Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
CDL - AI Analysis
Top Page
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
$76.00
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, particularly in the utilities sector, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund's returns.
Defensive Sector Exposure
The ETF is heavily weighted in defensive sectors like Utilities and Consumer Defensive, which tend to perform well in uncertain markets.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund's expense ratio is reasonable compared to many actively managed ETFs, helping investors retain more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Over-Concentration in U.S. Market
The ETF has nearly all its geographic exposure in the U.S., limiting diversification across global markets.
Sector Concentration Risk
Utilities and Consumer Defensive sectors make up nearly half of the portfolio, increasing vulnerability if these sectors underperform.
Limited Growth Sector Exposure
The ETF has minimal exposure to high-growth sectors like Technology and Materials, which could limit upside potential in a growth-driven market.
CDL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM354.14M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.42%
Beta0.51
IssuerVictoryShares
Inception DateJul 08, 2015
Dividend Yield3.35%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume7,287
30 Day Avg. Volume7,478
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
77.67Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering101
CDL Summary
The VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted ETF (CDL) is designed to invest in large U.S. companies that pay high dividends while managing risk through volatility weighting. It follows the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index and includes well-known companies like Duke Energy and Southern Co. This ETF is ideal for investors seeking steady income from dividends and a balanced approach to market ups and downs. However, since it focuses heavily on sectors like utilities and consumer defensive, its performance may be affected if these industries face challenges.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted ETF (CDL) has an expense ratio of 0.42%, meaning you’ll pay $4.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed to focus on high-dividend stocks while considering volatility, which requires more research and strategy compared to passively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?CDL's focus on high-dividend large-cap U.S. companies, particularly in stable sectors like Utilities and Consumer Defensive, could benefit from economic uncertainty as investors seek reliable income sources. However, rising interest rates might make dividend-paying stocks less attractive compared to fixed-income investments, and sector-specific challenges, such as regulatory changes in Utilities or energy price volatility, could negatively impact performance.
CDL Top 10 Holdings
The VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted ETF (CDL) leans heavily into utilities, which dominate its portfolio and provide steady dividend income but have shown mixed stock performance recently. Names like Evergy and Exelon are rising, buoyed by strong earnings and strategic investments, while others like Southern Co and DTE Energy are steady but grappling with high leverage and cash flow challenges. With a focus on U.S. large-cap stocks, the fund’s sector concentration in utilities and consumer defensive companies offers stability, though it may limit upside potential in more growth-oriented sectors like technology.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evergy | 1.70% | $5.99M | $17.68B | 28.92% | 68 Neutral | |
| WEC Energy Group | 1.61% | $5.69M | $35.96B | 16.91% | 70 Outperform | |
| CMS Energy | 1.58% | $5.57M | $22.38B | 7.69% | 72 Outperform | |
| Duke Energy | 1.55% | $5.47M | $96.66B | 10.31% | 75 Outperform | |
| American Electric Power | 1.53% | $5.41M | $64.37B | 23.66% | 72 Outperform | |
| Coca-Cola | 1.51% | $5.33M | $296.38B | 5.98% | 78 Outperform | |
| Southern Co | 1.51% | $5.32M | $103.55B | 6.21% | 65 Neutral | |
| Xcel Energy | 1.50% | $5.31M | $48.02B | 21.71% | 72 Outperform | |
| DTE Energy | 1.49% | $5.25M | $28.15B | 11.75% | 67 Neutral | |
| PPL | 1.47% | $5.21M | $27.01B | 15.72% | 67 Neutral |
CDL Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
68.76
Negative
67.79
Positive
66.37
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.09
Positive
40.70
Neutral
10.58
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CDL, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 68.89, equal to the 50-day MA of 68.76, and equal to the 200-day MA of 66.37, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.09 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 40.70 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 10.58 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for CDL.
CDL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
68.01
3.64
5.65%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
―
―
―
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
―
―
―
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
―
―
―
AVLC
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents