TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Genprex (0A8I) Risk Analysis

Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning. Genprex disclosed 69 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Genprex reported the most risks in the “Tech & Innovation” category.

Risk Overview Q2, 2026

Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Jun 30, 2026, filed Aug 14, 2026

Risk Distribution
69Risks
Sector Avg.Finance & CorporateTech & InnovationLegal & RegulatoryProductionAbility to SellMacro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Risk Change Over Time

Genprex disclosed risks per quarterNo. of Risks6667686970Q4Q4Q2Showing: Q2, 2026
Risks removedRisks addedRisks changedGenprex Risk Factors
  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
    Our common stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market. If we fail to maintain compliance with the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, our common stock may be delisted and the price of our common stock and our ability to access the capital markets could be negatively impacted.

    Our common stock is currently listed for trading on Nasdaq. On June 10, 2026, we received a letter from Nasdaq indicating that, based upon our lack of compliance with the with the requirement under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share for continued listing on Nasdaq (the "Bid Price Requirement") and our ineligibility for a 180 calendar day compliance period, the Listing Qualifications Staff of Nasdaq (the "Staff") had determined to delist our securities from Nasdaq unless we timely requested a hearing before a Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the "Panel"). Accordingly, we did so request a hearing before the Panel (which request stayed any suspension or delisting action by the Staff), and the Panel hearing was held on July 21, 2026. At the Panel hearing, we requested an extension within which to demonstrate compliance with the Bid Price Requirement, and on July 29, 2026, the Panel granted our request for an exception to demonstrate compliance with the Bid Price Requirement (the "Exception"). On August 4, 2026, the we were formally notified that the Panel determined that we have regained compliance with the Bid Price Requirement. The Panel further informed us that until December 7, 2026, which represents the full extent of the Panel's discretion in this matter with respect to the Bid Price Requirement, the Company must maintain a closing bid price at or above $1.00 for each trading day; and the Panel will maintain jurisdiction over the Company until December 7, 2026.  In the event the Company becomes non-compliant with any other listing rule at any time prior to December 7, 2026, we will be allowed seven calendar days to advise the Panel on our plan to cure the deficiency, with the Panel, at that time, to determine whether to grant the Company an exception to cure the deficiency or delist the Company. Pursuant to the Exception, we are required to, and fully intend to, provide the Panel with prompt notification of any significant events that occur that may affect our compliance with Nasdaq requirements, including any event that may call into question our ability to meet the terms of the Exception.  The Panel has reserved the right to reconsider the terms of the Exception based on any event, condition or circumstance that exists or develops that would, in the Panel's opinion, make continued listing of our securities on Nasdaq inadvisable or unwarranted.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to satisfy the terms of the Exception, or that we will be able to demonstrate or maintain compliance with the Bid Price Requirement or the other Nasdaq continued listing requirements for the duration of the Exception or for any future time period. We intend to continue to monitor the closing bid price of our common stock and take such definitive steps as deemed appropriate to evidence and maintain compliance with the Bid Price Requirement, including by implementing effective July 16, 2026 the one-for-twenty-two (1:22) reverse stock split of our common stock. However, the implementation of the reverse stock split could continue to negatively affect the price of our common stock, and there is no guarantee that our having implemented the reverse stock split will result in our maintaining compliance with the Bid Price Requirement, or that we will continue to satisfy the terms of the Exception. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock after the reverse stock split will be maintained for any period of time or at any particular level.  There is also the possibility that liquidity in our common stock may continue to be adversely affected by the reduced number of shares issued and outstanding which occurred as of the effective time of the reverse stock split. We must evidence and maintain compliance with Nasdaq's Bid Price Requirement of $1.00 per share (and must continue to maintain compliance with Nasdaq's other continued listing requirements, including, among other things, a minimum stockholders' equity of $2.5 million), or risk delisting, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, upon approval of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Nasdaq amended its listing rules on July 22, 2026 to provide that where a listed company fails to meet the continued listing requirement for market value of listed securities of at least $5 million for 30 consecutive business days, such deficiency will result in immediate suspension and delisting, bypassing typical grace periods and restricting appeal rights (the "MVLS Requirement"). On July 29, 2026, the SEC's Division of Trading and Markets confirmed that it had received notices of intention to petition the full SEC for review of the approval, which automatically stayed the order implementing the rule pending further action from the SEC. This process is pending as of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with no prescribed timeline for SEC action. As of the time of this filing, our market value of listing securities is currently below $5 million. Because we are currently below the $5 million threshold, if and when the MVLS Requirement becomes effective, we may become subject to immediate suspension and delisting, without any opportunity to cure, if our market value of listed securities remains below $5 million for 30 consecutive business days. If our common stock is delisted from Nasdaq, it could result in a corresponding material reduction in the price of our common stock as a result of the loss of market efficiencies associated with Nasdaq and the loss of federal preemption of state securities laws. In addition, delisting could harm our ability to raise capital through alternative financing sources on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and may result in the potential loss of confidence by investors, suppliers, contractual counterparties and employees and fewer business development opportunities. If our common stock were delisted, it could be more difficult to buy or sell our common stock or to obtain accurate quotations, and the price of our common stock could suffer a material decline. Delisting could also impair our ability to raise capital on acceptable terms, if at all.

