TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Granite Falls Energy (GFGY) Risk Analysis

Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning. Granite Falls Energy disclosed 37 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Granite Falls Energy reported the most risks in the “Legal & Regulatory” category.

Risk Overview Q2, 2021

Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Jul 31, 2021, filed Sep 14, 2021

Risk Distribution
37Risks
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Risk Change Over Time

Granite Falls Energy disclosed risks per quarterNo. of Risks3234363840Q3Q4Q12017Q2Q3Q4Q12018Q2Q3Q4Q12019Q2Q3Q4Q12020Q2Q3Q4Q12021Q2Showing: Q2, 2021
Risks removedRisks addedRisks changedGranite Falls Energy Risk Factors
  • Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
    The spread of coronavirus variants and the continued prevalence of COVID-19 infections may result in decreased demand for our ethanol and could negatively affect our profitability.

    While the COVID-19 infections generally decreased during the first half of 2021, new variants of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, including the Delta variant, have resulted in increased infections. The rise in COVID-19 infections and the spread of new variants may result in government policies and consumer behaviors that reduce demand for travel and thereby reduce the demand for transportation fuel, including the ethanol we produce. If demand for transportation fuel decreases, the Company expects the price of ethanol we sell to decrease, which could result in tight or negative operating margins.

Read and Evaluate the RiskReserved for Ultimate MembersUpgrade

Risk Highlights Q2, 2021

Main Risk Category
Legal & Regulatory
With 11 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
37
-2
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
1Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Jul 2021
Number of Risk Changed
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 1

Risk Word Cloud

meeting the requirements of evolving environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and in particular those related to climate change, could adversely affect our financial performance.adversely affect our financial performancerail logistical problems may result in delays in shipments of our products which could negatively impact our financial performance.negatively impact our financial performancesustained negative operating margins may require some ethanol producers to temporarily limit or cease production.ethanol producers to temporarily limitwe are exposed to credit risk resulting from non-payment by significant customers.exposed to credit risk resultingif we fail to comply with the 20% reduction in ghg emissions requirement, we will not be able to generate rins for our non-grandfathered volumes of ethanol, which could adversely affect our operating margins.our non-grandfathered volumes of ethanolepa imposed e10 blend wallepa imposed e10 blend wallthe california low carbon fuel standard may decrease demand for corn based ethanol which could negatively impact our profitability.california low carbon fuel standardoperational difficulties at our plants could negatively impact our sales volumes and could cause us to incur substantial losses.negatively impact our sales volumesthe prices of ethanol and distillers' grains may decline as a result of trade barriers imposed by foreign countries with respect to ethanol and distillers' grains originating in the u.s. and negatively affect our profitability.result of trade barriers imposedif we fail to comply with the 20% reduction in ghg emissions requirement, we will not be able to generate rins for our non-grandfathered volumes of ethanol, which could adversely affect our operating margins.adversely affect our operating margins

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 37

Regulation3 | 8.1%
  • Regulation - Risk 1
    Our failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

    We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to the discharge of materials into the air, water and ground. Certain aspects of our operations require environmental permits and controls to prevent and reduce air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities including the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws or non-compliance with environmental permits. We could also incur substantial costs and experience increased operating expenses as a result of operational changes to comply with environmental laws, regulations and permits. We have previously incurred substantial costs relating to our air emissions permit and expect additional costs relating to this permit in the future. Our plants' air permits require certain on-going performance testing to be completed periodically to ensure compliance with minor source emission limits. On May 12, 2017, HLBE submitted a letter to the MPCA regarding the results of certain non-compliant tests. On October 17, 2017, HLBE entered into a stipulation agreement with the MPCA relating to these non-compliant tests.  Under the stipulation agreement, HLBE agreed to pay a civil penalty of $63,500, which was paid in October 2017. Further, environmental laws and regulations are subject to substantial change. We cannot predict what material impact, if any, these changes in laws or regulations might have on our business. Future changes in regulations or enforcement policies could impose more stringent requirements on us, compliance with which could require additional capital expenditures, increase our operating costs or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also relax requirements that could prove beneficial to our competitors and thus adversely affect our business. In addition, regulations of the EPA and the MPCA depend heavily on administrative interpretations. We cannot assure you that future interpretations made by regulatory authorities, with possible retroactive effect, will not adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.  Failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

  • Regulation - Risk 2
    Because federal and state regulation heavily influence the supply of and demand for ethanol, changes in government regulation that adversely affect demand or supply will have a material adverse effect on our business.

