TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Braskem SA (BAK) Risk Analysis

Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning. Braskem SA disclosed 74 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Braskem SA reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q4, 2020

Risk Distribution
74Risks
Sector Avg.Finance & CorporateTech & InnovationLegal & RegulatoryProductionAbility to SellMacro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Risk Change Over Time

No filing history is available.

Risks removedRisks addedRisks changedBraskem SA Risk Factors
New Risk (4)
  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
    We have no control over the corporate actions or decisions of Pemex TRI and Cenagas, which are, respectively, our main supplier of ethane and provider of natural gas transportation services and Mexican state-owned enterprises subject to political interference and related risks.

    The Mexican government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Mexican economy. Accordingly, Mexican governmental actions concerning the Mexican economy and state-owned enterprises could have a significant impact on Mexican private sector entities in general and on our operations in particular. We cannot predict the impact that political conditions will have on the Mexican economy. We can give no assurances that changes in Mexican federal government policies will not adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We currently do not have and do not intend to obtain political risk insurance, but the investment is subject to the protections provided under the bilateral investment treaty between the Netherlands and Mexico. For additional information, see "-Political events in Mexico could affect the Mexican economic policy and our business, financial condition and results of operations." Our main supplier of ethane, Pemex TRI, is a subsidiary of Pemex, a state-owned entity of the Mexican government, and, therefore, the Mexican government controls Pemex, as well as its annual budget, which is approved by the Mexican Congress. The Mexican government may cut spending in the future. These cuts could adversely affect Pemex's annual budget and its ability to provide us with our contracted supply of ethane. In addition, Cenagas, which is a Mexican state-owned agency, has the monopoly of the transportation of natural gas in the region in which Braskem Idesa operates. As a result, the failure by Cenagas to renew the agreement for transportation of natural gas to our Ethylene XXI Project could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Pemex's production, over which we have no control, nor over any other corporate action or decision, have decreased over the last years according to public disclosure by Pemex. As a result, it has led to a significant decrease in oil production and associated production of natural gas, which, in turn, is the feedstock used by Pemex in the production of ethane. Any further decrease in the amount of ethane currently being delivered by Pemex TRI to our petrochemical facility under the ethane supply agreement or any reduction in, or outright failure by, Pemex TRI to pay us the shortfall penalties owed under the ethane supply agreement, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation. We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, U.S. domestic bribery laws, and other anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which we conduct activities, including Mexico. We may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or state-owned or affiliated entities in Mexico, such as Pemex TRI. We have been improving our compliance processes and controls to prevent the occurrence of any wrongdoing in such interactions. However, we could be held liable for the breach of such processes and controls and actions by our employees, representatives, contractors, partners and agents, even if we do not explicitly authorize such activities. Detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations of anti-corruption laws can require a significant diversion of time, resources, and attention from senior management. In addition, noncompliance with anti-corruption, anti-bribery, or anti-money laundering laws could subject us to whistleblower complaints, investigations, prosecution, enforcement actions, sanctions, settlements, fines, damages, other civil or criminal penalties or injunctions, suspension or prohibition from contracting with certain persons, reputational harm, adverse media coverage, and other collateral consequences. If any subpoenas or investigations are launched, or governmental or other sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any civil or criminal proceeding that may be filed against us, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. In light of the allegations of undue payments related to the Ethylene XXI project, which were originally published in the media in Mexico and were included in the testimony by the former CEO of Pemex to the Office of the Attorney General of Mexico, we, together with Braskem Idesa, in compliance with the standards established by Braskem's Global Compliance System Policy and Braskem Idesa's governance guidelines, approved the engagement of a U.S. law firm with proven experience in similar cases to conduct an independent internal investigation of the allegations. The investigation is ongoing, and we are unable to estimate a date for its conclusion or its outcome. If the investigation concludes that there is evidence supporting any of the allegations, such findings could materially and adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, controls, and results of operations, as well as the liquidity and price of the securities issued by us.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
    The totality of the shares issued by Braskem and owned by OSP Investimentos S.A. were given as collateral in financing agreements entered into by the Novonor Group.

    Pursuant to a shares fiduciary assignment agreement (alienação fiduciária em garantia) entered into by the Novonor Group on November 27, 2013, as amended on May 13, 2016, July 19, 2016, April 24, 2017, May 23, 2018, March 29, 2019 and October 9, 2020, all shares issued by Braskem and held by OSP Investimentos S.A. have been given as collateral in connection with certain financing agreements entered into by Novonor S.A. and certain of its subsidiaries. In the event that Novonor Group defaults on such financing agreements, or if such financing agreements are accelerated and, as a result, such collateral is seized by a creditor (assuming that Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras does not exercise its preemptive rights to acquire such shares) we may be subject to a change of control following statutory and procedural formalities required pursuant to our shareholders's agreement. A change of control under these circumstances may adversely affect us. A foreclosure on or sale of our shares held by OSP Investimentos S.A. - whether within or outside the Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings - may result in a change of control. As we do not have the ability to consent to or otherwise influence or control the Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings or otherwise the acquirer of the shares from any such foreclosure, we may have a change in our corporate control in the foreseeable future.

  • Debt & Financing - Risk 3
    Because Braskem Finance Limited and Braskem Netherlands Finance B.V. have no operations of their own, holders of our outstanding debt securities issued by Braskem Finance Limited or Braskem Netherlands Finance B.V. depend on Braskem to provide Braskem Finance Limited or Braskem Netherlands Finance B.V., respectively, with sufficient funds to make payments on these debt securities when they become due.

    Braskem Finance Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Braskem incorporated in the Cayman Islands, and Braskem Netherlands Finance B.V., or Braskem Netherlands Finance, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Braskem incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands, have no operations of their own other than the issuing and making of payments on their respective debt securities and other indebtedness, and using the proceeds therefrom as permitted by the agreements governing these issuances, including lending the net proceeds of the debt securities and other indebtedness incurred by Braskem Finance Limited and Braskem Netherlands Finance to Braskem and subsidiaries of Braskem. Accordingly, the ability of either Braskem Finance Limited or Braskem Netherlands Finance to pay principal, interest and other amounts due on the outstanding debt securities issued by it and other indebtedness will depend our financial condition and results of operations and those of our subsidiaries that are debtors of Braskem Finance Limited or Braskem Netherlands Finance, respectively. In the event of an adverse change in our financial condition or results of operations or those our subsidiaries that are debtors of Braskem Finance Limited or Braskem Netherlands Finance, these entities may be unable to service their indebtedness to Braskem Finance Limited or Braskem Netherlands Finance, as the case may be, which would result in the failure of Braskem Finance Limited or Braskem Netherlands Finance, as the case may be, to have sufficient funds to repay all amounts due on or with respect to the respective outstanding debt securities.

  • Debt & Financing - Risk 4
    Braskem's obligations under the guarantees of the outstanding debt securities are subordinated to certain statutory preferences.

    Under Brazilian law, Braskem's obligations under the guarantees of the outstanding debt securities are subordinated to certain statutory preferences. In the event of a liquidation, bankruptcy or judicial restructuring of Braskem, such statutory preferences, including post-petition claims, claims for salaries, wages, social security, taxes and court fees and expenses and claims secured by collateral, among others, will have preference over any other claims, including claims by any investor in respect of the guarantees. In such event, enforcement of the guarantees may be unsuccessful, and holders of the outstanding debt securities may be unable to collect amounts due under the outstanding debt securities.

Read and Evaluate the RiskReserved for Ultimate MembersUpgrade

Risk Highlights Q4, 2020

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 23 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
74
+3
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
4Risks added
1Risks removed
12Risks changed
Since Dec 2020
Number of Risk Changed
12
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 1

