Cheche Group (CCG) Risk Analysis

The trading market for our securities will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or competitors. If any of the analysts who may cover us change their recommendation regarding our securities adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, the price of our securities would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover us were to cease their coverage or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price or trading volume of our securities to decline.

The price of our securities has fluctuated, and may continue to fluctuate significantly due to the market's reaction to our financial performance, results of operations, and general market and economic conditions. An active trading market for our securities may not be sustained. In addition, the price of our securities may vary due to general economic conditions and forecasts, our general business condition and the release of our financial reports. Additionally, if our securities are delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market and are quoted on over-the-counter market, the liquidity and price of our securities may be more limited than if our securities were quoted or listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market or another national securities exchange. You may be unable to sell your securities unless a market can be established or sustained.

The Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association contain provisions that could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying, or preventing an acquisition that shareholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which shareholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for the Class A Ordinary Shares, and therefore depress the trading price of the Class A Ordinary Shares. These provisions could also make it difficult for shareholders to take certain actions, including electing directors who are not nominated by us or taking other corporate actions, including effecting changes in our management. See "Item 10. Additional Information-B. Memorandum and Articles of Association." These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our board of directors or management.

We are an exempted company limited by shares incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. We conduct a majority of our operations through the PRC Subsidiaries and the Affiliated Entities in China. Substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. A majority of our officers and directors reside outside the United States and a substantial portion of the assets of those persons are located outside of the United States. As a result, it could be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against the us or against these individuals outside of the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed upon under the applicable securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of the PRC could render you unable to enforce a judgment against the relevant assets or the assets of the relevant directors and officers. In addition, our corporate affairs are governed by our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, the Cayman Companies Act and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of investors to take action against our directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law may not be as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States. Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies (save for the memorandum and articles of association, the register of mortgages and charges, and special resolutions of our shareholders). Our directors have discretion under the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but we are not obliged to make them available to the shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder's motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States. To the extent we choose to follow home country practice with respect to corporate governance matters, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. See "- As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards." As a result of all of the above, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as Public Shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.

Our securities are listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards permit a foreign private issuer such as us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards. For instance, we are not required to: - have a majority of the board be independent;- have a compensation committee or a nominations and corporate governance committee consisting entirely of independent directors; or - have regularly scheduled executive sessions with only independent directors each year. We do not intend to have a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee consisting entirely of independent directors, or hold annual meeting of shareholders. We may also continue to rely on this and other exemptions available to foreign private issuers in the future, and to the extent that we choose to do so, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would have under the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

As of the date of this annual report, there are 13,726,877 warrants issued and outstanding, consisting of 10,802,764 Public Warrants, 2,860,561 Sponsor Warrants, and 63,552 Innoven Warrants. The Warrants will not become exercisable until 30 days after the Closing (provided that at the time of such exercise a registration statement under the Securities Act covering the issuance of the Class A Ordinary Shares underlying the Public Warrants is effective and a prospectus relating thereto is current), and will expire five years after the Closing. A registration statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-274806) covering the issuance of the Class A Ordinary Shares underlying the Warrants has been filed with the SEC. Each Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one Class A Ordinary Share at a price of $11.50 per whole share, subject to adjustment. The Warrants may be exercised only for a whole number of Class A Ordinary Shares. To the extent the Warrants and the Innoven Warrants are exercised, additional Class A Ordinary Shares will be issued, which will result in dilution to the then-existing holders of Class A Ordinary Shares and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of Class A Ordinary Shares. The exclusive forum provision in the amended and restated warrant agreement can result in increased costs to investors to bring a claim.

We cannot predict the prices at which our securities will trade. The price of our securities may not bear any relationship to any established criteria of the value of our business and prospects, and the market price of our securities may fluctuate substantially. In addition, the trading price of our securities have been, and is likely to continue to be volatile, and could fluctuate widely in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. The volatility of and fluctuations in the trading price of our Class A Ordinary Shares could cause you to lose all or part of your investment. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our securities include the following: - actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition or results of operations;- variance in our financial performance from expectations of securities analysts;- changes in our projected operating and financial results;- changes in laws or regulations applicable to our business;- announcements by our or our competitors of significant business developments, acquisitions or new offerings;- sales of our securities by our shareholders or warrant holders;- significant breaches of, disruptions to or other incidents involving our information technology systems or those of our business partners;- our involvement in material litigation;- conditions or developments affecting the digital insurance industry in China;- changes in senior management or key personnel;- the trading volume of our securities;- general economic and market conditions; and - other events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism, global pandemics or responses to these events.

We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "emerging growth companies," including the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We do not intend to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with certain other public companies difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of: (1) the last day of the fiscal year (i) following the fifth anniversary of the consummation of the Business Combination, (ii) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (iii) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common equity that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter; and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.00 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period. Investors may find our securities less attractive, and there may be a less active trading market for our securities, and the price of such securities may be more volatile.

In December 2012, the SEC brought administrative proceedings against the "big four" PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, alleging that they had violated U.S. securities laws and the SEC's rules and regulations thereunder by failing to provide to the SEC the firms' audit work papers and other documents related to certain other PRC-based companies that are publicly traded in the United States. On January 22, 2014, the administrative law judge presiding over the matter rendered an initial decision that each of the firms had violated the SEC's rules of practice by failing to produce audit papers and other documents to the SEC. The initial decision censured each of the firms and barred them from practicing before the SEC for a period of six months. The decision was neither final nor legally effective until reviewed and approved by the SEC, and on February 12, 2014, the PRC-based accounting firms appealed to the SEC against this decision. On February 6, 2015, the four PRC-based accounting firms each agreed to a censure and to pay a fine to the SEC to settle the dispute and avoid suspension of their ability to practice before the SEC and audit U.S.-listed companies. The settlement required the firms to follow detailed procedures and to seek to provide the SEC with access to PRC-based firms' audit documents via the CSRC. Under the terms of the settlement, the underlying proceeding against the four PRC-based accounting firms was deemed dismissed with prejudice four years after entry of the settlement. The four-year mark occurred on February 6, 2019. Despite the Statement of Protocol, it remains uncertain whether the SEC will further challenge the four PRC-based accounting firms' compliance with U.S. laws in connection with U.S. regulatory requests for audit work papers or if the results of such a challenge would result in the SEC imposing penalties such as suspensions. If additional remedial measures are imposed on the PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, we could be unable to timely file future financial statements in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act. Moreover, any negative news about any such future proceedings against these accounting firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding China-based, United States-listed companies and the market price of our securities may be adversely affected. A determination that we have not timely filed financial statements in compliance with the SEC requirements could ultimately lead to the delisting of our securities from the Nasdaq Stock Market or deregistration from the SEC, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of our securities in the United States.

The HFCAA stipulates that if the SEC determines that we have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspection by the PCAOB for two consecutive years beginning in 2022, the SEC shall prohibit our securities from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States. In August 2022, the PCAOB, the CSRC and the Ministry of Finance of the PRC signed the Statement of Protocol, which establishes a specific and accountable framework for the PCAOB to conduct inspections and investigations of PCAOB-governed accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it was able to secure complete access to inspect and investigate PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong completely in 2022. On December 29, 2022, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 was signed into law by President Biden. The CAA, among other things, reduced the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the HFCAA as it was originally passed from three years to two, and thus, reduced the time before our securities may be prohibited from trading or delisted. The PCAOB Board vacated its previous 2021 determinations that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. However, whether the PCAOB will continue to be able to satisfactorily conduct inspections of PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong is subject to uncertainties and depends on a number of factors out of our and our auditor's control. The PCAOB continues to demand complete access in mainland China and Hong Kong moving forward and is making plans to resume regular inspections in early 2023 and beyond, as well as to continue pursuing ongoing investigations and initiate new investigations as needed. The PCAOB has also indicated that it will act immediately to consider the need to issue new determinations with the HFCAA if needed. Because our registered accounting firm is headquartered in Shanghai, China, if the PRC government adopts positions at any time in the future that would prevent the PCAOB from continuing to inspect or investigate completely accounting firms headquartered in mainland China or Hong Kong, or if we fail to, among others, meet the PCAOB's requirements, including retaining a registered public accounting firm that the PCAOB determines it is able to inspect and investigate completely, we will be identified as a "Commission-identified Issuer" following the filing of the annual report for the relevant fiscal year. In accordance with HFCAA, our securities will be delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market, and will not be permitted for trading over the counter if we are identified as a Commission-identified Issuer for two consecutive years under the HFCAA and the CAA. If our securities are prohibited from trading in the United States, we cannot assure you that such securities will be listed on a non-U.S. exchange or that a market for our securities will develop outside of the United States. Such a prohibition would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase our securities when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with delisting would have a negative impact on the price of our securities. Moreover, the HFCAA, CAA or other efforts to increase U.S. regulatory access to audit information could cause investor uncertainty for affected issuers, including us, and the market price of our securities could be adversely affected. Also, such a prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.

We expect to issue additional share capital in the future that will result in dilution to all other shareholders. We also expect to grant equity awards to key employees under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan. We may also raise capital through equity financings in the future. As part of our business strategy, we may acquire or make investments in companies, solutions or technologies and issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition or investment. Any such issuances of the additional share capital may cause shareholders to experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the per share value of the Class A Ordinary Shares to decline.

Our outstanding share capital consists of Class A Ordinary Shares and Class B Ordinary Shares. Each Class A Ordinary Share is entitled to one vote and each Class B Ordinary Share is entitled to three votes at general meetings of our shareholders. As of the date of this annual report, Mr. Lei Zhang beneficially owns all of Class B Ordinary Shares, representing approximately 24.6% of our issued and outstanding share capital, and approximately 49.4% of voting power. This concentration of ownership and the protective provisions in the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control, which could have the dual effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale and reducing the price of the Class A Ordinary Shares. As a result of the foregoing, the value of your investment could be materially reduced.

On February 3, 2015, the State Administration of Taxation issued the Circular on Issues of Enterprise Income Tax on Indirect Transfers of Assets by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises ("Circular 7"), which replaced or supplemented certain previous rules under the Notice on Strengthening Administration of Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises (the "Circular 698"), issued by the State Administration of Taxation on December 10, 2009. Circular 7 sets out a wider scope of indirect transfer of PRC assets that might be subject to PRC enterprise income tax. Circular 7 also includes detailed guidelines regarding when such indirect transfer is considered to lack a bona fide commercial purpose and thus regarded as avoiding PRC tax. On October 17, 2017, the SAT issued the Announcement on Issues Relating to Withholding at Source of Income Tax of Non-resident Enterprises (the "SAT Circular 37"), which came into effect on December 1, 2017 and was amended on June 15, 2018. SAT Circular 37 further clarifies the practices and procedures for withholding non-resident enterprise income tax. The conditional reporting obligation of the non-PRC investor under Circular 698 is replaced by a voluntary reporting by the transferor, the transferee or the underlying PRC resident enterprise transferred. Using a "substance over form" principle, PRC tax authorities may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if the company lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding or deferring PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, currently at a rate of 10%, and the transferee has an obligation to withhold tax from the sale proceeds. Gains from the sale of shares by investors through a public stock exchange are not subject to the PRC enterprise income tax pursuant to Circular 7 where such shares were acquired in a transaction through a public stock exchange. There remains uncertainty as to the application of Circular 7 and the SAT Circular 37. PRC tax authorities may determine that Circular 7 and the SAT Circular 37 are applicable to offshore restructuring transactions or sale of the shares of offshore subsidiaries where non-resident enterprises, as the transferors, were involved. PRC tax authorities may pursue such non-resident enterprises with respect to a filing regarding the transactions and request the PRC Subsidiaries to assist in the filing. As a result, our non-resident subsidiaries in such transactions may risk being subject to filing obligations or being taxed under Circular 7 and the SAT Circular 37, unless it can be justified that the transactions are of reasonable business purposes such as group restructuring or other allowed circumstances. Practically, there has been no major transaction of similar nature challenged by the PRC tax authorities. However, given the increasingly tightened tax administration in China and the uncertainties under Circular 7, we cannot assure you that there is no tax reporting or settlement risk for such transactions.

Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementing rules, in general, a 10% PRC withholding tax is applicable to dividends payable to investors that are non-resident enterprises that do not have an establishment or place of business in the PRC, or have such establishment or place of business but the dividends are not effectively connected with such establishment or place of business, in each case to the extent such dividends are derived from sources within the PRC. Similarly, any gain realized on the transfer of Class A Ordinary Shares by such investors is also subject to PRC tax at a current rate of 10%, subject to any reduction or exemption set forth in relevant tax treaties, if such gain is regarded as income derived from sources within the PRC. If we are deemed as a PRC resident enterprise, dividends paid on the Class A Ordinary Shares, and any gain realized from the transfer of the Class A Ordinary Shares, will be treated as income derived from sources within the PRC and be subject to PRC taxation. Furthermore, if we are deemed as a PRC resident enterprise, dividends payable to individual investors who are non-PRC residents and any gain realized on the transfer of the Class A Ordinary Shares by such investors may be subject to PRC tax at a current rate of 20%, subject to any reduction or exemption set forth in applicable tax treaties. If we or any of our subsidiaries established outside China are considered a PRC resident enterprise, it is unclear whether holders of the Class A Ordinary Shares can claim the benefit of income tax treaties or agreements entered into between China and other countries or areas. If dividends payable to non-PRC investors or gains from the transfer of the Class A Ordinary Shares by such investors are subject to PRC tax, the value of your investment in the Class A Ordinary Shares may decline significantly.

Pursuant to Circular 37, PRC residents who participate in share incentive plans in overseas non-publicly-listed companies due to their position as director, senior management or employee of the PRC Subsidiaries of overseas companies may submit applications to SAFE or its local branches for foreign exchange registration before exercising rights. Our directors, executive officers and other employees who are PRC residents that have been granted options may follow Circular 37 to apply for foreign exchange registration. We and our directors, executive officers and other employees who are PRC residents that have been granted options are subject to the Notice on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly Listed company, issued by SAFE in February 2012. According to the Notice, employees, directors, supervisors and other management members participating in any stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly listed company who are PRC residents must register with SAFE through a domestic qualified agent and complete certain other procedures. Failure to complete SAFE registrations may subject our employees, directors, supervisors and other management members participating in our stock incentive plans to fines and legal sanctions or limit the PRC Subsidiaries' ability to distribute dividends to us. Failure to complete SAFE registrations may also limit our ability to make payments under the share incentive plans or receive dividends or sales proceeds related thereto, or to contribute additional capital into the PRC Subsidiaries and the Affiliated Entities in China. In addition, we face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional share incentive plans for our directors and employees under PRC law.

We currently report under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including, among others, (1) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act, (2) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their share ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time, and (3) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information. In addition, foreign private issuers such as us are required to file their annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year, while U.S. domestic issuers that are accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 75 days after the end of each fiscal year, and U.S. domestic issuers that are large accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 60 days after the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we currently intend to publish our financial results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of Nasdaq. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely than that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers.  As a result of all of the above, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of a company that is not a foreign private issuer.

