tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

VSMV - AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

VSMV

VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV)

Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:
$61.00
The VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) benefits from strong contributions by top holdings like Apple (AAPL) and Alphabet (GOOGL), which showcase robust financial performance and strategic growth in areas like AI and cloud services. However, weaker holdings such as Walmart (WMT) and Salesforce (CRM), with tempered outlooks due to high valuations and mixed technical indicators, slightly weigh on the fund's overall rating. A potential risk factor is the concentration in technology-heavy stocks, which could expose the ETF to sector-specific volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key positions, such as Alphabet and TE Connectivity, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across multiple sectors, including Technology, Consumer Defensive, and Health Care, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio of 0.35% is competitive, allowing investors to keep more of their returns compared to higher-cost ETFs.
Negative Factors
Over-Concentration in Technology
With over 31% of the portfolio allocated to Technology, the fund is heavily exposed to potential volatility in this sector.
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, like Salesforce and Adobe, have lagged in year-to-date performance, which could drag on the fund’s momentum.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is almost entirely focused on U.S. companies, offering little diversification across international markets.

VSMV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

VSMV Summary

The VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) is designed to invest in a wide range of U.S. companies while aiming to reduce the ups and downs of the stock market. It follows the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index and focuses on finding stocks with strong value, quality, and momentum. Some of its top holdings include well-known companies like Apple and Alphabet (Google). This ETF could be a good choice for investors looking for a more stable way to grow their money over time. However, since it heavily invests in technology and consumer sectors, its performance may be affected if those industries face challenges.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed multi-factor strategy to minimize volatility and optimize returns.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as stable consumer demand in defensive industries like Walmart. However, rising interest rates or economic uncertainty could negatively impact sectors like financials and consumer cyclical stocks, while regulatory changes in healthcare or technology might pose risks to top holdings like Apple and Alphabet. Overall, its focus on minimizing volatility may help cushion against broader market fluctuations.

VSMV Top 10 Holdings

The VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF leans heavily into technology, with Apple and Alphabet leading the charge. Apple’s steady performance and Alphabet’s rising momentum, fueled by AI and cloud growth, are key drivers for the fund. Meanwhile, Salesforce and Adobe are lagging, with mixed signals and valuation concerns holding them back. Consumer Defensive names like Walmart provide a stabilizing force, while TE Connectivity shines as a standout in industrials. Overall, the fund’s U.S.-centric portfolio balances growth and stability, but its tech-heavy tilt makes it sensitive to sector swings.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Apple10.07%$12.73M$4.03T20.14%
80
Outperform
Alphabet Class A6.25%$7.90M$3.41T64.50%
80
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson3.76%$4.75M$455.48B18.26%
78
Outperform
Walmart3.71%$4.70M$815.06B24.75%
75
Outperform
Salesforce3.61%$4.56M$244.33B-11.92%
79
Outperform
Qualcomm3.46%$4.38M$191.26B8.90%
78
Outperform
TE Connectivity3.41%$4.31M$71.93B65.14%
79
Outperform
Lam Research3.19%$4.03M$202.23B116.56%
77
Outperform
Exxon Mobil3.15%$3.98M$488.95B-1.79%
79
Outperform
Lockheed Martin3.10%$3.92M$113.32B-10.32%
70
Outperform

VSMV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
52.98
Positive
100DMA
51.21
Positive
200DMA
49.54
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.31
Positive
RSI
52.54
Neutral
STOCH
36.43
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For VSMV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 53.76, equal to the 50-day MA of 52.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 49.54, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.31 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.54 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 36.43 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for VSMV.

VSMV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$127.73M0.35%
75
Outperform
$884.45M0.59%
68
Neutral
$843.87M0.60%
73
Outperform
$739.29M0.52%
74
Outperform
$738.60M0.27%
70
Outperform
$737.79M0.50%
77
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
53.74
6.59
13.98%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement