Dole (4CB) Risk Analysis
Risk Overview Q2, 2026
Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 10, 2026
Risk Change Over Time
Risk Highlights Q2, 2026
Risk Word Cloud
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 50
- Regulation - Risk 1Changes in immigration laws could impact the availability of labor to harvest our products and operate our manufacturing plants, or the availability of produce purchased from third party suppliers.
The personnel engaged in our harvesting operations may include significant numbers of immigrants who are authorized to work in the host county in which we operate. The availability and number of these workers could decrease if there are changes in immigration laws in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate. A scarcity of available personnel to harvest agricultural products in these countries could increase our labor costs, increase our product costs or lead to product shortages, therefore adversely impacting our business, financial condition and results of operations.
- Regulation - Risk 2Our operations and products are highly regulated in the areas of food safety and protection of human health and the environment.
Our operations are subject to a broad range of foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including laws and regulations governing the use and disposal of pesticides and other chemicals, all of which involve compliance costs. These regulations directly affect day-to-day operations and, to maintain compliance with all of the laws and regulations that apply to our operations, we have been and may be required in the future to modify our operations, purchase new equipment or make capital improvements. Changes to our processes and procedures could require us to incur unanticipated costs and/or materially impact our business. Violations of these laws and regulations can result in substantial fines, penalties or sanctions. In some circumstances, we may recall a product, voluntarily or otherwise, if we or the regulators believe it presents a potential risk. There can be no assurance that these modifications and improvements and any fines, penalties and recalls would not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we have been and, in the future, may become subject to lawsuits alleging that our operations and products caused personal injury or property damage. As a producer and distributor of food products, we are subject to the laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where our facilities are located and where our products are distributed. In particular, in the U.S. we are subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Food Safety Modernization Act ("FSMA"), which is enforced by the FDA. The FDA has the authority to regulate the growing, harvesting, manufacturing, including composition and ingredients, processing, labeling, packaging import, distribution and marketing and safety of food in the U.S. The FSMA, enacted in January 2011, significantly enhances the FDA's authority over various aspects of food regulation. For example, the FSMA granted the FDA mandatory recall authority when the FDA determines there is a reasonable probability that a food is adulterated or misbranded and that the use of, or exposure to, the food will cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals. The FDA has been active in implementing the requirements of the FSMA through issuance of regulations designed to result in a reduction of the risk of contamination in food manufacturing and in beginning compliance enforcement of those regulations, such as the Foreign Supplier Verification program. The full impact of the FDA's compliance protocols continues to evolve, and we cannot assure you that it will not materially impact our business. Regulatory agencies in other jurisdictions have similar authority to address the risk of contamination or adulteration and to require that contaminated products be removed from the market. In addition, the shift to a sustainable food system could result in increased costs associated with compliance with new laws and regulations. The European Green Deal sets out to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. The EU's Farm to Fork Strategy is an integral part of the Green Deal and aims to address the challenges of sustainable food systems. This regulates food safety at all stages of the production and distribution process for all food products marketed within the EU, whether produced within the EU or imported from non-EU countries. This body of legislation forms a complex and integrated system of rules covering the entire food chain, from animal feed and health, through plant protection and food production, to processing, storage, transport, import and export and retail sales. A framework regulation called the General Food Law Regulation (EC No. 178/2002) lays down the general principles and requirements of food law. European Member States are required to implement European food safety law at a national level. National authorities and food agencies are responsible for enforcement and ensuring compliance within European Member States. National authorities may withdraw or recall food from the market if it is considered to be injurious to health or unfit for human consumption. Where food presents a serious risk to human health, animal health or the environment, the European Commission can put in place protective measures and suspend the placing on the market or use of products originating from the EU or suspend imports of products originating from non-EU countries. The failure to comply with these laws and regulations in any jurisdiction, or to obtain required approvals, could result in fines, as well as a ban or temporary suspension on the production of our products or limit or bar their distribution, and affect our development of new products, and thus could materially adversely affect our business and operating results. In addition, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (the "USDA") regulates the import and export of certain fruits and vegetables into and from the U.S., and the USDA also imposes growing, manufacturing and certification requirements for certain products labeled with organic claims. Similarly, the EU maintains a system of control, certification and enforcement to guarantee that food which is marketed as organic complies with organic standards. Organic food imported into the EU is also subject to control procedures to guarantee that they have been produced and shipped in accordance with organic principles. Failure to obtain necessary permits or otherwise comply with USDA and European regulations and requirements could result in a ban or temporary suspension of the import or export of our products into or from the U.S., or our ability to grow, manufacture or market our products as organic, and thus could materially adversely affect our business. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency, and other Canadian governmental departments, could enforce laws such as the Safe Food for Canadians Regulations in such a way as to cause significant disruption to our Canadian business, including for example, requirements relating to import licenses, traceability, organic certification and food testing requirements.