The sale of our Class A Ordinary Shares by existing shareholders in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could increase the volatility of the market price of the Class A Ordinary Shares or result in a significant decline in the public trading price of the Class A Ordinary Shares, even if our business is doing well. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. The lock-up restrictions applicable to former shareholder of CCT expired on March 14, 2024. Furthermore, 4,261,052 Class A Ordinary Shares as well as 2,860,561 Warrants (collectively, the "Sponsor Securities") held by the Sponsor are subject to lock-up and transfer restrictions pursuant to the terms of the Sponsor Support Agreement dated January 29, 2023, as amended on September 13, 2023, which may not be released until the earliest of (1) the consummation of a change of control of us after the Acquisition Closing, (2) the first date that the closing price of the Class A Ordinary Shares equals or is greater than $12.50 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30- trading day period after the first anniversary of Acquisition Closing, (3) with respect to twenty seven and one half percent (27.5%) of the Sponsor Securities six months after the Acquisition Closing (i.e., March 14, 2024), (4) with respect to an additional twenty seven and one half percent (27.5%) of the Sponsor Securities twelve months after the Acquisition Closing, and (5) with respect to forty five percent (45.0%) of the Sponsor Securities twenty four months after the Acquisition Closing. Following the expiration of the applicable lock-up period described in this this annual report and as restrictions on resale end and registration statements are available for use, the market price of the Class A Ordinary Shares could decline if the holders of restricted or locked up shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. These sales, or the perception in the market that such sales could occur, could reduce the market price of the Class A Ordinary Shares.

After the Closing, subject to the terms of the A&R Warrant Agreement, we have the ability to redeem the outstanding Warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, if, among other things, the Reference Value (as defined in the A&R Warrant Agreement) equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like). If and when the Warrants become redeemable, we may exercise such redemption right even if it is unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding Assumed Public Warrants as described above could force you to (1) exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (2) sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (3) accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is expected to be substantially less than the market value of the Warrants. In addition, we will have the ability to redeem the outstanding Warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.10 per warrant if, among other things, the Reference Value equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share dividends, rights issuances, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like). In such a case, the holders will be able to exercise their warrants prior to redemption for a number of Class A Ordinary Shares determined based on the redemption date and the fair market value of such Class A Ordinary Shares. The value received upon exercise of the Warrants (1) may be less than the value the holders would have received if they had exercised their warrants at a later time where the underlying share price is higher and (2) may not compensate the holders for the value of the warrants, including because the number of Class A Ordinary Shares to be received is capped at 0.361 shares of Class A Ordinary Shares per warrant (subject to adjustment) irrespective of the remaining life of the Warrants. None of the Sponsor Warrants will be redeemable so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees. However, we will have the ability to redeem the Sponsor Warrants once such Sponsor Warrants are transferred (other than to Sponsor's permitted transferees), provided that the criteria for redemption as set forth in the A&R Warrant Agreement are met.

The independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report of us included elsewhere in this annual report, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. Our auditor is located in China, a jurisdiction where the PCAOB was historically unable to conduct inspections and investigations completely before the end of 2022. As a result, we and investors in our securities are deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China in the past made it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our independent registered public accounting firm's audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that have been subject to the PCAOB inspections. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB issued a report that vacated its December 16, 2021 determination and removed mainland China and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. However, if the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in China, and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we and investors in our securities would be deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections again, which could cause investors and potential investors in our securities to lose confidence in our audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our financial statements. Furthermore, trading in our securities on any U.S. stock exchange or the U.S. over-the-counter market may be prohibited under the HFCAA if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely auditors located in China for two consecutive years. As a result the value of our securities will decline significantly or become worthless.

