tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

VSMV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

VSMV

VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV)

Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:
VSMV, the VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to its mix of high-quality, financially strong companies like Apple, Qualcomm, Johnson & Johnson, and Walmart, which bring robust profitability, growth initiatives, and generally bullish trends to the portfolio. At the same time, holdings such as Altria and Cigna, with technical and segment challenges, modestly weigh on the fund’s appeal. The main risk factor is the fund’s meaningful exposure to a handful of large individual stocks, which can increase sensitivity to company-specific setbacks even though the strategy aims for lower volatility.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum.
Diversified Sector Mix
Holdings spread across technology, consumer defensive, health care, and several other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Strong Contributors Among Top Holdings
Several major positions such as Lam Research, KLA, Walmart, Exxon Mobil, and Johnson & Johnson have delivered strong performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.
Negative Factors
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is higher than many broad U.S. stock ETFs, which can slightly reduce long-term net returns.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Mixed Results Within Top Holdings
Some large positions like Apple, Qualcomm, and Salesforce have shown weaker performance, which can drag on the fund if those stocks continue to lag.

VSMV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

VSMV Summary

VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) tracks the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, aiming to give you broad exposure to U.S. stocks while trying to smooth out the ups and downs. It holds many well-known companies like Apple and Walmart, and spreads investments across technology, consumer, health care, and other sectors. Someone might consider this ETF if they want stock market growth potential but with a focus on smaller price swings than the overall market. A key risk is that it still invests in stocks, so its value can go up and down with the market and may lag during strong rallies.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed multi-factor strategy to minimize volatility and optimize returns.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as stable consumer demand in defensive industries like Walmart. However, rising interest rates or economic uncertainty could negatively impact sectors like financials and consumer cyclical stocks, while regulatory changes in healthcare or technology might pose risks to top holdings like Apple and Alphabet. Overall, its focus on minimizing volatility may help cushion against broader market fluctuations.

VSMV Top 10 Holdings

VSMV is quietly leaning on a tech-heavy backbone, with Lam Research and KLA doing much of the heavy lifting as their chip-related businesses keep rising. Apple is still a star holding but has been a bit mixed lately, helping over the longer run while losing some steam in the near term. Qualcomm sits in the same tech camp with a strong trend but some recent wobble. On the defensive side, steady names like Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, and Allstate act as ballast, keeping this U.S.-only portfolio tilted toward stability rather than big drama.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Apple11.27%$17.42M$4.53T47.93%
79
Outperform
Lam Research5.44%$8.41M$439.46B226.68%
77
Outperform
KLA5.06%$7.83M$307.69B135.49%
77
Outperform
Qualcomm4.47%$6.92M$185.77B17.96%
80
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson4.09%$6.33M$633.19B71.54%
78
Outperform
Allstate3.55%$5.49M$64.44B30.02%
74
Outperform
Walmart3.44%$5.31M$890.03B11.37%
78
Outperform
Altria Group3.34%$5.16M$121.42B22.54%
64
Neutral
Exxon Mobil3.26%$5.04M$568.16B24.08%
74
Outperform
Cigna3.17%$4.90M$76.12B-8.13%
72
Outperform

VSMV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
59.45
Positive
100DMA
58.40
Positive
200DMA
56.46
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.02
Negative
RSI
53.13
Neutral
STOCH
65.87
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For VSMV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 59.50, equal to the 50-day MA of 59.45, and equal to the 200-day MA of 56.46, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.02 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 53.13 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 65.87 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for VSMV.

VSMV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$154.76M0.35%
75
Outperform
$940.18M0.59%
69
Neutral
$936.56M0.15%
73
Outperform
$918.57M0.50%
76
Outperform
$876.23M1.30%
68
Neutral
$852.38M0.27%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
59.65
10.86
22.26%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement