TipRanks
Advertisement

GARY - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GARY

Mango Growth ETF (GARY)

Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:―
GARY (Mango Growth ETF) appears to be a solid growth-focused fund, supported by strong holdings like ASML, Microsoft, and Nvidia, which benefit from robust financial performance and long-term growth themes in AI, cloud, and advanced semiconductor technology. The rating is held back somewhat by common risks across several top positions, including high valuations and occasional bearish or mixed technical signals, and the fund’s heavy tilt toward semiconductor and AI-related names means investors face added sector concentration risk. Overall, it offers attractive growth potential but with higher volatility and sensitivity to tech and chip-sector cycles.
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Performance
The ETF has delivered strong year-to-date returns, showing solid momentum so far this year.
Leading Semiconductor and Tech Holdings
Many of the largest positions are well-known technology and semiconductor companies that have shown strong or steady gains, helping drive the fund’s growth.
Focused Growth Exposure
The heavy tilt toward growth-oriented technology and related sectors gives investors targeted exposure to companies benefiting from long-term innovation trends.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into investor returns over time.
Sector Concentration in Technology
More than half of the portfolio is in the technology sector, increasing the risk if tech stocks face a downturn.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is heavily focused on U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market experiences weakness.

GARY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GARY Summary

Mango Growth ETF (ticker GARY) is an actively managed fund that focuses on large, fast-growing companies, mainly in the United States. Instead of tracking a fixed index, the managers pick stocks they believe have strong long-term growth potential, with a heavy tilt toward technology. Well-known holdings include Microsoft and Nvidia, along with other chip and software companies. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek higher growth and get diversified exposure to leading tech and growth businesses in one investment. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in technology stocks, so its value can rise and fall sharply with the tech sector.
How much will it cost me?The Mango Growth ETF (Ticker: GARY) has an expense ratio of 0.77%, which means you’ll pay $7.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average expense ratio for ETFs because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Mango Growth ETF's strong focus on technology and communication services positions it to benefit from continued innovation and demand in these sectors, especially as advancements in AI, semiconductors, and digital infrastructure drive growth. However, the fund could face challenges from rising interest rates, which often impact growth stocks negatively, and potential regulatory changes in the tech industry that could affect its top holdings like Nvidia and AMD. Broader economic conditions, such as a slowdown in consumer spending or healthcare policy shifts, may also influence the ETF's performance.

GARY Top 10 Holdings

Mango Growth ETF is leaning hard into the chip-and-AI boom, with Nvidia, AMD, ASML, Applied Materials, and TSMC forming a tech-heavy core that largely sets the fund’s tone. AMD and Microsoft are doing much of the heavy lifting lately, while Palantir and ServiceNow are more of a roller coaster, adding excitement but also bumpiness. ASML and Applied Materials have been losing a bit of altitude recently, tempering gains from the stronger names. With a clear U.S.-centric, large-cap growth tilt and a big bet on semiconductors and software, this fund lives and dies by tech’s next move.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Advanced Micro Devices5.13%$16.12M$970.08B177.65%
73
Outperform
Palantir Technologies4.91%$15.45M$502.24B16.10%
74
Outperform
Applied Materials4.91%$15.43M$394.84B112.77%
77
Outperform
ASML Holding4.88%$15.34M$674.52B74.71%
81
Outperform
Nvidia4.70%$14.77M$5.45T26.93%
76
Outperform
Mastercard4.53%$14.24M$521.30B6.49%
75
Outperform
Microsoft4.19%$13.15M$4.02T5.82%
79
Outperform
SpaceX4.15%$13.06M$2.22T――
Lam Research4.04%$12.71M$387.39B117.71%
77
Outperform
ServiceNow3.88%$12.18M$145.09B-23.94%
75
Outperform

GARY Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
27.35
Positive
100DMA
26.72
Positive
200DMA
24.53
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.40
Positive
RSI
54.72
Neutral
STOCH
36.43
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GARY, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.97, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 24.53, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.40 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.72 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 36.43 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GARY.

GARY Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$314.30M0.77%
65
Neutral
――$788.24M0.56%
72
Outperform
――$687.73M0.39%
75
Outperform
――$398.50M0.48%
73
Outperform
――$394.08M0.65%
75
Outperform
――$351.08M0.54%
75
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
28.11
7.89
39.02%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
―
―
―
FLCG
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF
―
―
―
LRGE
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF
―
―
―
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
―
―
―
CARK
CastleArk Large Growth ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement