TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. (ANTX) Risk Analysis

Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning. AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. disclosed 71 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. reported the most risks in the “Tech & Innovation” category.

Risk Overview Q2, 2026

Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 11, 2026

Risk Distribution
71Risks
Sector Avg.Finance & CorporateTech & InnovationLegal & RegulatoryProductionAbility to SellMacro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Risk Change Over Time

AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. disclosed risks per quarterNo. of Risks687072747678Q4Q12023Q2Q3Q4Q12024Q2Q3Q12026Q2Showing: Q2, 2026
Risks removedRisks addedRisks changedAN2 Therapeutics, Inc. Risk Factors
  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
    Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before you invest in our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below together with all of the other information contained in this Form 10-Q, including our unaudited condensed financial statements and the related notes and the section titled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The occurrence of any of the events or developments described below could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects. Unless otherwise indicated, references in these risk factors to our business being harmed will include harm to our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.

    Risk Factors Summary

Read and Evaluate the RiskReserved for Ultimate MembersUpgrade

Risk Highlights Q2, 2026

Main Risk Category
Tech & Innovation
With 26 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
71
No changes from last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
0Risks added
0Risks removed
2Risks changed
Since Jun 2026
Number of Risk Changed
2
+1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 1

Risk Word Cloud

we have a contractual commitment to develop epetraborole for global health initiatives, which may affect our ability to develop and commercialize epetraborole in certain countries and may impact our intellectual property rights. our strategy for our global health initiatives depends on receiving non-dilutive funding, and we as a company have limited experience with this strategy.our global health initiatives dependswe require substantial additional funding to meet our financial needs and to pursue our business objectives. if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or altogether cease our current and future product development programs or future commercialization efforts.to pursue our business objectivesobtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment, and other requirements imposed by government patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.maintaining our patent protection dependsif we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information, know-how and trade secrets, the value of epetraborole or other product candidates could be adversely affected and our business and competitive position would be harmed.confidentiality of our proprietary informationwe are subject to u.s. and certain foreign export and import controls, sanctions, embargoes, anti-corruption laws, and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. compliance with these legal standards could impair our ability to compete in domestic and international markets. we can face criminal liability and other serious consequences for violations, which can harm our business.impair our ability to competeour ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.our net operating loss carryforwardsif we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining, required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercialize epetraborole or our other product candidates, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.our ability to generate revenuewe may attempt to seek accelerated approval in the united states for certain of our product candidates. if we are not able to use that pathway, we may be required to conduct additional clinical trials beyond those that are contemplated, which would increase the expense of obtaining, and delay the receipt of, necessary regulatory approvals, if we receive them at all. in addition, even if an accelerated approval pathway is available to us, it may not lead to expedited approval of our product candidates, or approval at all.attempt to seek accelerated approvalwe expect to expand our research, development, and business capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.expect to expand our researchour limited operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.to assess our future viability

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 71

Innovation / R&D13 | 18.3%
  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 1Changed
    We are currently conducting and may continue to conduct clinical trials for our product candidates outside of the U.S., and the FDA may not accept data from such trials, in which case our development plans may be delayed, which could materially harm our business.

    We conduct and may in the future conduct one or more of our clinical trials or a portion of our clinical trials for our product candidates outside the U.S. For instance, we will be initiating a global PV Phase 2 study in the U.S., Australia and India and a Chagas Phase 2 study in Bolivia. The acceptance of study data from clinical trials conducted outside the U.S. or another jurisdiction by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions or may not be accepted at all. In cases where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the sole basis for regulatory approval in the U.S., the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations; and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA, or if the FDA considers such inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. In addition, even where the foreign study data are not intended to serve as the sole basis for approval, the FDA will not accept the data as support for an application for regulatory approval unless the study is well-designed and well-conducted in accordance with GCP requirements and the FDA is able to validate the data from the study through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar requirements for clinical data gathered outside of their respective jurisdictions. In addition, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the U.S. or the relevant jurisdiction. If the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it may result in the need for additional trials, which could be costly and time-consuming, and which may result in current or future product candidates that we may develop not receiving approval for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 2
    Evaluation of our product candidates in investigator-initiated clinical trials ("IITs") may expose us to additional risks that could impair the development of our product candidates.

