TipRanks
Advertisement

ETFT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ETFT

Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT)

Rating:63Neutral
Price Target:―
ETFT (Fundsmith Equity ETF) has a solid overall rating, largely driven by strong, high-quality holdings like Mastercard, Visa, and Sage Group, which show robust financial performance, revenue growth, and strategic innovation in areas such as cloud, AI, and global payments. However, several holdings, including Philip Morris and Amadeus IT Group, face bearish technical trends, high leverage, or valuation concerns, which weigh on the fund’s rating. The main risk factor is that many of its key positions share similar issues of rich valuations and bearish technical signals, which could increase short-term volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Growth-Oriented Holdings
Several key positions like Veeva Systems, Philip Morris, Church & Dwight, and Waters have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall performance.
Sector Diversification Across Defensive and Growth Areas
The fund spreads its assets across technology, health care, consumer defensive, financials, and other sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any single industry struggles.
Global Exposure with a U.S. Core
While most of the ETF is invested in U.S. companies, it also holds meaningful positions in France, Spain, and the UK, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions such as Amadeus IT Group, Stryker, Sage Group, and Mastercard have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s results.
Heavy Tilt Toward the U.S. Market
With most assets in U.S. stocks, the fund is heavily exposed to the U.S. economy and may not benefit as much if other regions outperform.

ETFT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ETFT Summary

The Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) is an actively managed fund that invests in a handpicked mix of companies from the U.S. and around the world, rather than tracking a set index. It focuses on high-quality businesses in areas like technology, health care, and consumer goods. Well-known holdings include Mastercard and Visa. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth and global diversification in a single investment. However, because it owns stocks and is actively managed, its value can go up and down with the stock market and may underperform broad index funds.
How much will it cost me?The Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) has an expense ratio of 1.0%, meaning you’ll pay $10 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, which involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Fundsmith Equity ETF could benefit from global economic growth and advancements in technology and healthcare, as these sectors make up a significant portion of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact consumer spending and the valuation of growth-focused companies, as well as regulatory changes affecting its international holdings. Its active management strategy allows flexibility to adapt to market shifts, but this approach also carries higher costs that could weigh on returns during periods of market volatility.

ETFT Top 10 Holdings

Fundsmith Equity ETF leans heavily on high-quality global growth names, with a clear tilt toward tech and healthcare. Veeva Systems has been a real engine lately, rising sharply and giving the fund a nice boost, while Visa and Waters are also pulling their weight with steady gains. On the flip side, Stryker and Uber are losing steam, acting as small anchors on performance. With big positions in payment giants like Mastercard and a mix of U.S. and European names such as Amadeus, the fund’s story is global, but concentrated in a handful of powerful franchises.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
―12.01%$944.59K―――
Waters6.05%$475.52K$42.45B28.82%
70
Outperform
Mastercard5.08%$399.17K$521.30B6.49%
75
Outperform
Visa4.94%$388.53K$726.79B13.69%
70
Outperform
Veeva Systems4.84%$380.96K$47.90B4.86%
66
Neutral
Amadeus IT Group S.A4.76%$374.70K€21.30B-22.32%
61
Neutral
Stryker4.03%$317.02K$108.40B-23.64%
70
Outperform
Philip Morris3.90%$306.91K$314.84B25.28%
61
Neutral
Sage Group plc3.75%$294.72K£9.77B-5.47%
77
Outperform
Church & Dwight3.63%$285.27K$23.69B15.18%
72
Outperform

ETFT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price―
Price Trends
50DMA
10.00
Positive
100DMA
9.89
Positive
200DMA
9.77
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.05
Negative
RSI
67.25
Neutral
STOCH
93.06
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ETFT, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 9.93, equal to the 50-day MA of 10.00, and equal to the 200-day MA of 9.77, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.05 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 67.25 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 93.06 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ETFT.

ETFT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
――$7.83M1.00%
63
Neutral
――$94.22M0.73%
69
Neutral
――$75.82M0.68%
67
Neutral
――$75.52M0.65%
68
Neutral
――$71.17M0.75%
58
Neutral
――$65.46M0.59%
67
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ETFT
Fundsmith Equity ETF
10.22
0.23
2.30%
GOP
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF
―
―
―
PRAY
FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF
―
―
―
SAGP
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
MNVT
Moonvest ETF
―
―
―
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement