TipRanks
Advertisement

QLVD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QLVD

FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
QLVD’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier fund, supported by high-quality, stable companies outside the U.S. Strong holdings like Novartis and DBS Group, which show robust profitability, healthy balance sheets, and supportive valuations, help lift the fund’s overall quality. However, weaker momentum and higher valuations in names like Mitsubishi and Air Liquide, along with some bearish technical signals, introduce risk and slightly hold back the fund’s rating, with a key risk being exposure to stocks that may be overvalued or facing short-term technical pressure.
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Performance
The fund has shown solid gains so far this year and recently, indicating positive momentum for investors.
Quality Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including major banks and industrial leaders, have delivered strong returns, helping support the ETF’s performance.
Broad International Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many developed countries outside the U.S. and across multiple sectors, which helps reduce the impact of problems in any single market or industry.
Negative Factors
Mixed Performance Among Top Stocks
A few key holdings, such as large consumer and health care names, have recently lagged, which can drag on the fund’s overall results.
Financial Sector Exposure
With a meaningful portion of assets in financial companies, the fund can be sensitive to issues like interest rate changes and banking sector stress.
Moderate Fund Size
The ETF manages a relatively modest amount of assets, which could lead to lower trading volume and slightly wider bid-ask spreads for investors.

QLVD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QLVD Summary

QLVD is an ETF that tracks the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index, focusing on stocks from developed countries outside the United States. It holds well-known companies like Novartis and Nestlé, and spreads investments across many sectors and regions such as Japan, Europe, and Canada. This fund aims to give investors international diversification while favoring companies with steady finances and smaller price swings, which may appeal to those seeking smoother long-term growth. A key risk is that it still invests in stocks, so its value can go up and down with global markets.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for QLVD is 0.12%, which means you’ll pay $1.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because QLVD is passively managed, tracking an index rather than relying on active stock picking.
What would affect this ETF?Positive drivers for QLVD include potential growth in developed markets outside the U.S., particularly in sectors like Financials and Consumer Defensive, which are heavily weighted in the ETF. However, negative factors could arise from global economic slowdowns, regulatory changes in key regions, or currency fluctuations that impact international investments. Additionally, rising interest rates could affect sectors like Utilities and Real Estate, which are sensitive to borrowing costs.

QLVD Top 10 Holdings

QLVD leans heavily on steady, blue-chip names across developed markets outside the U.S., with banks and healthcare quietly steering the ship. Royal Bank of Canada, Canadian Bank of Commerce, and DBS Group are rising, giving the fund a solid financial backbone. ASML has been a standout, adding some high-octane semiconductor exposure to an otherwise low-volatility mix. On the defensive side, Novartis is firm while Sanofi and Nestlé look more mixed, occasionally losing steam. Overall, it’s a globally diversified, ex-U.S. portfolio with a tilt toward stable financials and pharma leaders.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Novartis AG3.79%$1.97MCHF209.20B18.33%
80
Outperform
Royal Bank Of Canada3.77%$1.96M$280.64B38.23%
75
Outperform
ASML Holding NV2.26%$1.17M€533.33B89.44%
76
Outperform
Unilever2.26%$1.17M£99.96B-9.53%
72
Outperform
DBS Group Holdings2.10%$1.09M$171.10B42.04%
78
Outperform
Canadian Bank of Commerce1.76%$914.15KC$143.51B40.78%
74
Outperform
Iberdrola1.62%$840.49K€133.48B29.20%
67
Neutral
Sanofi1.57%$816.42K€89.18B-8.11%
75
Outperform
Nestlé SA1.55%$805.48KCHF199.76B4.38%
71
Outperform
Zurich Insurance Group1.54%$799.16KCHF88.76B-1.16%
78
Outperform

QLVD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
34.21
Negative
100DMA
33.39
Positive
200DMA
32.80
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.07
Positive
RSI
46.77
Neutral
STOCH
14.07
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QLVD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 34.51, equal to the 50-day MA of 34.21, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.80, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.07 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 46.77 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 14.07 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for QLVD.

QLVD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$52.83M0.12%
68
Neutral
$66.90M0.03%
64
Neutral
$55.88M0.24%
58
Neutral
$33.92M0.48%
67
Neutral
$20.51M0.42%
67
Neutral
$19.42M0.55%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
34.17
3.84
12.66%
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
OEFA
O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
RWIN
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF
FFDI
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement