Want to see BAH full AI Analyst Report?
Risk Overview Q2, 2026
Risk Distribution
33% Finance & Corporate
19% Ability to Sell
13% Legal & Regulatory
12% Tech & Innovation
12% Production
12% Macro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.
Risk Change Over Time
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Booz Allen Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
Risk Highlights Q2, 2026
Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 17 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 17 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
52
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
52
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
0Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Jun 2026
0Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Jun 2026
Number of Risk Changed
0
-5
From last reportS&P 500 Average: 1
0
-5
From last reportS&P 500 Average: 1
See the risk highlights of Booz Allen in the last period.
Risk Word Cloud
The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 52
Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 17/52 (33%)Above Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights2 | 3.8%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
The market for our Class A Common Stock may be adversely affected by the performance of other companies in the government services market.Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
Provisions in our organizational documents and in the Delaware General Corporation Law may prevent takeover attempts that could be beneficial to our stockholders.Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws include a number of provisions that may have the effect of delaying, deterring, preventing, or rendering more difficult a change in control of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation that our stockholders might consider in their best interests. These provisions include:
- granting to the Board the sole power to set the number of directors and to fill any vacancy on the Board;- granting to the Board the ability to designate and issue one or more series of preferred stock without stockholder approval, the terms of which may be determined at the sole discretion of the Board;- the establishment of advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to the Board at stockholder meetings; and - prohibiting our stockholders from acting by written consent.
In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which imposes additional requirements regarding mergers and other business combinations. These provisions may prevent our stockholders from receiving the benefit from any premium to the market price of our common stock offered by a bidder in a takeover context. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if the provisions are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws may also make it difficult for stockholders to replace or remove our management. These provisions may facilitate management entrenchment that may delay, deter, render more difficult, or prevent a change in our control, which may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Accounting & Financial Operations6 | 11.5%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
We cannot assure you that we will pay special or regular dividends on our stock in the future.Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
Our financial results may vary significantly from period to period as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control, which could cause the market price of our Class A Common Stock to fluctuate.Our financial results may vary significantly from period to period in the future as a result of many external factors that are outside of our control. Factors that may affect our financial results and could cause the market price of our outstanding securities, including our Class A Common Stock, to fluctuate include those listed in this "Risk Factors" section and others such as:
- any cause of reduction or delay in U.S. government funding;- fluctuations in revenue earned on existing contracts;- commencement, completion, or termination of contracts during a particular period;- a potential decline in our overall profit margins if our other direct costs and subcontract revenue grow at a faster rate than labor-related revenue;- strategic decisions by us or our competitors, such as changes to business strategy, strategic investments, acquisitions, divestitures, spin offs, and joint ventures;- a change in our contract mix to less profitable contracts;- changes in policy or budgetary measures that adversely affect U.S. government contracts in general;- variable purchasing patterns under U.S. government GSA schedules, blanket purchase agreements, which are agreements that fulfill repetitive needs under GSA schedules, and IDIQ contracts;- changes in demand for our services and solutions;- fluctuations in the degree to which we are able to utilize our professionals;- seasonality associated with the U.S. government's fiscal year;- an inability to utilize existing or future tax benefits for any reason, including a change in law;- alterations to contract requirements; and - adverse judgments or settlements in legal disputes.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 3
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is a holding company with no operations of its own, and it depends on its subsidiaries for cash to fund all of its operations and expenses, including to make future dividend payments, if any.The operations of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation are conducted almost entirely through its subsidiaries and its ability to generate cash to meet its debt service obligations or to pay dividends is highly dependent on the earnings and receipt of funds from its subsidiaries via dividends or intercompany loans. In addition, Delaware law may impose requirements that may restrict our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 4
Goodwill represents a significant asset on our balance sheet, and changes in future business conditions could cause these investments to become impaired, requiring substantial write-downs that would reduce our operating income.As of March 31, 2026, the value of our goodwill was $2,399 million. The amount of our recorded goodwill may substantially increase in the future as a result of any acquisitions that we make. We evaluate the recoverability of recorded goodwill amounts annually, or when evidence of potential impairment exists. Impairment analysis is based on several factors requiring judgment and the use of estimates, which are inherently uncertain and based on assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Additionally, material changes in our financial outlook, as well as events outside of our control, such as deteriorating market conditions for companies in our industry, may indicate a potential impairment. When there is an impairment, we are required to write down the recorded amount of goodwill, which is reflected as a charge against operating income. Such non-cash impairment charges could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which they are recognized.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 5
We may not realize the full value of our backlog, which may result in lower than expected revenue.We historically have not realized all of the revenue included in our total backlog, and we may not realize all of the revenue included in our current or future total backlog. There is a higher degree of risk in this regard with respect to unfunded backlog and priced options. In addition, there can be no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenue in any particular period, because the actual receipt, timing, and amount of revenue under contracts included in backlog are subject to various contingencies, including congressional appropriations, many of which are beyond our control. The actual receipt of revenue from contracts included in backlog may never occur or may be delayed because: a program schedule could change or the program could be canceled; a contract's funding or scope could be reduced, modified, delayed, de-obligated, or terminated early; in the case of funded backlog, the period of performance for the contract has expired or the U.S. government has exercised its unilateral right to cancel multi-year contracts and related orders or terminate existing contracts for convenience or default; in the case of unfunded backlog, funding may not be available; or, in the case of priced options, our customers may not exercise their options.
Any inability to hire additional appropriately qualified personnel or failure to timely and effectively deploy such additional personnel against funded backlog could negatively affect our ability to grow our revenue. We may also not recognize revenue on funded backlog due to, among other reasons, the tardy submissions of invoices by our subcontractors and the expiration of the relevant appropriated funding. The amount of our funded backlog is also subject to change, due to, among other factors: changes in congressional appropriations; changes in the use of U.S. government contracting vehicles, and the provisions therein used to procure our services; and adjustments to the scope of services under our contracts, or cancellation of contracts, by the U.S. government at any time. As a result of the U.S. government's review of federal spending across U.S. government agencies, we have had certain of our contracts impacted, reduced or canceled as a result of these reviews, which has reduced the amount of our total backlog and could have a material adverse impact on our business and financial performance. Furthermore, even if our backlog results in revenue, the contracts may not be profitable.
Our backlog does not include contracts that have been awarded but are currently under protest and also does not include any task orders under IDIQ contracts, GSA Schedule or other master agreement contract vehicles, except to the extent that task orders have been awarded to us under those contracts. For additional disclosure regarding our backlog, please see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Factors and Trends Affecting Our Results of Operations-Sources of Revenue-Contract Backlog."
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 6
We use estimates in recognizing revenue and if we make changes to estimates used in recognizing revenue, our profitability may be adversely affected.Revenue from our fixed-price contracts is primarily recognized using the percentage-of-completion method with progress toward completion of a particular contract based on actual costs incurred relative to total estimated costs to be incurred over the life of the contract. Revenue from our cost-reimbursable-plus-award-fee contracts are based on our estimation of award fees over the life of the contract. Estimating costs at completion and award fees on our long-term contracts is complex and involves significant judgment. Adjustments to original estimates are often required as work progresses, experience is gained, and additional information becomes known, even though the scope of the work required under the contract may not change. Any adjustment as a result of a change in estimate is recognized as events become known.
In the event updated estimates indicate that we will experience a loss on a contract, we recognize the estimated loss at the time it is determined. Additional information may subsequently indicate that the loss is more or less than initially recognized, which requires further adjustments in our consolidated financial statements. Changes in the underlying assumptions, circumstances, or estimates could result in adjustments that could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations.
Debt & Financing5 | 9.6%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
A downgrade, suspension or withdrawal of the rating assigned by a rating agency to us or our indebtedness could make it more difficult for us to obtain additional debt financing in the future.Debt & Financing - Risk 2
Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. Following the significant increases in interest rates during 2022 and 2023, rates have gradually declined but, as of March 2026, remain above recent historical lows. Future movements in interest rates remain uncertain. With an increase in interest rates, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remains the same, and our net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, would correspondingly decrease.
Based on the outstanding $1.5 billion term loan and any balances drawn under the revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2026, and after considering interest rate swaps that fix the interest rate on $350 million of principal of our variable-rate debt, each quarter point change in interest rates would result in a $3 million change in our projected annual interest expense on the outstanding indebtedness under our Senior Credit Facility. We have entered into interest rate swaps and may in the future enter into additional interest rate derivatives that balances our debt portfolio and keeps a neutral stance on interest rates. However, due to risks for hedging gains and losses and cash settlement costs, we may not elect to maintain such interest rate swaps, and any swaps may not fully mitigate our interest rate risk.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
The terms of the agreements governing our indebtedness restrict our current and future operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes or to take certain actions, which could harm our long-term interests.The Senior Credit Facility and the indentures governing our outstanding senior notes contain covenants that, among other things, impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us and limit our ability to engage in actions that may be in our long-term best interest, including restrictions on our ability to:
- incur additional indebtedness, guarantee indebtedness, or issue disqualified stock or preferred stock;- enter into sale-leaseback transactions;- incur liens;- consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our and our subsidiaries' assets; and - enter into certain lines of business.
These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. In addition, the restrictive covenants in the Senior Credit Facility require us to maintain a consolidated net total leverage ratio that will be tested at the end of each fiscal quarter. Our ability to satisfy such financial ratio test may be affected by events beyond our control.
A breach of the covenants under the agreements governing our indebtedness could result in an event of default under those agreements. Such a default may allow certain creditors to accelerate the related debt and may result in the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. In addition, an event of default under the Senior Credit Facility would also permit the lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility to terminate all other commitments to extend further credit under that facility. In the event the lenders accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we may not have sufficient assets to repay that indebtedness.
As a result of these restrictions, we may be:
- limited in how we conduct our business;- unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns; or - unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities.
These restrictions might hinder our ability to grow in accordance with our strategy.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.Our ability to make scheduled payments on or refinance our debt obligations will depend on our financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to financial, business, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. We might not be able to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness. For information regarding the risks to our business that could impair our ability to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, see "- Risks Related to Our Indebtedness."
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures or to dispose of material assets or operations, seek additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We may not be able to effect any such alternative measures on commercially reasonable terms or at all and, even if successful, those alternative actions may not allow us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. Our cash flows could be reduced for a number of reasons, including as a result of unexpectedly aggressive capital calls from our venture capital investments.
The agreements governing our indebtedness restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness, which could limit our ability to raise debt to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due.
We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain proceeds in an amount sufficient to meet any debt service obligations then due. To the extent that we are required to prepay any amounts under our Term Loans, we may have insufficient cash to make required principal and interest payments on other indebtedness.
Our inability to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all, would materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness.
If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we would be in default and the following events could occur: lenders under our Senior Credit Facility and holders of our outstanding senior notes could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable; and lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility could terminate their commitments to provide loans. All of these events could force us into bankruptcy or liquidation and result in investors' losing some or all of the value of their investment.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
We have indebtedness and may incur additional indebtedness, which could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to obtain financing in the future as well as to react to changes in our business.We have indebtedness, and we are able to, and may, incur additional indebtedness in the future. The material terms of our indebtedness are described in Note 10, "Debt," to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The level of our indebtedness could have important consequences to holders of our common stock, including:
- making it more difficult for us to satisfy our existing debt obligations;- limiting our ability to refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate requirements;- requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes;- increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, including increased interest rates;- placing us at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors or competitors with comparable debt and more favorable terms and thereby affecting our ability to compete; and - increasing our cost of borrowing.
Although the agreements governing our indebtedness contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the additional indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we and the guarantors now face would increase and we may not be able to meet all our existing debt obligations.
Corporate Activity and Growth4 | 7.7%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
We may consummate acquisitions, investments, partnerships, joint ventures and divestitures, which involve numerous risks and uncertainties.Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
Efforts by the U.S. government to revise its organizational conflict of interest rules could limit our ability to successfully compete for new contracts or task orders, which would adversely affect our results of operations.Efforts by the U.S. government to reform its procurement practices have focused on, among other areas, the separation of certain types of work to facilitate objectivity and avoid or mitigate organizational conflicts of interest and the strengthening of regulations governing organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest may arise from circumstances in which a contractor has:
- impaired objectivity during performance;- unfair access to non-public information; or - the ability to set the "ground rules" for another procurement for which the contractor competes.
A focus on organizational conflicts of interest issues has resulted in legislation and a proposed regulation aimed at increasing organizational conflicts of interest requirements, including, among other things, separating sellers of products and providers of advisory services in major defense acquisition programs. Recently, U.S. government agencies have issued proposed regulations, which provide for and update definitions of each of the above types of conflicts of interest and provide illustrative examples of various relationships that contractors could have that would give rise to potential conflicts of interest. The resulting rule making process, as well as continuing reform initiatives in procurement practices, may result in future amendments to the FAR, increasing the restrictions in current organizational conflicts of interest regulations and rules, or place heightened scrutiny on the relationships we have with other entities, including partnerships and investments. Similarly, organizational conflicts of interest remain an active area of bid protest litigation, increasing the likelihood that competitors may leverage such arguments in an attempt to overturn agency award decisions. To the extent that proposed and future organizational conflicts of interest laws, regulations, and rules or interpretations thereof limit our ability to successfully compete for new contracts or task orders with the U.S. government, either because of organizational conflicts of interest issues arising from our business, or because companies with which we are affiliated, or with which we otherwise conduct business, create organizational conflicts of interest issues for us, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
Changes to our operating structure, capabilities, or strategy intended to address our customers' needs, respond to developments in our markets, and grow our business may not be successful.We routinely review our operating structure, capabilities and strategy to determine whether we are effectively meeting the needs of customers, effectively responding to developments in our markets and successfully building platforms intended to provide the foundation to support the future growth of our business. The outcome of any such review is difficult to predict and the extent of changes to our business following such a review, if any, are dependent in part upon the nature and extent of the review.
