Want to see CRBG full AI Analyst Report?
Risk Overview Q2, 2026
Risk Distribution
42% Finance & Corporate
31% Legal & Regulatory
13% Production
7% Tech & Innovation
4% Ability to Sell
2% Macro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.
Risk Change Over Time
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Corebridge Financial, Inc. Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
Risk Highlights Q2, 2026
Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 19 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 19 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
45
-3
From last reportS&P 500 Average: 32
45
-3
From last reportS&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
1Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Jun 2026
1Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Jun 2026
Number of Risk Changed
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 0
0
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 0
See the risk highlights of Corebridge Financial, Inc. in the last period.
Risk Word Cloud
The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 45
Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 19/45 (42%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights4 | 8.9%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
Gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities may be realized or result in future impairments.Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
We and certain of our stockholders may have conflicts of interest with AIG, Nippon or Blackstone, our largest stockholders.Conflicts of interest may arise between AIG, Nippon, Blackstone and us, since AIG, Nippon and Blackstone have in the past and may in the future engage in transactions with us. Further, AIG. Nippon or Blackstone may, from time to time, acquire and hold interests in, or maintain business relationships with, businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. In general, AIG, Nippon or Blackstone could pursue business interests or exercise its voting power as stockholders in ways that are detrimental to us but beneficial to themselves or to other companies in which they invest or with whom they have relationships.
In addition, adverse publicity, regulatory scrutiny and pending investigations by regulators or law enforcement agencies involving AIG, Nippon or Blackstone could negatively impact our reputation due to our relationship with AIG, Nippon or Blackstone, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
Anti-takeover provisions could discourage, delay, or prevent our change in control, even if the change in control would be beneficial to our shareholders.Our Organizational Documents include a number of provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders consider favorable, including provisions that:
- authorize the issuance of shares of our common stock that could be used by our Board to create voting impediments or to frustrate persons seeking to effect a takeover or gain control;- authorize the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock that could be used by our Board to thwart a takeover attempt;- provide that vacancies on our Board (other than vacancies created by the removal of a director by stockholder vote), including vacancies resulting from an enlargement of our Board, may be filled by a majority vote of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum; and - establish advance notice requirements for nominations of candidates for election as directors or to bring other business before an annual meeting of our stockholders.
These provisions could prevent our stockholders from receiving the benefit from any premium to the market price of our common stock offered by a bidder in a takeover context. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if the provisions are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.
Our Organizational Documents could also make it difficult for stockholders to replace or remove our management. Furthermore, the existence of the foregoing provisions, as well as the significant amount of Corebridge Parent common stock that AIG and Nippon beneficially own, could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. These provisions could facilitate management entrenchment that could delay, deter, render more difficult or prevent a change in our control, which may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.
In addition to the anti-takeover provisions of our Organizational Documents, there are other factors that may delay, deter or prevent our change in control. As an insurance holding company, we are regulated as an insurance holding company and are subject to the insurance holding company acts of the states in which our insurance company subsidiaries are domiciled. The insurance holding company acts and regulations restrict the ability of any person to obtain control of an insurance company without prior regulatory approval. Under those statutes and regulations, without such approval (or an exemption), no person may acquire any voting security of a domestic insurance company, or an insurance holding company which controls an insurance company, or merge with such a holding company, if as a result of such transaction such person would "control" the insurance holding company or insurance company. "Control" is generally defined as the direct or indirect power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a person and is presumed to exist if a person directly or indirectly owns or controls 10% or more of the voting securities of another person. State insurance regulators, however, may find that "control" exists in circumstances in which a person owns or controls less than 10% of the voting securities.
Each of AIG and Nippon is currently considered our affiliate for insurance regulatory purposes. Because AIG's common stock (i.e., its voting securities) trades on the NYSE, persons considering an investment in our common stock (i.e., our voting securities) should take into consideration their ownership of AIG voting securities and consult their own legal advisors regarding such insurance holding company laws relating to the purchase and ownership of our common stock in light of their particular circumstances.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the stock purchase agreement executed in connection with the Nippon Transaction (the "Purchase Agreement"), we waive any interest or expectancy in corporate opportunities presented to AIG, Blackstone or Nippon, as applicable.Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the Purchase Agreement provide that we renounce and waive any interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, corporate opportunities that are from time to time presented to AIG, Blackstone, Nippon or their respective officers, directors, agents, stockholders, members, partners, affiliates or subsidiaries, even if the opportunity is one that we might reasonably be deemed to have pursued or had the ability or desire to pursue if granted the opportunity to do so. None of AIG, Blackstone, Nippon or their respective agents, stockholders, members, partners, affiliates or subsidiaries will generally be liable to us or any of our subsidiaries for breach of any fiduciary or other duty, as a director or otherwise, by reason of the fact that such person pursues, acquires or participates in such corporate opportunity, directs such corporate opportunity to another person or fails to present such corporate opportunity, or information regarding such corporate opportunity, to us unless, in the case of any such person who is a director or officer, such corporate opportunity is expressly offered to such director or officer in writing solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer. As a result, AIG, Blackstone or Nippon may compete with us for investment and other opportunities, which could result in fewer such opportunities for us. We likely will not always be able to compete successfully with AIG, Blackstone or Nippon (or any of their portfolio companies). Further, AIG, Blackstone or Nippon may pursue acquisition opportunities for their respective businesses that are complementary to our business. As a result, such acquisition opportunities may not be available to us, and none of AIG, Blackstone or Nippon would have any obligation to offer us corporate opportunities.
Accounting & Financial Operations4 | 8.9%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
Estimates, assumptions or data used in the preparation of financial statements and certain modeled results may differ materially from actual experience.Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
In addition to the other information set forth in thisQuarterly Report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in "RiskAdded
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in "Risk
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 3
We have outstanding Series A Preferred Stock which may limit our ability to pay dividends.Pursuant to the terms of our outstanding 6.875% Fixed Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A ("Series A Preferred Stock"), unless the full dividends for the latest completed dividend period on all outstanding Series A Preferred Stock have been declared and paid, or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof has been set aside, then we will not, nor will we permit our subsidiaries to, declare or pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make a liquidation payment with respect to, any shares of common stock or other junior capital stock of Corebridge Parent or make any guarantee payments regarding any guarantee issued by us of securities of any of our subsidiaries if the guarantee ranks upon our liquidation on parity with or junior to the Series A Preferred Stock.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 4
Our valuation of investments and derivatives involves the application of methodologies and assumptions to derive estimates that may differ from actual experience.It has been and may continue to be difficult to value certain of our investments or derivatives that are not actively traded. There also may be cases where certain assets in normally active markets with significant observable data become inactive with insufficient observable data due to the financial environment or market conditions in effect at that time. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation and judgment, as well as valuation methods that are more complex. These values may not be realized in a market transaction, may not reflect the value of the asset and may change very rapidly as market conditions change and valuation assumptions are modified. Decreases in value and/or an inability to realize that value in a market transaction or other disposition may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity or lead to volatility in our profitability.
