our clients, our clients' clients, their clients or others for breaching contractual confidentiality and security provisions or data protection laws.
Laws and expectations relating to data protection continue to evolve in ways that may limit our access, use and disclosure of sensitive data, and may require increased expenditures by us or may dictate that we do not offer certain types of services.
Given the hybrid working model, there is relatively higher potential for confidential data being exposed. We endeavor to strengthen and automate controls and educate our employees on how to secure the data and follow the best security practices, but non-material data breaches have occurred and the possibility of future data breaches (material or non-material) cannot be completely ruled out. This may lead to an adverse impact on our brand and financial condition and results of operations.
Our reputation could be at risk and we may be liable to our clients for damages caused by cybersecurity incidents.
AI-led cyber attacks represent a new frontier in digital threats where artificial intelligence is leveraged to enhance the sophistication and effectiveness of malicious campaigns. These attacks can automate the identification of vulnerabilities, craft convincing phishing messages, and adapt in real time to bypass security measures. The increase in sophistication and complexity of cyber-attacks, cybercrime and cyber insecurity have made the global cyber threat landscape highly volatile. Organizations across the world need to be vigilant to shield themselves from cybersecurity risks and the associated perils and challenges. We and our third-party service providers have in the past and may in the future be targets of cybersecurity attacks.
Cyber threats evolve rapidly, and there have in the past and could in the future be a scenario where we are unable to adapt our threat detection and prevention measures to detect or prevent new, modified, or evolving threats to our solutions or product offerings.
We and our third-party service providers have in the past and may in the future suffer cybersecurity breaches and other information security incidents due to a multitude of factors, including one or more of the following:
- insider threats;- hackers and other state or non-state actors with an intent to cause harm to us or our clients (including, for example, our government clients and our clients in sensitive industry segments such as financial services, insurance, energy, utilities or healthcare);- technological error or human error and inadvertent actions by our employees and contractors;- malware, ransomware, viruses, worms, and similar threats, including the potential for infection spreading between environments;- increased threat and attack surface due to a hybrid work model and emergence of the metaverse;- vulnerability of the security automation system to attacks;- unintended data leakage and security vulnerabilities arising due to use of AI;- vulnerability of the supply chain (including software supply chain) to attacks; and - malicious use of AI leading to the industrialization of tailored, high volume, high-impact cyberattacks, leaving organizations overwhelmed and unable to operate effectively.
We believe the risks presented by cybersecurity breaches and other information security incidents will increase as we scale, grow our cloud-based offerings and services and AI-powered enterprise transformation, store and process increasingly large amounts of our clients' data and host or manage parts of our clients' businesses, especially in industries involving sensitive data such as the financial services, energy, utilities and healthcare industries. In addition, with increased dependence on cloud vendors, any consequential large-scale failure in their security, coupled with difficulties of porting data from one vendor to another, may jeopardize our and our clients' business continuity. By virtue of our business presence across continents, any alleged or actual non-compliance with our obligations relating to cybersecurity and information security in any applicable jurisdictions could lead to regulatory investigations, claims, litigation, and significant damages, fines, penalties, and other liability.
Cybersecurity breaches and other data security incidents have in the past and could in the future have an adverse impact on our business, operations, financial performance, and reputation especially in cases where critical systems, or numerous systems, are unavailable or otherwise impacted, resulting in partial to complete disruption of intended business delivery, or due to unauthorized access to, or the loss, corruption, or theft of, intellectual property, personal data, or sensitive information. If we or any of our third-party service providers suffer a cybersecurity breach or other data security incident, or if any such breach or incident is believed to have occurred, we have in the past and could in future face potential claims and litigation, regulatory investigations and inquiries, damages, fines, penalties, and other liability, substantial harm to our reputation, a loss of business, and significant costs to investigate, remediate, and otherwise address the breach or other incident. In addition, we have in the past and expect in the future to incur increased costs in preventing cybersecurity breaches or other information security incidents in the future. Furthermore, as there is increased focus on ESG concerns, our failure to demonstrate strong corporate governance around cybersecurity in the event of a breach could impact our reputation.
Our cybersecurity insurance covers first party losses that occur due to a cybersecurity-incident wherein losses include cost of forensics, appointing a crisis consultant and data restoration. The insurance also provides for business interruption losses that we might have to incur as a result of a system shutdown due to a cyber-incident. Our insurance may not be adequate to cover all losses in connection with any cybersecurity breach or other incident, and we cannot be certain that our present coverage, or any future coverage we may obtain, will remain available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Our reputation may be impacted, and we may incur financial liabilities if privacy breaches and incidents under General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") or other data privacy regulations across the globe are attributed to us or if we are not able to take necessary steps to report such breaches and incidents to regulators and data subjects, wherever applicable, within the stipulated time or if we are unable to respond on data subject requests on timely manner. Further, any claim from our clients for losses suffered by them due to privacy breaches caused by our employees may impact us financially and affect our reputation.
The GDPR and similar data privacy laws in other jurisdictions impose additional obligations and increase risk exposure upon our business and increase substantially the penalties to which we could be subject to. For example, because the GDPR's enforcement history on our industry sector is limited, we are unable to predict how certain obligations under the GDPR may be applied to us. Despite our efforts to comply with various data privacy laws applicable to us, a regulator may determine that what we have done is not sufficient and subject us to fines and public censure, which could harm our business and reputation.
We may see an increase in the number of data privacy incidents arising from our operations with the scale of our business, and our move to a hybrid working model. Further, more of our work may come under the ambit of privacy regulations as more countries have adopted new regulations or strengthened their existing privacy laws similar to the GDPR.
We constituted our data privacy function over a decade ago, which operates as an independent business enabling function, reporting to the top management and using the globally recognized Privacy Information Management System ("PIMS") framework. We assess our liabilities as processors and controllers and implementing controls where required to mitigate the risks. We have formulated and implemented policies and procedures for identifying and reporting privacy breaches, to affected data subjects and/or regulators (as required) within the stipulated time. In addition to implementing and monitoring various controls, we are covered by insurance to some extent in the case of any eventuality. Despite these efforts and insurance, we continue to be at risk of experiencing a data privacy breach, and any such breach could adversely impact our financial results and reputation.