In connection with the Business Combination, we entered into the A&R Warrant Agreement on August 7, 2023, which relates to the Warrants. Under the A&R Warrant Agreement, we, in collaboration with the warrant agent, are required to deliver Class A Ordinary Shares to warrantholders, provided that they duly exercise their Warrants and make payment in accordance with the terms of the A&R Warrant Agreement. Disputes with warrantholders may arise in connection with the performance of our contractual obligations under the A&R Warrant Agreement. The A&R Warrant Agreement provides that any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to such agreement will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which will be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. This provision will apply to claims under the Securities Act but as discussed below, will not apply to claims under the Exchange Act. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, the exclusive forum provision in the A&R Warrant Agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Accordingly, the exclusive forum provision does not designate the courts of the State of New York as the exclusive forum for any derivative action arising under the Exchange Act, as there is exclusive federal jurisdiction in that instance. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, the enforceability of the exclusive forum provision in the A&R Warrant Agreement is uncertain, and a court may determine that such provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or any other claim for which the federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction. Further, compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder cannot be waived by investors in our securities. The exclusive forum provision in the A&R Warrant Agreement may limit a warrant holder's ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes related to the A&R Warrant Agreement, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors or officers. Alternatively, if a court were to find this exclusive forum provision inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and board of directors.

The exercise price for our Warrants is $11.5 per share (subject to adjustment as described in the A&R Warrant Agreement), which exceeds the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares, which was $2.02 based on the closing price of our Class A Ordinary Shares on Nasdaq on April 23, 2024. The likelihood that warrant holders will exercise the Warrants and any cash proceeds that we would receive is dependent upon the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. If the market price for our Class A Ordinary Shares is less than $11.50 per share, we believe warrant holders will be unlikely to exercise their Warrants, and we are unlikely to receive proceeds from the exercise of Warrants.

Under PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions, including agreements and contracts such as the leases and sales contracts, are executed using the chop or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with the relevant local branch of the State Administration for Market Regulation (the "SAMR") (formerly known as State Administration for Industry and Commerce (the "SAIC")). We generally execute legal documents by affixing chops or seals, rather than having the designated legal representatives sign the documents. The relevant entities typically hold the chops of the Affiliated Entities and the PRC Subsidiaries, allowing them to execute documents locally. To maintain the physical security of these chops, we typically store them in secure locations accessible only to custodians and designated key employees of our legal, administrative or finance departments. Although we have implemented approval procedures and monitored our chop custodians and key employees, including the designated legal representatives of the Affiliated Entities and the PRC Subsidiaries, the procedures may not prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. Our chop custodians, key employees or designated legal representatives may abuse their authority, for example, by binding the Affiliated Entities and the PRC Subsidiaries with contracts against these entities' interests. We may be required to honor these contracts if the other contracting party acts in good faith in reliance on the authority of our chops or signatures of our legal representatives. If any designated legal representative obtains control of the chop in an effort to obtain control over the relevant entity, we need to pass a shareholder or board resolution to designate a new legal representative and to take legal actions to seek the return of the chop, apply for a new chop, or otherwise seek legal remedies for the legal representative's misconduct. If any of the designated legal representatives obtains, misuses or misappropriates these chops and seals or other controlling intangible assets for whatever reason, we could experience disruptions in our operations. We may also have to take corporate or legal action, which could involve significant time and resources to resolve while distracting management from our operations, materially adversely affecting our business and results of operations.

The interests of the VIE's shareholders may differ from the interests of us, the PRC Subsidiaries and the VIE. When conflicts of interest arise, any or all of these individuals or entities may not act in the best interests of us, the PRC Subsidiaries and/or the Affiliated Entities, and any conflicts of interest may not resolve in the favor of us, the PRC Subsidiaries and/or the Affiliated Entities. In addition, these individuals or entities may breach or cause the VIE and the PRC Subsidiaries to breach or refuse to renew existing contractual arrangements with WFOE. None of us, the PRC Subsidiaries or the Affiliated Entities has arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these shareholders and any of themselves. We, the PRC Subsidiaries and the Affiliated Entities rely on these shareholders to abide by the laws of the Cayman Islands and China. These laws provide that directors owe a fiduciary duty to the us to act in good faith and in our best interests and not to use their respective positions for personal gain. However, the legal frameworks of China and the Cayman Islands do not provide guidance on resolving conflicts in the event of a conflict with another corporate governance regime. If we, the PRC Subsidiaries and/or the Affiliated Entities cannot resolve any conflict of interest or dispute between any of themselves and the shareholders of the VIE, we, the PRC Subsidiaries and the Affiliated Entities will likely rely on legal proceedings, which could disrupt their business and subject them to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of such proceedings. As of the date of this annual report, 14.24% of the equity interests in the VIE held by Beijing Zhongjin Huicai Investment Management Co., Ltd. were frozen by the People's Court of Futian District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province for a civil dispute between Beijing Zhongjin Huicai Investment Management Co., Ltd. and certain other party. Under applicable PRC laws, (1) the frozen equity interests in the VIE cannot be sold, transferred, or disposed of in any manner from July 28, 2022 to July 27, 2025, unless such freezing was released by a competent court; and (2) if a competent court rules to auction off the frozen equity interests, the proceeds from the auctioning and sale of the frozen equity interests by competent court shall be firstly distributed to pledgee, i.e. the WFOE, thereafter the remaining proceeds (if any), shall be used to settle the claims of the creditor applying with court for enforcement. Therefore, uncertainties remain with respect to the enforcement of the option of the WFOE to purchase such frozen equity interests under the exclusive option agreement among us, WFOE, the VIE and shareholders of the VIE, dated June 18, 2021, which may be subject to the auction process by the competent court. However, as that such equity interests had been pledged to WFOE prior to the freezing, we do not believe the freezing of the above-mentioned equity interests in the VIE will cause any material impact to our operations.

If the VIE or its shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under their contractual arrangements with WFOE, we and the PRC Subsidiaries may incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We and the PRC Subsidiaries may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages. Such remedies may not be effective. WFOE's contractual arrangements with the VIE and its shareholders are governed by PRC laws and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitrations in the PRC. Accordingly, these contractual arrangements would be interpreted in accordance with PRC laws, and any disputes arising from these contractual arrangements would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures. Uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit the abilities of us and the PRC Subsidiaries to enforce these contractual arrangements. For example, there have been very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a variable interest entity should be interpreted or enforced under PRC laws. In addition, in the PRC, rulings by arbitrators are final, and parties cannot appeal the arbitration results in courts. If the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit, the prevailing parties may only enforce arbitration awards in PRC courts through arbitration award recognition proceedings, which would require additional expenses and delays. In the event that we and the PRC Subsidiaries cannot enforce the contractual arrangements with respect to the VIE, or suffer significant delays or other obstacles in enforcing these contractual arrangements, we and the PRC Subsidiaries may not be able to consolidate the financial results of the Affiliated Entities. As a result, the ability of us and PRC Subsidiaries to conduct our business, and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. See "-Risks Related to Doing Business in China-Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws, rules and regulations could materially adversely affect our business." In addition, as of the date of this annual report, 14.24% of the equity interests in the VIE held by Beijing Zhongjin Huicai Investment Management Co., Ltd. were frozen by the People's Court of Futian District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province for a civil dispute between Beijing Zhongjin Huicai Investment Management Co., Ltd. and certain other party, which may affect the enforcement of the option of the WFOE under the contractual arrangements. See "-Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure-The VIE's shareholders may have potential conflicts of interest with us, the PRC Subsidiaries and the Affiliated Entities, which may materially adversely affect our business and financial condition."

We and the PRC Subsidiaries rely on contractual arrangements with the VIE and its shareholders to operate their business. These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us and the PRC Subsidiaries with control over the VIE. Because we and the PRC Subsidiaries do not have a direct ownership interest in the VIE, we consolidate our financial results by relying on the performance by the VIE and its shareholders of their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements with them. The shareholders of the VIE may not act in the best interests of us and the PRC Subsidiaries, or otherwise fail to perform their contractual obligations. We and the PRC Subsidiaries may replace the shareholders of the VIE pursuant to the contracts with the VIE and its shareholders. However, if any dispute relating to these contracts or the replacement of the VIE's shareholders remains unresolved, we and the PRC Subsidiaries must enforce their rights under these contracts under PRC law and be subject to uncertainties in the PRC legal system.