HSBC Holdings (HBC2) Risk Analysis
Risk Overview Q4, 2021
Risk Change Over Time
No filing history is available.
- Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1HSBC Holdings is a holding company and, as a result, is dependent on loan/instrument payments and dividends from its subsidiaries to meet its obligations, including obligations with respect to its debt securities, and to provide profits for payment of future dividends to shareholders
HSBC Holdings is a non-operating holding company and, as such, its principal source of income is from operating subsidiaries that hold the principal assets of the Group. As a separate legal entity, HSBC Holdings relies on remittance of its subsidiaries’ loan/instrument interest payments and dividends in order to be able to pay obligations to debt holders as they fall due, and to pay dividends to its shareholders. The ability of HSBC Holdings' subsidiaries and affiliates to pay remittances and dividends to HSBC Holdings is subject to such subsidiaries’ and affiliates’ financial performance and could also be restricted by applicable laws, regulations, exchange controls and other requirements.
- Debt & Financing - Risk 2We may not manage risks associated with the replacement of benchmark rates and indices effectively
Key benchmark rates and indices, including interbank offered rates (“Ibors”) such as the London interbank offered rate (‘Libor’), have been the subject of national, international and other regulatory scrutiny and reform for a number of years. This has resulted in significant changes to the methodology and operation of certain benchmarks and indices, the adoption of replacement near risk free rates (“RFRs”) and the proposed discontinuation of certain reference rates (including Libor). In May 2019, the European Money Markets Institute (‘EMMI’) announced the cessation of the Euro Overnight Index average (Eonia) from the end of 2021 and, in March 2021, ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (‘IBA’) announced that it would cease publication of (i) all sterling, Euro, Swiss franc and Japanese yen settings, and the 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar Libor settings immediately after 31 December 2021 and (ii) the remaining U.S. dollar Libor settings immediately after 30 June 2023. The FCA subsequently used its regulatory powers to compel IBA to publish a number of sterling and Japanese Yen Libor settings on an alternative methodology basis (so-called “synthetic Libor”) from 1 January 2022 for an undetermined period of time. The discontinuation of sterling, Swiss franc, Euro and Japanese Yen Libor interest rates, and Eonia has occurred with the adoption of respective replacement near risk free rates (‘RFR’). The continued existence of legacy contracts in benchmark rates that demised from the end of 2021, so called ‘tough legacy,’ and legacy contracts referencing other Ibors that are expected to demise at a later date, notably a number of US dollar Libor settings, results in a number of risks for HSBC, its clients and the financial services industry more widely. These include but are not limited to; •Regulatory compliance, legal and conduct risks, that arise from the transition of legacy contracts to RFRs or alternative rates and from the sales of products referencing RFRs could lead to unintended or unfavourable outcomes for clients and market participants. These risks could be heightened if HSBC’s sales processes and procedures are not appropriately adapted or executed to detail the risks and complexity of the RFR market conventions; •Legal risks are associated with legacy contracts that HSBC is unable to appropriately transition and legacy contracts that rely on the use of legislative solutions, such as 'synthetic' Libor. If HSBC is unable to appropriately transition legacy contracts this could lead to reliance on fallback provisions which do not contemplate the permanent cessation of the relevant Ibor, and there is a risk that these fallback provisions do not work from a contractual, practical or financial perspective, potentially resulting in unintended outcomes for clients. While legislative solutions are (in some circumstances) expected to assist market participants with transitioning contracts or mitigating risks associated with 'tough legacy' contracts, there remains some uncertainty around the operation and implementation of such solutions as well as their longevity. For legacy contracts that utilise 'synthetic' Libor there is a risk that we are unable to transition such contracts to a new RFR or alternative rate before the relevant 'synthetic' Libor is discontinued. This could lead to reliance on the above mentioned fallback provisions, which do not contemplate permanent cessation of Libor. Each of these issues could result in unintended or unfavourable outcomes for clients and market participants and this could potentially increase the risk of disputes; •Financial risks result from the discontinuation of US dollar Libor and the development of liquidity in its replacement RFR, Secured Overnight Funding rate (‘SOFR’). Differences in US dollar Libor and SOFR interest rate levels create a basis risk in the trading book and banking book due to asymmetric adoption of SOFR across assets, liabilities and products that we need to actively manage through appropriate financial hedging. In addition, this may limit the ability to hedge effectively; and •Resilience and operational risks, resulting from ‘tough legacy’ and other legacy Ibor contracts that are expected to be transitioned to RFRs and alternative rates. In particular, there is a risk that our systems, processes and controls have not been appropriately adapted to account for new RFR methodology changes or fallback provisions, leading to complaints and disputes. The operational and resilience risks may be further heightened if there is a slow take-up of the use of the SOFR benchmark for new financing and hedging activities in 2022, as this could compress the timelines for transition of legacy contracts referencing US dollar Libor settings that are demising in 2023. If any of these risks materialise this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and customers.