Recently and increasingly, AI-based tools and technologies have proliferated across the digital industry and our business, introducing newer privacy threats, the understanding of which is at early stages both for the industry and regulators. We may not be able to anticipate or adequately manage the privacy threats that may emerge in connection with greater adoption of AI.
We may be the subject of litigation which, if adversely determined, could harm our business and impact reputation, growth, profitability, and results of operations.
In the normal course of business, we are, and may in the future be, subject to legal disputes or claims. An unfavorable outcome on any litigation matter could require that we pay substantial damages, or, in connection with any intellectual property infringement claims, could require that we pay ongoing royalty payments or prevent us from selling certain of our products. In addition, we may decide to settle any litigation, which could cause us to incur significant costs. A settlement or an unfavorable outcome on any litigation matter could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, reputation, financial position or cash flows.
For example, Cognizant TriZetto Software Group, Inc. ("TriZetto") has filed a lawsuit against Infosys asserting claims for misappropriation of TriZetto trade secrets relating to its Facets and QNXT software products, breach of contract, and unfair competition. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, as well as, among other things, an injunction against us to stop us from using any of TriZetto's trade secrets. We filed counterclaims against TriZetto and its parent company, Cognizant Technology Services (collectively "Cognizant") alleging that Cognizant has monopolized, and restrained trade in, the markets for U.S. healthcare payor software products and related IT support for those products in violation of federal and state antitrust laws. We seek treble damages, attorneys' fees, and an injunction to stop the alleged anticompetitive conduct. Discovery is ongoing and the trial is set to occur in near future.
Any prolonged economic downturn, changes in tariffs or trade restrictions and geopolitical conflicts and the resulting financial impact to our clients, vendors and other stakeholders along with other situations like cybersecurity threats, data breaches, contractual suspensions, delayed payments and similar other incidents may give rise to more litigation and disputes with our stakeholders resulting in additional cost, or loss of reputation if the same surfaces in the media.
Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to protect us against all potential losses to which we may be subject, which could adversely affect our business.
Our insurance policies generally cover loss or damage to insured property and loss due to business interruption following loss or damage to property. These policies cover our property and assets around the world, including all leased property. We also maintain insurance coverage for damage caused by disclosure of employee and client-related personally identifiable confidential information, system failures, errors or unsatisfactory performance of services to our clients in the event of a third-party claim citing damages or financial loss.
We believe we have taken sufficient insurance policies to cover ourselves from potential losses that we may be subject to. However, this coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms and may be unavailable in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims. Also, an insurer might disclaim coverage as to any future claim. For example, certain insurers have indicated that they may disclaim coverage for claims arising from business interruption due to geopolitical conflicts. A successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceed our available insurance coverage or that cause changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of a large deductible or co-insurance requirement, could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our hybrid working model increases the risk of claims arising out of various situations like errors and omissions and data breaches, which could render the coverage taken inadequate. Increased claims could cause the insurance premium on our regular policies to be increased which could adversely affect our profitability.
In addition, losses arising from events not covered by our insurance policies could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that any claims filed under our insurance policies will be honored fully or in a timely manner. Our financial condition may be adversely affected to the extent we suffer any loss or damage that is not covered by insurance, or which exceeds our insurance coverage.
The markets in which we operate are subject to the risk of earthquakes, floods, tsunamis, storms, pandemics and other disasters.
Some of the regions that we operate in are prone to earthquakes, floods, tsunamis, storms, pandemics and other disasters. In the event that any of our business centers or the telecommunications networks that our business depends on are affected by any such disasters, we may incur costs in redeploying personnel and property, sustain damage to our operations and properties, suffer significant financial losses or be unable to complete our client engagements in a timely manner, if at all.
In addition, if such disasters occur in any of the locations in which our significant clients are located, we face the risk that our clients may incur losses or sustain business interruption, which may materially impair our ability to provide services to our clients and may limit their ability to continue their purchase of products or services from us. This could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, a prolonged disruption of our operations due to such disasters may impact our business continuity and employee productivity.
The safety of our employees, assets and infrastructure may be affected by untoward incidents beyond our control, impacting business continuity or reputation.
The health and safety of our employees or those working on our behalf or those present in our offices, and the security of our physical infrastructure may be affected due to acts of violence or vandalism by anti-social elements or the emergence of a disease pandemic or geopolitical conflicts. Although we take protective measures to ensure the safety of our employees at our global locations of work and transit, incidents of organized political demonstrations, civil unrest, random acts of rage or a public health crisis can affect the safety of our assets and employees, impacting business continuity or reputation or exposing us to lawsuits from employees.
Currently, we operate in 290 locations across 59 countries. Our global development centers are linked with a telecommunications network architecture that uses multiple service providers and various satellite and optical links with alternate routing. While we believe we have put in place adequate infrastructure and business continuity plans to handle disruption in services due to failure in our communication network, our operations and service delivery may be impacted if such networks are affected by disasters.
As an international company, our offshore and onsite operations may also be impacted by disease, epidemics, war, conflicts and local social instability, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Terrorist attacks or a war could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war have the potential to directly impact our clients or us. To the extent that such events affect or involve the United States or Europe (including the current geopolitical conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East), our business may be significantly impacted, as a majority of our revenues are derived from clients located in the United States and Europe. In addition, events of terrorism, military coup or threat of warfare in other parts of the world, could cause geopolitical instability, which in turn may impact our clients or impact our ability to execute projects. Such attacks may destabilize the economic and political situation in India and other countries where we have large operations making it more difficult to obtain work visas and plan travel for many of our technology professionals who are required to work in the United States or Europe. Such obstacles to business may increase our expenses and negatively affect the results of our operations. Furthermore, any attacks in India could cause a disruption in the delivery of our services to our clients, and could have a negative impact on our business, personnel, assets, results of operations and could cause our clients or potential clients to choose other vendors for the services we provide.