Read and Evaluate the RiskReserved for Ultimate MembersUpgrade

Risk Highlights Q2, 2026

Main Risk Category
Tech & Innovation
With 25 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
69
+1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
0Risks added
0Risks removed
1Risks changed
Since Jun 2026
Number of Risk Changed
1
-6
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 1

Risk Word Cloud

we are currently listed on the nasdaq capital market. if we are unable to maintain listing of our securities on nasdaq or any stock exchange, our stock price could be adversely affected and the liquidity of our stock and our ability to obtain financing could be impaired and it may be more difficult for our stockholders to sell their securities.our ability to obtain financingfuture sales and issuances of our securities could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our share price to fall.percentage ownership of our stockholderswe may not be able to manage our business effectively if we are unable to attract and retain key personnel and consultants.to manage our business effectivelyif we are unable to secure contract manufacturers with capabilities to produce the products that we require, we could experience delays in conducting our planned clinical trials.unable to secure contract manufacturersfuture sales and issuances of our securities could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our share price to fall.our share price to fallwe have in the past and may again in the future have trademark applications in the united states and/or certain other countries, and failure to secure these registrations could adversely affect our business; additionally, we may need to enforce our trademark rights against third parties and expend significant resources to enforce such rights against infringement.expend significant resources to enforcewe face risks related to health epidemics and outbreaks, including covid-19, which could significantly disrupt our preclinical studies and clinical trials. our business has previously been adversely affected by the coronavirus pandemic which delayed our clinical trials and disrupted our supply chain. a potential resurgence of covid-19, or any future disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic, could disrupt our clinical trials and supply chain and materially adversely affect our business and operations.significantly disrupt our preclinical studieswe have completed and may in the future complete related party transactions that were not and may not be conducted on an arm's length basis.future complete related party transactionseven if we obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, our products will remain subject to regulatory oversight.remain subject to regulatory oversightif a product liability claim is successfully brought against us for uninsured liabilities, or such claim exceeds our insurance coverage, we could be forced to pay substantial damage awards that could materially harm our business.claim exceeds our insurance coverage

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 69

Innovation / R&D9 | 13.0%
  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 1
    REQORSA, GPX-002, and any other product candidate we advance through clinical trials may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval. Even if we complete the necessary clinical trials, we cannot predict when, or if, we will obtain regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates, and the approval may be for a narrower indication than we seek.