Risk Highlights Q4, 2021
Risk Word Cloud
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 36
- Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1ChangedHSBC Holdings is a holding company and, as a result, is dependent on loan/instrument payments and dividends from its subsidiaries to meet its obligations, including obligations with respect to its debt securities, and to provide profits for payment of future dividends to shareholders
HSBC Holdings is a non-operating holding company and, as such, its principal source of income is from operating subsidiaries that hold the principal assets of the Group. As a separate legal entity, HSBC Holdings relies on remittance of its subsidiaries’ loan/instrument interest payments and dividends in order to be able to pay obligations to debt holders as they fall due, and to pay dividends to its shareholders. The ability of HSBC Holdings' subsidiaries and affiliates to pay remittances and dividends to HSBC Holdings is subject to such subsidiaries’ and affiliates’ financial performance and could also be restricted by applicable laws, regulations, exchange controls and other requirements.
- Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2Non-Financial risks are inherent in our business, including the risk of fraudulent activity
We are exposed to many types of non-financial risks that are inherent in banking operations. Non-financial risk can be defined as the risk to HSBC of achieving its strategy or objectives as a result of inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. It includes; fraudulent and other criminal activities (both internal and external), breakdowns in processes or procedures, breaches of regulations or law, financial reporting and tax errors, external events and systems failure or non-availability. These risks are also present when we rely on outside suppliers or vendors to provide services to us and our customers. In particular, fraudsters may target any of our products, services and delivery channels, including lending, internet banking, payments, bank accounts and cards. This may result in financial loss to the Group and/or our customers, an adverse customer experience, reputational damage and potential litigation, regulatory proceeding, administrative action or other adversarial proceeding in any jurisdiction in which we operate, depending on the circumstances of the event. These non-financial risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, strategy and reputation.
- Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 3Our financial statements are based in part on judgements, estimates and assumptions that are subject to uncertainty
The preparation of financial information requires management to make judgements and use estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Due to the inherent uncertainty in making estimates, particularly those involving the use of complex models, actual results reported in future periods could differ from those on which management’s estimates are based. Estimates, judgements, assumptions and models are continually evaluated, and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the prevailing circumstances. The impacts of revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. Accounting policies deemed critical to our results and financial position are those that involve a high degree of uncertainty and have a material impact on the financial statements. In 2021 these include impairment of amortised cost financial assets and assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, impairment of goodwill and non-financial assets, valuation of financial instruments, deferred tax assets, provisions, impairment of interests in associates and post-employment benefit plans, which are discussed in detail in ‘Critical accounting estimates and judgements’ on page 90. The measurement of impairment of amortised cost financial assets and financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income requires the selection and calibration of complex models and the use of estimates and assumptions to incorporate relevant information about past events, current conditions and forecasts of economic conditions. Additionally, significant judgement is involved in determining what is considered to be significant increases in credit risk and what the point of initial recognition is for revolving facilities. The assessment of whether goodwill and non-financial assets are impaired, and the measurement of any impairment, involves the application of judgement in determining key assumptions, including discount rates, estimated cash flows for the periods for which detailed cash flows are available and projecting the long-term pattern of sustainable cash flows thereafter. The recognition and measurement of deferred tax assets involves significant judgement regarding the probability and sufficiency of future taxable profits, taking into account the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and tax planning strategies, including corporate reorganisations. The recognition and measurement of provisions involve significant judgements due to the high degree of uncertainty in determining whether a present obligation exists, and in estimating the probability and amount of any outflows that may arise. The valuation of financial instruments measured at fair value can be subjective, in particular where models are used that include unobservable inputs. The assessment of interests in associates for impairment involves significant judgements in determining the value in use, in particular estimating the present values of cash flows expected to arise from continuing to hold the investment, based on a number of management assumptions. At 31 December 2021, we performed an impairment review of our investment in BoCom and concluded it was not impaired based on our value in use calculation. The calculation of the defined benefit pension obligation involves the determination of key assumptions, including discount rate, inflation rate, pension payments and deferred pension and pay and mortality. Given the uncertainty and subjectivity associated with the above critical accounting judgements and estimates, future outcomes may differ materially from those assumed using information available at the reporting date. The effect of these changes on the future results of operations and the future financial position of the Group may be material, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. For further details, see ‘Critical accounting estimates and judgements’ on page 90.
- Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 4Changes in accounting standards may have a material impact on how we report our financial results and financial condition
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’), including interpretations (‘IFRICS’) issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee. From time to time, the IASB or the IFRS Interpretations Committee may issue new accounting standards or interpretations that could materially impact how we calculate, report and disclose our financial results and financial condition, and which may affect our capital ratios, including the CET1 ratio. For example, IFRS 17 ‘Insurance Contracts’ sets the requirements that an entity should apply in accounting for insurance contracts it issues and reinsurance contracts it holds. IFRS 17 is effective from 1 January 2023 and could have a significant adverse impact on the profitability of our insurance business. We could also be required to apply new or revised standards retrospectively, resulting in our restating prior period financial statements in material amounts.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.