Want to see GLOO full AI Analyst Report?
Gloo Holdings, Inc. Class A (GLOO) Risk Analysis
Risk Overview Q2, 2026
Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Jul 31, 2026, filed Sep 10, 2026
Risk Change Over Time
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1Although we do not expect to rely on the "controlled company" exemption under the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market, we have the right to use such exemption and therefore could in the future avail ourselves of certain reduced corporate governance requirements.
Mr. Beck holds a majority of the aggregate voting power of our outstanding common stock and we may be considered to be a "controlled company" as that term is set forth in the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by a person or group of persons acting together is a "controlled company" and may elect not to comply with certain rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market regarding corporate governance, including: - the requirement that a majority of its board of directors consist of independent directors;- the requirement that its director nominees be selected or recommended for the board's selection by a majority of the board's independent directors in a vote in which only independent directors participate or by a nominating committee comprised solely of independent directors, in either case, with board resolutions or a written charter, as applicable, addressing the nominations process and related matters as required under the federal securities laws; and - the requirement that its compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee's purpose and responsibilities. These requirements would not apply to us if, in the future, we choose to avail ourselves of the "controlled company" exemption. Although we qualify as a "controlled company," we do not currently expect to rely on these exemptions and intend to fully comply with all corporate governance requirements under the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market. However, if we were to rely on some or all of these exemptions in the future, you would not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of other companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Risk Highlights Q2, 2026
Risk Word Cloud
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 58
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1AddedAlthough we do not expect to rely on the "controlled company" exemption under the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market, we have the right to use such exemption and therefore could in the future avail ourselves of certain reduced corporate governance requirements.
Mr. Beck holds a majority of the aggregate voting power of our outstanding common stock and we may be considered to be a "controlled company" as that term is set forth in the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by a person or group of persons acting together is a "controlled company" and may elect not to comply with certain rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market regarding corporate governance, including: - the requirement that a majority of its board of directors consist of independent directors;- the requirement that its director nominees be selected or recommended for the board's selection by a majority of the board's independent directors in a vote in which only independent directors participate or by a nominating committee comprised solely of independent directors, in either case, with board resolutions or a written charter, as applicable, addressing the nominations process and related matters as required under the federal securities laws; and - the requirement that its compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee's purpose and responsibilities. These requirements would not apply to us if, in the future, we choose to avail ourselves of the "controlled company" exemption. Although we qualify as a "controlled company," we do not currently expect to rely on these exemptions and intend to fully comply with all corporate governance requirements under the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market. However, if we were to rely on some or all of these exemptions in the future, you would not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of other companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2ChangedSellers in our acquisitions of Visitor Reach have repurchase rights during specified periods, and any exercise of such rights could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The existence of the repurchase rights may increase the likelihood of an impairment charge, complicate the overall integration process and decrease the benefits potentially realizable from investment synergies.
In connection with our acquisition of Visitor Reach, we granted the counterparties contractual rights to repurchase a portion of the business interests that we acquired, subject to certain conditions and over specified periods. If these repurchase rights are exercised, we may be required to unwind part or all of a completed acquisition or divest all or a portion of a completed investment, on terms that may not be favorable to us, which could result in the loss of strategic or core assets or future revenue streams. The exercise of these repurchase rights may also require us to deconsolidate such entities from our consolidated financial statements, which would adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and prospects. For example, if all repurchase rights outstanding as of January 31, 2026 for Visitor Reach were exercisable as of such date and were exercised on such date, we would be required to deconsolidate $3.8 million, or 4.1%, of our fiscal 2025 revenue and $1.1 million, or 0.7%, of our fiscal 2025 net loss. If all repurchase rights outstanding as of January 31, 2025 were exercisable for Visitor Reach as of such date and were exercised on such date, we would be required to deconsolidate $0.2 million, or 0.9%, of our fiscal 2024 revenue and $0.2 million, or an immaterial percent, of our fiscal 2024 net loss. The exercise of repurchase rights may also lead to other financial and operational disruption and require us to restructure our operations or write down previously recognized goodwill or intangible assets. Moreover, the existence of repurchase rights may affect our ability to integrate acquired businesses and reduce the certainty of long-term ownership, which could adversely affect our ability to realize the benefits of these acquisitions and investments. Such repurchase rights increase the consideration paid for acquisitions, which then may also increase the likelihood that we take impairment charges subsequent to the closing of acquisitions or investments.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3ChangedOur co-founder, president and chief executive officer, Mr. Beck, and his affiliates control a majority of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock and this limits other stockholders' ability to influence or direct the outcome of key corporate actions and transactions, including a change in control.
Our publicly traded Class A common stock entitles each holder to one vote per share. Our co-founder, president and chief executive officer, Mr. Beck, and his affiliates hold shares of Class B common stock that are entitled to ten votes per share. As of September 10, 2026, the shares beneficially owned by Mr. Beck represented a majority of the aggregate voting power of our outstanding common stock. As a result, for the foreseeable future, Mr. Beck will be able to significantly influence or control all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or other major transaction requiring stockholder approval. Mr. Beck may have interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interest. The concentration of influence will limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future and could have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control of our company, could deprive you and other holders of Class A common stock of an opportunity to receive a premium for your Class A common stock as part of a sale of our company and could negatively affect the trading price of our Class A common stock. In addition, this may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders. Additionally, future transfers by holders of our Class B common stock will generally result in those shares converting into our Class A common stock, subject to limited exceptions. The conversion of our Class B common stock to our Class A common stock will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of our Class B common stock who retain their shares in the long term. As a result, it is possible that one or more holders of our Class B common stock, including Mr. Beck, could gain additional control as other holders of our Class B common stock sell or otherwise convert their shares into our Class A common stock. In addition, the conversion of our Class B common stock into our Class A common stock will dilute holders of our Class A common stock, including holders of shares purchased in our IPO, in terms of their voting power within our Class A common stock.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4Sellers in certain of our prior investments have the right to require Mr. Beck and certain of his affiliates to purchase the Gloo shares received in such transaction at a given price during specified periods. If such rights are exercised and Mr. Beck chooses to sell a substantial number of the shares of Class A common stock owned by him or his affiliates to obtain funding for such purchases, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline.
In connection with certain of our prior investments, Mr. Beck has granted sellers the right to require him and certain of his affiliates, who collectively own a significant number of our outstanding shares of common stock, to purchase the Gloo shares received in the transaction at a given price during specified periods. If any such rights are exercised, Mr. Beck and his affiliates may choose to liquidate a substantial number of our shares of Class A common stock to finance the purchase price. Any substantial sale of shares by Mr. Beck or his affiliates could cause the trading price of our Class A common stock to decline.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5We may be required to acquire full ownership of Barna Holdings LLC under unfavorable terms upon the termination of one of such company's executive officers, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
In February 2025, we acquired a 49% equity interest in Barna. Under the organizational documents of Barna and an employment agreement with one of its executives, if such executive is terminated under certain conditions and circumstances, we may be obligated to acquire the remaining ownership interest in Barna at fair market value as determined by an independent qualified appraiser. Such acquisition may occur at a time or on terms that we do not believe to be favorable to us and may require us to make a significant unplanned capital expenditure. Such acquisition could materially affect our liquidity, require us to raise additional capital and divert management attention, each of which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 6We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company, and any decision on our part to comply only with certain reduced reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies could make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors.
We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the JOBS Act, and for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to "emerging growth companies," including: - exemption from the requirement to have our registered independent public accounting firm attest to management's assessment of our internal control over financial reporting;- exemption from compliance with the requirement of the PCAOB regarding the communication of critical audit matters in the auditor's report on the financial statements;- reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements; and - exemption from the requirement to hold non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements. We could continue to be an emerging growth company for up to five years until as late as January 31, 2031. Our status as an emerging growth company will end as soon as any of the following takes place: - the last day of the fiscal year in which we have at least $1.235 billion in annual revenue;- the date we qualify as a "large accelerated filer," with at least $700.0 million of equity securities held by non-affiliates;- the date on which we have issued, in any three-year period, more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities; or - January 31, 2031, which is the last day of the fiscal year ending after the fifth anniversary of the completion of the IPO. In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company may take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, delaying the adoption of these accounting standards until they would apply to private companies unless it otherwise irrevocably elects not to avail itself of this exemption. We have elected to use this extended transition period until we are no longer an emerging growth company or until we affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period. As a result, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates. We are also a "smaller reporting company" because our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the year ended January 31, 2026. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company in any given fiscal year if either (1) the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of such fiscal year or (2) our annual revenue is less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of such fiscal year. If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an emerging growth company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and, similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation. We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A common stock less attractive if we choose to rely on any of the exemptions afforded emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies. If some investors find our Class A common stock less attractive because we rely on any of these exemptions, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and the trading price of our Class A common stock may be more volatile and may decline.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 7The trading price of our Class A common stock might be volatile or might decline regardless of our operating performance, resulting in substantial losses for investors.
The trading price of our Class A common stock is likely to be volatile and could be subject to fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our Class A common stock include the following: - price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;- sales of shares of our Class A common stock by us or our stockholders;- the recruitment or departure of key personnel;- the public's reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC;- rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry;- fluctuations in the trading volume of our shares or the size of our public float;- actual or anticipated changes or fluctuations in our results of operations;- actual or anticipated developments in our business, our competitors' businesses or the competitive landscape generally;- failure of securities analysts to maintain coverage of us, changes in actual or future expectations of investors or securities analysts or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;- litigation involving us, our industry or both;- governmental or regulatory actions or audits;- regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries;- general economic conditions and trends;- announcement or expectation of additional financing efforts;- expiration of lock-up agreements or other restrictions on the sale or disposition of our securities; and - changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines, interpretations or principles. The realization of any of the above risks or any of a broad range of other risks, including those described in this "Risk Factors" section, could have an adverse impact on the trading price of our Class A common stock. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the trading price of a particular company's securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management's attention and resources.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 8Substantial future sales of shares of our Class A common stock, or the perception that such sales may occur, could cause the trading price of our Class A common stock to decline.
The trading price of our Class A common stock could decline as a result of substantial sales of our Class A common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders, a large number of shares of our Class A common stock becoming available for sale or the perception in the market that holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 9The dual-class structure of our common stock may adversely affect the trading market for our Class A common stock.
Certain stock index providers have excluded companies with multiple classes of shares of common stock from being added to certain stock indices. Accordingly, the dual-class structure of our common stock makes us ineligible for inclusion in indices with such restrictions and, as a result, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and other investment vehicles that attempt to passively track those indices may not invest in our Class A common stock. In addition, several stockholder advisory firms and large institutional investors have been critical of the use of multi-class structures. Such stockholder advisory firms may publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or our capital structure, which may dissuade large institutional investors from purchasing shares of our Class A common stock. These actions could make our Class A common stock less attractive to other investors and may result in a less active trading market for our Class A common stock.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 10If securities or industry analysts either do not publish research about us or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us, our business or our market, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our Class A common stock, the trading price or trading volume of our Class A common stock could decline.
The trading market for our Class A common stock is influenced in part by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. If one or more securities analysts initiate research with an unfavorable rating or downgrade our Class A common stock, provide a more favorable recommendation about our competitors or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our Class A common stock price would likely decline. If few securities analysts cover us, or if one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets and demand for our securities could decrease, which in turn could cause the price and trading volume of our Class A common stock to decline.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 11Our issuance of additional capital stock in connection with financings, acquisitions, investments, our equity incentive plans or otherwise will dilute all other stockholders.
We expect to issue additional capital stock in the future that will result in dilution to all other stockholders. We expect to grant equity awards to employees, directors and consultants under our equity incentive plans. We may also raise capital through equity financings in the future. If we acquire or make investments in complementary companies, products or technologies, we may issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition or investment. Any such issuances of additional capital stock may cause stockholders to experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the per share value of our Class A common stock to decline.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 12Delaware law and provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws might delay, discourage or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management, thereby depressing the trading price of our Class A common stock.
Our status as a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL"), may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult or delay or prevent changes in control of our management. Among other things, these provisions: - provide for a dual class common stock structure, with differing voting rights;- permit our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock, with any powers, rights, preferences and privileges as they may designate;- provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors;- provide that all vacancies and newly created directorships, may, except as otherwise required by law, our governing documents or resolution of our board of directors, and subject to the rights of holders of our preferred stock, only be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, provided that vacancies occurring on our board of directors created by the removal of a director by the stockholders may also be filled by a vote of the stockholders if, at the time of such action to fill such vacancy, there is a holder of shares of Class B common stock that has voting control over at least a majority of the voting power of our outstanding shares of capital stock;- divide our board of directors into three classes, each of which stands for election once every three years;- for so long as our board of directors is classified, and subject to the rights of holders of our preferred stock, provide that a director may only be removed from the board of directors by the stockholders for cause;- require that any action to be taken by our stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and not be taken by written consent, provided that at any time that a holder of shares of Class B common stock has voting control over at least a majority of the voting power of our outstanding shares of capital stock, any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders may be taken by written consent in accordance with the DGCL as long as our board of directors has first recommended or approved such action or our board of directors and secretary have been provided with at least 30 days' prior written notice of such action;- provide that stockholders seeking to present proposals before a meeting of stockholders or to nominate candidates for election as directors at a meeting of stockholders must provide notice in writing in a timely manner, and also meet specific requirements as to the form and content of a stockholder's notice;- not provide for cumulative voting rights (therefore allowing the holders of a plurality of the shares of common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors to elect all of the directors standing for election, if they should so choose); and - provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by our board of directors, the chairperson of our board of directors, our chief executive officer or president, or a holder of shares of Class B common stock that has voting control over at least a majority of the voting power of our outstanding shares of capital stock. These provisions, alone or together, could delay, discourage or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors of their choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions they desire, any of which, under certain circumstances, could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our Class A common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Class A common stock.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 13Our bylaws designate a state or federal court located within the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, and also provide that the federal district courts are the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, each of which could limit our stockholders' ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, stockholders or employees.
Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (1) any derivative action brought on our behalf, (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our current or former directors, stockholders, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders, (3) any action arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or (4) any other action asserting a claim that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine shall be the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, another State court in Delaware or the federal district court for the District of Delaware), except for, as to each of (1) through (4) above, any claim as to which such court determines that there is an indispensable party not subject to the jurisdiction of such court (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of such court within ten days following such determination). This provision does not apply to any action brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 22 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") establishes concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over Securities Act claims. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to hear such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our bylaws also provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States are the sole and exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Any person or entity purchasing, holding or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our securities shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing bylaw provisions. Although we believe these exclusive forum provisions benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law and federal securities laws in the types of lawsuits to which each applies, the exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder's ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with us or our current or former directors, officers,stockholders or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our current and former directors, officers, stockholders and other employees. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder as a result of our exclusive forum provisions. Further, the enforceability of similar exclusive forum provisions in other companies' organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that a court of law could rule that these types of provisions are inapplicable or unenforceable if they are challenged in a proceeding or otherwise. If a court were to find either exclusive forum provision contained in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur significant additional costs associated with resolving such dispute, as well as resolving such action in other jurisdictions, all of which could harm our results of operations.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.