Regional conflicts in South Asia could adversely affect the Indian economy, disrupt our operations and cause our business to suffer. South Asia has, from time to time, experienced instances of civil unrest and hostilities among neighboring countries, including China and Pakistan. There have been military confrontations between India and Pakistan that have occurred in the region of Kashmir and along the India-Pakistan border including as recently as May 2025. Continued conflict in South Asia, Eastern Europe and Middle East may impact the safety of our employees and development centers in affected locations and increase cybersecurity threats. It may further impact our ability to service our global clients if we are unable to move our operations out of conflict zones in a timely manner or our cost of operations increases as our work is moved to an alternate location. Military activity or terrorist attacks in the future could hurt the Indian economy by disrupting communications and making travel more difficult and such political tensions could create a greater perception that investments in Indian companies involve higher degrees of risk. Further, such warfare may also potentially increase the risk of cyber-attacks on us as we are a leading Indian IT service provider. This, in turn, could adversely affect the market for securities of Indian companies, including our equity shares and our ADSs, and the market for our services.
Heightened geopolitical conflicts may affect our ability to operate in these geographies. In addition, any prolonged conflict may delay the economic recovery from the pandemic, compounding any adverse impact to our business.
Climate change risks are increasingly manifesting in our business as strategic, physical and transitional (market and compliance) risks, which if not managed adequately, can affect our operations, reputation and profitability.
There is increased focus by organizations to plan for ESG risks arising out of climate change, environmental management practices and duty of care, work and safety conditions, respect for human rights, anti-bribery and anti-corruption practices, and compliance to relevant laws and regulations. Risks related to these factors, except those related to climate change, are covered elsewhere in this document. Climate change related risks are discussed in this section.
Strategic climate change risks: In a market with increased awareness of climate change, aligning business with the evolving trends is an important factor affecting the success of the Company. As a member of the global IT/digital supply chain ecosystem, we are prone to strategic risks if our climate action goals are not aligned to global treaties like the Paris Agreement on climate change.
Physical climate change risks: Extreme weather events due to climate change may cause (1) physical damage to our building infrastructure and other physical assets that cause disruptions in business continuity (2) disruption of the city's functional continuity such as the transport network and utilities in the cities that we operate that can severely hamper business continuity, and (3) a decrease in morale of employees due to extreme weather events.
Extreme weather events also bring in unique problems depending on the type of calamity. For example, drought can bring increases in food prices, or shortages of certain food items, while events like flooding can cause diseases and epidemics. It can also lead to loss of productivity and increased operational costs. Changes in the availability of essential natural resources like water, in regions where we operate could directly impact our operations and employee livelihood, which will impact our ability to do business and ensure business continuity. With large operating campuses in major urban cities, operating risks include disruption of power and water supply to our campuses due to extreme weather events, affecting business continuity.
Climate related market risks: In response to increasing awareness on climate change and other related socio- environmental issues, clients increasingly insist on climate action updates, including emission performance disclosures such as Carbon Disclosure Project ("CDP") score (globally renowned for climate disclosure) during the evaluation stage. A number of clients and potential clients have enquired about Infosys' Net Zero commitment, commitment to Science Based Targets, and supply chain emission reduction initiatives, and responses to such enquiries may become an important factor in clients' overall decision-making process. If performance is not managed in these areas, it may adversely impact our ability to compete and win/renew contracts.
Climate related regulatory risks: Countries that have agreed to the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change have made specific promises or plans , known as "Intended Nationally Determined Contributions", to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change. This has translated into emission reduction goals and other environmental targets, disclosures and increased compliance mandated to businesses in different geographies. In many regions, regulations requiring detailed disclosures on climate action, performance, risk and opportunities already exist or are being developed. New and emerging regulations may result in increased cost of compliance. Further, any gaps due to incorrect reporting of environmental data /metrics, including misinterpretation of evolving global standards may attract penalties, impact reputation and may lead to other consequences.
Risks resulting from potential violations or non-conformance with climate laws and regulations could impact our reputation and profitability through the incurrence of penalties or by limiting our ability to operate in certain geographies and could adversely impact our business performance.
Our reputation, access to capital and longer-term financial stability could be at risk if we are unable to meet our stated goals under our ESG 2030 vision.
Infosys is among the early signatories to the United Nations Global compact. In 2020, when we became carbon neutral, we published our ESG Vision and Ambitions 2030, articulating our roadmap to responsible/sustainable business. Our annual ESG publications provide a report of our performance on our ESG Ambitions and are mapped to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In 2025, at the mid-point of our journey towards our ESG Vision 2030, we had an opportunity to refresh our ESG ambitions to address the changing priorities of our stakeholders and reinforce our commitment to responsible business. Our ESG performance and leadership is monitored internally as well as by external agencies including global ESG assessments. If we are unable to meet our goals or if we are not assessed favorably on ESG measures by external agencies, our reputation, access to capital and longer-term financial stability may be adversely impacted including our brand reputation which could impact the share price.
Conversely, a number of regulators, lawmakers and stakeholders have increasingly expressed or pursued contrary views, legislation and investment expectations with respect to ESG ambitions and measures, including proposing or enacting "anti-ESG" legislation, regulation or policies, which may expose us to additional legal, financial or reputational risks based upon our ESG Ambitions and disclosures.
Negative media coverage and public scrutiny may divert the time and attention of our board and management and adversely affect our reputation and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
There is media coverage and public scrutiny of our business practices, policies and actions including negative, and in some cases, inaccurate posts or comments. Any future negative media coverage in relation to our business, our Board or senior management, regardless of the factual basis for the assertions being made, may adversely impact our reputation. In addition, responding to allegations made in the media can significantly divert the time and attention of our Board and senior management away from our business and disrupt our operations. We may not be able to respond publicly to certain comments in the media due to the obligations we have with our employees, clients and other stakeholders. Any unfavorable publicity may also adversely impact investor confidence and directly or indirectly cause the price of our equity shares and ADSs to decline.
If any of our employees, as independent individuals, engage in any acts that are perceived to be against the interests of the communities we operate in or that violate local regulations, and if such acts become the subject of mainstream and social media attention or regulatory scrutiny, our reputation may be negatively impacted.
Regulatory requirements that obligate our management to respond to rumors within a specified time may put strain on board and management bandwidth, digress their attention from business-critical strategic work and can also adversely impact our reputation.
Production
Total Risks: 5/14 (36%)Above Sector Average
Employment / Personnel1 | 7.1%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
IV. Risks related to our employee workforceSupply Chain2 | 14.3%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
V. Risks related to our contractual obligationsSupply Chain - Risk 2
V. Risks related to our contractual obligationsOur failure to complete fixed-price and fixed-timeframe contracts, or transaction-based pricing contracts, within budget and on time, may negatively affect our profitability.
As an element of our business strategy, in response to client requirements and pressures on IT budgets, we offer an increasing portion of our services on a fixed-price, fixed-timeframe basis, rather than on a time-and-materials basis. In fiscal 2026 and 2025, revenues from fixed-price, fixed-timeframe projects accounted for 54% of our total revenue, respectively. In addition, pressure on the IT budgets of our clients and the AI disruptions have led us to deviate from our standard pricing policies and to offer varied pricing models to our clients including output or outcome-based pricing model in certain situations in order to remain competitive. For example, we enter into transaction-based pricing contracts with certain clients who are not historically offered such terms in order to give them the flexibility to pay as they use our services.
The risk of entering into fixed-price, fixed-timeframe arrangements, output, outcome and transaction-based pricing arrangements is that if we fail to properly estimate the appropriate pricing for a project, we may earn lower profits or incur losses as a result of being unable to execute projects within the timeframe and with the amount of labor we expected. Although, we use our software engineering methodologies and processes and past project experience to reduce the risks associated with estimating, planning and performing fixed-price, fixed-timeframe projects and transaction-based pricing projects, we bear the risk of cost overruns, completion delays and wage inflation in connection with these projects. If we fail to estimate accurately the resources and time required for a project, the extent of automation and productivity gains we may be able to achieve, the complexity of executing large and multi-party programs, future wage inflation rates or currency exchange rates, or if we fail to complete our contractual obligations within the contracted timeframe, our profitability may suffer. We expect that we will continue to enter into fixed-price, fixed-timeframe and transaction-based pricing engagements in the future, and such engagements may increase in relation to the revenues generated from engagements on a time-and-materials basis, which would increase the risks to our business.
Our client contracts can typically be terminated without cause, which could negatively impact our revenues and profitability.
Our clients typically retain us on a non-exclusive, project-by-project basis. Many of our client contracts, including those that are on a fixed-price, fixed time frame basis, can be terminated with or without cause, with a notice period as agreed in the contract. Our business is dependent on the decisions and actions of our clients, and there are a number of factors relating to our clients that are outside of our control, which might lead to termination, descoping of a project or the loss of a client, including:
- financial difficulties for a client including limited access to the credit markets, increased cost of debt service, increased cost of operations, insolvency or bankruptcy, adverse impact due to the macro-economic factors, changes in tariffs or trade restrictions or geopolitical conflicts;- a change in strategic priorities, resulting in a reduced level of technology spending;- a demand for price reductions; or an unwillingness to accept higher pricing due to various factors such as higher wage costs, higher cost of doing business;- a change in outsourcing strategy by moving more work to the clients' in-house technology departments or to our competitors;- the replacement by our clients of existing software with packaged software supported by licensors;- mergers and acquisitions;- consolidation of technology spending by a client, whether arising out of mergers and acquisitions, or otherwise; or - sudden ramp-downs in projects due to an uncertain economic environment or geopolitical conflicts or a pandemic.
Our inability to control the client's decision with respect to termination of client contracts could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. While there have been no material project terminations due to economic uncertainty, changes in tariffs or trade restrictions or geopolitical conflicts, a prolonged uncertainty could heighten the risk that certain of our clients may invoke termination clauses to reduce their expenditure which could in turn affect our anticipated growth and profitability.
Our client contracts are often conditional upon our performance, which, if unsatisfactory due to any reason, could result in lower revenues than previously anticipated.
A number of our client contracts have incentive-based or other pricing terms that condition some or all of our fees on our ability to meet defined performance goals or service levels. In addition, certain client situations may require us to agree to higher contractual liability exposure limits. Our failure to meet these goals or a client's expectations in such performance-based contracts, especially due to dependencies on the client not clearly articulated in the contract, may result in us not being able to bill them for expended effort. This could lead to not only to a less profitable or an unprofitable engagement but may also result in penalties or fines impacting our overall financial health.
Our clients may seek more favorable terms from us in our contracts, particularly related to the limitation of our liability for damages resulting from unsatisfactory performance of services. Further, any damages resulting from such failure, particularly where we are unable to recover such damages from our insurers, may adversely impact our business, revenues and operating margins.
Our ability to meet contractual commitments in client contracts may be impacted due to lack of talent availability or geopolitical conflicts leading to client dissatisfaction and loss of revenue.
As clients increasingly expect engagements to incorporate AI-enabled solutions, we face evolving contractual, operational and legal risks relating to AI-based projects, including risks associated with confidentiality, data privacy, intellectual property ownership, model training and reuse, accuracy of outputs and allocation of liability.
Some of our long-term client contracts contain benchmarking provisions which, if triggered, could result in lower future revenues and profitability under the contract.