Debt & Financing8 | 17.8%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
We are exposed to risk from equity market declines or volatility.Debt & Financing - Risk 2
We are exposed to risks from our participation in repurchase, securities lending and other collateralized programs.We participate in a repurchase and reverse repurchase program for our investment portfolios whereby we sell, or purchase, fixed income securities to or from third-party repurchase counterparties, primarily major brokerage firms and commercial banks, with a concurrent agreement to repurchase or sell substantially similar securities at a predetermined price and future date. During the term of the repurchase agreements, cash collateral, received and returned on a daily basis, is required to be maintained at a level that is sufficient to fund substantially all of the cost of purchasing replacement securities. In some cases, the fair value of the securities could be below the agreed repurchase price and we must provide additional cash collateral. Additionally, we invest the cash collateral we receive from the repurchase program in certain long-dated corporate bonds. If we are required to return cash collateral under the repurchase program earlier than expected, we may need to sell those bonds at a price lower than anticipated and may have less cash available. Further, we may be unable to roll over each arrangement under the repurchase program if the relevant counterparty refuses such rollover.
We may also participate in securities lending programs whereby securities are loaned to third-party borrowers. We generally obtain cash collateral in an amount based upon the estimated fair value of the loaned securities. A return of loaned securities by a borrower requires us to return the cash collateral associated with such loaned securities. In some cases, the fair value of the loaned securities could be below the amount of cash collateral we received, and we must return some cash collateral. Additionally, we use the cash collateral we receive in cash management, contingent liquidity and hedging programs. In some cases, if our securities lending arrangements are terminated earlier than their maturity date, we may be required to return cash collateral earlier than anticipated, resulting in less cash available for such purposes.
Under both securities lending and repurchase programs, defaults by third-party repurchase counterparties could result in the applicable counterparty failing to post cash collateral to us or complying with their other obligations under the relevant agreements. Also, market conditions on the maturity date could limit our ability to enter into new agreements. Our inability to enter into new securities lending or repurchase agreements would require us to return the cash collateral proceeds associated with such transactions on the maturity date.
If we are required to return significant amounts of cash collateral and are forced to sell securities to meet the return obligation, we could have difficulty selling securities in a timely manner, be forced to sell securities in a volatile or illiquid market for less than we otherwise would have been able to realize under normal market conditions, or both.
The repurchase and securities lending programs we manage are subject to technical and fundamental market risks which can broadly impact the financial markets. Under adverse capital market and economic conditions, liquidity could broadly deteriorate, which would further restrict our ability to sell securities and require us to provide additional collateral and sell securities for less than the price at which we recorded them, and third-party repurchase counterparties could fail to post cash collateral to us or default on their other obligations, which, in each case, could cause a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Additionally, if we expand the use of strategies requiring collateralization and considering potential impact of reinsurance and shifts in asset allocation in favor of private and structured assets, we may experience a shortage of eligible collateral, especially in periods of severe market stress.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
We are exposed to counterparty credit risk.We are exposed to credit risk arising from exposures to various counterparties related to investments, derivatives, premiums receivable and reinsurance recoverables. These counterparties include, but are not limited to, issuers of fixed income and equity securities we hold, borrowers of loans we hold, customers, plan sponsors, trading counterparties, counterparties under swaps and other derivative instruments, reinsurers, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses, custodians, brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, intra-group counterparties with respect to derivatives and other third parties, financial intermediaries and institutions and guarantors. These counterparties may default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, financial distress, lack of liquidity, adverse economic conditions, operational failure, fraud, government intervention and other reasons.
In addition, for exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures, options as well as "cleared" over-the-counter derivatives, we are generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant central counterparty clearing house and futures commission merchants through which we clear derivatives. For uncleared over-the-counter derivatives, we are also generally exposed to the credit risk of the third-party custodians at which margin collateral that we post, or is posted to us by our counterparties, is held as a result of regulatory or contractual requirements. With respect to transactions in which we acquire a security interest in collateral owned by the borrower, our credit risk could be exacerbated when the collateral cannot be realized or if we cannot offset our exposures through derivative transactions, reinsurance and underwriting arrangements, unsecured money market and prime funds and equity investments. Additionally, if the underlying assets supporting the structured securities we invest in are expected to default or actually default on their payment obligations, our securities may incur losses.
We assume pension obligations from plan sponsors, including obligations in respect of current employees of the plan sponsor. If the plan sponsor experiences financial distress that results in bankruptcy or significant terminations or otherwise experiences substantial turnover of employees active under the plan, its employees may be entitled to rights under the pension plan, such as lump-sum payments. To the extent that a plan sponsor experiences a significant turnover event, we may not achieve the targeted return expected at the time the PRT transaction was priced. Further, when we invest on a short-term basis, the cash collateral pledged to us by our derivative instruments counterparties in unsecured money markets, prime funds and bank demand deposit accounts, we are exposed to the credit risk of financial institutions where we invest funds received as collateral. Any resulting loss or impairments to the carrying value of these assets or defaults by these counterparties on their obligations to us could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. See "Business-Regulation-U.S. Regulation-Dodd-Frank" for further discussion.
In the event of a credit risk event such as an insolvency of, or the appointment of a receiver to rehabilitate or liquidate, a significant competitor, such appointment may impact consumer confidence in the products and services we offer, which could negatively impact our business.
Our exposure to credit risk may be exacerbated in periods of market or credit stress, as derivative counterparties take a more conservative view of their acceptable credit exposure to us, resulting in reduced capacity to execute derivative-based hedges when we need it most.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
We are exposed to risk from changes in interest rates.Changes in interest rates have had, and could continue to have a material adverse effect on the value of our investment portfolio. Increases in interest rates have impacted our investment portfolio in the past by decreasing the estimated fair values of the fixed income securities that constitute a substantial portion of our investment portfolio. This in turn has increased and could continue to increase the unrealized loss positions in our portfolio and adversely affect our ability to realize associated deferred tax assets, and materially and adversely affecting our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
We are exposed primarily to the following risks arising from, or exacerbated by, fluctuations in interest rates:
- mismatch between the expected duration of our liabilities and our assets;- impairment to our ability to earn the returns or spreads assumed in the pricing and the reserving for our products;- changes in certain statutory reserve or capital requirements that are based on formulas or models that consider interest rates or prescribed interest rates, such as asset adequacy reserves;- changes in the costs of derivatives we use for hedging or increases in the volume of hedging we do;- loss related to customer withdrawals following a sharp and sustained increase in interest rates;- loss from reduced fee income, and changes in fair values of Market Risk Benefits ("MRBs") and embedded derivatives net of associated hedges;- the reinvestment risk associated with more prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and other fixed income securities in decreasing interest rate environments and fewer prepayments in increasing interest rate environments;- an increase in policy loans, surrenders and withdrawals as interest rates rise; and - volatility in our GAAP results of operations driven by interest rate-related components of liabilities and equity market-related components of optional guaranteed benefits and the cost of associated hedges in low interest rate environments.