    We are currently supporting an IIT evaluating epetraborole in patients with M. abscessus lung disease, and may in the future support other IITs for our product candidates that are designed and managed by independent investigators or institutions. While we believe these clinical trials have the potential to provide supportive data that may further the development of our product candidates, we do not directly control the clinical development process, including, but not limited to, the initiation, enrollment, safety reporting, or conduct of these trials. As a result, investigator-sponsored trials may be subject to significant delays, fail to comply with GCP or other regulatory requirements. be terminated prematurely by the investigator or applicable IRBs or ethics committees, or produce data that is not useful for, or acceptable to, regulatory authorities for purposes of obtaining regulatory approval. IITs may also identify safety or tolerability concerns that could adversely affect the development of our product candidates, including through the imposition of clinical holds, or otherwise subject us to liability. Moreover, if the data from IITs differ from the data we have observed in our sponsored clinical studies, such differences could potentially require us to conduct additional clinical trials or otherwise delay or prevent regulatory approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Any of these factors could adversely impact our reputation, delay our development timelines, or negatively affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 3
    We have a contractual commitment to develop epetraborole for global health initiatives, which may affect our ability to develop and commercialize epetraborole in certain countries and may impact our intellectual property rights. Our strategy for our global health initiatives depends on receiving non-dilutive funding, and we as a company have limited experience with this strategy.

    Under our Global Health Agreement with Adjuvant, we have a contractual commitment to use reasonably diligent endeavors to develop epetraborole and any other mutually agreed-upon products for melioidosis, tuberculosis, and other indications for at-risk developing countries at accessible pricing and at reasonable volume, including selling epetraborole and any other mutually agreed-upon products in certain target countries at or slightly above the cost of sales, so long as we do not sell products at a loss. Under the Global Health Agreement, we made certain commitments to develop epetraborole and any other mutually agreed-upon products and to pursue regulatory strategies and product registrations. If we do not maintain compliance with these and other program-related global access commitments under the Global Health Agreement, Adjuvant may be entitled to repayment for any portion of its investment that is not used for the purposes outlined in the Global Health Agreement. Our obligations under the Global Health Agreement may affect our ability to commercialize epetraborole in certain countries. Our strategy for developing epetraborole for global health initiatives depends on receiving non-dilutive funding from sources such as public and private agencies and foundations. We, as a company, have limited experience with non-dilutive funding, and we may not be able to obtain additional non-dilutive funding to support our needs to fund our global health initiatives. For example, we cannot be certain that there will be additional awards, contracts, grants or funding sources or solicitations available to support our development efforts, that our other grant applications and funding proposals will be successful, or that we will be able to continue satisfying the award criteria of the NIAID contract award or any grants or funding awarded to us. If we fail to receive additional non-dilutive funding, progress in our global health initiatives may be impaired or delayed.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 4
    If clinical trials of our product candidates fail to demonstrate safety and/or efficacy of such product candidates to the satisfaction of the FDA or other comparable regulatory authorities, or do not otherwise produce favorable results, we may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of our product candidates.