As the size and duration of our client engagements increase, clients may increasingly require benchmarking provisions. Benchmarking provisions allow a client in certain circumstances to request a benchmark study prepared by an agreed upon third-party comparing our pricing, performance and efficiency gains for delivered contract services to that of an agreed upon list of service providers for comparable services and in comparable geography. Based on the results of the benchmark study and depending on the reasons for any unfavorable variance, we may be required to reduce the price of our services or provide clients with a right to terminate our services without paying any termination fee. This may have an adverse impact on our revenues and profitability. Benchmarking provisions in our client engagements may have a greater impact on our results of operations during an economic slowdown because pricing pressure and the resulting decline in rates may lead to a reduction in fees that we charge to clients that have benchmarking provisions in their engagements with us.
Our work with governmental agencies may expose us to additional risks.
While the vast majority of our clients are privately or publicly owned, we also bid for work with governments and governmental agencies in key geographies in which we operate. Projects involving governments or governmental agencies carry various risks inherent in the government contracting process, including the following:
- Such projects may be subject to a higher risk of reduction in scope or termination than other contracts due to political and economic factors such as changes in government, pending elections or the reduction in, or absence of, adequate funding, or disputes with other government departments or agencies;- Terms and conditions of government contracts tend to be more onerous than other contracts and may include, among other things, higher liability exposure to us for direct or indirect damages, extensive rights of audit, more punitive service level penalties and other restrictive covenants. Additionally, there are risks of delayed payments or change in the terms of such contracts due to political and economic factors and lack of timely closure of requirements;- Government contracts are often subject to more extensive scrutiny and publicity than other contracts. Any negative publicity related to such contracts, regardless of the accuracy of such publicity, may adversely affect our business and reputation;- Participation in government contracts could subject us to stricter regulatory requirements, which may increase our cost of compliance; and - Such projects may involve multiple parties in the delivery of services and require greater project management efforts on our part, and any failure in this regard may adversely impact our performance.
In addition, we operate in jurisdictions in which local business practices may be inconsistent with international regulatory requirements, including anti-corruption and anti-bribery regulations prescribed under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA"), and the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, which, among other things, prohibits giving or offering to give anything of value with the intent to influence the awarding of government contracts. Although we believe that we have adequate policies and enforcement mechanisms to ensure legal and regulatory compliance with the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and other similar regulations, it is possible that any of our employees, subcontractors, agents or partners may violate any such legal and regulatory requirements in spite of terms requiring strict compliance with these regulations in our contracts with such subcontractors, agents or partners, which may expose us to criminal or civil enforcement actions, including penalties and suspension or disqualification from U.S. federal procurement contracting.
Our inability to execute contracts and/or amendments with clients on a timely basis can impact our revenues and profits, causing fluctuations in our reported results.
We generally enter into contracts with our clients prior to beginning work. However, we may occasionally commence working on client projects before contracts or amendments to previously executed contracts are executed. This practice may not only impact our ability to recognize revenue for the effort spent in a specified period, but may also impact margins if cost and revenue are accounted for in different periods. In rare instances of contract abandonment, we might not be in a position to recover the cost for the efforts incurred before contract execution.
Costs2 | 14.3%
Costs - Risk 1
III. Risks related to our cost structureCosts - Risk 2
III. Risks related to our cost structurea.Our expenses are difficult to predict and can vary significantly from period to period, which could cause fluctuations to our profitability.
b.Any inability to manage our growth could disrupt our business, reduce our profitability and adversely impact our ability to implement our growth strategy.
c.Wage pressures and the hiring of employees and sub-contractors either outside or in India may prevent us from sustaining our competitive advantage and may reduce our profits.
d.We are investing substantial cash in creating and maintaining physical and technological infrastructure, and our profitability could be reduced if our business does not grow proportionately.
e.Currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates may affect the results of our operations and yield on cash balances.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 2/14 (14%)Below Sector Average
Regulation2 | 14.3%
Regulation - Risk 1
VII. Risks related to legislation and regulatory complianceRegulation - Risk 2
VII. Risks related to legislation and regulatory compliancea.New and changing regulatory compliance, corporate governance and public disclosure requirements add uncertainty to our compliance efforts and increase our costs of compliance.
b.The intellectual property ("IP") laws of India may not give sufficient protection to software and the related IP rights to the same extent as those in the United States. We may be unsuccessful in protecting our IP rights. We may also be subject to third party claims of IP infringement.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 2/14 (14%)Above Sector Average
Demand2 | 14.3%
Demand - Risk 1
I. Risks related to the markets in which we and our clients operateDemand - Risk 2
I. Risks related to the markets in which we and our clients operateSpending on technology products and services by our clients and prospective clients fluctuates depending on many factors, including technological advances, geopolitical changes, economic factors, regulatory environment, and changes in tariffs or trade restrictions, fiscal or monetary policies, in the markets in which they operate.
The technology and IT budgets of our clients are frequently impacted by technology disruptions, geopolitical conflicts, economic slowdowns, changes in tariffs and trade restrictions or uncertainties in the markets in which they operate. Resulting reductions in IT spending have in the past adversely impacted, and may in the future adversely impact, our results of operations.
Increased regulations, changes to existing regulations or increased government interventions, including sanctions, tariffs or trade restrictions in the industries in which our clients operate or economic uncertainty due to inflation, geopolitical conflicts and potential global economic slowdown may adversely affect our client's businesses and may reduce demand for our services or cause us to incur additional costs in our processes or personnel, thereby negatively affecting our business, results of operations and financial condition. For instance, our clients may be subject to more stringent compliance requirements, including industry-specific compliance, privacy and security standards for handling data, which could impact the manner in which we provide our services. Additionally, geopolitical conflicts, including conflicts in the Middle East, Eastern Europe and India - Pakistan, may adversely affect certain of our clients' operations or cause them to redirect spending toward business continuity, which may reduce their IT spend. A general slowdown in key geographies where our clients operate or depend on for their supply chain may adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Further, regulators have imposed guidelines for the use of cloud computing services that mandate specific controls or require enterprises in specific sectors (such as financial services, insurance, and aerospace) to obtain regulatory approval prior to outsourcing certain functions. Regulators across the world may regulate evolving technologies such as AI by setting boundaries for regulating their use. Evolving regulatory frameworks may impact revenue and profitability of our technology sector clients who invest in such emerging technologies and anticipate deriving revenue from such emerging technologies. Reduced or delayed IT spending, including due to changes in tariffs and trade may also lead to our clients cancelling ongoing projects with us, requesting pricing discounts, seeking extended payment terms or consolidating the technology service providers that they partner with. In the past such events have adversely impacted our utilization rates, revenue earned per billed person month, competitiveness of our proposals, gross margins and cash flows.
Macroeconomic uncertainties, changes in tariffs and trade restrictions and geopolitical conflicts have in the past, and may in the future, lead to an increase in consumer and wage inflation, energy prices, interest rates, and currency fluctuations thus impacting revenue and profitability of some of our clients. For example, some of our clients shut down their operations in Russia due to the conflict in Eastern Europe. As a result, clients may become cautious and reduce their discretionary spending in the short term or delay their decision-making process with respect to their contracts, thereby affecting our revenue. Clients looking to optimize costs may prioritize cost takeout projects, and we may need to alter our offerings, talent mobility and marketing efforts to capture these opportunities. Any geopolitical conflicts, including the conflict between India and Pakistan, conflicts in South Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East, may impact our ability to service our global clients if we are unable to move our operations out of conflict zones in a timely manner or our cost of operations increases as our work is moved to an alternate location. Geopolitical conflicts may impact our clients' businesses that are spread across the conflicting geographies. Such conflicts may lead to clients prioritizing budgets for investments to decouple from geopolitical conflicts zones. Such investments could lead to a reduction in discretionary investments by our clients in technology services thus impacting our revenue and profitability.
Additionally, any sudden emergence or resurgence of any pandemic in the geographies where we have significant exposure or our clients have exposure or where a majority of our employees are located may impact our revenues and profitability.
An economic slowdown or other factors may affect the economic health of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Australia or various industries from where our revenues are derived.
Our revenues are concentrated in a few geographies and client industry segments. In fiscal 2026, 56.1%, 32.1% and 8.9% of our revenues were derived from projects in North America, Europe and the Rest of the World (excluding India), respectively. In fiscal 2026, we derived 27.9% of our revenues from the financial services and insurance industry.
Instability and uneven growth in the global economy have had an adverse impact on the growth of the IT industry in the past and may continue to impact it in the future. This instability also impacts our business and results of operations and may continue to do so in the future. For instance, if the economies of the United States, United Kingdom or the EU weaken or if their growth remains uneven, our clients may reduce or postpone their technology spending significantly, which may in turn lower the demand for our services and negatively affect our revenues and profitability. Continued inflation and the second order impact of the high interest rates in these geographies may dampen the business sentiments and may result in our clients reducing their spend with us. Some factors that may affect our clients' businesses include supply chain issues, availability of critical minerals or materials, labor shortages, inflation, political elections or other macroeconomic factors.
Any future global uncertainty, arising out of various factors including any global pandemic or changes in tariffs or trade restrictions or geopolitical conflicts or evolving technology such as AI, impacting the financial services, retail, consumer goods, telecommunications, energy and manufacturing industries on which we depend for a substantial portion of our annual revenues, may result in the reduction, postponement or consolidation of IT spending, reduce the duration of contracts, contract terminations, deferrals of projects or delays in purchases by our clients. This may lower the demand for our services, reduce the utilization or impact the prices that we can obtain for our services and consequently, adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
We also depend on clients in the energy sector to generate our revenues. Any impact in the energy sector due to oil price volatility, such as the volatility caused by the conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East leading to the suspension or closure of operations in those geographies by our clients, may lead to economic pressure on our clients and in turn impact our revenues and profitability.
Our clients may operate in sectors that are adversely impacted by climate change, which could consequently impact our business and reputation.
There is increased concern and awareness of risks resulting from climate change across industry sectors in which our clients operate. Our current or future clients in affected sectors may need to transition from climate impacting solutions to climate friendly solutions, resulting in transition or investment risks to their businesses. For instance, our clients in mining and oil exploration related businesses may face severe financial stress due to investments in climate friendly solutions. This in turn may impede our ability to grow due to our exposure to such sectors. In addition, any societal pressure or adverse media publicity against companies that are using or implementing climate impacting solutions may consequentially affect our reputation if we are a significant service provider to such clients.
In certain geographies where our clients have already started transitioning to sustainable solutions, regulatory or regime changes may lead our clients to abandon or temporarily hold such investments potentially impacting our growth and profitability in such service lines.
Changes in immigration laws, their interpretation or enforcement, increase in visa fees, or delays in getting visas in the jurisdictions in which we operate, could result in increased compliance costs, business disruptions, inability to bid for or fulfill projects, enforcement actions or penalties, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition
A significant portion of our employees in the United States, the United Kingdom, the EU, and other countries and regions rely on work visas and permits, which makes our business vulnerable to changes and exposed to variations in immigration laws. These legal requirements are numerous, frequently changing, and sometimes conflict with one another. In addition, we have in the past and may in the future, experience policy changes to the way in which laws are interpreted and/or enforced. Authorities in the United States and certain other jurisdictions have adopted and continue to adopt protectionist interpretations of such laws and have increased regulatory scrutiny and enforcement. For example, on September 19, 2025, the President of the United States signed a presidential proclamation imposing a $100,000 fee on new H1-B visa applications subject to certain exclusions. Similarly, a recent pronouncement from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") restricts the ability of immigrants to file for a Green card while residing in the United States except in extraordinary circumstances. Changes in legal requirements or their interpretations, increased visa fees or increased regulatory scrutiny and enforcement could result in an increase in the cost of compliance, business disruptions impairing our ability to service our clients, potential enforcement actions, and sanctions, fines on us or our employees and could potentially increase the rejection rates of our visa applications or cause us to lose access to such visas. Likewise, there could be increases to prevailing wages for our visa dependent workforce. In addition, changes or any additional adverse revisions to immigration laws and regulations or inordinate delays in getting visas due to operational challenges in the jurisdictions in which we operate have in the past caused and may continue to cause us delays, staffing shortages, additional costs, and/or an inability to bid for or fulfill projects for clients. All of this could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") is conducting an investigation regarding how we classified certain H-1B visa-recipient employees in immigration documents filed with certain U.S. government authorities. We are engaged in discussions with the DOJ regarding its ongoing investigation and continue our own inquiry regarding the matter. At this stage, we are unable to predict the outcome of this matter, including whether such outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our clients may be the subject of economic or other sanctions by governments and regulators in key geographies that we operate in, limiting our ability to grow these relationships, and risking increased penalties and exposure of our business to consequential sanctions.