    Clinical failure can occur at any stage of our clinical development. Clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or nonclinical studies. In addition, data obtained from trials and studies are susceptible to varying interpretations, and regulators may not interpret our data as favorably as we do, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Additionally, our partners, clients, other vendors, and/or other stakeholders may not agree with our interpretation(s) of data obtained from our clinical trials, which could potentially cause a variety of issues, including, but not limited to, delays, the necessity for additional studies and analyses, dependence on third-party validation, and/or other unforeseen challenges. Success in preclinical studies and early clinical trials does not ensure that subsequent clinical trials will generate the same or similar results or otherwise provide adequate data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of a product candidate. Later-stage clinical trials could differ in significant ways from early-stage clinical trials, including changes to inclusion and exclusion criteria, efficacy endpoints, dosing regimen and statistical design. For example, the small number of patients in our completed Phase 1 Monotherapy clinical trial of REQORSA and the Phase 1/2 Combination Tarceva trial may make the results of these trials less predictive of the outcome of later clinical trials. In addition, although we observed encouraging clinical activity in the Phase 1 Monotherapy and Phase 1/2 Combination Tarceva trial, the primary objectives of the Phase 1 Monotherapy Trial and the Phase 1 portion of the Phase 1/2 Combination Tarceva trial were safety and MTD and not to demonstrate efficacy. The assessments of clinical activity from these clinical trials, some of which were not pre-specified, may not be predictive of the results of later clinical trials of REQORSA. Furthermore, safety events may be observed in later trials that alter the anticipated risk-benefit profiles of REQORSA or other product candidates. In addition, the design of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. We may be unable to design and execute a clinical trial to support regulatory approval. Further, clinical trials of potential products often reveal that it is not practical or feasible to continue development efforts. We do not know whether any clinical trials we conduct will demonstrate the consistent or adequate efficacy and safety that would be required to obtain regulatory approval and market any products. If REQORSA, GPX-002 or other current or future product candidates are found to be unsafe or lack efficacy, we will not be able to obtain regulatory approval for it and our business would be harmed. If we are unable to bring REQORSA, GPX-002 or other product candidates to market, or acquire other products that are on the market or can be developed, our ability to create stockholder value will be limited. Regulatory authorities also may approve a product candidate for more limited indications than requested, or they may impose significant limitations in the form of narrow indications.  These regulatory authorities may require warnings or precautions with respect to conditions of use or they may grant approval subject to the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials.  In addition, regulatory authorities may not approve the labeling claims or allow the promotional claims that are necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of our product candidates.  Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects for our product candidates and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 2
    A product candidate can fail at any stage of preclinical and clinical development.

    The historical failure rate for product candidates is high due to scientific feasibility, safety, efficacy, changing standards of medical care and other variables. The results from preclinical testing or early clinical trials of a product candidate may not predict the results that will be obtained in later phase clinical trials of the product candidate. We, the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities may suspend clinical trials of a product candidate at any time for various reasons, including, but not limited to, a belief that subjects participating in such trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks or adverse side effects, or other adverse initial experiences or findings. We may not have the financial resources to continue development of, or to enter into collaborations for, a product candidate if we experience any problems or other unforeseen events that delay or prevent regulatory approval of, or our ability to commercialize, product candidates, including: - inability to obtain sufficient funds required for clinical development;- inability to reach agreements on acceptable terms with current or prospective vendors, CROs and trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different vendors, CROs and trial sites;- negative or inconclusive results from our clinical studies or the clinical studies of others for product candidates similar to ours, leading to a decision or requirement to conduct additional preclinical testing or clinical trials or abandon a program;- serious and unexpected side effects experienced by subjects in our clinical trials or by individuals using drugs similar to our current and future product candidates;- conditions imposed by the FDA or comparable foreign authorities regarding the scope or design of our clinical trials;- unexpected results from preclinical testing and development;   - inability or delays in enrolling research subjects in clinical trials;- high drop-out rates and high fail rates of research subjects;- inadequate supply or quality of product candidate components or materials or other supplies necessary for the conduct of preclinical or clinical testing;- greater than anticipated clinical trial costs;- poor effectiveness of our current and potential product candidates during clinical trials; or - unfavorable FDA or other regulatory agency inspection and review of a clinical trial site or vendor.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 3
    We may not be able to obtain or maintain orphan drug designation or exclusivity for our product candidates.

    In August 2023, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to REQORSA for the treatment of SCLC. Upon receipt of regulatory approval, orphan drug status will provide us with seven years of market exclusivity in the United States under the Orphan Drug Act. We may seek other orphan drug designations in the future in the United States and in the European Union for our product candidates. However, there is no guarantee that the FDA will grant orphan drug designation for any of our other drug candidates for any future indication, which would make us ineligible for the additional exclusivity and other benefits of orphan drug designation for those other drug candidates in the future. Moreover, there can be no assurance that another company also holding orphan drug designation for the same indication or which may receive orphan drug designation in the future will not receive approval prior to us, in which case our competitor would have the benefit of the seven years of market exclusivity, and we would be unable to commercialize our product for the same indication until the expiration of such seven-year period. Even if we are the first to obtain approval for the orphan drug indication, there are circumstances under which a competing product may be approved for the same indication during our seven-year period of exclusivity. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making a drug available in the Unites States for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA or BLA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan designation does not convey any advantage in or shorten the duration of regulatory review and approval process. In addition to the potential period of exclusivity, orphan designation makes a company eligible for grant funding of up to $400,000 per year for four years to defray costs of clinical trial expenses, tax credits for clinical research expenses and potential exemption from the FDA application user fee. If a product that has orphan designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as (i) the drug's orphan designation is revoked; (ii) its marketing approval is withdrawn; (iii) the orphan exclusivity holder consents to the approval of another applicant's product; (iv) the orphan exclusivity holder is unable to assure the availability of a sufficient quantity of drug; or (v) a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan exclusivity by a competitor product. If a drug designated as an orphan product receives marketing approval for an indication broader than what is designated, it may not be entitled to orphan drug exclusivity. There can be no assurance that we will receive orphan drug designation for any of our drug candidates for any additional indications, if we elect to seek such designation. Even if orphan designation is granted it may be withdrawn by the FDA for non-compliance with regulations.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 4
    Fast track designation of our products by FDA and designation under any other FDA expedited development program may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, nor will it assure FDA approval of our product candidates.

    REQORSA has received three fast track designations from the FDA.  We may in the future seek additional fast track designations for our products and/or request breakthrough therapy designation, accelerated approval or priority review of applications for approval. FDA has broad discretion whether or not to grant these designations and requests, so even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for these designations, we cannot assure you that the FDA will grant them. Even with fast track designation and other FDA expedited development programs, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. The FDA may withdraw fast track designation and other expedited program designations if it believes that the requirements of the program are no longer met.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 5
    Delays in the commencement, enrollment and completion of clinical trials could result in increased costs to us and delay or limit our ability to obtain regulatory approval for REQORSA and other current or future product candidates.

    Clinical development is very expensive and can take many years. Delays in the commencement, enrollment and/or completion of our Acclaim-1 and Acclaim-3 clinical trials or any future clinical trials could increase our product development costs or delay or limit the regulatory approval of REQORSA or other product candidates. We have experienced delays in opening our clinical sites for our Acclaim-1 and Acclaim-2 trials in the past; for example, there was a delay with Acclaim-2 due to competition for investigators and eligible patients with numerous other trials involving the same patient population. We do not know and cannot predict whether future trials or studies of other current or future product candidates, including later stages of our Acclaim trials, and any for GPX-002, will begin as planned, if at all, and we do not know and cannot predict whether our Acclaim-1 and Acclaim-3 clinical trials or any future trials or studies of other current or future product candidates will be completed on schedule, if at all. The start or end of a clinical study may be delayed or halted due to regulatory requirements, changes in the proposed regulatory approval pathway for a drug candidate, manufacturing challenges, including delays or shortages in available raw materials required to manufacture the drug product, required clinical trial administrative actions, slower than anticipated patient enrollment, changing standards of care, availability or prevalence of use of a comparative drug or required prior therapy, clinical outcomes or financial constraints. For instance, delays or difficulties in patient enrollment or difficulties in retaining trial participants can result in increased costs, longer development times or termination of a clinical trial, such as the Acclaim-2 program. Clinical trials of a new product candidate require the enrollment of a sufficient number of patients, including patients who are suffering from the disease the product candidate is intended to treat and who meet other eligibility criteria, such as mutation of the EGFR which is required for the Acclaim-1 trial and is present in a minority of NSCLC patients. Rates of patient enrollment are affected by many factors, including the size of the patient population, the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial, which include the age and condition of the patients and the stage and severity of disease, the nature of the protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites and the availability of effective treatments and/or availability of other investigational treatment options for the relevant disease.  We have initiated our Acclaim-1 and Acclaim-3 clinical trials pursuant to an existing IND. We have previously filed with the FDA amendments to our IND consisting of an updated chemistry, manufacturing and controls section, and the protocol for the respective clinical trial. We cannot be sure that issues will not arise in the future in connection with potential subsequent amendments or otherwise that might result in the FDA imposing a clinical hold which could result in the delay of any of these clinical trials. For GPX-002 we have not yet filed an IND and cannot predict all of the challenges and issues that may arise in connection with the preparation and filing of an IND, or whether this IND will be filed at all.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 6
    Conducting successful clinical studies may require the enrollment of large numbers of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit.

    Patient enrollment in clinical trials and completion of patient participation and follow-up depends on many factors, including the size of the patient population; the nature of the trial protocol; the attractiveness of, or the discomforts and risks associated with, the treatments received by enrolled subjects; the availability of appropriate clinical trial investigators; support staff; and proximity of patients to clinical sites; ability to comply with the eligibility and exclusion criteria for participation in the clinical trial; and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical trials if the trial protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the safety and effectiveness of our product candidates or if they determine that the treatments received under the trial protocols are not attractive or involve unacceptable risks or discomforts. Patients may also not participate in our clinical trials if they choose to participate in contemporaneous clinical trials of competitive products. In addition, our ability to successfully initiate, enroll and complete clinical trials in any foreign country is subject to numerous risks of conducting business in foreign countries, including: - difficulty in establishing or managing relationships with CROs and physicians;- different standards for the conduct of clinical trials;- our inability to locate qualified local consultants, physicians and partners; and - the potential burden of complying with a variety of foreign laws, medical standards and regulatory requirements, including the regulation of pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and treatments. If we have difficulty enrolling a sufficient number of patients to conduct our clinical trials as planned, such as we have experienced with the Acclaim-2 clinical trial for example, we may need to delay, limit or terminate ongoing or planned clinical trials, any of which would have an adverse effect on our business.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 7
    REQORSA, GPX-002, and other current or future product candidates may have undesirable side effects that may delay or prevent marketing approval, or, if approval is received, require them to be taken off the market, require them to include safety warnings or otherwise limit their sales.

    Undesirable side effects for REQORSA, GPX-002, or any of our other current or future product candidates could arise either during clinical development or, if approved, after the approved product has been marketed. A showing that REQORSA, GPX-002, or any of our other current or future product candidates cause undesirable or unacceptable side effects could interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and result in the failure to obtain or suspension or termination of marketing approval from the FDA and other regulatory authorities, or result in marketing approval from the FDA and other regulatory authorities only with restrictive label warnings. If REQORSA, GPX-002, or any of our other current or future product candidates receives marketing approval and we or others later identify undesirable or unacceptable side effects caused by such products: - regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, specific warnings, a contraindication or field alerts to physicians and pharmacies;- we may be required to change instructions regarding the way the product is administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product;- we may be subject to limitations on how we may promote the product;- sales of the product may decrease significantly;- regulatory authorities may require us to take our approved product off the market;- we may be subject to litigation or product liability claims; and - our reputation may suffer. Any of these events could prevent us or our potential future collaborators from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of our products or could substantially increase commercialization costs and expenses, which in turn could delay or prevent us from generating revenues from the sale of our products.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 8
    Our success depends greatly on the success of our development of REQORSA for the treatment of NSCLC and SCLC, and our other product candidates, including GPX-002 for the treatment of diabetes.

    At this time, we are actively pursuing the development of REQORSA for NSCLC through our Acclaim-1 clinical trial and for SCLC through our Acclaim-3 clinical trial, which are both currently enrolling patients.  We are also pursuing the development of preclinical gene therapy GPX-002 for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, as well as earlier discovery programs. In particular, we are dependent on the success of REQORSA and GPX-002. We cannot provide you any assurance that we will be able to successfully advance REQORSA, GPX-002 or any of our other current or future product candidates through the development process, or that any development problems we experience in the future will not cause significant delays or unanticipated costs, or that such development problems can be solved. For example, as previously announced in August 2024, based on a number of factors, including enrollment challenges and delays due to competition for investigators and eligible patients with numerous other trials involving the same patient population, we decided to cease enrollment of new patients in the Acclaim-2 trial (which involved a combination of REQORSA and Merck & Co.'s Keytruda (pembrolizumab) in patients with late-stage NSCLC whose disease has progressed after treatment with Keytruda) to prioritize our resources and focus on the other two Acclaim trials in SCLC and NSCLC, respectively. We may also experience delays in the development of a sustainable, reproducible and scalable manufacturing process or transferring that process to commercial partners, or developing or validating product release assays in a timely manner, which may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our products on a timely or profitable basis, if at all. Immunotherapy, gene therapy and biopharmaceutical product development are highly speculative undertakings and involve a substantial degree of uncertainty. Because REQORSA, GPX-002 and our other current product candidates are based upon novel technology, it is difficult to predict whether, either as stand-alone therapies or in combination with other drugs, they will show consistently favorable results and to predict the time and cost of their development and of subsequently obtaining regulatory approval. We believe only a few gene therapy products have been approved in the United States or Europe. We have found it difficult to enroll patients in our clinical studies in the past, have experienced certain difficulties in enrolling patients in our current trials and may continue to find it difficult in the future, which could delay or prevent clinical studies of REQORSA or other current or future product candidates. Examples of such difficulties include the Acclaim-2 trial noted above and also for Acclaim-1, which as previously announced in August 2024, we decided to limit our enrollment efforts moving forward to patients who received only prior Tagrisso treatment and cease enrollment of the second cohort (patients who received prior Tagrisso treatment and chemotherapy) due to slow enrollment, resource prioritization and to focus on the patients for whom REQORSA is most likely to show a benefit. We may encounter other delays in our preclinical or clinical studies, or we may fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of FDA and other regulatory authorities. We may not be successful in our efforts to identify or discover additional product candidates, or to develop product candidates that we have identified. In addition, the clinical trial requirements of the FDA, the European Commission, the European Medicines Agency ("EMA"), the competent authorities of the Member States of the European Union ("EU") and other regulatory authorities and the criteria these regulators use to determine the safety and efficacy of a product candidate vary substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use and market of such product candidates. The regulatory approval process for novel product candidates such as ours can be more expensive and take longer than for other, better known or more extensively studied product candidates. Even if we are successful in developing product candidates, it is difficult to determine how long it will take or how much it will cost to obtain regulatory approvals for these product candidates in either the United States or the EU, or how long it will take to commercialize any other products for which we receive marketing approval. In addition, any future marketing authorization granted by the European Commission may not be indicative of what the FDA may require for approval and vice versa.

  • Innovation / R&D - Risk 9
    We may use our financial and human resources to pursue a particular research program or product candidate and fail to capitalize on programs or product candidates that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

    Because we have limited resources, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with certain programs or product candidates or for indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on research and development programs for product candidates may not yield any commercially viable products. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through strategic collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such product candidate, or we may allocate internal resources to a product candidate in a therapeutic area in which it would have been more advantageous to enter into a partnering arrangement.

See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment. They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result. It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process. Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”. Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report. According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing. You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector. Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements. A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below. 1. Financial & Corporate Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results. Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing. Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments. Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances. 2. Legal & Regulatory Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company. Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation. Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy. Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives. 3. Production Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory. Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers. Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls. Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation. 4. Technology & Innovation Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development. Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology. Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks. Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying. 5. Ability to Sell Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers. Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes. Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration. Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation. 6. Macro & Political Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions. Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19. International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company. Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.