The implementation of changes to our operating structure, capabilities, strategy or any other aspect of our business following an internal review, may materially alter various aspects of our business or our business model as an entirety and there can be no assurance that any such changes will be successful or that they will not ultimately have a negative effect on our business and results of operations.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 4
Our focus on new growth areas for our business entails risks, including those associated with new relationships, customers, talent needs, capabilities, service offerings, and maintaining our collaborative culture and core values.We are focused on growing our presence in our addressable markets by: expanding our relationships with existing customers, acquiring new customers by leveraging our core competencies, further developing our existing capabilities and service offerings, creating new capabilities and service offerings to address our customers' emerging needs, and undertaking business development efforts focused on identifying near-term developments and long-term trends that may pose significant challenges for our customers. These efforts entail inherent risks associated with innovation and competition from other participants in those areas, potential failure to help our customers respond to the challenges they face, our ability to comply with uncertain evolving legal standards applicable to certain service offerings, including those in the cybersecurity area, and, with respect to potential growth in foreign jurisdictions, risks associated with operating in foreign jurisdictions, such as compliance with applicable foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that may impose different and, occasionally, conflicting or contradictory requirements, and the economic, legal, and political conditions in the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate, including the GDPR and the EU AI Act. See "-Implementation of and compliance with various data privacy and cybersecurity laws, regulations and standards could require significant investment into ongoing compliance activities, trigger potential liability, and limit our ability to use personal data." As we attempt to develop new relationships, customers, capabilities, and service offerings, these efforts could harm our results of operations due to, among other things, a diversion of our focus and resources and actual costs, opportunity costs of pursuing these opportunities in lieu of others and a failure to reach a profitable return on our investments in new technologies, capabilities, and businesses, including expenses on research and development investments, and these efforts could ultimately be unsuccessful.
The needs of our customers change and evolve regularly due to complex and rapidly changing technologies. Our success depends upon our ability to identify emerging technological trends; develop technologically advanced, innovative, and cost-effective products and services; and market these products and services to our customers. Our success also depends on our continued access to suppliers of important technologies and components. The possibility exists that our competitors might develop new capabilities or service offerings that might cause our existing capabilities and service offerings to become obsolete. If we fail in our new capabilities development efforts or our capabilities or services fail to achieve market acceptance more rapidly than our competitors, our ability to procure new contracts could be negatively impacted, which would negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Our ability to grow our business by leveraging our operating model to efficiently and effectively deploy our people across our customer base is also largely dependent on our ability to maintain our collaborative culture. To the extent that we are unable to maintain our culture for any reason, including our effort to focus on new growth areas or acquire new businesses with different corporate cultures, we may be unable to grow our business. Any such failure could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, with the growth of our U.S. and foreign operations, we are providing customer services and undertaking business development efforts in numerous and disparate geographic locations both domestically and in select foreign locations. Our ability to effectively serve our customers is dependent upon our ability to successfully leverage our operating model across all of these and any future locations, maintain effective management controls over all of our locations to ensure, among other things, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, and instill our core values in all of our personnel at each of these and any future locations. Any inability to ensure any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 10/52 (19%)Above Sector Average
Competition1 | 1.9%
Competition - Risk 1
We face intense competition from many competitors, which could cause us to lose business, lower prices and suffer employee departures.Demand1 | 1.9%
Demand - Risk 1
The U.S. government may prefer small and small disadvantaged businesses; therefore, we may have fewer opportunities to bid for.Sales & Marketing8 | 15.4%
Sales & Marketing - Risk 1
The U.S. government may revise its procurement, contract, or other practices in a manner adverse to us.Sales & Marketing - Risk 2
Our work with government customers exposes us to additional risks inherent in the government contracting environment, which could reduce our revenue, disrupt our business, or otherwise materially adversely affect our results of operations.U.S. government contractors (including their subcontractors and others with whom they do business) operate in a highly regulated environment and are routinely audited and reviewed by the U.S. government and its agencies, including the DCAA, DCMA, Department of War Inspector General, and others. These agencies review our performance on contracts, pricing practices, cost accounting practices, and compliance with applicable policies, laws, regulations, and standards, including applicable government cost accounting standards, as well as our contract costs, including allocated indirect costs. The DCAA audits and the DCMA reviews, among other areas, the adequacy of our internal control systems and policies, including our DFARS required business systems, which are comprised of our purchasing, property, estimating, earned value, accounting and material management and accounting systems. These internal control systems could focus on significant elements of costs, such as executive compensation. Determination of a significant internal control deficiency by a government agency could result in increased payment withholding that might adversely affect our cash flow. In particular, over time the DCMA has increased and may continue to increase the proportion of executive compensation that it deems unallowable and the size of the executive population whose compensation is disallowed, which will continue to materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition including the requirement to carry an increased level of reserves. We recognize as revenue, net of reserves, executive compensation that we determine, based on management's estimates, to be allowable; management's estimates in this regard are based on a number of factors that may change over time, including executive compensation survey data, our and other government contractors' experiences with the DCAA audit practices in our industry, and relevant decisions of courts and boards of contract appeals. Any costs found to be unallowable under a contract will not be reimbursed, and any such costs already reimbursed must be refunded. Further, the amount of any such refund may exceed the provision for claimed costs, which is based on management's estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and may not cover actual losses. For example, DCAA audits may result in, and have historically resulted in, the Company's inability to retain certain claimed costs, including executive and employee compensation, due to differing views of the allowability and reasonableness of such costs. As of March 31, 2026, years subsequent to the Company's fiscal year 2011 remained subject to audit and/or final resolution. As of March 31, 2026, the Company recognized a liability of $248 million for estimated adjustments to claimed costs based on its historical DCAA audit results, including the final resolution of such audits with the DCMA. Determining the provision for claimed costs is complex and subject to management's estimate of adjustments to claimed costs based on the number of years that remain open to audit and expected final resolution by U.S. government agencies. As a result, significant changes in estimates could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations. Furthermore, the disallowance of any costs previously charged could directly and negatively affect our current results of operations for the relevant prior fiscal periods, and we could be required to repay any such disallowed amounts. Each of these results could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Moreover, if any of the administrative processes and business systems, some of which are currently certified as effective, are found not to comply with government imposed requirements, we may be subjected to increased government scrutiny and approval that could delay or otherwise adversely affect our ability to compete for or perform contracts or to be paid timely. Unfavorable U.S. government audit, review, or investigation results could subject us to civil or criminal penalties or administrative sanctions, require us to retroactively and prospectively adjust previously agreed to billing or pricing rates for our work, and could harm our reputation and relationships with our customers and impair our ability to be awarded new contracts, which could affect our future sales and profitability by preventing us, by operation of law or in practice, from receiving new government contracts for some period of time. In addition, if our invoicing system were found to be inadequate following an audit by the DCAA, our ability to directly invoice U.S. government payment offices could be eliminated. As a result, we would be required to submit each invoice to the DCAA for approval prior to payment, which could materially increase our accounts receivable days sales outstanding and adversely affect our cash flow. In addition, proposed regulatory changes, if adopted, would require the Department of War's contracting officers to impose contractual withholding at no less than certain minimum levels based on assessments of a contractor's business systems. If a government investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeitures of profits, withholding of payments, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with the U.S. government. We could also suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against us.
In addition, operation of our financial management systems, including changes to modernize and upgrade those systems, and certain changes to our cost accounting practices that we have adopted may negatively impact our profitability. In particular, the changes to our cost accounting practices required us to estimate changes in costs for certain contracts and make payments in connection with such estimates. The changes are subject to audit by the DCAA and negotiation with the DCMA, which could result in additional payments that may be material and not recoverable. To the extent we are unable to fully mitigate the costs associated with changes to our cost accounting practices as we implement the new systems, our business and financial results may be adversely affected.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 3
Our U.S. government contracts may be terminated by the government at any time and may contain other provisions permitting the government to discontinue contract performance, and if lost contracts are not replaced, our operating results may differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.U.S. government contracts contain provisions and are subject to laws and regulations that provide government customers with rights, remedies, and obligations not typically found in commercial contracts. These rights and remedies allow government customers, among other things, to:
- terminate existing contracts, with short notice, for convenience as well as for default;- reduce orders under or otherwise modify contracts;- for contracts subject to the Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Statute, reduce the contract price or cost where it was increased because a contractor or subcontractor furnished cost or pricing data during negotiations that was not complete, accurate or current;- for some contracts, (i) demand a refund, make a forward price adjustment, or terminate a contract for default if a contractor provided inaccurate or incomplete data during the contract negotiation process and (ii) reduce the contract price under certain triggering circumstances, including the revision of price lists or other documents upon which the contract award was predicated;- terminate our facility security clearances and thereby prevent us from receiving classified contracts;- cancel multi-year contracts and related orders if funds for contract performance for any subsequent year become unavailable;- decline to exercise an option to renew a multi-year contract or issue task orders in connection with IDIQ contracts;- claim rights in solutions, systems, and technology produced by us, appropriate such work-product for their continued use without continuing to contract for our services and disclose such work-product to third parties, including other U.S. government agencies and our competitors, which could harm our competitive position;- prohibit future procurement awards with a particular agency due to a finding of organizational conflicts of interest based upon prior related work performed for the agency that would give a contractor an unfair advantage over competing contractors, or the existence of conflicting roles that might bias a contractor's judgment;- subject the award of contracts to protest by competitors, which may require the contracting federal agency or department to suspend our performance pending the outcome of the protest and may also result in a requirement to resubmit offers for the contract or in the termination, reduction, or modification of the awarded contract;- suspend or debar us from doing business with the U.S. government; and - control or prohibit the export of our services.
In connection with the efforts by the U.S. government to reduce federal spending across federal civilian, defense, and intelligence departments and agencies, we have had, and may in the future have, certain of our contracts renegotiated, modified, reduced or canceled and may in the future continue to experience such adjustments. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Factors and Trends Affecting Our Results of Operations-U.S Political, Budget and Regulatory Environment" for additional disclosure regarding our business environment. Similarly, if a U.S. government customer were to unexpectedly terminate, cancel, or decline to exercise an option to renew with respect to one or more of our significant contracts, or suspend or debar us from doing business with the U.S. government, such actions could cause reputational harm to us, and could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and results of operations.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 4
If we cannot collect our receivables or if payment is delayed, our business may be adversely affected by our inability to generate cash flow, provide working capital, or continue our business operations.We depend on the timely collection of our receivables to generate cash flow, provide working capital, and continue our business operations. If any of our U.S. government or commercial customers, or any prime contractor for whom we are a subcontractor, fails to pay or delays the payment of invoices for any reason, our business and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. For example, our U.S. government customers may delay or fail to pay invoices for a number of reasons, including lack of appropriated funds, lack of an approved budget, lack of revised or final settled billing rates as a result of open audit years or as a result of audit findings by government regulatory agencies. Some prime contractors for whom we are a subcontractor have significantly fewer financial resources than we do, which may increase the risk that we may not be paid in full or that payment may be delayed. In recent months, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, delays in the payment of invoices by our U.S. government customers. Should such delays become significant, there may be a material and adverse affect on our business.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 5
We depend on contracts with U.S. government agencies for substantially all of our revenue. If our reputation or relationships with such agencies are harmed, our future revenue and operating profits would decline.The U.S. government is our primary customer. We expect to continue to derive the vast majority of our revenue from work performed under U.S. government contracts. For this reason, any issue that compromises our relationship with the U.S. government generally or any U.S. government agency that we serve would cause our revenue to decline. Among the key factors in maintaining our relationship with U.S. government agencies is our performance on contracts and task orders, the strength of our professional reputation, compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and the strength of our relationships with customer personnel.
Our relationship with U.S. government agencies could be harmed by the mishandling or the perception of mishandling of sensitive information, such as our failure to maintain the confidentiality of the existence of our business relationships with certain of our customers, including as a result of misconduct or other improper activities by our employees, subcontractors, or suppliers, or a failure to maintain adequate protection against security breaches, including those resulting from cyber-attacks. Our relationship with the U.S. government could also be damaged as a result of an agency's dissatisfaction with work performed by us, a subcontractor, or other third parties who provide services or products for a specific project for any reason, including due to perceived or actual deficiencies in the performance or quality of our work, and we may incur additional costs to address any such situation and the profitability of that work might be impaired. In addition, to the extent our performance under a contract does not meet a U.S. government agency's expectations, the customer might seek to terminate the contract prior to its scheduled expiration date, provide a negative assessment of our performance to government-maintained contractor past-performance data repositories, fail to award us additional business under existing contracts or otherwise, and direct future business to our competitors.
Further, negative publicity concerning government contractors in general, or us, our business practices, or our products and services, regardless of accuracy or completeness, may harm our reputation among federal agencies and federal government contractors, and the credibility of our brand, and adversely affect our ability to attract or retain customers or talent. Due to the sensitive nature of our work and our confidentiality obligations to our customers, we may be unable or limited in our ability to respond to such negative publicity, which could also harm our reputation and business. To the extent our reputation or relationships with U.S. government agencies is impaired, our revenue and operating profits could materially decline.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 6
Our earnings and profitability may vary based on the mix of our contracts and may be adversely affected by our failure to accurately estimate or otherwise recover the expenses, time, and resources for our contracts.We enter into three general types of U.S. government contracts for our services: cost-reimbursable, time-and-materials, and fixed-price. Each of these types of contracts, to varying degrees, involves the risk that we could underestimate our cost of fulfilling the contract, which may reduce the profit we earn or lead to a financial loss on the contract and adversely affect our operating results.
Under cost-reimbursable contracts, we are reimbursed for allowable costs up to a ceiling and paid a fee, which may be fixed or performance-based. If our actual costs exceed the contract ceiling or are not allowable under the terms of the contract or applicable regulations, we may not be able to recover those costs. In particular, there is ongoing focus by the U.S. government on the extent to which government contractors, including us, are able to receive reimbursement for employee compensation, including the adoption of interim rules by federal agencies implementing a section of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, as amended, that substantially decreased the level of allowable compensation cost for executive-level employees and further applied the newly reduced limitation to all employees. In addition, there is an increased risk of compensation being deemed unallowable or payments being withheld as a result of U.S. government audit, review, or investigation.
Under time-and-materials contracts, we are reimbursed for labor at negotiated hourly billing rates and for certain allowable expenses. We assume financial risk on time-and-materials contracts because our costs of performance may exceed these negotiated hourly rates.
Under fixed-price contracts, we perform specific tasks or deliver a specific outcome for a predetermined price. Compared to time-and-materials and cost-reimbursable contracts, fixed-price contracts generally offer higher margin opportunities because we receive the benefits of any cost savings, but involve greater financial risk because we bear the impact of any cost overruns. The U.S. government, through the recent executive order "Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting," directs federal agencies, subject to certain exceptions, to increase the use of firm-fixed price contracts for new awards to the maximum extent consistent with law. Additionally, agencies are directed, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with law, to seek to modify, restructure, or renegotiate, their top ten highest-dollar-value contracts issued on an other-than-fixed price basis. This executive order may result in future contract modifications and conversions of existing contracts to fixed-price contracts. Because we assume the risk for cost overruns and contingent losses on fixed-price contracts, an increase in the percentage of fixed-price contracts in our contract mix may increase our risk of incurring losses.
Additionally, our profits could be adversely affected if our costs under any contract exceed the assumptions we used in bidding for the contract. For example, we may miscalculate the costs, resources, or time needed to complete projects or meet contractual milestones as a result of delays on a particular project, including delays in designs, engineering information, or materials provided by the customer or a third party, delays or difficulties in equipment and material delivery, schedule changes, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. Additionally, as more contracts with the U.S. government transition to fixed-price, we face greater risk of cost overruns due to ambiguities in the contract itself regarding delineation of responsibilities between us and the U.S. government and uncertainty with how the government may manage the contract in practice. We record provisions in our consolidated financial statements for losses on our contracts when necessary, as required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, but our contract loss provisions may not be adequate to cover all actual losses that we may incur in the future.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 7
A significant majority of our revenue is derived from task orders under indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity, or IDIQ, contract vehicles where we perform in either a prime or subcontractor position.We believe that one of the key elements of our success is our position as the holder of 2,426 active task orders under IDIQ contract vehicles as of March 31, 2026.
IDIQ contracts provide for the issuance by the customer of orders for services or products under the contract, and often contain multi-year terms and unfunded ceiling amounts, which allow but do not commit the U.S. government to purchase products and services from contractors. Our ability to generate revenue under each of these types of contracts depends upon our ability to be awarded task orders for specific services by the customer. IDIQ contracts may be awarded to one contractor (single award) or several contractors (multiple award). Multiple contractors must compete under multiple award IDIQ contracts for task orders to provide particular services, and contractors earn revenue only to the extent that they successfully compete for these task orders. A failure to be awarded task orders under such contracts would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, our ability to maintain our existing business and win new business depends on our ability to maintain our prime and subcontractor positions on these contracts. The loss, without replacement, of certain of these contract vehicles could have a material adverse effect on our ability to win new business and our operating results. If the U.S. government elects to use a contract vehicle that we do not hold, we will not be able to compete for work under that contract vehicle as a prime contractor.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 8
We derive a majority of our revenue from contracts awarded through a competitive bidding process, and our revenue and profitability may be adversely affected if we are unable to compete or re-compete effectively in the process or if there are delays caused by our competitors protesting major contract awards received by us.We derive a majority of our revenue from U.S. government contracts awarded through competitive bidding and re-competing processes. We do not expect this to change for the foreseeable future. Our failure to compete effectively in this procurement environment would have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability.
The competitive bidding and re-competing processes involve risk and significant costs to businesses operating in this environment, including:
- the necessity to expend resources, make financial commitments (such as procuring leased premises), and bid on engagements in advance of the completion of their design, which may result in unforeseen difficulties in execution, cost overruns and, in the case of an unsuccessful competition, the loss of committed costs;- the substantial cost and managerial time and effort spent to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that may not be awarded to us;- the ability to accurately estimate the resources and costs that will be required to service any contract we are awarded;- the expense and delay that may arise if our competitors protest or challenge contract awards made to us pursuant to competitive bidding, and the risk that any such protest or challenge could result in the resubmission of bids on modified specifications, or in termination, reduction, or modification of the awarded contract; and - any opportunity cost of not bidding and winning other contracts we might have otherwise pursued.
In addition, changes in U.S. government procurement practices, including the increased use of alternative contracting methods, such as other transaction authority agreements, may reduce barriers to entry for non-traditional contractors, increase competition, and increase pricing pressure, which could adversely affect our ability to win new contracts or task orders and our profitability.
In circumstances where contracts are held by other companies and are scheduled to expire, we still may not be provided the opportunity to bid or otherwise compete on those contracts if the U.S. government determines to extend the existing contract. If we are unable to win particular contracts that are awarded through the competitive bidding and re-competing processes, we may not be able to enter, operate, or expand in the markets for the services that are provided under those contracts for the duration of those contracts to the extent that there is no additional demand for such services. An inability to consistently win new contract awards over any extended period would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In the current environment, we have seen delays in procurements generally as well as an overall decline in the number of bid protests from unsuccessful bidders on our new program awards. It can take many months for the relevant U.S. government agency to resolve protests by one or more of our competitors of contract awards we receive. Bid protests may result in significant expense to us, contract modification, or loss of an awarded contract as a result of the award being overturned. Even where we do not lose the awarded contract, the resulting delay in the startup and funding of the work under these contracts may cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. There can be no assurance that these delays will not ultimately have a material adverse impact on our business and financial performance. While the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2026 contained provisions intended to curb protests by incumbent contractors, it remains too early to predict the impact such provisions will have upon protest rates.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 7/52 (13%)Below Sector Average
Regulation1 | 1.9%
Regulation - Risk 1
We are required to comply with numerous laws and regulations, some of which are highly complex, and our failure to comply could result in fines or civil or criminal penalties or suspension or debarment by the U.S. government that could result in our inability to continue to work on or receive U.S. government contracts, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.Litigation & Legal Liabilities1 | 1.9%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Adverse judgments or settlements in legal disputes could result in materially adverse monetary damages or injunctive relief and damage our reputation.Taxation & Government Incentives1 | 1.9%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
Changes in tax law or judgments by management related to complex tax matters could adversely impact our results of operations.Environmental / Social4 | 7.7%
Environmental / Social - Risk 1
Our business is subject to a number of risks related to climate and environmental matters, including regulatory, political, reputational, litigation and financial risks, that could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.Environmental / Social - Risk 2
Implementation of and compliance with various data privacy and cybersecurity laws, regulations and standards could require significant investment into ongoing compliance activities, trigger potential liability, and limit our ability to use personal data.Any failure by us, our vendors or other business partners to comply with foreign, U.S. federal, state or local laws and regulations regarding data privacy, including the protection of personal or confidential information of our customers or employees which we may handle and process, or cybersecurity could result in significant monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions, fines, penalties, private litigation or claims, and/or criminal prosecution in one or more jurisdictions, including as a result of the perception of our practices, products, and services in relation to violations of individual privacy, data protection rights, or cybersecurity requirements. We may also incur substantial expenses in implementing and maintaining compliance with such laws and regulations, or anticipated laws and regulations, including those that require certain types of data to be retained on servers within these jurisdictions or otherwise impose data sovereignty, localization, and cross-border transfer restrictions on how and where data is stored, processed, accessed, or transferred. These laws and regulations, and anticipated laws and regulations, are increasing in complexity and number, change frequently, sometimes conflict or create different requirements across jurisdictions, and are subject to interpretation by different regulators and courts, creating the possibility of different compliance measures or enforcement risks across jurisdictions, which may cause additional expenses for compliance with such laws and regulations. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in privacy claims or enforcement actions against us, including liabilities, fines and damage to our reputation, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
More than 20 U.S. states have enacted comprehensive privacy laws, and we are also subject to federal, state, local, and foreign privacy and data protection laws and regulations such as the European Union's ("EU") General Data Protection Regulation (the "GDPR"), and the United Kingdom's GDPR, that impose compliance obligations on companies that process personal data. These data privacy laws and regulations govern the collection, use, and processing of personal information, provide rights to residents of those respective states, in some cases including personal information collected from residents in the context of recruitment and employment, as well as business-to-business arrangements. The number and fragmentation of these laws create a complex regulatory landscape. Compliance with these laws, or new and evolving foreign, U.S. federal, state or local privacy laws, requires investments into compliance programs, investments to deploy, operate and maintain technology that enables compliance, potential modifications to business processes, ongoing data protection activities and documentation requirements, and creates the potential for fines, individual claims and other liabilities for noncompliance as well as litigation risks, particularly in the event of a data breach, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, including how we use personal information or our results of operations. Certain foreign, U.S. federal, state laws and regulations also impose obligations to maintain and implement an information security program that includes administrative, technical, physical, or organizational safeguards, and in some cases may require cybersecurity audits, risk assessments, or compliance measures relating to automated decision-making technologies, as well as obligations to give notice to affected individuals and to certain regulators in the event of a data breach. We may be required to spend significant resources to comply with these information security and data breach legal requirements. A significant data breach (including various forms of external attack, such as ransomware, as well as data incidents resulting from internal actions or omissions) could have negative consequences for our business and future prospects, including possible penalties, fines, damages, reduced customer demand, legal claims against and by customers, personnel, business partners or other persons claiming to be affected, harm to our systems and operations and harm to our reputation and brand.