- Regulation - Risk 3As a global company, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") and other anti-corruption laws or trade control laws, within the jurisdictions in which we do business. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, other remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There is no assurance that we will be completely effective in ensuring our compliance with all applicable regulations and laws. In particular, we cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted. If we are not in compliance with such laws we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of such laws by U.S. or foreign authorities could also have an adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. Sanctions As a company with international operations, we are subject to economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we do business, including, as applicable, the U.S., the U.K. and the EU, among others. These laws and regulations may have a broad jurisdictional reach. For instance, our non-U.S. affiliates may be required to comply with the sanctions administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"), depending on the sanctions program involved or the nexus of the non-U.S. affiliate's activities to the U.S. Economic sanctions typically prohibit or impose restrictions on dealings that involve certain foreign jurisdictions, governments, individuals or entities. Moreover, the goods we sell may be subject to applicable export control laws and regulations, such as the Export Administration Regulations ("EAR") administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security. The EAR generally govern the export, reexport and in-country transfer of items that are subject to the EAR, including U.S.-origin goods. Changes to applicable sanctions or export control laws and regulations could result in decreased use of our products or hinder our ability to export or sell our products to existing or potential customers, which may adversely affect our operating results, financial condition or strategic objectives. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties. Dole has in the past and may in the future engage in the exportation of agricultural commodities pursuant to an OFAC general license or similar licenses under other economic and trade sanctions laws. For example, Dole has exported fruit to distributors located in Iran and in other countries for onward shipment to Iran in reliance on an OFAC general license that authorizes such activities. This general license required Dole to comply with certain conditions with respect to products sold, end-user limitations and payment terms. Although Dole believes it complied with the general license requirements for such sales and will comply with all applicable laws related to any future similar sales should they occur, there can be no assurance that Dole would be deemed by OFAC, or other applicable sanctions authorities, to have been in compliance. Non-compliance with general licenses or other sanctions laws could lead to a finding of a violation, which may result in monetary penalties, reputational harm or other harm to our business. Tax legislation Dole is also subject to changes in the approach to tax laws in the countries in which we do business. For example, various foreign taxing jurisdictions enacted local legislation formally adopting the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules ("Pillar Two"), which generally provide for a minimum effective tax rate of 15%, as established by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Pillar Two Framework. The rules became effective on January 1, 2024, and January 1, 2025, for different aspects of the legislation and vary by jurisdiction. The impact of the Pillar Two rules effective in 2025 has been included in the consolidated financial statements. Additional jurisdictions are expected to implement the model rules under local law in the future, with varying effective dates. Based on current implemented legislation, the Company believes that its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows will not be materially impacted by the Pillar Two directives. Anti-bribery We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") and other anti-corruption laws of the countries and regions in which we do business. As well as the FCPA, these include but is not limited to the UK Bribery Act (UKBA), France's Sapin II, the Criminal Justice (Corruption Offences) Act (2018) in Ireland, the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, and the Brazilian Clean Company Act (CCA), amongst others. If we are not in compliance with these laws, we may be subject to criminal or civil penalties, other remedial measures and legal expenses, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. The FCPA, U.K. Bribery Act and these other laws generally prohibit us and intermediaries from bribing, being bribed or making other prohibited payments to government officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. We operate in a number of jurisdictions, some of which may pose a high risk of potential FCPA or other local anti-corruption violations, and we participate in joint ventures and relationships with third parties whose actions could potentially subject us to liability under the FCPA or local anti-corruption laws. Antitrust & Competition laws We are subject to the anti-trust and competition laws of the countries and regions in which we do business including but not limited to EU & U.S. competition laws. Failure to comply with such regulations, or even the allegation of violation of antitrust or competition law, could adversely impact our reputation, business and results of operations. It could also result in material fines for the Company.
- Regulation - Risk 4Litigation and regulatory enforcement concerning marketing and labeling of food products could adversely affect our business and reputation.
The marketing and labeling of any food product in recent years has brought increased risk that consumers will bring class action lawsuits, and that the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC"), and/or state attorneys general will bring legal action concerning the truth and accuracy of the marketing and labeling of the product. Examples of causes of action that may be asserted in a consumer class action lawsuit include fraud, unfair trade practices and breach of state consumer protection statutes, such as Proposition 65 in California. The FTC and/or state attorneys general may bring legal action that seeks removal of a product from the marketplace and imposes fines and penalties. Even when not merited, class claims, action by the FTC or state attorneys general enforcement actions can be expensive to defend and adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and consumers and our corporate and brand image, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. The labeling of our products, and their distribution and marketing, is also subject to regulation by governmental authorities in each jurisdiction where our products are marketed, such as, in the EU, under Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labeling of organic products, Directive (EU) 2019/2161 on consumer protection rules, Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers and Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. For example, the USDA requires compliance with certain growing production and certification requirements as a condition to labeling foods with the word "organic" or with the USDA organic seal. A failure to comply with such labeling requirements could result in enforcement proceedings in the relevant jurisdiction that could materially affect our marketing and distribution.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.