    We may not commercialize, market, promote, or sell any product candidate without obtaining regulatory approval from the FDA or other comparable regulatory authorities, and we may never receive such approvals. It is impossible to predict when or if any of our product candidates will be deemed effective or safe in humans and receive regulatory approval. Before obtaining regulatory approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any of our product candidates, we must complete preclinical and nonclinical development and conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of such product candidates in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete, and is uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. Moreover, preclinical, nonclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical and nonclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain regulatory approval of their products. In addition, before we can initiate clinical trials for any product candidates, we must submit the results of preclinical studies to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities along with other information, including information about product candidate chemistry, manufacturing and controls and our proposed clinical trial protocol, as part of an IND or similar regulatory submission. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to conduct additional preclinical studies for any product candidate before it allows us to initiate clinical trials under any IND or similar regulatory submission, which may lead to delays and increase the costs of our preclinical development programs. We may experience numerous unforeseen events prior to, during, or as a result of, clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to receive regulatory approval or commercialize any of our product candidates, including, but not limited to: - we may be unable to generate sufficient preclinical, toxicology or other in vivo or in vitro data to support the initiation or continuation of clinical trials;- the FDA or other comparable regulatory authorities may disagree as to the design or implementation of our clinical trials, including the selection of primary and secondary endpoints, which may result in changes to our planned clinical trial design and potential target clinical outcomes, or may result in failure to obtain approval altogether;- regulators, IRBs, or ethics committees may not allow or authorize us or our investigators to commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site;- we may not reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs, and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and clinical trial sites;- we may experience delays in identifying, recruiting and training suitable clinical investigators;- regulators may issue a clinical hold, or regulators or institutional review boards may require that we or our investigators suspend or terminate clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;- we may make changes or amendments to a trial protocol;- we may select endpoints that require prolonged periods of clinical observation or require extended analysis of the resulting data;- clinical trial sites may deviate from the trial protocol or drop out of a trial;- clinical trials for our product candidates may produce negative or inconclusive results;- we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or abandon product development programs;- enrollment in clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate, participants may drop out of these clinical trials at a higher rate than we anticipate, we may fail to recruit suitable patients to participate in a trial, or the number of patients required for clinical trials of our product candidates may be larger than we anticipate;- our third-party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all;- regulators may issue a clinical hold, or regulators or institutional review boards may require that we or our investigators suspend or terminate clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;- we may lack adequate funding to complete a clinical trial, or the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates may be greater than we anticipate;- the FDA or other comparable regulatory authorities may fail to approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with whom we enter into agreements for clinical and commercial supplies;- the supply or quality of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of such product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate;- serious adverse events may occur in trials of the same class of agents conducted by other companies that could be considered similar to our product candidates;- our product candidates may have undesirable side effects or other unexpected characteristics, causing us or our investigators, regulators or IRBs to suspend or terminate the clinical trials; and - the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or other comparable regulatory authorities may significantly change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval. If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of any of our product candidates beyond the studies that we currently contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete clinical trials or other testing of our product candidates, or if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns observed in these trials or tests, we may: - be delayed in obtaining regulatory approval for our product candidates;- not obtain regulatory approval at all;- obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are not as broad as intended or desired;- obtain approval with labeling that includes significant use or distribution restrictions or safety warnings, such as black box warnings or a REMS program;- be subject to additional post-marketing testing requirements; or - be required to remove the product from the market after obtaining regulatory approval. We do not know whether any of our preclinical and nonclinical studies or clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured, or will be completed on schedule or at all. Significant preclinical and nonclinical study or clinical trial delays also could shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do and impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, delays of clinical trials may ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 5
    We cannot predict whether or when bacteria may develop resistance to any of our antibacterial product candidates, which could affect the revenue potential of our product candidates.

    We are developing certain of our product candidates to treat bacterial infections. The bacteria responsible for these infections evolve quickly and may develop antibiotic resistance caused by spontaneous mutations in the genes encoding the cellular target of the antibiotic. In some cases, resistance mechanisms can be transferred within and between bacterial species. Prescription or use of our product candidates, if approved, could depend on the type and rate of resistance of the targeted bacteria. Although we do intend to analyze the potential of emergence of resistance to our product candidates and only select those that we believe have low resistance potential, we cannot predict whether or when bacterial resistance may develop. Such bacterial resistances, if and when identified, could adversely affect the conduct or results of our clinical trials, and could adversely affect the market potential of the product candidate, if approved. The growth of drug-resistant infections in community settings or in countries with poor public health infrastructures, or the potential use of any product candidates outside of controlled hospital settings, could contribute to the rise of resistance.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 6
    Our product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial potential, or result in significant negative consequences following any potential regulatory approval.

    Results of our clinical trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects or unexpected characteristics. Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates, whether used alone or in combination with other therapies, could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, or, if such product candidates are approved, result in a more restrictive label and other post-approval requirements. Any treatment-related side effects could also affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial, or could result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects significantly. Additional adverse events may emerge (along with additional data further defining previously identified risks) in any ongoing or subsequent clinical trials and there may be unforeseen serious adverse events or side effects that differ from those seen in studies completed to date. It is possible that as we test our product candidates in larger, longer and more extensive clinical programs, or as use of such product candidates becomes more widespread, if they receive regulatory approval, subjects will report illnesses, injuries, discomforts and other adverse events that were not observed in earlier trials, as well as conditions that did not occur or went undetected in previous trials. Many times, side effects are only detectable after investigational drugs are tested in large-scale clinical trials or, in some cases, after they are made available to patients on a commercial scale after approval. If additional clinical experience indicates that any of our product candidates has unexpected side effects or causes serious or life-threatening side effects, the development of the product candidate may fail or be delayed, or, if the product candidate has received regulatory approval, such approval may be revoked, which would harm our business. Even if we believe our product candidates demonstrate clinical efficacy, any unacceptable adverse side effects or toxicities, when administered in the presence of other pharmaceutical products, which can arise at any stage of development, may outweigh potential benefits. We may observe adverse or significant adverse events or drug-drug interactions in future preclinical studies or clinical trial candidates, which could result in the delay or termination of development, prevent regulatory approval or limit market acceptance if ultimately approved. For example, we have observed cases of anemia in patients receiving epetraborole, and though we believe these reported adverse events have not been serious in nature or otherwise suggestive of a material safety issue, consistent imbalances in observed adverse events between active and placebo arms could adversely affect the integrity of a study blind and subsequent trial data. Moreover, if we elect, or are required, to delay, suspend or terminate any clinical trial of any of our product candidates, the commercial prospects of such product candidate may be harmed and our ability to generate revenue through its sale may be delayed or eliminated. Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business. Additionally, if any of our product candidates receive regulatory approval, regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such as a "black box" warning or a contraindication, or the adoption of a REMS program to ensure that the benefits outweigh its risks, which may include, among other things, a medication guide outlining the risks of the drug for distribution to patients and a communication plan to health care practitioners. Furthermore, if we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by any product candidates, several potentially significant negative consequences could result, including: - regulatory authorities may suspend or withdraw approvals of such product candidate, or we may decide to suspend marketing or remove a product from the marketplace;- regulatory authorities may require additional warnings on the label or impose distribution or use restrictions;- we may be required to change the way a product candidate is administered or conduct additional clinical trials, including one or more post-marketing research studies;- we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients;- we may be required to implement REMS, including the creation of a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients;- we could be subject to fines, injunctions or the imposition of criminal or civil penalties;- we may need to conduct a recall or comparable post-marketing action; and - our reputation may suffer. Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product candidate, if approved, or could substantially increase commercialization costs and expenses, which could delay or prevent us from generating revenue from the sale of our product candidates and harm our business and results of operations.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 7
    If we are not successful in discovering, developing and commercializing additional product candidates, our ability to expand our business and achieve our strategic objectives would be impaired.