Risk Word Cloud

we have no control over the corporate actions or decisions of pemex tri and cenagas, which are, respectively, our main supplier of ethane and provider of natural gas transportation services and mexican state-owned enterprises subject to political interference and related risks.our main supplier of ethanewe may be subject to attempts to acquire our control, which may lead to significant changes in management, the strategies that we are currently pursuing, or in our current corporate governance practices.our current corporate governance practiceswe rely on access to third-party licensed technology and related intellectual property, particularly in the context of the manufacturing process of certain of our products. if the licensed third-party technology and intellectual property that we use cease to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or if any such third party ceases to provide us with technical support under license or technical services agreements that we have entered into with them to allow us to satisfactorily operate, certain of our production facilities, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.party ceases to provide usif we are unable to comply with the restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness, there could be a default under the terms of these agreements, which could result in an acceleration of payment of funds that we have borrowed and could affect our ability to make principal and interest payments on our debt obligations.acceleration of payment of fundsmexico has experienced a period of increased criminal activity, including violence associated with drug trafficking and organized crime, and such activities could adversely affect our financing costs and exposure to our customers and counterparties.period of increased criminal activitywe rely on access to third-party licensed technology and related intellectual property, particularly in the context of the manufacturing process of certain of our products. if the licensed third-party technology and intellectual property that we use cease to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or if any such third party ceases to provide us with technical support under license or technical services agreements that we have entered into with them to allow us to satisfactorily operate, certain of our production facilities, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.access to third-party licensed technologybrazilian government exchange control policies could increase the cost of servicing our foreign currency-denominated debt, adversely affect our ability to make payments under our foreign currency-denominated debt obligations and impair our liquidity.our foreign currency-denominated debt obligationsbecause braskem finance limited and braskem netherlands finance b.v. have no operations of their own, holders of our outstanding debt securities issued by braskem finance limited or braskem netherlands finance b.v. depend on braskem to provide braskem finance limited or braskem netherlands finance b.v., respectively, with sufficient funds to make payments on these debt securities when they become due.sufficient funds to make paymentswe depend on petrobras to supply us with a substantial portion of our naphtha, ethane, propane and propylene needs.substantial portion of our naphthaif we fail to develop an alternative source of ethane or to expand the current alternative source of ethane, it may have a negative impact on our business because we cannot operate our mexico complex at full capacity.current alternative source of ethane

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 74

Share Price & Shareholder Rights12 | 16.2%
  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1Changed
    We have no control over the corporate actions or decisions of Pemex TRI and Cenagas, which are, respectively, our main supplier of ethane and provider of natural gas transportation services and Mexican state-owned enterprises subject to political interference and related risks.

    The Mexican government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Mexican economy. Accordingly, Mexican governmental actions concerning the Mexican economy and state-owned enterprises could have a significant impact on Mexican private sector entities in general and on our operations in particular. We cannot predict the impact that political conditions will have on the Mexican economy. We can give no assurances that changes in Mexican federal government policies will not adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We currently do not have and do not intend to obtain political risk insurance, but the investment is subject to the protections provided under the bilateral investment treaty between the Netherlands and Mexico. For additional information, see "-Political events in Mexico could affect the Mexican economic policy and our business, financial condition and results of operations." Our main supplier of ethane, Pemex TRI, is a subsidiary of Pemex, a state-owned entity of the Mexican government, and, therefore, the Mexican government controls Pemex, as well as its annual budget, which is approved by the Mexican Congress. The Mexican government may cut spending in the future. These cuts could adversely affect Pemex's annual budget and its ability to provide us with our contracted supply of ethane. In addition, Cenagas, which is a Mexican state-owned agency, has the monopoly of the transportation of natural gas in the region in which Braskem Idesa operates. As a result, the failure by Cenagas to renew the agreement for transportation of natural gas to our Ethylene XXI Project could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Pemex's production, over which we have no control, nor over any other corporate action or decision, have decreased over the last years according to public disclosure by Pemex. As a result, it has led to a significant decrease in oil production and associated production of natural gas, which, in turn, is the feedstock used by Pemex in the production of ethane. Any further decrease in the amount of ethane currently being delivered by Pemex TRI to our petrochemical facility under the ethane supply agreement or any reduction in, or outright failure by, Pemex TRI to pay us the shortfall penalties owed under the ethane supply agreement, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation. We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, U.S. domestic bribery laws, and other anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which we conduct activities, including Mexico. We may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or state-owned or affiliated entities in Mexico, such as Pemex TRI. We have been improving our compliance processes and controls to prevent the occurrence of any wrongdoing in such interactions. However, we could be held liable for the breach of such processes and controls and actions by our employees, representatives, contractors, partners and agents, even if we do not explicitly authorize such activities. Detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations of anti-corruption laws can require a significant diversion of time, resources, and attention from senior management. In addition, noncompliance with anti-corruption, anti-bribery, or anti-money laundering laws could subject us to whistleblower complaints, investigations, prosecution, enforcement actions, sanctions, settlements, fines, damages, other civil or criminal penalties or injunctions, suspension or prohibition from contracting with certain persons, reputational harm, adverse media coverage, and other collateral consequences. If any subpoenas or investigations are launched, or governmental or other sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any civil or criminal proceeding that may be filed against us, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. In light of the allegations of undue payments related to the Ethylene XXI project, which were originally published in the media in Mexico and were included in the testimony by the former CEO of Pemex to the Office of the Attorney General of Mexico, we, together with Braskem Idesa, in compliance with the standards established by Braskem's Global Compliance System Policy and Braskem Idesa's governance guidelines, approved the engagement of a U.S. law firm with proven experience in similar cases to conduct an independent internal investigation of the allegations. The investigation is ongoing, and we are unable to estimate a date for its conclusion or its outcome. If the investigation concludes that there is evidence supporting any of the allegations, such findings could materially and adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, controls, and results of operations, as well as the liquidity and price of the securities issued by us.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
    Shareholders of our class A preferred shares or the ADSs may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders' equity.