In periods of rapidly increasing interest rates or sustained periods of elevated interest rates, we may not be able to purchase, in a timely manner, the higher yielding investments needed to fund the higher crediting rates necessary to keep interest rate-sensitive products that we offer competitive. Therefore, we may need to accept a lower investment spread and, thus, lower profitability, or face a decline in sales and greater loss of existing contracts and related assets. Policy loans, surrenders and withdrawals also tend to increase as policyholders seek investments with higher perceived returns in higher interest rate environments. These impacts may continue to result in significant cash outflows requiring that we either meet the cash outflows with new premium deposits, which could reduce future spread income, or sell investments at a time when the prices of those investments are adversely affected by the increase in interest rates, which could result in realized investment losses by selling assets in an unrealized loss position. Additionally, the nature of interest guarantees imposed under the contracts and for compliance with applicable laws can slow or delay upward or downward adjustments to changes in prevailing interest rates, and regulatory changes or interpretations, including but not limited to ERISA plan asset regulations, could impact the treatment of underlying general account assets.
Conversely, sustained low interest rates negatively affected, and could in the future negatively affect, the performance of our investments and have reduced, and could in the future reduce, the level of investment income earned on our investment portfolios, resulting in net investment spread compression. We may experience lower investment income as well as lower sales of new products and policies when a low or declining U.S. interest rate and credit spread environment persists, and/or interest rates turn or, in certain circumstances, remain negative across various global economies. For example, low interest rate environments have negatively affected, and may in the future negatively affect, sales of interest rate sensitive products in our industry and have negatively impacted, and in the future may negatively impact, the profitability of our existing business as we reinvest cash flows from investments, including cash flows due to calls and prepayments of fixed-rate securities and mortgage loans, at rates below the average yield of our existing portfolios. As a result of such low interest rates in the past, we de-emphasized sales of interest-sensitive products in our Life Insurance segment.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
Volatility in credit spreads could have a material adverse effect on the valuation of our fixed income investments, our investment income and reserve calculations.We are exposed to credit spread risk primarily as a result of market price volatility and investment risk associated with the fluctuation in credit spreads.
The primary source of our exposure to credit spreads is in the value of our fixed income securities. If credit spreads widen significantly, we could be exposed to higher levels of impairments. If credit spreads tighten significantly, it could result in reduced net investment income and in turn, reduced profitability associated with new purchases of fixed maturity securities.
Credit spreads also affect our spread income. Tightening credit spreads would reduce the investment yields available on new asset purchases. Both widening or tightening credit spreads could potentially increase statutory reserve requirements and, in turn, reduce statutory surplus. Although these effects on bond valuation, investment yields and reserve impacts could run in offsetting directions for either credit spread widening or tightening, it is possible for one of them to outweigh the others under certain market conditions.
Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Debt & Financing - Risk 6
Corebridge Parent's ability to access funds from our subsidiaries is limited.Corebridge Parent is a holding company for all of our operations, and it is a legal entity separate from our subsidiaries. It depends on dividends, distributions and other payments from our subsidiaries to fund the return of capital to its shareholders, to pay corporate operating expenses, to make interest and principal payments due on outstanding debt and other obligations, to pay taxes and to make other investments. The majority of our assets are held by our regulated subsidiaries. The inability of Corebridge Parent to receive dividends, distributions or other payments from our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and restrict our ability to meet our obligations or return capital to stockholders. It could also restrict our flexibility to meet capital and liquidity needs of our subsidiaries, maintain statutory capital requirements of our insurance company subsidiaries at target levels in times of stress, comply with rating agency requirements, meet unexpected cash flow obligations, satisfy capital maintenance and guarantee agreements and collateralize debt with respect to certain subsidiaries.
The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends, distributions or other payments to us in the future will depend on their earnings, tax considerations, covenants contained in any financing or other agreements and applicable regulatory restrictions or actions. In addition, such payments could be limited as a result of claims against our subsidiaries by their creditors, including policyholders, suppliers, vendors and lessors.
Furthermore, the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends, distributions or make other payments to Corebridge Parent depends on their ability to meet applicable regulatory standards and receive regulatory approvals, which are based in part on an insurance company subsidiary's statutory income, capital and surplus and unassigned funds for the prior year. Changes in, or reinterpretations of, these regulatory standards could constrain the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends, distributions or make other payments in sufficient amounts and at times necessary to meet our obligations. Further, our subsidiaries have no obligation to pay amounts due on Corebridge Parent's obligations or to make funds available to Corebridge Parent for such payments.
Our decision to pursue strategic changes or transactions in our business and operations may also subject our subsidiaries' dividend plans to heightened regulatory scrutiny and could make obtaining regulatory approvals for extraordinary distributions by our subsidiaries, if any are sought, more difficult.
If our liquidity is insufficient to meet our needs, we may draw on our credit facilities or seek third-party financing, including through the capital markets, or other sources of liquidity, which may not be available or could be prohibitively expensive. The availability and cost of any additional financing at any given time depends on a variety of factors, including general market conditions, the volume of trading activities, the overall availability of credit, regulatory actions, our credit ratings and our credit capacity. It is also possible that, as a result of such recourse to external financing, customers, lenders or investors could develop a negative perception of our short- or long-term financial prospects. Disruptions, volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets, and downgrades in our financial strength or credit ratings, may limit or prevent our ability to access external capital markets or other financing sources on favorable terms. If we are unable to satisfy the capital or liquidity needs of a subsidiary, the credit rating agencies could downgrade our subsidiary's financial strength ratings or the subsidiary could become insolvent or, in certain cases, could be seized by its regulator.
Debt & Financing - Risk 7
We have incurred and may incur additional indebtedness.We currently rely on, and may in the future rely on, the incurrence of indebtedness as a source of liquidity. In addition, despite our current indebtedness levels, we may incur substantially more indebtedness.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our existing or future indebtedness will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future from operations, financing or asset sales.
If we are unable to satisfy our obligations with respect to our borrowings, comply with the covenants with respect to such borrowings or fulfill the conditions applicable to such borrowings, or the lenders fail to fund their lending commitments (whether due to insolvency, illiquidity or other reasons), our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and our ability to meet our obligations or return capital to our stockholders could be adversely impacted. We may also be subject to increased regulatory supervision, and ultimately, receivership or similar proceedings, and we could be forced to take unfavorable actions, including business and legal entity restructuring, limited new business investment, asset sales or dedicating an unsustainable level of our cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness.
If we seek to refinance our indebtedness, we may be unable to do so on terms acceptable to us or at all. Market disruptions, as well as our indebtedness level, may increase our cost of borrowing or adversely affect our ability to refinance our obligations as they become due. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness or access additional credit, or if short-term or long-term borrowing costs dramatically increase, our ability to meet our short and long-term obligations could be adversely affected, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity and restrict our ability to meet our obligations or return capital to our stockholders.
In addition, the level of our indebtedness could put us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged than us. These competitors could have greater financial flexibility to pursue business strategies and secure financing for their operations. The level of our indebtedness could also impede our ability to withstand downturns in our industry or the economy in general.
Debt & Financing - Risk 8
We may not be able to generate cash to meet our needs due to the illiquidity of some of our investments.We have a diversified investment portfolio. However, economic conditions, as well as adverse capital market conditions, including a lack of buyers, the inability of potential buyers to obtain financing on reasonable terms, general market volatility, credit spread changes, interest rate changes, foreign currency exchange rates and/or decline in collateral values have in the past impacted, and may in the future impact, the liquidity and value of our investments.
For example, we have made investments in certain securities that are generally considered less liquid, including certain fixed income and structured securities, privately placed securities, investments in private equity and hedge funds, mortgage loans, finance receivables and real estate. The reported values of our relatively less liquid types of investments do not necessarily reflect the values achievable in a stressed market environment for those investments. If we are forced to sell certain of our more illiquid assets on short notice, we could be unable to sell them for the prices at which we have recorded them or at all, and we could be forced to sell them at significantly lower prices, which could cause a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and restrict our ability to meet our obligations or return capital to our stockholders. Additionally, adverse changes in the valuation of real estate and real estate-linked assets, volatility or deterioration of capital markets and widening credit spreads have in the past, and may in the future, materially adversely affect the liquidity and the value of our investment portfolios, including our residential and commercial mortgage-related securities portfolios.
In the event additional liquidity is required by one or more of our subsidiaries, it may be difficult for us to generate additional liquidity by selling, pledging or otherwise monetizing these or other of our investments at reasonable prices and time frames.
Corporate Activity and Growth3 | 6.7%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
We are exposed to risks from our arrangements with Blackstone, BlackRock and any other asset manager we engage. Furthermore, historical performance should not be relied on as a predictor of future results.Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
Business or asset acquisitions and dispositions may expose us to certain risks.We have made acquisitions in the past and may pursue further acquisitions or other strategic transactions, including reinsurance, dispositions and joint ventures, in the future. The completion of any business or asset acquisition or disposition is subject to certain risks, including those relating to the receipt of required regulatory or other approvals, the terms and conditions of regulatory approvals, including any financial accommodations required by regulators, our ability to satisfy such terms, conditions and accommodations, the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of a transaction and the risk that parties may not be willing or able to satisfy the conditions to a transaction. As a result, there can be no assurance that any business or asset acquisition or disposition will be completed as contemplated, or at all, or regarding the expected timing of the completion of the acquisition or disposition.
Once we complete acquisitions or dispositions, there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated economic, strategic or other benefits of any transaction. For example, the integration of businesses we acquire may not be as successful as we anticipate, or there may be undisclosed risks present in such businesses. Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including operational, strategic, financial, accounting, legal, compliance and tax risks, including difficulties in assimilating and retaining employees and intermediaries, difficulties in retaining the existing customers of the acquired entities, unforeseen liabilities that arise in connection with the acquired businesses, unfavorable market conditions that could negatively impact our expectations for the acquired businesses, and difficulties in integrating and realizing the projected results of acquisitions and managing the litigation and regulatory matters to which acquired entities are party. Such difficulties in integrating an acquired business may result in the acquired business performing differently than we expected (including through the loss of customers) or in our failure to realize anticipated expense-related efficiencies. Risks resulting from future acquisitions may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Similarly, dispositions of a business also involve a number of risks, including operational and technology risks, risk of data loss or compromised data integrity, loss of talent and stranded costs, which could potentially have a negative impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In connection with a business or asset disposition, we may also hold a concentrated position in securities of the acquirer as part of the consideration, which subjects us to risks related to the price of equity securities and our ability to monetize such securities. In addition, with respect to certain dispositions, we could be subject to restrictions on our use of proceeds or to non-compete or non-solicit arrangements. Strategies implemented to explore opportunities for acquisitions could also be materially and adversely affected by the increasingly competitive nature of the life insurance and annuity merger and acquisition market and the increased participation of non-traditional buyers in the life insurance and annuity merger and acquisition market. In addition, we have provided and may provide financial guarantees and indemnities in connection with the businesses we have sold or may sell, as described in greater detail in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. While we do not currently believe that claims under these indemnities will be material, it is possible that significant indemnity claims could be made against us. If such a claim or claims were successful, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
Our risk management policies, standards and procedures may prove to be ineffective and leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk.We have developed and continue to enhance enterprise-wide risk management policies, standards and procedures to identify, monitor and mitigate risk to which we are exposed. Our risk management policies, standards and procedures may not be sufficiently comprehensive and may not identify or adequately protect us from every risk to which we are exposed. Many of our methods of identifying, measuring, underwriting and managing risks are based upon our study and use of historical market, applicant, customer, employee and bad actor behavior or statistics based on historical models. As a result, these methods may not accurately predict future exposures from events such as a major financial market disruption as the result of a natural or manmade disaster like a climate-related event or terrorist attack, which could be significantly different than the historical measures indicate, and could also result in a substantial change in policyholder behavior and claims levels not previously observed. We have and will continue to enhance our life insurance underwriting process, including, from time to time, considering and integrating newly available sources of data to confirm and refine our traditional underwriting methods. Our efforts to implement these improvements may not, however, be fully successful, which may adversely affect our competitive position. We have also introduced new product features designed to limit our risk and taken actions on in-force business, which may not be fully successful in limiting or eliminating risk. We may take additional actions on our in-force business, including adjusting crediting rates and cost of insurance, which may not be fully successful in maintaining profitability and which may result in litigation. In addition, our current business continuity and disaster recovery plans are based upon our use of historical market experiences and models, customer, employee and bad actors' historic behavior and certain statistics and accordingly may not be sufficient to mitigate the impact of cyber risks, including ransomware, natural catastrophic events or fraudulent attacks, such as account take-over, that are beyond the level that historical measures indicate and greater than our anticipated thresholds or risk tolerance levels. Other risk management methods depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible to us, which may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated. Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record and verify large numbers of transactions and events, such as new and frequently updated legal and regulatory requirements across the United States and internationally. These policies and procedures may not be fully effective. Accordingly, our risk management policies, standards and procedures may not adequately mitigate the risks to our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
If our risk management policies, standards and procedures are ineffective, we may suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected. As our business changes, the markets in which we operate evolve and new risks emerge, including, for example, the risks posed by the rapidly developing technology associated with AI and the implementation thereof, risks related to climate change or meeting stakeholder expectations relating to environmental, social or governance issues, and our risk management framework may not evolve at the same pace as those changes. The effectiveness of our risk management strategies may be limited, resulting in losses to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and restrict our ability to meet our obligations or return capital to our stockholders. In addition, there can be no assurance that we can effectively review and monitor all risks or that all of our employees will understand and follow (or comply with) our risk management policies, standards and procedures.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 14/45 (31%)Above Sector Average
Regulation4 | 8.9%
Regulation - Risk 1
Our business is heavily regulated.Regulation - Risk 2
New domestic or international laws and regulations, or new interpretations of current laws and regulations, may affect our ability to operate efficiently or compete effectively.Legislators, regulators and self-regulatory organizations have in the past and may in the future periodically consider various proposals that may affect or restrict, among other things, our business practices or our eligibility to do business with certain public sector clients, underwriting methods and data utilization, product designs and distribution relationships, how we market, sell or service certain products we offer, our capital, reserving and accounting requirements, reinsurance practices, price competitiveness of the products we sell and consumer demand for our products or the profitability of certain of our business lines.