In addition, as a contractor supporting defense and national security customers, we are subject to certain additional regulatory compliance requirements relating to data privacy and cybersecurity. Under the DFARS and other federal regulations, our networks and IT systems are required to comply with the security and privacy controls in certain National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publications ("NIST SP"). To the extent that we do not comply with the applicable security and control requirements, unauthorized access or disclosure of sensitive information could result in a contract termination, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results and lead to reputational harm. We are also subject to the Department of War Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification ("CMMC"), requirements, which are being phased into covered solicitations and contracts and require contractors to obtain specified certifications relating to cybersecurity standards in order to be eligible for certain contract awards and, in some cases, contract modifications or option exercises. Although we have obtained CMMC level 2 certification, maintaining that status and satisfying applicable ongoing compliance, assessment, affirmation, monitoring, remediation, and renewal requirements may require significant effort and expense. In addition, certain subcontractors and vendors may also be required to comply with CMMC requirements. If we, or members of our supply chain, fail to maintain required compliance or certification levels, we could be unable to bid on, receive, or continue performing certain contracts or contract options, which could adversely affect our revenue, profitability, and reputation. In addition, any obligations that may be imposed on us under the CMMC may be different from or in addition to those otherwise required by applicable laws and regulations, which may cause additional expense for compliance.
Environmental / Social - Risk 3
We may fail to obtain and maintain necessary security clearances which may adversely affect our ability to perform on certain contracts.Many U.S. government programs require contractor employees and facilities to have security clearances. Security clearances are issued at the discretion of the U.S. government and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain the security clearances necessary to perform our contracts. Depending on the level of required clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain. In the current environment we are seeing delays by the U.S. government in the processing of security clearances and there have been recent examples of large numbers of security clearances being revoked by executive orders. If we or our employees are unable to obtain or retain necessary security clearances in a timely manner, or a significant number of our employees lose security clearances, we may not be able to win new business, and our existing customers could terminate their contracts with us or decide not to renew them. To the extent we are not able to obtain and maintain facility security clearances or engage employees with the required security clearances for a particular contract, we may not be able to bid on or win new contracts, effectively rebid on expiring contracts, or retain existing contracts, which may adversely affect our operating results and inhibit the execution of our growth strategy.
Environmental / Social - Risk 4
Many of our contracts with the U.S. government are classified or subject to other security restrictions, which may limit insight into portions of our business.We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from contracts with the U.S. government that are classified or subject to security restrictions that preclude the dissemination of certain information. In general, access to classified information, technology, facilities, or programs requires appropriate personnel security clearances, is subject to additional contract oversight and potential liability, and may also require appropriate facility clearances and other specialized infrastructure. A significant number of our employees have security clearances which preclude them from providing information regarding certain customers and services provided to such customers to other employees (or members of our board of directors) without security clearances and investors. Because we are limited in our ability to provide information about these contracts and services, the various risks associated with these contracts or services or any dispute or claims relating to such contracts or services, important information concerning our business may not be available, which may limit insight into a substantial portion of our business and reduce the ability to fully evaluate the risks related to that portion of our business.
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 6/52 (12%)Above Sector Average
Trade Secrets2 | 3.8%
Trade Secrets - Risk 1
Assertions by third parties of infringement, misappropriation or other violations by us of their intellectual property rights could result in significant costs and substantially harm our business and operating results.Trade Secrets - Risk 2
Failure to adequately protect, maintain, or enforce our rights in our intellectual property may adversely limit our competitive position.We rely upon a combination of nondisclosure agreements, licenses, and other contractual arrangements, as well as employment, copyright, trademark, patent, and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary information. We also enter into proprietary information and intellectual property agreements with employees, which require them to disclose any inventions created prior to and during employment. Inventions created during employment require inventors to convey such rights to inventions to us, and to restrict any disclosure of proprietary information. Trade secrets are generally difficult to protect. Although our employees are subject to confidentiality obligations, this protection may be inadequate to deter or prevent misappropriation of our confidential information and/or the infringement of our trade secrets, trademarks, patents, and copyrights. Further, we may be unable to detect unauthorized use of our intellectual property or otherwise take appropriate steps to enforce our rights. Failure to adequately protect, maintain, or enforce our intellectual property rights may adversely limit our competitive position. We will also need to continue to respond to and anticipate changes resulting from disruptive technologies, including from AI. If we are not successful in protecting and preserving our intellectual property rights and licenses, including trade secrets, or in staying ahead of developing AI technologies and strategically incorporating them into our business, our business and financial performance could be materially and adversely affected.
Cyber Security1 | 1.9%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
Systems that we develop, integrate, maintain, or otherwise support could experience security breaches which may damage our reputation with our customers and hinder future contract win rates.Technology3 | 5.8%
Technology - Risk 1
Internal system or service failures, or those of our vendors, including as a result of cyber or other security threats, could disrupt our business and impair our ability to effectively provide our services to our customers, which could damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.Technology - Risk 2
Certain services we provide and technologies we develop are designed to prevent, detect and monitor threats to our customers and may expose us or our customers and business partners to financial loss or physical or reputational harm.We help our customers prevent, detect, monitor and mitigate threats to their people, information, and facilities. These threats may originate from nation states, terrorists or criminal actors, activist hackers, financially or politically motivated actors, or others who seek to harm our customers. Successful attacks on our customers may cause reputational harm to us and our customers and business partners, as well as liability to our customers or third parties. If we are associated with our customers and business partners in this regard, our staff, systems, information, and facilities may be targeted by a similar group of threat actors and may be at risk for financial loss or physical or reputational harm.