    As permitted by the Brazilian Corporate Law, our by-laws specify that 25% of our adjusted net profit for each fiscal year must be distributed to shareholders as mandatory dividends, or the Mandatory Distribution of Dividends. Under our by-laws, our class A and class B preferred shareholders are entitled to an annual non-cumulative preferential dividend, or the Minimum Preferred Dividend, equal to 6% of their pro rata share of our capital before dividends may be paid to our common shareholders. The Brazilian Corporate Law allows a publicly traded company like ours to suspend the Mandatory Distribution of Dividends in any particular year if our board of directors informs our shareholders that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition or cash availability, provided that such suspension does not affect the Minimum Preferred Dividend, which is still payable to the holders of preferred shares. However, the shareholders, including the holders of our class A preferred shares or the ADSs, may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders' equity in any given year if we do not record a profit.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
    Our class A preferred shares and the ADSs have limited voting rights and are not entitled to vote to approve corporate transactions, including mergers or consolidations of our Company with other companies, or the declaration of dividends.

    Under the Brazilian Corporate Law and our by-laws, holders of our class A preferred shares and, consequently, the ADSs underlying these shares are not entitled to vote at meetings of our shareholders, except in very limited circumstances. These limited circumstances directly relate to key rights of the holders of class A preferred shares, such as modifying basic terms of our class A preferred shares or creating a new class of preferred shares with superior rights. Holders of preferred shares without voting rights are entitled to elect one member and his or her respective alternate to our board of directors and our fiscal council, depending on specific requirements provided in the Brazilian Corporate Law. Holders of our class A preferred shares and the ADSs are not entitled to vote to approve corporate transactions, including mergers or consolidations of our Company with other companies, or the declaration of dividends. However, if we do not pay dividends for three consecutive years, holders of our class A preferred shares and the ADSs will be granted voting rights. See "Item 10. Additional Information-Description of Our By-laws-Voting Rights."

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4
    Holders of the ADSs may find it difficult to exercise even their limited voting rights at our shareholders' meetings.

    Under Brazilian law, only shareholders registered as such in our corporate books may attend our shareholders' meetings. All class A preferred shares underlying the ADSs are registered in the name of the depositary. ADS holders may exercise the limited voting rights with respect to our class A preferred shares represented by the ADSs only in accordance with the deposit agreement relating to the ADSs, which provides that voting rights are only available to ADS holders at our discretion. There are practical limitations upon the ability of ADS holders to exercise their voting rights due to the additional steps involved in communicating with ADS holders. For example, we are required to publish a notice of our shareholders' meetings in certain newspapers in Brazil. To the extent that holders of our class A preferred shares are entitled to vote at a shareholders' meeting, they will be able to exercise their voting rights by attending the meeting in person, voting by proxy or by remote voting, if applicable. By contrast, holders of the ADSs will receive notice of a shareholders' meeting by mail from the depositary following our notice to the ADS depository requesting the ADS depository to do so. To exercise their voting rights, ADS holders must instruct the depositary on a timely basis. This noticed voting process will take longer for ADS holders than for holders of class A preferred shares. If it fails to receive timely voting instructions for all or part of the ADSs, the depositary will assume that the holders of those ADSs are instructing it to give a discretionary proxy to a person designated by us to vote their ADSs, except in limited circumstances. In the limited circumstances in which holders of the ADSs have voting rights, they may not receive the voting materials in time to instruct the depositary to vote the class A preferred shares underlying their ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out the voting instructions of the holders of the ADSs or for the manner of carrying out those voting instructions. Accordingly, holders of the ADSs may not be able to exercise their voting rights, and they will have no recourse if the class A preferred shares underlying their ADSs are not voted as requested.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5
    If holders of the ADSs exchange them for class A preferred shares, they may risk temporarily losing, or being limited in, the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages.