Further, new laws and regulations may even affect or significantly limit our ability to conduct certain business lines at all, including proposals relating to restrictions on the type of activities in which investment managers and other financial institutions, including insurance companies in particular, are permitted to engage, as well as the types of investments we hold or divest. For example, regulators have shown continued interest in how organizations within the financial services industry, including insurance companies, are managing ESG issues, such as climate risk within their business operations and investment portfolios. Resulting actions by governments, regulators and international standard setters could lead to additional reporting obligations concerning investment holdings that are exposed to climate change-related risk. They could also lead to substantial additional laws or regulations that limit or restrict investments in certain assets, such as thermal coal or other carbon-based investments, and impose additional compliance costs. Additionally, rules on defined benefit pension plan funding may reduce the likelihood of, or delay corporate plan sponsors in, terminating their plans or engaging in transactions to partially or fully transfer pension obligations. This could affect the mix of our PRT business and increase non-guaranteed funding products. Further, state insurance regulators have had an increased focus on private equity involvement in life insurers, including the role of asset managers and the increase of private investments in insurers' portfolios. Resulting changes to model laws and regulations or NAIC handbooks may impact our insurance company subsidiaries' affiliate and related party relationships and pursuit of strategic transactions, investment portfolios and financial condition.
There has also been increased regulatory scrutiny of the use of artificial intelligence such as machine learning, predictive models and other techniques, including in the insurance industry. Certain state and federal lawmakers, non-governmental organizations, insurance regulators, including in Colorado and New York, and advisory groups are developing, or have developed, regulations or guidance applicable to insurance companies that use AI, machine learning and predictive models in their operations. We cannot predict what, if any, regulatory actions may be taken in the future with regard to "big data," artificial intelligence, machine learning or predictive models, but any limitations imposed as a result of or in response to any such regulatory actions could have a material impact on our business, processes, results of operations and financial condition.
It is difficult to predict the impact laws and regulations adopted in foreign jurisdictions may have on the financial markets generally or our business, results of operations or cash flows. It is possible such laws and regulations may significantly alter our business practices. See "Business-Regulation-U.S. Regulation" and "Business-Regulation-International Regulation."
Regulation - Risk 3
Nippon's relationship with us may result in us needing to comply with additional regulatory requirements.Nippon is regulated by the Insurance Business Act of Japan (Act No. 105 of 1995, as amended, the "IBA") as well as the Financial Services Agency of Japan (the "JFSA"), and holds an approximately 24.6% interest in our Common Stock as of December 31, 2025. As a result, we are considered an affiliate of Nippon for purposes of the IBA and its subordinate regulations and related supervisory guidelines issued by the JFSA (the "JFSA Guidelines"). As an affiliate of a regulated insurance company in Japan, Nippon may request that we comply with certain requirements of the IBA, its subordinate regulations and the JFSA Guidelines, including providing certain information to satisfy Nippon's financial reporting and risk and solvency requirements. In practice, the JFSA has broad prudential powers to request additional information from Nippon, which Nippon may, in turn, request from us. Nippon may also be prohibited from entering into certain transactions with us unless they are on arms' length terms and approved by the JFSA.
In addition, the NAIC's Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act and the Insurance Holding Company System Model Regulation (together, the "Holding Company Models"), versions of which have been enacted by all of the states in which we have domestic insurers, place limitations on, and require prior approval of, intercompany transactions, including certain service agreements, reinsurance arrangements, transfers of assets and payments of dividends or distributions between a domestic insurer and its affiliates. As such, our domestic insurers may not be able to enter into certain transactions with Nippon (or any other affiliate of ours) unless they are on arms' length terms and approved or non-disapproved by our domiciliary state insurance regulators. Similarly, state insurance regulators require, through the adoption of applicable statutory accounting principles, additional disclosures regarding transactions between an insurer and its affiliates or related parties.
Regulation - Risk 4
Pricing for our products is subject to our ability to adequately assess risks and estimate losses.Our business is dependent on our ability to price our products effectively and charge appropriate fees and other policy charges. Pricing adequacy depends on a number of factors and assumptions, including proper evaluation of insurance risks, our expense levels, expected net investment income to be realized, our response to rate actions taken by competitors, our response to actions by distributors, legal and regulatory developments, and long-term assumptions regarding interest rates, credit spreads, investment returns, operating costs and the expected persistency of certain products, which is the probability that a policy will remain in force from one period to the next. For example, some of our life insurance policies and annuity contracts provide management the limited right to adjust certain non-guaranteed charges or benefits and interest crediting rates if necessary, subject to guaranteed minimums or maximums, and the exercise of these rights could result in reputational and/or litigation risk.
Management establishes target returns for each product based upon these factors, certain underwriting assumptions and capital requirements, including statutory, GAAP and economic capital models. We monitor and manage pricing and sales to achieve target returns on new business, but we may not be able to achieve those returns due to the factors discussed above. Profitability from new business emerges over a period of years, depending on the nature of the product, and is subject to variability as actual results may differ from pricing assumptions.
Our profitability depends on multiple factors, including the impact of actual mortality, longevity, morbidity and policyholder behavior experience as compared to our assumptions; the adequacy of investment margins; our management of market and credit risks associated with investments, including the cost of hedging; costs associated with derivatives transactions; our ability to maintain premiums and contract charges at a level adequate to cover mortality, benefits and contract administration expenses; the adequacy of contract charges and availability of revenue from providers of investment options offered in variable contracts to cover the cost of product features and other expenses; and management of operating costs and expenses. Inadequate pricing and the difference between estimated results of the above factors compared to actual results could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities3 | 6.7%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Guarantees within certain of our products may increase the volatility of our results.Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 2
We and AIG have indemnification obligations to one another.We and AIG have entered into certain agreements, including the Separation Agreement, a registration rights agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement"), a trademark license agreement, the Transition Services Agreement and the Tax Matters Agreement, that govern our and AIG's obligations to each other in respect of, among other things, governance rights, taxes, transition services and indemnification obligations. The amounts payable by us pursuant to such indemnification obligations could be significant. Alternatively, AIG's failure to perform its indemnification or other obligations in favor of us could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 3
We may be subject to significant legal, governmental or regulatory proceedings.In the normal course of business, we are subject to regulatory and governmental investigations and civil actions, litigation and other forms of dispute resolution in various domestic and foreign jurisdictions. In addition, we are involved in litigation and arbitration concerning our rights and obligations under insurance policies issued by us and under reinsurance contracts with third parties. Additionally, from time to time, various regulatory and governmental agencies review the transactions and practices of us and our subsidiaries and in connection with industry-wide and other inquiries into, among other matters, the business practices of current and former operating insurance company subsidiaries. Such investigations, inquiries or examinations have in the past developed and could in the future develop into administrative, civil or criminal proceedings or enforcement actions, including class-actions, in which remedies could include fines, penalties, restitution, remedial actions, enhanced supervision or alterations in our business practices, and could result in additional expenses, limitations on certain business activities and reputational damage.
We and our officers and directors are also subject to, or may become subject to, a variety of additional types of legal disputes brought by holders of our securities, customers, employees and others, alleging, among other things, breach of contractual or fiduciary duties, bad faith, indemnification and violations of federal and state statutes and regulations. Certain of these matters may also involve potentially significant risk of loss due to the possibility of significant jury awards, arbitration decisions and settlements, punitive damages or other penalties. Many of these matters are also highly complex and seek recovery on behalf of a class or similarly large number of plaintiffs. It is therefore inherently difficult to predict the size or scope of potential future losses arising from them, and developments in these matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
For a discussion of certain legal proceedings, see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Taxation & Government Incentives5 | 11.1%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
We are not able to file a single U.S. consolidated federal income tax return for five years following our IPO.Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 2
We underwent an "ownership change" for U.S. federal income tax purposes.Under Section 382 of the Code, if a corporation or its parent that is a "loss" corporation undergoes an "ownership change" (very generally defined as a greater than 50% change, by value, in the corporation's equity ownership by certain shareholders or groups of shareholders over a rolling three-year period), the corporation's ability to use its pre-ownership change deferred tax assets to offset its post-ownership change income may be limited. Generally, a corporation is a loss corporation if, at the date of the ownership change, the corporation has tax loss carryforwards and other built-in losses or deductions which may be used in a tax year after the ownership change ("pre-change loss").
Upon an ownership change, the amount of taxable income attributable to any post-change year which may be offset by a pre-change loss is subject to an annual limitation. Generally, the annual limitation is equal to the equity value of the corporation immediately before the ownership change, multiplied by the long-term, tax-exempt rate posted monthly by the IRS (subject to certain adjustments). The current year annual limitation imposed under Section 382 would be increased by the amount of any unused limitation in a prior year(s). In addition, to the extent that a company has a net unrealized built-in loss or deduction at the time of an ownership change, Section 382 of the Code limits the utilization of any such loss or deduction which is realized and recognized during the five-year period following the ownership change.
We met the definition of a loss corporation and underwent an ownership change. In 2025, multiple large shareholders sold down their ownership interests in us but did not trigger an ownership change. However, if there are more sell downs in 2026 or 2027, there is an expectation that we will again meet the definition of a loss corporation and undergo an ownership change. We may experience further ownership changes upon future issuances of our stock or due to secondary trading of our stock which may be outside of our control, and which could result in the application of additional limitations under Section 382. The resulting limitations from these ownership changes could increase the tax liability to which we are subject.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 3
We are subject to risks associated with the Tax Matters Agreement and income taxes for years in which we were members of the AIG Consolidated Tax Group.The Tax Matters Agreement provides that we generally will remain responsible for any and all taxes arising in pre-separation periods attributable to us. Although we will not be liable for matters settled by AIG for which we did not provide our prior written consent (to the extent reasonably withheld), AIG generally will control both the tax return preparation and audits and contests relating to pre-separation tax periods, which will determine the amount of any taxes for which we are responsible.
Also, for certain tax years or portions thereof, we were included in the AIG Consolidated Tax Group, and we did not file separate federal income tax returns. Under U.S. federal income tax laws, regardless of the contractual terms of the Tax Matters Agreement, any entity that is a member of a consolidated group at any time during a taxable year is severally liable to the IRS for the group's entire federal income tax liability for the entire taxable year. Thus, notwithstanding any contractual rights to be reimbursed or indemnified by AIG pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, to the extent AIG or other members of the AIG Consolidated Tax Group fail to make any federal income tax payments required of them by law in respect of taxable years for which we were a member of the AIG Consolidated Tax Group, we would be liable. Similar principles apply for state and local income tax purposes in certain states and localities and for value-added tax in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 4
Our deferred tax assets may not be realized.Deferred income tax represents the tax effect of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are assessed periodically by management to determine if they are realizable. As of December 31, 2025, we had net deferred tax assets, after valuation allowance, of $6.3 billion related to federal, foreign, and state and local jurisdictions. The performance of the business, the geographic and legal entity source of our income, tax planning strategies, and the ability to generate future taxable income from a variety of sources and planning strategies including capital gains, are factored into management's determination. If, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized, then a valuation allowance must be established with a corresponding charge to profitability, which such action we have taken from time to time. Such charges could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. For further discussion regarding deferred tax assets, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Accounting Policies and Pronouncements-Critical Accounting Estimates-Income Taxes-Recoverability of Net Deferred Tax Asset" and Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 5
Changes in U.S. federal income or other tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws could affect sales of our products and impact the taxation of our operations.Changes in tax laws could reduce demand in the United States for life insurance and annuity contracts, which could reduce our income due to lower sales of these products or changes in customer behavior, including potential increased surrenders of in-force business.
Changes in tax laws could also impact the taxation of our operations. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (H.R. 5376) (the "Inflation Reduction Act"), enacted on August 16, 2022, included a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax ("CAMT") on adjusted financial statement income for corporations with average profits over $1 billion over a three-year period and a 1% stock buyback tax. On September 12, 2024, the IRS and the U.S. Treasury issued proposed regulations on the application of the CAMT. Certain sections of the proposed regulations apply to tax years ending after September 13, 2024, while other sections apply to tax years ending after the date final regulations are published. On September 30, 2025, the IRS issued Notice 2025-46 and Notice 2025-49 that provide interim guidance on the application of the CAMT and signal the Treasury's intent to partially withdraw and amend the prior proposed regulations. There remain significant uncertainties regarding the application of the CAMT, and there can be no assurance that final regulations, if adopted, will be adopted in a form consistent with the existing guidance. Our estimated CAMT liability may differ from the final liability based on further guidance, and Corebridge will continue to refine its liability calculations as guidance becomes available.
New tax laws outside the U.S., in particular those enacted in response to proposals by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, could make substantive changes to the global international tax regime. Such changes could increase our global tax costs. We continue to monitor and assess the impact of such proposals.
Finally, it is possible that tax laws will be further changed either in a technical corrections bill or entirely new legislation. It remains difficult to predict whether or when there will be any tax law changes or further guidance by the authorities in the U.S. or elsewhere in the world. New or proposed changes to tax laws may have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, as the impact of proposals on our business can vary substantially depending upon the specific changes or further guidance made and how the changes or guidance are implemented by the authorities.