We also design and develop technologies that are highly technical and complex and may contain errors, defects, or security vulnerabilities that cannot be discovered before they are released, installed, and used by our customers. The introduction of new and emerging technologies, such as AI, further increases this risk. Errors, defects or vulnerabilities in the technology we develop could disrupt our customers' or their customers' proper functioning of the technology, cause disruptions in our customers' business operations, or allow unauthorized access to proprietary information, which could cause reputational harm to us and our customers, and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Technology - Risk 3
We develop and use artificial intelligence, which could expose us to financial, regulatory, strategic, reputational, and other risks.We use artificial intelligence, including agentic, physical, and adversarial artificial intelligence, and similar tools and technologies (collectively, "AI") that collect, aggregate, manipulate, or generate data and systems in connection with our business. The development, deployment and oversight of the use of AI by us, either directly by our staff or indirectly through our suppliers or third-party AI developers, as well as the use of AI by competitors, requires us to invest substantially in AI technology resources and related governance. There is no guarantee that our use of AI will enhance our products or services, produce the intended results, or keep pace with the use of AI by our competitors. For example, AI algorithms may produce incomplete, insufficient, inaccurate, biased or otherwise flawed results or rely upon incomplete, insufficient, inaccurate, biased or otherwise flawed data, and any of these deficiencies may not be easily detectable despite the mitigations in place. Degraded or flawed performance could also result from adversarial attacks that include data poisoning, prompt injection, malware risks, and evasion techniques. If the AI that we use produces deficient, inaccurate, or controversial results, or if public opinion of AI is adversely affected due to actual or perceived risks regarding the usage of AI, we could incur operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, legal liability, brand or reputational harm, or other adverse impacts on our business. Further, ownership and intellectual property rights of content generated by or manipulated with AI is a developing area, presenting unique challenges that could affect our business interests and restrict our delivery of AI-driven solutions. If we, or the third-party AI developers on which we rely, do not have sufficient rights to use the data or other material relied upon by such AI technologies, we also may incur liability through the alleged violation of applicable laws and regulations, third-party intellectual property, data privacy, or other rights or contractual obligations. Although we conduct diligence on third-party AI developers, we will not be able to control the manner in which third-party AI technologies are developed or maintained. Our ability to develop, deploy, maintain, or scale AI technologies may also depend on our ability to obtain or access high-quality datasets, models, computing resources, and other AI system components from third parties on commercially reasonable terms, and any limitation, interruption, pricing change, licensing restriction, or other reduction in such access could impair our ability to deliver AI-enabled solutions competitively or at all. It is not possible to predict all the operational or technological risks that may arise relating to the use of AI, any of which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Legal and regulatory frameworks related to the use of AI are evolving, including due to the perceived or actual risks of bias, lack of transparency, and information security. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including intellectual property, data privacy and security, consumer protection, competition, and equal opportunity laws, and may be subject to new laws and regulations or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations. AI is the subject of ongoing review by various U.S. and foreign governmental and regulatory agencies. The U.S. policy environment for AI is rapidly changing through executive orders, other executive actions, agency guidance, procurement directives, and rulemaking, and these developments may impose new or different compliance obligations, alter enforcement priorities, and require us to modify our AI governance, development, deployment, and contracting practices. In addition, the EU AI Act, which applies to certain AI systems and general-purpose AI models and affects data and governance practices used to develop, test, deploy, and use them, is being implemented in phases. The enactment or expansion of laws and regulations related to the use of AI in our operations could result in increased compliance costs related to our use of AI, while the persistence of regulatory ambiguity results in uncertainty regarding potential compliance obligations and presents challenges to longer-term strategic decision-making. Additionally, we may not always be able to anticipate how courts and regulators will apply existing laws to AI how new legal frameworks will develop to address AI, or how we must respond to these frameworks, as they are rapidly evolving. We may also have to expend resources to adjust our offerings in certain jurisdictions if the legal frameworks are not consistent across jurisdictions.
Further, we face competition from other companies that are developing their own AI-enabled technologies, which may be superior to our technologies or more cost-effective to develop and deploy. In addition, as we develop and deploy AI-enabled solutions, our customers may not accept new pricing models designed to reflect the value, efficiency gains, or differentiated capabilities of those solutions, which could limit our ability to realize an adequate return on our AI investments. While AI is currently the focus of significant investment and strategic prioritization, there is a risk that if the expected value of AI does not materialize at scale, or if high-profile AI failures emerge, customers may reassess their AI plans, which could lead to reduced funding and a reduction in certain of our AI initiatives. These factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Production
Total Risks: 6/52 (12%)Below Sector Average
Employment / Personnel4 | 7.7%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
Our profitability could suffer if we are not able to timely and effectively utilize our employees or manage our cost structure.Employment / Personnel - Risk 2
We may fail to attract, train, and retain skilled and qualified employees, which may impair our ability to generate revenue, effectively serve our customers, and execute our growth strategy.Our business depends in large part upon our ability to attract and retain sufficient numbers of highly qualified individuals who may have advanced degrees and/or appropriate security clearances. We compete for such qualified personnel with other U.S. government contractors, the U.S. government, and private industry, and such competition is intense. Personnel with the requisite skills, qualifications, or security clearance may be in short supply or generally unavailable. The government and industry have recognized that the current process for obtaining security clearances is time-consuming, sometimes taking years to complete, and can present a risk to customer mission. See "-We may fail to obtain and maintain necessary security clearances which may adversely affect our ability to perform on certain contracts." In addition, as technologies and customer demands evolve rapidly, including in AI and other advanced technologies, we may need to make significant investments to train and re-skill our workforce, and we may not be successful in doing so quickly enough or at all.
Our ability to recruit, hire, and internally deploy former employees of the U.S. government is subject to complex laws and regulations, which may serve as an impediment to our ability to attract such former employees, and failure to comply with these laws and regulations may expose us and our employees to civil or criminal penalties. Additionally, our ability to attract, hire, and retain skilled and qualified employees may be impacted by our engagements in, or perceived connections to, politically or socially sensitive activities, adverse labor and economic market conditions, as well as pandemics, epidemics or similar disease outbreaks.
If we are unable to recruit and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, or cannot obtain their appropriate security clearances in a timely manner, or fail to deploy such employees, our ability to maintain and grow our business and to effectively serve our customers could be limited and our future revenue and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, to the extent that we are unable to make necessary permanent hires to appropriately serve our customers, we could be required to engage larger numbers of contracted personnel, which could reduce our profit margins.
If we are able to attract sufficient numbers of qualified new hires, training and retention costs may place significant demands on our resources. In addition, to the extent we experience attrition in our employee ranks, we may realize only a limited or no return on such invested resources, and we would have to expend additional resources to hire and train replacement employees. The loss of key personnel could also impair our ability to perform required services under some of our contracts and to retain such contracts, as well as our ability to win new business.
Employment / Personnel - Risk 3
Our employees or subcontractors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, which could harm our ability to conduct business with the U.S. government.We are exposed to the risk that fraud or other misconduct by employees, subcontractors, suppliers or other third parties with which we do business could occur. Misconduct by employees, subcontractors or suppliers could include intentional or unintentional failures to comply with U.S. government procurement regulations, engaging in other unauthorized activities, misusing authorized access, or falsifying time records. Misconduct could also involve the improper use or mishandling of our customers' sensitive, classified, or export-controlled information, or the inadvertent or intentional disclosure of our or our customers' sensitive information in violation of our contractual, statutory, or regulatory obligations, among other things. It is not always possible to deter employee, subcontractor, or supplier misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not always be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses, which could materially harm our business. As a result of such misconduct, our employees could lose their security clearances and we could face fines and civil or criminal penalties, loss of facility clearance accreditation, and suspension, proposed debarment or debarment from bidding for or performing under contracts with the U.S. government, as well as reputational harm, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Employment / Personnel - Risk 4
We may lose one or more members of our senior management team or fail to develop new leaders, which could cause the disruption of the management of our business.We believe that the future success of our business and our ability to operate profitably depends on the continued contributions of the members of our senior management and the continued development of new members of senior management. We rely on our senior management to generate business and execute programs successfully. In addition, the relationships and reputation that many members of our senior management team have established and maintain with our customers are important to our business and our ability to identify new business opportunities. The loss of any member of our senior management or our failure to continue to develop new members could impair our ability to identify and secure new contracts, to maintain good customer relations, and to otherwise manage our business.
Supply Chain1 | 1.9%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
Our failure to maintain strong relationships with other contractors, or the failure of contractors with which we have entered into a sub- or prime-contractor relationship to meet their obligations to us or our customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.Costs1 | 1.9%
Costs - Risk 1
We face certain significant risk exposures and potential liabilities that may not be adequately covered by indemnity or insurance.Macro & Political
Total Risks: 6/52 (12%)Above Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment5 | 9.6%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
U.S. government spending levels and mission priorities could change in a manner that adversely affects our future revenue and limits our growth prospects.Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2
We cannot predict the consequences of future geopolitical events, but they may adversely affect the markets in which we operate and our results of operations.Ongoing instability and current geopolitical conflicts in global markets, including ongoing conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, increased tensions in Asia, and political and economic instability in Venezuela, the potential for future geopolitical conflicts and terrorist activities, and trade tensions related to recent shifts in international trade policies could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and profitability. These types of matters cause uncertainty in financial markets and may significantly increase the political, economic and social instability in the geographic areas in which we operate.
In addition, in connection with the current status of foreign relations with Russia, particularly in light of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the U.S. government has imposed enhanced export controls on certain products and sanctions on certain industry sectors and parties in Russia. The U.S. government has imposed tariffs, and may impose new or increased tariffs, on certain imports from other countries. The governments of other jurisdictions in which we operate, such as the European Union and Canada, may also implement sanctions or other restrictive measures. These potential sanctions, tariffs, and export controls could adversely affect the Company and/or our supply chain, business partners, or customers.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 3
A delay in the completion of the U.S. government's budget process, including as a result of a failure to raise the debt ceiling, could result in a reduction in our backlog and have a material adverse effect on our revenue and operating results.Appropriations for the U.S. government's fiscal year 2026 were delayed, with Congress enacting partial appropriations legislation in multiple tranches, with such appropriations ultimately covering a majority of federal agencies. However, a full-year, comprehensive appropriations agreement has not been reached for all agencies, and certain portions of the government have been funded through continuing resolutions or remain subject to funding uncertainty, including the Department of Homeland Security, for which funding has been provided only on a partial basis, while certain components, including its immigration enforcement operations, remain subject to funding uncertainty. As a result, uncertainty regarding federal funding levels persists. To the extent the U.S. Congress is unable to approve the annual federal budget before the start of the U.S. government's fiscal year 2027, funding for new projects may not be available and funding on contracts we are already performing may be delayed. If Congressional efforts to approve such funding fail, and Congress is unable to craft a long-term agreement on the U.S. government's ability to incur indebtedness in excess of its current limits, the U.S. government may not be able to fulfill its current funding obligations and there could be significant disruption to all discretionary programs, which would have corresponding impacts on us and our industry. Any such delays would likely result in new business initiatives being delayed or canceled and a reduction in our backlog, and could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and operating results.
In addition, a failure to complete the budget process and fund government operations pursuant to a continuing resolution may result in a U.S. government shutdown, which could result in us incurring substantial costs without reimbursement under our contracts. The delay or cancellation of key programs or the delay of contract payments may have a material adverse effect on our revenue and operating results. In addition, when supplemental appropriations are required to operate the U.S. government or fund specific programs and the passage of legislation needed to approve any supplemental appropriation bill is delayed, the overall funding environment for our business could be adversely affected.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 4
Deterioration of economic conditions or weakening in credit or capital markets may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.Volatile, negative, or uncertain economic conditions, an increase in the likelihood of a recession, or concerns about these or other similar risks may negatively impact our customers' ability and willingness to fund their projects. Our customers reducing, postponing or cancelling spending on projects in respect of which we provide services may reduce demand for our services quickly and with little warning, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Moreover, instability in the credit or capital markets in the U.S., including as a result of failures of financial institutions and any related market-wide reduction in liquidity, or concerns or rumors about events of these kinds or similar risks, could affect the availability of credit, making it relatively difficult or expensive to obtain additional capital at competitive rates, on commercially reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts, or at all, thus making it more difficult or expensive for us to access funds or refinance our existing indebtedness, or obtain financing for acquisitions. Such instability could also cause counterparties, including vendors, suppliers and subcontractors, to be unable to perform their obligations, or to breach their obligations, to us under our contracts with them. If any such counterparties are unable to perform their obligations to us or our customers, we may be required to provide additional services or make alternate arrangements on less favorable terms. In addition, instability in the credit or capital markets could negatively impact our customers' ability to fund their project and, therefore, utilize our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, if one or more financial institutions with which we maintain our cash, cash equivalents, or other investments were to fail or become subject to receivership or similar proceedings, our access to such funds could be temporarily impaired,which could adversely affect our liquidity, disrupt our business, or otherwise materially adversely affect our results of operations.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 5
Global inflationary pressures and new or increased tariffs on certain imports have increased the prices of goods and services, which could raise the costs associated with providing our services, diminish our ability to compete for new contracts or task orders, and/or reduce customer buying power.For a variety of reasons, including geopolitical factors, the global economy in which we operate has faced, and may continue to face, heightened inflationary pressure, impacting the cost of doing business (in both supply and labor markets). These inflationary pressures have been and could continue to be exacerbated by geopolitical turmoil and economic policy actions, including new or increased tariffs on certain imports from other countries, and the duration of such pressures is uncertain. We generate revenue through various fixed price and multi-year government contracts, our primary customer being the U.S. government, which has traditionally been viewed as less affected by inflationary pressures. However, our approach to include modest annual price escalations in our bids for multi-year work may be insufficient to counter inflationary cost pressures, which may result in significant cost overruns on each contract. In addition, new or increased tariffs could result in increased costs for hardware and other goods necessary to support business operations. This could result in reduced profits, or even losses, as inflation increases, particularly for fixed-priced contracts, and our longer-term multi-year contracts as contractual prices become less favorable to us over time. In the competitive environment in which we operate as a government contractor, the lack of pricing leverage and power to renegotiate long-term, multi-year contracts, coupled with reduced customer buying power as a result of inflation, could reduce our profits, disrupt our business, or otherwise materially adversely affect our results of operations.
International Operations1 | 1.9%
International Operations - Risk 1
We are subject to risks associated with operating in foreign jurisdictions.See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.
FAQ
What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
1. Financial & Corporate
- Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
- Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
- Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
- Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
2. Legal & Regulatory
- Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
- Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
- Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
- Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
3. Production
- Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
- Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
- Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
- Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
4. Technology & Innovation
- Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
- Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
- Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
- Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
5. Ability to Sell
- Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
- Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
- Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
- Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
6. Macro & Political
- Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
- Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
- International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
- Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.