    The Brazilian custodian for the preferred shares underlying the ADSs must obtain an electronic registration number with the Central Bank to allow the depositary to remit U.S. dollars abroad. ADS holders benefit from the electronic certificate of foreign capital registration from the Central Bank obtained by the custodian for the depositary, which permits it to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the class A preferred shares into U.S. dollars and remit the proceeds of such conversion abroad. If holders of the ADSs decide to exchange them for the underlying preferred shares, they will only be entitled to rely on the custodian's certificate of registration with the Central Bank for five business days after the date of the exchange. Thereafter, they will be unable to remit U.S. dollars abroad unless they obtain a new electronic certificate of foreign capital registration in connection with the preferred shares, which may result in expenses and may cause delays in receiving distributions. See "Item 10. Additional Information-Exchange Controls." Also, if holders of the ADSs that exchange the ADSs for our Class A preferred shares do not qualify under the foreign investment regulations, they will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment of dividends and distribution on, and the proceeds from any sale of, our preferred shares. See "Item 10. Additional information-Exchange Controls" and "Item 10. Additional Information-Taxation-Brazilian Tax Considerations."

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 6
    Holders of the ADSs may face difficulties in protecting their interests because we are subject to different corporate rules and regulations as a Brazilian company and our shareholders may have fewer and less well-defined rights than under the laws of other jurisdictions, including in a jurisdiction in the Unites States.

    Holders of the ADSs are not our direct shareholders and are unable to enforce the rights of shareholders under our by-laws and the Brazilian Corporate Law. Our corporate affairs are governed by our by-laws and the Brazilian Corporate Law, which differ from the legal principles that would apply if we were incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States, such as the State of Delaware or New York, or elsewhere outside Brazil. Even if a holder of ADSs surrenders its ADSs and becomes a direct shareholder, its rights as a holder of the class A preferred shares underlying the ADSs under the Brazilian Corporate Law to protect its interests relative to actions by our board of directors may be fewer and less well-defined than under the laws of those other jurisdictions. Although insider trading and price manipulation are crimes under Brazilian law and are the subject of continuously evolving regulations promulgated by the Brazilian Securities Commission, or the CVM, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities markets or the markets in some other jurisdictions. In addition, rules and policies against self-dealing or for preserving shareholder interests may be less well-defined and enforced in Brazil than in the United States and certain other countries, which may put holders of our class A preferred shares and the ADSs at a potential disadvantage when compared to holders of shares of companies incorporated in other jurisdictions. Corporate disclosures also may be less complete or informative than for a public company in the United States or in certain other countries.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 7
    Holders of the ADSs may face difficulties in serving process on or enforcing judgments against us and other persons.

    We are a corporation (sociedade por ações) organized under the laws of Brazil, and all of our directors and executive officers and our independent public accountants reside or are based in Brazil. Most of our assets and those of these other persons are located in Brazil. As a result, it may not be possible for holders of the ADSs to effect service of process upon us or these other persons within the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil or to enforce against us or these other persons judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil. In addition, because a substantial portion of our assets and all of our directors and officers reside outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against us or any of our directors or officers may not be collectible within the United States. Because judgments of U.S. courts for civil liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced in Brazil if certain conditions are met, holders may face greater difficulties in protecting their interests in the case of actions by us or our directors or executive officers than would shareholders of a U.S. corporation.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 8
    Actual or anticipated sales of a substantial number of class A preferred shares could decrease the market prices of our class A preferred shares and the ADSs.

    Sales of a substantial number of our class A preferred shares could negatively affect the market prices of our class A preferred shares and the ADSs. If substantial sales of shares are made through the securities markets by our controlling shareholders or other class A preferred shares, the market price of our class A preferred shares and, by extension, the ADSs may decrease significantly. As a result, holders of the ADSs may not be able to sell the ADSs at or above the price they paid for them.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 9
    Holders of the ADSs or class A preferred shares in the United States may not be entitled to the same preemptive rights as Brazilian shareholders have, pursuant to Brazilian legislation, in the subscription of shares resulting from capital increases made by us.

    Under Brazilian law, if we issue new shares in exchange for cash or assets as part of a capital increase, subject to certain exceptions, we must grant our shareholders preemptive rights at the time of the subscription of shares, corresponding to their respective interest in our share capital, allowing them to maintain their existing shareholding percentage. We may not legally be permitted to allow holders of ADSs or class A preferred shares in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future capital increase unless (1) we file a registration statement for an offering of shares resulting from the capital increase with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, or (2) the offering of shares resulting from the capital increase qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. At the time of any future capital increase, we will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration statement for an offering of shares with the SEC and any other factors that we consider important in determining whether to file such a registration statement. We cannot assure the holders of the ADSs or class A preferred shares in the United States that we will file a registration statement with the SEC to allow them to participate in any of our capital increases. As a result, the equity interest of such holders into us may be diluted.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 10
    The relative volatility and liquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may adversely affect holders of our class A preferred shares and ADSs.