Environmental / Social2 | 4.4%
Environmental / Social - Risk 1
We may face increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from investors, regulators, customers and other stakeholders regarding environmental, social and governance matters.Environmental / Social - Risk 2
We are exposed to risks from our use of derivative instruments to hedge market risks associated with our liabilities.Our risk management strategy seeks to mitigate the potential adverse effects of changes in capital markets, specifically changes in equity markets, foreign exchange rates and interest rates on guarantees related to fixed index annuities, registered index-linked annuities and index universal life insurance, and liability guarantees associated with our GLBs for certain products such as fixed index annuities and fixed annuities. The strategy primarily relies on hedging strategies using derivatives instruments and, to a lesser extent, reinsurance.
Derivative instruments primarily composed of futures, swaps and options on equity indices and interest rates and portfolios of derivative instruments are an essential part of our hedging strategy and are selected to provide a measure of economic protection. We utilize a combination of short-term and longer-term derivative instruments to have a laddered maturity of protection and reduce rollover risk during periods of market disruption or higher volatility. We manage the potential credit exposure for derivative instruments through utilization of financial exchanges, ongoing evaluation of the creditworthiness of counterparties, the use of International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ("ISDA") and collateral agreements, and other master netting agreements. For additional information on our derivative programs see see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In connection with our hedging program, we may decide to seek the approval of applicable regulatory authorities to permit us to increase our limits with respect to derivatives transactions used for hedging purposes consistent with those contemplated by the program. No assurance can be given that any of our requested approvals will be obtained and whether, if obtained, any such approvals will not be subject to qualifications, limitations or conditions. If our capital is depleted in the event of persistent market downturns, we may need to replenish it by holding additional capital, which we may have allocated for other uses, or purchase additional hedging protection through the use of derivatives with strike levels at then-current market levels, which may result in additional costs. Under our hedging strategy, period-to-period changes in the valuation of our hedges relative to the guaranteed liabilities may result in significant volatility to certain of our profitability measures, which in certain circumstances could be more significant than has been the case historically.
In addition, hedging instruments we enter into may not effectively offset changes in economic values of the guarantees within certain of our annuity products and life insurance products or may otherwise be insufficient in relation to our obligations. For example, in the event that derivatives counterparties or central clearinghouses are unable or unwilling to honor their obligations, we remain liable for the guaranteed liability benefits. See "Risks Relating to Our Investment Portfolio, Liquidity, Capital and Credit-We are exposed to counterparty credit risk."
The cost of our hedging program may be greater than anticipated if adverse market conditions were to limit the availability and increase the costs of the derivatives we intend to employ, and such costs may not be recovered in the pricing of the underlying products we offer. Our transactions with financial and other institutions generally specify the circumstances under which either party is required to pledge collateral related to any change in the market value of the derivative instruments. The amount of collateral, or a total of initial and variation margins, we are required to post under these agreements could increase under certain circumstances, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
The above factors, individually or in the aggregate, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our profitability measures and may impact our capitalization, our distributable earnings, our ability to receive dividends from our operating companies and our liquidity. These impacts could then in turn impact our RBC ratios and our financial strength ratings.
Production
Total Risks: 6/45 (13%)Above Sector Average
Employment / Personnel2 | 4.4%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
We may not be able to attract and retain the key employees and highly skilled people we need to support our business.Employment / Personnel - Risk 2
Employee error and misconduct may be difficult to detect and prevent and may result in significant losses.There have been a number of cases involving fraud or other misconduct by employees in the financial services industry in recent years and we are also exposed to the risk that fraud or misconduct by our employees or agents of third parties performing services and activities for us could occur. Our human resources and compliance departments work collaboratively to monitor for fraud and conduct extensive training for such employees and agents, however, employee misconduct may still occur. Instances of fraud, illegal acts, errors, failure to document transactions properly or to obtain proper internal authorization, misuse of customer or proprietary information or failure to comply with regulatory requirements or our internal policies may result in losses and/or reputational damage.
Supply Chain1 | 2.2%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
Third parties we rely upon to provide certain business and administrative services may not perform as anticipated.Costs3 | 6.7%
Costs - Risk 1
The amount and timing of insurance liability claims are difficult to predict.Costs - Risk 2
Reinsurance may not be available or economical and may not be adequate to protect us against losses.We purchase and use third-party reinsurance as part of our overall risk management strategy. For example, our two largest reinsurance agreements are with Fortitude Re and CSLR. As of December 31, 2025, $24.1 billion of liabilities related to business written by us had been ceded to Fortitude Re and $5.0 billion of General Account liabilities and $45.2 billion of Separate Accounts liabilities related to business written by us had been ceded to CSLR, under reinsurance transactions.
Reinsurers may attempt to increase rates with respect to our existing reinsurance arrangements, and their ability to increase rates depends upon the terms of each reinsurance contract and the market environment when we negotiate reinsurance arrangements for our in-force and new business. Attempts to increase reinsurance rates may lead to and have resulted in arbitration over the terms of the reinsurance contracts. An increase in reinsurance rates may affect the profitability of our insurance business. Additionally, such a rate increase may lead to and has resulted in a recapture of the business, which may result in a need for additional reserves and increase our exposure to claims. Reinsurance for new business may be more difficult or costly to obtain in the event of prolonged or severe adverse mortality or morbidity experience. We may, at certain times, be forced to incur additional costs for reinsurance or may be unable to obtain sufficient reinsurance on acceptable terms. In the latter case, we would have to accept an increase in exposure to risk and the increase in volatility of mortality experience on a going-forward basis, reduce the maximum policy size and amount of business written by our subsidiaries going forward or seek alternatives in line with our risk limits or a combination thereof.
The insolvency of one or more of our reinsurance counterparties, or the inability or unwillingness of such reinsurers to make timely payments under the terms of our contracts or payments in an amount equal to our expected reinsurance recoverables, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Additionally, we are exposed to credit risk with respect to our reinsurers to the extent the reinsurance receivable is not secured, or is inadequately secured, by collateral or does not benefit from other credit enhancements. We bear the risk that a reinsurer is, or may be, unable to pay amounts we have recorded as reinsurance receivables for any reason, including that:
- the reinsurance transaction performs differently than we anticipated as compared to the original structure, terms or conditions;- the terms of the reinsurance contract do not reflect the intent of the parties to the contract or there is a disagreement between the parties as to their intent;- the terms of the contract are interpreted by a court or arbitration panel differently than expected;- a change in laws and regulations or accounting principles, or in the interpretation of the laws and regulations or accounting principles, materially impacts a reinsurance transaction; or - the terms of the contract cannot be legally enforced.
Further, we face the risk of financial responsibility for risks related to assumed reinsurance, including claims made by the ceding company.
Our subsidiaries also utilize intercompany reinsurance arrangements to provide capital benefits to their affiliated cedants. We have also pursued, and may continue to pursue, reinsurance transactions with external parties and permitted practices to manage the capital impact of statutory reserve requirements under applicable reserving rules. The application of actuarial guidelines involves numerous interpretations. If state insurance departments do not agree with our interpretations, or if regulations change with respect to our ability to manage the capital impact of certain statutory reserve requirements, or if our domiciliary regulators do not approve of proposed intercompany reinsurance arrangement(s), our statutory reserve requirements could increase, or our ability to take reserve credit for reinsurance transactions could be reduced or eliminated. Additionally, if our ratings decline, we could incur higher costs to obtain reinsurance, each of which could adversely affect sales of our products and our financial condition or results of operations.
Some of our reinsurance arrangements are structured as modco agreements, such as our arrangement with Fortitude Re. The manner in which we account for these reinsurance arrangements has led, and will continue to lead, to volatility in our results of operations. In modco arrangements, the investments supporting the reinsurance agreements, and which reflect the majority of the consideration that would be paid to the reinsurer for entering into the transaction, are withheld by, and therefore continue to reside on the balance sheet of, the ceding company (i.e., Corebridge insurance company subsidiaries) thereby creating an obligation for the ceding company to pay the reinsurer at a later date. Additionally, as our applicable insurance company subsidiaries maintain ownership of these investments, we will maintain the existing accounting for these assets (e.g., the changes in fair value of available-for-sale securities will be recognized within OCI). Under the modco arrangement, our applicable insurance company subsidiaries have established a funds withheld payable to the reinsurers while simultaneously establishing a reinsurance asset representing reserves for the insurance coverage that the reinsurer has assumed. The funds withheld payable contains an embedded derivative and changes in fair value of the embedded derivative related to the funds withheld payable are recognized in earnings through realized gains (losses). This embedded derivative is considered a total return swap with contractual returns that are attributable to various assets and liabilities associated with these reinsurance agreements. As a result of changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative, we experience volatility in our GAAP net income.
Costs - Risk 3
The IFS ratings of our insurance companies or our credit ratings could be downgraded.Downgrades of the IFS ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries, including related to changes in rating agency methodologies, could prevent these companies from selling, or make it more difficult for them to succeed in selling, products and services, make it more difficult for them to enter into new reinsurance contracts or obtain it on reasonable terms, or result in increased policy cancellations, lapses and surrenders, termination of, or increased collateral posting obligations under, assumed reinsurance contracts, or return of premiums. A downgrade in our credit ratings could result in a downgrade of the IFS ratings of our insurance or reinsurance company subsidiaries. Similarly, a downgrade of the IFS ratings of our insurance and reinsurance company subsidiaries could result in a downgrade in our credit ratings.
In addition, a downgrade of our long-term debt ratings by one or more of the major rating agencies, including related to changes in rating agency methodologies, could increase our financing costs and collateral requirements and limit the availability of financing, making it more difficult to refinance maturing debt obligations, and support business and investment strategies. Specifically, a downgrade of our or Corebridge Life Holdings, Inc.'s ("CRBGLH") long-term debt ratings below specified levels may require us and CRBGLH to collateralize the principal amount outstanding under the CRBGLH notes and our junior subordinated debt at any given time, any related accrued and unpaid interest, and the net present value of future interest payments with respect to such debt. Such collateralization could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
A downgrade could also impede our ability to maintain or improve the IFS ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries. Additionally, a downgrade in our insurance company subsidiaries' IFS ratings or our credit ratings could cause counterparties to limit or reduce their exposure to us and thus reduce our ability to manage our market risk exposures effectively during times of market stress. Such a downgrade could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
For information on our credit ratings, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -Liquidity and Capital Resources-Credit Ratings."
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 3/45 (7%)Below Sector Average
Trade Secrets1 | 2.2%
Trade Secrets - Risk 1
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.Technology2 | 4.4%
Technology - Risk 1
We may be unable to maintain the availability of our critical technology systems and data and safeguard the confidentiality and integrity of our data.Technology - Risk 2
Our reliance on, and third party use of, AI exposes us to risks.Currently, AI plays a role in certain aspects of our business. In addition, our underwriting processes with respect to our Life Insurance segment use algorithms and predictive models. We are currently exploring wider uses of advanced technologies in our operating environments. We are following relevant regulatory developments and enhancing our governance processes, where needed. See "Business-Regulation-U.S. Regulation – State Insurance Regulation – Insurance Regulatory Examinations and Other Activities."
Our processes for the development, testing, use, oversight and ongoing monitoring of our AI use may not be effective, and our use of AI could introduce various risks and biases into our processes. Our competitors may also adopt these tools more efficiently and effectively, exposing us to competitive harm.
Third party use of AI also exposes us to risk as we cannot predict how others in the market, including our vendors, will make use of these emerging technological developments and whether they will do so effectively and in compliance with applicable laws. AI has potential to automate processes and provide more tailored customer service; we expect third parties on which we rely to seek to benefit from these increased efficiencies. Our vendor review and approval policies and procedures for all third party engagement with AI may not be effective, and we continue to face risks from third party misuse of AI.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 2/45 (4%)Below Sector Average
Sales & Marketing2 | 4.4%
Sales & Marketing - Risk 1
We may experience difficulty in marketing and distributing our Individual Retirement and Life Insurance products and the use of third parties may result in additional liabilities.Sales & Marketing - Risk 2
We may experience difficulty in sales and asset retention with respect to our Retirement Services business.Plan sponsors, our customers in our Retirement Services segment, have in the past, and may in the future, elect to renegotiate the terms of existing relationships on terms that are not attractive or acceptable to us, limit the products or services they offer to their plan participants, including the types of products and advisory services offered by us, or otherwise reduce or terminate their relationships with us. This could arise as a result of the influence of third-party retirement plan consulting firms, the consolidation of plan sponsors (particularly in the healthcare industry), changes in law and regulations with respect to the investments that may be offered under certain plans, such as collective investment trusts, the redirection of assets to other providers who may provide more favorable terms or products, the provision of operational support by other providers which may be viewed as more favorable for the plan, changes in our business model, or allocation of plan services among subsidiaries. The renegotiation or termination of plans that contribute significantly to our profitability could have a meaningful impact on our overall profitability. In the case of employer-sponsored plans, the impact of renegotiations can also vary depending on whether existing plan accounts remain with us, are transferred at the direction of the plan sponsor or are transferred at the direction of individual plan participants.
Additionally, both public and private plan sponsors have in the past, and may in the future, experience financial difficulty and some may reduce costs, including through headcount reductions or the rebalancing of their workforce in favor of part-time employees who are ineligible for retirement benefits. The financial stress on such plan sponsors is often exacerbated by reductions in governmental funding sources. Finally, our state laws or regulations may restrict the ability of our plan sponsors to select non-government entities to provide these services and/or the way plan participants may enroll in our services.
Given these challenges, our premiums and deposits may decline or stagnate, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 1/45 (2%)Below Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment1 | 2.2%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
Our business is highly dependent on economic and capital market conditions.See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.
FAQ
What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
1. Financial & Corporate
- Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
- Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
- Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
2. Legal & Regulatory
- Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
- Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
- Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
- Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
3. Production
- Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
- Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
- Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
- Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
4. Technology & Innovation
- Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
- Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
- Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
- Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
5. Ability to Sell
- Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
- Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
- Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
- Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
6. Macro & Political
- Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
- Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
- International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
- Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.