We engage with clients that operate in various geographies and sectors, including in conflict zones or in highly regulated sectors. Sanctions may be enforced on them, their investors or their key managerial personnel either before they become our clients or during the course of our work with them. While we take reasonable precautions to determine if a potential client is on a sanctioned list, our ability to screen and ensure that we do not enter into contract with any such clients is limited and largely depends on the data available in the public domain or third-party databases on sanctioned entities or personnel. If a client is subject to sanctions during the course of our work with them, such engagements may expose us to consequential sanctions, administrative action or loss of any government contracts or engagements.
A large part of our revenues is dependent on a limited number of our clients, and the loss of any one of our major clients or large contracts could significantly impact our business.
We have historically earned and believe that in the future we will continue to earn a significant portion of our revenues from a limited number of clients and large contracts. In fiscal 2026, our five largest clients together accounted for 12.9% of our total revenues, and our ten largest clients together accounted for approximately 20.5% of our total revenues. The volume of work we perform for different clients may vary from year to year depending on the discretion of our clients. Thus, a major client in one year may not provide the same level of revenues in a subsequent year. There are a number of factors, apart from our performance that could cause the loss of a client or reduction of business from a client. In certain cases, our business may be impacted when a large client either changes its outsourcing strategy by moving more work in-house or by establishing Global Capability Centers ("GCCs") or replaces its existing software with packaged software supported by the licensor. Reduced technology spending or reduction in the contract duration in response to a challenging geopolitical, economic or competitive environment or emergence of new AI solutions may also result in the loss of a client's business in part or in full. Our clients, including our major clients, may increasingly use AI tools, that reduce or eliminate the need for certain existing services. If we lose one of our major clients or large contracts, or if one of our major clients significantly reduces its volume of business with us, our revenues and profitability could be adversely affected.
Financial stability of our clients may be affected owing to several factors such as demand and supply challenges, currency fluctuations, regulatory sanctions, changes in tariffs or trade restrictions, geopolitical conflicts and other macroeconomic conditions which may adversely impact our ability to recover fees for the services rendered to them.
Our clients face business challenges and pressures due to several factors that could affect their ability to pay their vendors on time and result in a downward revision of their credit ratings and their ability to raise funds. Any such downgrade of their credit rating could adversely affect our credit terms with such clients, leading to adverse impact on our cash flow and results of operations. While we take precautions to evaluate a client's credit risks before we onboard them, any sudden variation in the financial health of our clients owing to macroeconomic conditions, changes in tariffs or trade restrictions, including volatility in key business sectors that we operate in, geopolitical conflicts or other global challenges may adversely affect our ability to recover the fees for the services rendered to our clients. Any adverse change in India's debt rating or our credit rating by international or domestic rating agencies could also negatively impact our business and profitability.
Outbreaks of contagious diseases, viruses or pandemics, could disrupt our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Outbreaks of contagious diseases, viruses, or pandemics, and related mitigation efforts have disrupted, and may in the future disrupt, our business. The extent of the impact of any future pandemic or outbreak of disease, on our business will depend on factors that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, such as the availability of effective vaccines, regulatory actions impacting our business and our clients, and changes to consumer behavior or spending patterns. We may also be adversely affected as a result of the impact that any pandemic or other future outbreak of disease could have on our third-party providers. Any pandemic or a similar public health threat may have an impact on our business and is likely to also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this "Risk Factors" section.
We may not be able to provide end-to-end business solutions for our clients, which could lead to clients discontinuing their work with us, which in turn could harm our business.
In recent years, we have been expanding the nature and scope of our client engagements by extending the breadth of solutions and services that we offer, which include, for example, software applications, automation solutions, digital design and analytics services, engineering services, cloud related services, application development and maintenance, consulting, business process management, systems integration and security and infrastructure management. If we fail to anticipate and develop new and innovative offerings utilizing emerging technologies, such as AI based automation, generative AI, cloud, robotic process automation, IoT, and autonomous vehicles, or enhance existing offerings to keep pace with rapid changes in technology and in the industries on which we focus, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. Further, our inability to provide solutions in the areas that our clients are interested in may lead to insourcing as well as setting up of GCCs or shifting of work to our competitors.
The increased breadth of our service offerings may result in larger and more complex client projects. This will require us to establish closer relationships with our clients and potentially with other technology service providers and vendors and require a more thorough understanding of our clients' operations. Our ability to establish these relationships will depend on a number of factors including the proficiency of our technology professionals and our management personnel. Thus, if we are unable to attain a thorough understanding of our clients' operations, our service offerings may not effectively meet client needs and jeopardize our client engagements, which may negatively impact our revenues and financial condition.
Larger projects often involve multiple components, engagements or stages, and a client may choose not to retain us for additional stages or may cancel or delay additional planned engagements for various reasons unrelated to the quality of our services and outside of our control, such as the business or financial condition of our clients or the economy in general, cost pressures due to changes in tariffs or trade restrictions (including introduction of tariffs and tax on IT services), or geopolitical conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. These terminations, cancellations or delays may make it difficult to plan for project resource requirements, which may have a negative impact on our profitability. Geopolitical conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East may impact our ability to service our global clients in certain geographies leading to client dissatisfaction, loss of future business, termination of contracts and litigations.
Additionally, the business owners of our clients are increasingly making or influencing technology-related buying decisions. If we are unable to maintain or continue establishing business relationships with new buying centers, or if we are unable to articulate the value of our technology services to these business functions, our revenues may be adversely impacted.
Intense competition in the market for technology services could affect our win rates and pricing, which could reduce our market share and decrease our revenues and profits.
Our revenues and profits depend, in part, upon the continued demand for our services by our existing and new clients and our ability to meet this demand in a competitive and cost-effective manner. The technology services market is highly competitive. Our competitors include large global consulting firms, India-based technology services firms, software and solution providers, niche service providers, in-house IT departments and GCCs of large corporations.
The technology services industry is experiencing rapid changes that are affecting the competitive landscape, including recent divestitures and acquisitions that have resulted in consolidation within the industry. These changes may result in larger competitors with significant resources or competitors with more competitive service offerings in emerging areas of demand, such as generative AI, agentic AI, digital design, cloud-based solutions and cybersecurity. In addition, some of our competitors have added offshore capabilities to their service offerings. These competitors may be able to offer their services using the offshore and onsite model more efficiently. Many of these competitors are also substantially larger than us and have significant experience with international operations. We may face competition in countries where we currently operate, as well as in countries in which we expect to expand our operations. We also expect additional competition from consulting, technology services and outsourcing firms with current operations in other countries, such as Eastern Europe, China and the Philippines. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources, generate greater revenues, have more extensive existing client relationships and technology partnerships, greater brand recognition and greater ability to hire key technology and management talent than we do. In addition, our competitors may offer higher productivity benefits based on their investment in AI capabilities leading to lower total cost of ownership (TCO) for our clients and, potentially leading to significant pricing pressure. We may have to reduce prices to retain our existing clients or win more business. We may be unable to compete successfully against these competitors or may lose clients to these competitors. Additionally, our ability to compete effectively also depends in part on factors outside our control, such as the price at which our competitors offer comparable services, and the extent of our competitors' responsiveness to their clients' needs. If we lose clients, fail to attract new clients, or are forced to make pricing concessions as a result of our inability to differentiate our services, commoditization or increased competition, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Over the last few years, we have made significant investments in building our capabilities and training our employees in emerging technologies. Many of our large, existing competitors have also made similar investments. However, recent advancements in such technologies have democratized the availability of such technologies, leading to reduced entry barriers for new competitors to enter and disrupt the market for software services. Any inability on our part to compete with such companies and defend our market share could negatively impact our revenues and financial condition.
Moreover, our ability to maintain or increase pricing is restricted as clients often expect that as we do more business with them, they will receive efficiency gains, volume discounts or lower rates. This may impact our ability to pass on any increases in our costs to the clients. In addition, existing and new clients are also increasingly using third-party consultants with broad market knowledge to assist them in negotiating contractual terms. Any inability to maintain or increase pricing may also adversely impact our results of operations. Further macroeconomic uncertainties may have an adverse impact on our ability to increase pricing for our services and may lead certain clients to negotiate their existing contracts with us.
Our clients may decide to increase their in-house IT capabilities and/or control of their technology investments by setting up or expanding their own GCCs in India or other locations such as Eastern Europe, Latin America and South-east Asia. While this presents opportunities for us to partner with our clients, such centers may also result in erosion of some addressable market and/or increasing pricing pressures for our business.
If we are unable to transform existing services by leveraging AI and/or scale new AI-first service offerings to meet evolving client requirements at appropriate price points, our win rates could decline, market share could shrink, and our revenues and profits could decrease. Additionally, client demand for outcome-based pricing where our pricing is linked to achieving specific business objectives or outcomes, may challenge our traditional pricing models. Failure to deliver these outcomes could adversely impact our revenues and profitability.
Our engagements with clients are typically singular in nature and do not necessarily provide for subsequent engagements.
Our clients generally retain us on a short-term, engagement-by-engagement basis in connection with specific projects, rather than on a recurring basis under long-term contracts. Although a substantial majority of our revenues are generated from repeat business, which we define as revenues from a client who also contributed to our revenues during the prior fiscal year, our engagements with our clients are typically for projects that are singular in nature. Therefore, we must continually secure new engagements when our current engagements are completed or terminated, while also seeking to expand our business with existing clients. In some cases, we may intentionally transition clients from traditional services to newer offerings, including AI-enabled services, in order to maintain or expand client relationships and remain competitive. Such transitions may reduce revenues from certain traditional services, involve pricing concessions, or otherwise temporarily impact our profitability.
In addition, in order to continue expanding our business, we may need to significantly expand our sales and marketing group, which would increase our expenses and may not necessarily result in a substantial increase in business. If we are unable to generate a substantial number of new engagements for projects on a continual basis, our business and results of operations would likely be adversely affected. Additionally, macroeconomic uncertainties, changes in tariffs, trade restrictions or geopolitical conflicts may lead to clients re-evaluating their spending, which may lead them to decide not to extend or renew their business with us. Further, with the adoption of AI, the buying centers within our clients have shifted or are shifting from IT to business. Business leaders such as the Chief Human Resource Officer, Chief Marketing Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and others are increasingly involved in decisions regarding project awards. Our inability to establish and maintain strong relationships with such decision makers may adversely impact our ability to win projects.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.
FAQ
What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
1. Financial & Corporate
- Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
- Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
- Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
2. Legal & Regulatory
- Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
- Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
- Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
- Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
3. Production
- Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
- Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
- Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
- Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
4. Technology & Innovation
- Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
- Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
- Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
- Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
5. Ability to Sell
- Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
- Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
- Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
- Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
6. Macro & Political
- Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
- Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
- International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
- Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.