    Although a substantial amount of our effort will focus on potential clinical testing and potential regulatory approval of our product candidates, an element of our strategy is to discover, develop and commercialize a portfolio of product candidates to treat diseases with high unmet need. We are seeking to do so by utilizing our targeted-design AN2 drug discovery platform, which uses bacterial genomics and state-of-the-art molecular and dynamic models to design active new compounds that target known mechanisms. We focus our clinical development on pathogens, drug targets, and patients with high, unmet medical needs to leverage the development and regulatory paths available for first-in-class or best-in-class therapeutics. Research efforts to identify and develop product candidates require substantial technical, financial, and human resources, whether or not any product candidates are ultimately identified. Our research programs may initially show promise in identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development for many reasons, including the following: - the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying potential product candidates;- competitors may develop alternatives that render our product candidates obsolete or less attractive;- product candidates we develop may nevertheless be covered by third parties' patents or other exclusive rights;- a product candidate may reveal harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate it is unlikely to be effective or otherwise does not meet applicable regulatory criteria;- a product candidate may not be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at an acceptable cost, or at all;- a product candidate may not be accepted as safe, tolerable and effective by patients, the medical community or third-party payors, if applicable; and - the FDA or other regulatory authorities may not approve or agree with the intended use of a new product candidate. If we fail to develop and successfully commercialize our product candidates, our business and future prospects may be harmed and our business will be more vulnerable to any problems that we encounter in developing and commercializing our product candidates.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 8
    If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, our clinical development activities and receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.

    Patient enrollment is a significant factor in the timing of clinical trials, and the timing of our clinical trials will depend, in part, on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in our trials, as well as completion of required follow-up periods. We may not be able to initiate, continue or complete clinical trials of any product candidates that we develop if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials, as required by the FDA or other comparable regulatory authorities. We have limited experience enrolling patients in our clinical trials and cannot predict how successful we will be in enrolling patients in future clinical trials. Patient enrollment is also affected by other factors including: - the size and nature of the targeted patient population;- the severity of the disease under investigation;- the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients;- the eligibility criteria for participation in the clinical trial;- the design of the clinical trial;- the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;- our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with appropriate experience;- efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;- the availability and efficacy of drugs approved to treat the diseases under study;- the patient referral practices of physicians;- our ability to obtain and maintain patient consents;- the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment; and - the risk that patients enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the trials before completion. In particular, we may face delays and difficulties in enrollment in our planned trials of certain of our product candidates because PV, M. abscessus, Chagas disease and certain other conditions we may target include rare diseases (i.e., the size of the targeted patient population is small). Because of this, we may experience difficulties in recruiting sufficient patients into certain of our planned clinical trials. Additionally, other pharmaceutical companies and research institutions targeting these same diseases are recruiting clinical trial patients from these patient populations, which may make it more difficult to fully enroll any clinical trials. We also rely on, and will continue to rely on, CROs and clinical trial sites to ensure proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials and preclinical studies. Though we have entered into agreements governing their services, we will have limited influence over their actual performance. Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for clinical trials would result in significant delays and could require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. We have experienced enrollment delays in the past. Enrollment delays in these clinical trials may result in further increased development costs for our product candidates, which would reduce the capital we have available to support our current and future product candidates and may result in our need to raise additional capital earlier than planned and could cause the value of our common stock to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 9
    We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate or indication and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or have a greater likelihood of success.