    The Brazilian securities markets are substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than major securities markets in the United States and other jurisdictions, and may be regulated differently from the manner in which U.S. investors are accustomed. Factors that may specifically affect the Brazilian equity markets may limit the ability of holders of the ADSs to sell class A preferred shares underlying ADSs at a price and at a time when they wish to do so and, as a result, could negatively impact the market price of the ADSs themselves.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 11
    Some of our shareholders may have the ability to determine the outcome of corporate actions or decisions, which could affect the holders of our class A preferred shares and the ADSs.

    Novonor, directly or through its wholly-owned subsidiary OSP Investimentos S.A., or OSP Inv., owns 38.32 % of our total share capital, including 50.11% of our voting share capital, and Petrobras holds 36.14% of our total share capital, including 47.03% of our voting share capital. Nominees of Novonor constitute a majority of the members of our board of directors. Under a shareholders' agreement to which Novonor and Petrobras are parties, which we refer to as the Braskem S.A. Shareholders' Agreement, we may only undertake certain actions after Novonor and Petrobras have reached a consensus with respect to those actions. However, Novonor will have the sole power to approve our business plan, through the board of directors, as described under "Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions-Major Shareholders-Shareholders' Agreements." As a result, Novonor has the ability to determine the outcome of most corporate actions or decisions requiring the approval of our shareholders or our board of directors-in certain instances, with the consent of Petrobras-which could affect the holders of our class A preferred shares and of our American Depositary Shares, or ADSs. Furthermore, on June 17, 2019, Novonor, together with certain of its controlling and controlled entities, filed a petition for judicial restructuring before the First Judicial Bankruptcy Court of the State of São Paulo, Brazil, seeking a voluntary judicial restructuring and emergency relief staying certain foreclosure actions by their creditors (the "Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings"). The Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings does not include us. Although we are not currently a party to any pending bankruptcy or other judicial restructuring proceedings in Brazil or elsewhere, we are exposed to certain risks related to the Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings, such as risks related to the change of our corporate control resulting from decisions taken and/or agreed under such proceedings and the consequences derived thereto, including but not limited to significant changes in our management and our strategy that may be undertaken by any new controlling shareholders that may arise from the conclusion of these proceedings. We have no control over the Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings, and no assurance can be given on the outcome of the Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings or their effect on us.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 12Changed
    The totality of the shares issued by Braskem and owned by OSP Investimentos S.A. were given as collateral in financing agreements entered into by the Novonor Group.

    Pursuant to a shares fiduciary assignment agreement (alienação fiduciária em garantia) entered into by the Novonor Group on November 27, 2013, as amended on May 13, 2016, July 19, 2016, April 24, 2017, May 23, 2018, March 29, 2019 and October 9, 2020, all shares issued by Braskem and held by OSP Investimentos S.A. have been given as collateral in connection with certain financing agreements entered into by Novonor S.A. and certain of its subsidiaries. In the event that Novonor Group defaults on such financing agreements, or if such financing agreements are accelerated and, as a result, such collateral is seized by a creditor (assuming that Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras does not exercise its preemptive rights to acquire such shares) we may be subject to a change of control following statutory and procedural formalities required pursuant to our shareholders's agreement. A change of control under these circumstances may adversely affect us. A foreclosure on or sale of our shares held by OSP Investimentos S.A. - whether within or outside the Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings - may result in a change of control. As we do not have the ability to consent to or otherwise influence or control the Novonor Judicial Restructuring Proceedings or otherwise the acquirer of the shares from any such foreclosure, we may have a change in our corporate control in the foreseeable future.

See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment. They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result. It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process. Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”. Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report. According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing. You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector. Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements. A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below. 1. Financial & Corporate Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results. Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing. Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments. Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances. 2. Legal & Regulatory Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company. Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation. Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy. Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives. 3. Production Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory. Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers. Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls. Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation. 4. Technology & Innovation Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development. Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology. Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks. Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying. 5. Ability to Sell Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers. Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes. Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration. Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation. 6. Macro & Political Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions. Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19. International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company. Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.