Want to see CNS full AI Analyst Report?
Cohen & Steers (CNS) Risk Analysis
Risk Overview Q2, 2026
Risk Change Over Time
- Regulation - Risk 1Regulations restricting the use of commission credits to pay for research have increased, and may continue to increase, increase our operating expenses.
On behalf of our clients, we make decisions to buy and sell securities, select broker-dealers to execute trades and negotiate brokerage commission rates. In connection with these transactions and subject to best execution, we receive commission credits to pay for eligible research and services from broker-dealers and other eligible service providers. Under regulations in the European Union (EU) and U.K., we may continue to eliminate the use of commission credits to pay for research and eligible services for accounts where we have certain obligations within the scope of MiFID II (together with substantially similar national rules of the U.K. and implementing rules and regulations), where our operating expenses then include payment for research and eligible services for these accounts, or use commission credits to pay for research subject to applicable SEC regulations, which would impact our operating expenses.
- Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 2The tax treatment of our Company and certain of our funds involves the interpretation of complex provisions of U.S. federal income tax law for which no precedent may be available and may be subject to potential legislative, judicial or administrative change and differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.
The U.S. federal income tax treatment of certain of our funds depends in some instances on determinations of fact and interpretations of complex provisions of U.S. federal income tax law for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. U.S. federal income tax rules are constantly under review by the U.S. Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service, frequently resulting in revised interpretations of established concepts, statutory changes, revisions to regulations and other modifications and interpretations. Ongoing changes to U.S. federal income tax laws and interpretations thereof could also cause us to change our investments and commitments, affect the tax considerations of an investment in us and our funds and change the character or treatment of portions of our income. In addition, the Company may be required to make certain assumptions when electing a particular tax treatment. It is possible that the Internal Revenue Service could assert successfully that the assumptions made by us do not satisfy the technical requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and/or Treasury Regulations and could require items of income, gain, deduction, loss or credit, including interest deductions, be adjusted, reallocated or disallowed in a manner that adversely affects us and our clients.
Risk Highlights Q2, 2026
Risk Word Cloud
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 28
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1A significant portion of our common stock is owned or controlled by our Executive Chairman and our Board Chairman and their respective family members, which may limit the ability of other stockholders to influence the affairs of the Company.
As of December 31, 2025, Robert H. Steers, our current Executive Chairman, and a member of his family held approximately 23.4% of our common stock and Martin Cohen, our current Chairman of the board of directors (our "Board Chairman"), and a member of his family held approximately 17.7% of our common stock. Such levels of ownership or control create the ability to meaningfully influence, among other things: - the election of members of our board of directors, thereby indirectly influencing the management and affairs of the Company;- the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders; and - any unsolicited acquisition of us and, consequently, potentially adversely affect the market price of our common stock or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium on their shares. The interests of one or more of such persons may differ from those of other stockholders in instances where, for example, management compensation is being determined or where an unsolicited acquisition of us could result in a change in our management. The concentration of beneficial ownership in such persons may limit the ability of our other stockholders to influence the affairs of the Company.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may delay or prevent a change in control of us, which could decrease the trading price of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain certain anti-takeover provisions that could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of the Company without negotiating with our board of directors. Such provisions could limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for the Company's common stock. Certain of these provisions allow the Company to issue preferred stock with rights more senior to those of our common stock, impose various procedural and other requirements that could make it more difficult for stockholders to effect certain corporate actions and set forth rules about how stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at annual meetings. We believe these provisions protect our stockholders from coercive or other unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors and by providing our board of directors with more time to assess acquisition proposals. However, these provisions apply even if an acquisition proposal may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could have the effect of delaying or preventing an acquisition. In the event that our board of directors determines that a potential business combination transaction would be beneficial to the Company and its stockholders, such stockholders may elect to sell their shares in the Company and the trading price of our common stock could decrease.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3A sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, and the issuance of additional shares will dilute your percentage ownership in the Company.
A sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sale may occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Our current Executive Chairman and our Board Chairman, together with certain of their respective family members, held 11,958,912 shares and 9,016,077 shares, respectively, of our common stock as of December 31, 2025. Any of such persons may sell shares of our common stock, subject to any restrictions imposed by U.S. federal securities laws on sales by affiliates. In connection with our initial public offering in 2004, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement") with our current Executive Chairman, Robert H. Steers and our current Board Chairman, Martin Cohen, and certain trust entities controlled by certain of their respective family members that requires us to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, shares of our common stock (and other securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of common stock) held by them under certain circumstances. In May 2024, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 covering (i) the resale of up to an aggregate of 21,065,378 shares owned or controlled by our Executive Chairman and our Board Chairman and certain other persons and (ii) the offer and sale of an indeterminate number of shares by us to the public. The sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, and any additional shares that we issue will dilute your percentage ownership in the Company.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4A decline in the absolute or relative performance or value of preferred securities or similar securities in which we invest, or the attractiveness of portfolios or investment strategies utilizing such securities, would have an adverse effect on the assets we manage and our revenue.
As of December 31, 2025, approximately 20.0% of our total assets under management was concentrated in preferred securities strategies, including approximately 8.0% in the Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income Fund. Preferred securities investments are subject to varying degrees of market, contractual, financial, regulatory, litigation and other risks that could affect investment performance, returns and attractiveness, including risks related to actual or anticipated inflationary trends, interest rates, comparative returns on senior credit or "risk-free" debt instruments, counterparty credit, income and distributions, regulatory intervention and treatment, and applicable tax treatment. Issuers of securities that represent the focus of these investment strategies may be concentrated in industries and geographies that experience sector-based volatility. Volatility or disruption in any such industries or geographies may cause a decline in the value of our preferred securities portfolios and negatively impact our investment returns, such as the U.S. banking sector, utility sector and the broader financial industry. In addition, issuers of securities that are the focus of these investment strategies may experience a direct credit, liquidity or other financial event that negatively impacts the value of our investment positions in such issuer, such as the high-profile collapse and regulatory intervention at a Swiss financial services organization during 2023 that resulted in the write-down of the value of such issuer's contingent capital securities instruments held by us and other investors. In a higher interest rate environment, we face increasing competition for our actively managed strategies from relatively lower-risk fixed income investments, such as U.S. treasury securities and money-market funds, that may provide stable or attractive returns to investors. Further, to the extent limitations may arise in the overall supply of preferred securities or similar investments at attractive prices or at all, whether due to performance concerns about the asset class, shifts in market or economic trends or investor preferences, redemptions or decreased volume of new issuances, our ability to deploy our available investment capacity may become constrained. A decline in the performance or value of preferred securities or similar investments, or diminishment in the attractiveness or availability of preferred securities or similar investments, would have an adverse effect on the assets we manage, limit our ability to increase and invest assets in these strategies and reduce the fees we earn and our revenue.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5Our growth and the execution of our real estate investment strategy may be constrained by the size and number of real estate securities issuers, as well as REIT ownership restrictions.
Investments in real estate securities play an important role in our overall investment strategy. Our ability to fully utilize our investment capacity and continue to increase our ownership of real estate securities depends, in part, on growth in the size and number of issuers in the real estate securities market, particularly in the U.S. Limited growth, or any consolidation activity in the real estate sector, could limit or reduce the number of investment opportunities otherwise available to us. In addition, increased competition for investment opportunities due to large amounts of available capital dedicated to real estate strategies or due to alternative forms of investment methods, or a real or perceived trend towards merger and acquisition activity in the sector, could affect real estate valuations and prices. A limited number of investment targets could adversely impact our ability to make new investments based on fundamental valuations or at all, impair the full utilization of our overall investment capacity and otherwise negatively affect our investment strategy. Our ability to increase our ownership, or maintain existing levels of ownership, in securities issued by REITs may also be constrained by REIT ownership limits on a REIT's capital stock, common stock and/or preferred stock. REIT charters generally grant a REIT the right to unilaterally reduce any ownership amount that it deems to be in violation of its ownership limits. Such charters do not typically provide for the elimination of such right even in the event a REIT has previously provided waivers from such limits or acknowledgements that ownership levels do not violate such limits. To the extent these ownership restrictions prevent us from acquiring new or additional real estate securities, or force us to reduce existing ownership amounts in general or at prices that are not attractive, our revenue and our ability to invest available assets and increase the assets we manage could be negatively affected.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.