    Various federal and state laws, regulations and programs impact the supply of and demand for ethanol.  We believe the most important of these is the RFS, which sets minimum national volume standards for use of cellulosic, biomass-based diesel and total advanced renewable fuels. The RFS helps support a market for ethanol that might disappear without this incentive. In the case of the RFS, while it creates a demand for ethanol, the existence of specific categories of renewable fuels also creates a demand for these types of renewable fuels and will likely provide an incentive for companies to further develop these products to capitalize on that demand. In these circumstances, the RFS may also reduce demand for ethanol in favor of the renewable fuels for which specific categories exist. By statute, the RFS requires that 16.55 billion gallons be sold or dispensed in 2013, increasing to 36.0 billion gallons by 2022, but caps the amount of corn-based ethanol that can be used to meet the renewable fuels blending requirements at 15.0 billion gallons for 2015 and thereafter. The final 2021 RVOs have not yet been released. On December 19, 2019, the EPA announced final RVO requirements for the RFS for calendar year 2020. The corn-based biofuel requirement was set at 15.0 billion gallons, equating to the statutory requirement level as originally set by Congress when the RFS was enacted. However, the overall RVOs were set at 20.09 billion gallons for 2020, more than 20% below the overall statutory level of 30 billion gallons, due to decreases in the RVOs for cellulosic ethanol and advanced biofuels.  The 2019 and 2018 standards were also more than 20% below the overall statutory level. According to the RFS, if mandatory renewable fuel volumes are reduced by at least 20% for two consecutive years, the EPA is required to modify, or reset, statutory volumes through 2022. In October 2018, the Office of Management and Budget announced that the 20% thresholds "have been met or are expected to be met in the near future." In May 2019, the EPA delivered a proposed RFS "reset" rule to the Office of Management and Budget. If the statutory RVOs are reduced as a result of reset, it could have an adverse effect on the market price and demand for ethanol which would negatively impact our financial performance. Current ethanol production capacity exceeds the 2020 RVO standard which can be satisfied by corn-based ethanol. Reduction of blending requirements could reduce the demand for and price of ethanol. If demand for ethanol decreases, it could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, opponents of ethanol such as large oil companies will likely continue their efforts to repeal or reduce the RFS through lawsuits or lobbying of Congress. Successful reduction or repeal of the blending requirements of the RFS could have an adverse effect on the market price and demand for ethanol which would negatively impact our financial performance. Under the RFS, small refineries may petition for and be granted temporary exemptions from the RVOs if they can demonstrate that compliance with the RVOs would cause disproportionate economic hardship. On December 17, 2020, the EPA released data on the number of waivers filed, which indicated that, as of December 17, 2020, 14 petitions for waivers for the 2020 compliance year have been received. For the 2019 compliance year, 32 petitions have been received. To date, all of the petitions received for both compliance years 2020 and 2019 remain pending. Further, some petitions remain pending from previous compliance years. Additionally, 44 petitions have been received by the EPA for the 2018 compliance year. To date, 31 petitions have been approved, which have exempted approximately 1.43 billion RINs, which is approximately 13.42 billion gallons of gasoline and diesel, from meeting the RFS blending targets. It is expected that additional petitions for waivers for the 2020 compliance year will be received by the EPA. It is also expected that the EPA will approve a significant number of these waiver petitions, thereby exempting a substantial number of gallons of gasoline and diesel from meeting the RFS blending targets. These exemptions decrease demand for our products, which negatively impacts ethanol prices and our profitability. On May 29, 2018, the National Corn Growers Association, National Farmers Union, and the RFA filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit challenging the EPA's grant of waivers to three specific refineries.  The petitioners are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit to reject the waivers granted to three refineries located in Wynnewood, Oklahoma, Cheyenne, Wyoming, and Woods Cross, Utah as an abuse of EPA authority. These waived gallons are not redistributed to obligated parties, and in effect, reduce the aggregate RVOs under the RFS.  In January 2020, the court struck down the exemptions as improperly issued by the EPA. The court interpreted the RFS statute to provide that refineries are only eligible for relief if they have received uninterrupted, continuous extensions of the exemptions. Consistent with the ruling, the EPA denied certain small refinery exemption petitions filed by oil refineries in 2020 seeking retroactive relief from their ethanol use requirements for prior years. However, HollyFrontier and Wynnewood Refining filed a petition in the U.S. Supreme Court in September 2020 seeking review of the January 2020 ruling. In January 2021, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. Oral arguments are expected to be scheduled in spring of 2021. The Supreme Court's decision could result in the overturning of the EPA's denial of certain small refinery exemption petitions. Such a decision could have sweeping negative effects on the ethanol industry and our profitability. An EPA final rule released in December 2019 provides that EPA will project exempt volumes based on a three-year average of the relief recommended by the Department of Energy ("DOE") for years 2016-2018, rather than based on actual exemptions granted. For the 2016 compliance year, the EPA said the DOE's recommended relief was approximately 440 million RINs. The EPA, however, actually granted waivers for approximately 790 million RINs. Similarly, the DOE's 2017 compliance year recommendation was 1.02 billion RINs, as compared to the approximately 1.82 billion RINs granted waivers by the EPA. For the 2018 compliance year, the DOE recommended the EPA approve waivers for 840 million RINs, as compared to the approximately 1.43 billion RINs granted waivers by the EPA. The EPA's final rule also announced its general policy approach with respect to small refinery waivers on a go-forward basis as consistent with DOE's recommendations, where appropriate. This final rule fell short of the relief that was urged by ethanol producers. As a result, management expects that small refinery exemptions will continue to have a negative effect on demand for our products, ethanol prices, and our profitability.

  • Regulation - Risk 3
    There are significant restrictions on the transfer of our units.

    To protect our status as a partnership for tax purposes and to assure that no public trading market in our units develops, our units are subject to significant restrictions on transfer and transfers are subject to approval by our board of governors. All transfers of units must comply with the transfer provisions of our member control agreement and the unit transfer policy adopted by our board of governors. Our board of governors will not approve transfers which could cause us to lose our tax status or violate federal or state securities laws. As a result of the provisions of our member control agreement, members may not be able to transfer their units and may be required to assume the risks of the investment for an indefinite period of time.

See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment. They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result. It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process. Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”. Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report. According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing. You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector. Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements. A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below. 1. Financial & Corporate Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results. Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing. Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments. Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances. 2. Legal & Regulatory Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company. Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation. Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy. Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives. 3. Production Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory. Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers. Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls. Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation. 4. Technology & Innovation Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development. Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology. Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks. Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying. 5. Ability to Sell Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers. Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes. Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration. Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation. 6. Macro & Political Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions. Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19. International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company. Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.