    Because we have limited financial and management resources, we focus on research programs and product candidates that we identify for specific indications. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial drugs or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing, or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such product candidate.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 10
    Interim "topline" and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.

    From time to time, we may publicly disclose interim, topline or preliminary data from our clinical trials and preclinical studies, which is based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the interim, topline or preliminary results that we report may differ from future results of the same studies or trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Topline and preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the topline or preliminary data we previously published. As a result, topline and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are further subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse differences between interim, topline or preliminary data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects. Further, disclosure of such data by us or by our competitors could result in volatility in the price of our common stock. Further, others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization of the particular product candidate or product and our company in general. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what we determine is material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure, and any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product candidate or our business. If the interim, topline or preliminary data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, financial condition, operating results, and growth prospects.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 11
    If we successfully commercialize any of our product candidates, failure to comply with our reporting and payment obligations under U.S. governmental pricing programs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

    If we participate in the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and/or Medicare Part D, if and when we successfully commercialize a product candidate, we will be required to report certain pricing information for such product candidate to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that administers the Medicaid and Medicare programs. We may also be required to report pricing information to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. If we become subject to these reporting requirements, we will be liable for errors associated with our submission of pricing data, for failure to report pricing data in a timely manner, and for overcharging government payers, which can result in civil monetary penalties under the Medicaid statute, the federal civil False Claims Act, and other laws and regulations.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 12
    If in the future, we need to expand our research, development, and business capabilities and implement sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, we may encounter difficulties in managing such growth, which could disrupt our operations.

    If the development of our product candidates progresses, we may experience growth in the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of research, drug development, regulatory affairs and, if any of our product candidates receives regulatory approval, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage any such growth, we will need to implement and improve our managerial, operational, and financial systems, expand our facilities and recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such growth, we may not be able to effectively manage such an expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may also lead to significant costs and may divert our management and research and development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 13
    We may not be able to obtain or maintain orphan drug designations for any product candidates, and we may be unable to take advantage of the benefits associated with orphan drug designation, including the potential for market exclusivity.

    Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the U.S., may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, the FDA may designate a product as an orphan product if it is intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a diagnosed patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals in the U.S., or a patient population of greater than 200,000 individuals in the U.S., but for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the U.S. Similar laws exist in Europe and Japan. The European Commission may grant a product orphan medicinal product designation if the product is intended for the treatment, prevention or diagnosis of a life-threatening or very serious condition, with a prevalence in the European Union of not more than five in 10,000 people, and where either no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of the condition in question exists, or if such method exists that the medicinal product will be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition. As part of our business strategy, we intend to seek orphan drug designation, where applicable, from the FDA and orphan medicinal product designation from the European Commission; however, we may not be able to obtain or maintain this status for our product candidates. There can be no assurance that any regulatory authority will grant any orphan drug designations. In the U.S., orphan designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages, and user-fee waivers. In addition, if a product candidate that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the rare disease or condition for which it has such designation, it is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including an NDA, to market the same drug for the same approved use or indication within the relevant rare disease or condition for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity within the relevant approved use or indication or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity. More than one product may be approved by the FDA for the same use or indication within the orphan disease or condition, as long as the products are different drugs, as determined by the FDA. As a result, if any of our product candidates is approved by the FDA and receives orphan drug exclusivity, absent other applicable exclusivities, the FDA can still approve other drugs for use in treating the same indication or use within the applicable rare disease or condition, which could create a more competitive market for us. The failure to successfully obtain orphan drug exclusivity would adversely affect our business. Even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same use or indication within the same rare disease or condition. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority can subsequently approve the same drug for the same use or indication within the relevant rare disease or condition if such regulatory authority concludes that the later drug is clinically superior if it is shown to be safer, more effective, or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process.

See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment. They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result. It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process. Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”. Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report. According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing. You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector. Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements. A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below. 1. Financial & Corporate Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results. Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing. Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments. Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances. 2. Legal & Regulatory Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company. Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation. Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy. Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives. 3. Production Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory. Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers. Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls. Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation. 4. Technology & Innovation Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development. Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology. Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks. Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying. 5. Ability to Sell Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers. Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes. Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration. Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation. 6. Macro & Political Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions. Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19. International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company. Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.