The field of immunotherapy for treatment of cancers is characterized by intense and dynamic competition to develop new technologies and proprietary therapies. Any product candidates that we developed or are in the process of developing will have to compete with existing therapies and new therapies that may from time to time become available in the future. We face competition from various sources, including well-funded biopharmaceutical companies, established biopharmaceutical companies, as well as public and private research institutions. The areas of competition include relevant scientific and management human resources, funding for product development, establishing clinical study sites and clinical subjects participating in the trials.
Our known biopharmaceutical competitors working on allogeneic CAR-T therapies currently include Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:ALLO), Astellas Pharma Inc. (TSE:4503.T), Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE:BMY), Celyad Oncology SA (Nasdaq:CYAD), Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:FATE), Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq:GILD), NantKwest, INC. (Nasdaq:NK), Novartis International AG (NYSE:NVS), Surface Oncology, Inc. (Nasdaq:SURF), Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (NYSE:TAK) and numerous other biopharmaceutical companies.
We are aware of the recent developments of our potential competitors for allogeneic CAR gamma delta T- cell therapy. Based on publicly disclosed information, in May 2023 Acepodia Biotech, Inc. announced first patient dosed in their phase 1 clinical trial of an anti-CD20 armed allogeneic gamma delta T-cell therapy to treat patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, as well as FDA Clearance of Investigational New Drug (IND) Application for a First-in-Class Allogeneic Anti-EGFR Cell Therapy. In first quarter 2024, Bristol Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY) announced U.S. FDA approval for CD19-directed CAR T cell therapy as the first and only CAR T cell therapy for adults with relapsed or refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL), as well as Priority Review for Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). In October 2023, Immatics N.V. (NASDAQ: IMTX) received FDA Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation for a TCR-T cell therapy targeting PRAME, a protein frequently expressed in a large variety of solid tumors, with current ongoing discussions with FDA to enter registration-enabling Phase 2 trial in melanoma in 2024. In December 2023, Adicet Bio, Inc. (Nasdaq: ACET) reported robust dose-dependent expansion and persistence for their gamma-delta T-cell therapy through their ongoing clinical phase I trial for advanced lymphoma, displaying a strong exposure profile and was positively associated with both PD correlates and clinical response.
Our existing competitors in the field of gamma delta T cell therapy are listed in Table 2 of the section entitled "Competition" in this annual report. We are aware of the recent development of our potential competitor for allogeneic gamma delta T- cell therapy. Based on publicly disclosed information, in November 2023, TC BioPharm (Holdings) PLC (Nasdaq: TCBP) announced FDA Clearance of a Phase 1B IND for its allogeneic unmodified gamma delta T-cell product in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. As of date of this annual report, we are not aware of any approved Phase III trial for gamma delta T cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Our gamma delta T cell product candidate may also face competition from other cell-based immunotherapy approaches derived from NK cells and T cells.
Our existing competitors in the field of iPSC-derived immune cells include Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:FATE), Takeda-CiRA joint program (Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (NYSE:TAK), Centre for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University) and Century Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:IPSC). In January 2024, Fate Therapeutics has announced initiation of a phase I clinical trial for an iPSC-derived CAR T-cell product targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). As of the date of this annual report, Takeda-CiRA joint program is in its pre-clinical stage.
Many of our existing or potential competitors may have greater financial and other resources, larger teams of R&D staff, and more experienced capabilities in researching, developing and testing products than we do. Many of these companies also have more experience in conducting clinical trials, obtaining relevant regulatory approvals, and manufacturing, marketing and distributing therapeutic products. Smaller or pre-clinical stage companies like us may successfully compete by establishing collaborative relationships with larger pharmaceutical companies or academic institutions. Accordingly, our competitors may be more successful than us in obtaining approval for treatments and achieving widespread market acceptance. Our competitors' treatments may be more clinically effective, or more effectively marketed, than any treatment we may commercialize, and they may render our treatments obsolete or non-competitive before we can recover the expenses of developing and commercializing any of our treatments.
Mergers and acquisitions in the industry may result in even greater resources being concentrated in a smaller number of our competitors. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical study sites and subjects for clinical studies. Other small or early-stage companies may also prove to be strong competitors, particularly those with collaborative arrangements with large and established companies.
We anticipate that we will face intense and increasing competition as new therapies enter the market and advanced technologies become available from time to time. We expect that any treatments which we develop and commercialize will need to compete on, among other things, efficacy, safety, convenience of administration and delivery, price, the level of generic competition and the availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors.
Our ability to commercialize our proprietary cell products could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are potentially more suitable, more effective, have a better safety profile, are more convenient or are less expensive than our products. Our competitors also may obtain relevant regulatory approvals for their products more rapidly than we may be able to obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors obtaining a head start and establishing a frontrunner position before we are ready to commercialize. If we are not able to compete effectively against our existing and potential competitors, our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects may be materially and adversely affected. Please refer to the section entitled "Competition" for further details.