TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Stratasys (SCY) Risk Analysis

Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning. Stratasys disclosed 53 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Stratasys reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q4, 2025

Source: the company's latest filing for the period ended Dec 31, 2025, filed Mar 05, 2026

Risk Distribution
53Risks
Sector Avg.Finance & CorporateTech & InnovationLegal & RegulatoryProductionAbility to SellMacro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy

Risk Change Over Time

Stratasys disclosed risks per quarterNo. of Risks42444648505254Q4Q4Q4Q4Showing: Q4, 2025
Risks removedRisks addedRisks changedStratasys Risk Factors
New Risk (1)
  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
    Potential hostile actions by a shareholder or other third party, including a potential unsolicited tender offer, or a potential attempt to remove and replace our directors with its own nominees, as occurred in the recent past, could materially adversely impact our shareholders' investment in our company and could also strain our cash resources.

    We have in the recent past been subject to litigation in Israel and other hostile actions initiated by our shareholder, Nano Dimension Ltd., or Nano, which challenged the validity, under Israeli law, of our then-current limited-duration shareholder rights plan, which expired on December 19, 2025. Our shareholder rights plan was designed to give all shareholders (other than an offeror) a way to voice their position directly to our board of directors on certain types of offers and whether the plan should apply to those offers, and in other circumstances, to exempt an offer from the applicability of the rights altogether. We agreed to an exemption from the applicability of our former shareholder rights plan for Fortissimo Capital's (which, together with its affiliates, is referred to as Fortissimo) acquisition of a significant equity stake in our company (in connection with our private investment in public equity (PIPE) agreements with Fortissimo), which acquisition was completed in April 2025. Pursuant to Fortissimo's shareholder agreement with us, Fortissimo is subject to certain standstill and voting limitations and a required advisory vote of our shareholders (other than Fortissimo and any shareholders affiliated with it) if it were to seek to acquire more than 24.99% of the outstanding ordinary shares of our company, which acquisition would be required to be accomplished by way of a special tender offer under Israeli law in which Fortissimo acquires at least 15% of our outstanding shares. While we do not currently have a shareholder rights plan in place, if our board of directors were to seek to reinstate such a plan, there is no guarantee that it would be legally upheld. The Israeli courts have not formally ruled on the legality of a shareholder rights plan or so-called "poison pill" under the Companies Law. On July 18, 2023, in the context of an interim procedural decision in a litigation initiated by Nano against our company, the court expressed its preliminary view that: it is inclined to rule that rights plans are permissible under Israeli law; the adoption of a rights plan by a board should be viewed "with suspicion"; and a board bears the burden of proving that it was informed, that it acted in good faith, that experts were consulted, and that it considered the interests of the company and its shareholders, rather than acting for the sake of entrenching itself, when adopting a shareholder rights plan. On December 19, 2023, the court issued an order noting that, from the parties' written submissions, it is appropriate to rule upon one critical question: whether, under Israeli law, a company can adopt a ‘poison pill'. However, the court never rendered such a ruling, as on July 1, 2024, following a request submitted by Nano, which was unopposed by our company, the court dismissed Nano's claim without prejudice. While the court's interim ruling opened the way for a potential final court ruling that our shareholder rights plan was valid and validly adopted (before it expired in December 2025), there can be no assurance that an Israeli court will determine that our board of directors actually meets the requisite burden of proof for upholding the validity of any future shareholder rights plan that we may adopt. In addition to a legal challenge to our shareholder rights plan, a shareholder or other third party may also launch, in the future, a hostile tender offer that may be similar to the Nano tender offer that it launched on May 25, 2023 and that expired (without any purchase of our ordinary shares) on July 31, 2023, pursuant to which any such shareholder or other third party may seek to acquire our ordinary shares which, together with any ordinary shares that it already owns, may represent a majority or, even if less than a majority, a significant percentage of the outstanding ordinary shares. Nano had furthermore followed up on its uncompleted tender offer by announcing on December 23, 2023 a preliminary proposal to purchase all outstanding shares of our company that it did not then own for $16.50 per share in cash. Our board of directors acknowledged receipt of, and considered, Nano's offer, but ultimately determined not to proceed with any particular strategic transaction when exploring strategic alternatives for our company, instead opting in August 2024 to adopt a restructuring plan. There can be no assurances that any shareholder or other third party will not once again disregard a determination by our board of directors not to proceed with a coordinated transaction with it and instead attempt a hostile tender offer or other action to attempt to take over our company in a manner that our board of directors believes would not maximize shareholder value. Any major shareholder (as Nano did in 2023) may also utilize its rights pursuant to the provisions of the Companies Law to demand, as a greater-than 10% shareholder, to call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders at which the removal of some or all of our then-incumbent directors and the election of its nominees in their stead would be on the agenda. The relevant majority for approval of any such proposal would be an ordinary majority of shares represented in person or by proxy and voting at a general meeting, without excluding the shares of interested shareholders. If a major shareholder were to hold a substantial portion of our ordinary shares when doing so, its votes in favor of such a proposal would give it an advantage in having the proposal approved. To the extent that an Israeli court would invalidate any shareholder rights plan that we may have in place, or declare or provide any remedies to a hostile shareholder that facilitate, and thereby allow, such a shareholder to launch a tender offer that is similar to the Nano tender offer, that may result in that shareholder having an opportunity to attempt to become a majority or significant shareholder of our company. Such a shareholder would then have significant ability to impact the operations of Stratasys. Similarly, if any such hostile shareholder would succeed in replacing any of our directors, that would also give it significant influence over the management and policies of our company. Either or both of those outcomes would enable the hostile shareholder to influence the operations of our company for its own interests, which may be to the detriment of our public/minority shareholders. Such a shareholder could use its voting power, whether as a substantial (or even controlling) shareholder or on the Stratasys board, to significantly influence the policies of our company in a manner that benefits it and adversely impacts our company and our results of operations in a material way. Such a shareholder's possession of a substantial or controlling interest in Stratasys could also adversely impact trading in our ordinary shares and liquidity for our public/minority shareholders, potentially causing a decline in the value of public shareholders' investment in our company.

  • Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
    If additional goodwill, other intangible assets, or equity investments that we have recorded become impaired, we could have to take future charges against earnings

    As of December 31, 2025, the carrying value of all of our goodwill and other intangible assets was approximately $197.4 million compared to a carrying value of $205.3 million as of December 31, 2024. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, we are required to review goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. Intangible assets are generally amortized into earning based on their useful life, but are also reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. Assets that we carry on our balance sheet as equity investments are also reviewed for potential impairment when circumstances warrant. In the third quarter of 2025, we experienced a significant impairment charge, in an aggregate amount of $33.9 million, which was attributable to our equity investment in Ultimaker. That impairment resulted in a much larger GAAP loss for that quarter than what we had anticipated. Any further impairments to our goodwill, intangible assets or equity investments in the future could result in further significant charges against our earnings and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. For further information, please see Notes 8 and 9 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

  • Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
    The focused restructuring actions that we have implemented to streamline operations and enhance our go-to-market strategy have not yielded, thus far, and may not yield, in the short-term future, an increase to our revenues.

    Our focused restructuring program, announced in August 2024 and implemented in the periods that followed, attempted to counteract negative macroeconomic trends with greater efficiency on our part, including a downsize in our workforce by approximately 15% in the last four months of 2024 and a decision to focus on the highest growth potential use cases, products, materials and software solutions. While this restructuring program has enabled us to withstand challenging macro-economic conditions, by emphasizing operational efficiencies, execution and better profitability, thus far it has not yielded, and there is no guarantee that it will yield in the near term, an increase to our revenues. Ultimately, to a certain extent, we are impacted by the market for 3D printing generally and need that market to return to its prior trend of growth for our revenues to once again grow, which would also improve our other measures of operating performance. In the interim, we continue to monitor the situation, assessing further implications of the relatively stagnant period for 3D printing for our operations, supply chain, liquidity, cash flow and customer orders, in an effort to mitigate potential new adverse consequences should they arise. There is no guarantee as to when capital spending in the 3D printing industry will recover.

Read and Evaluate the RiskReserved for Ultimate MembersUpgrade

Risk Highlights Q4, 2025

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 14 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
53
+1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
1Risks added
0Risks removed
10Risks changed
Since Dec 2025
Number of Risk Changed
10
+3
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 1

Risk Word Cloud

if our product mix shifts too far into lower margin products or our revenues mix shifts significantly towards our am services business, our profitability could be reduced.our revenues mix shifts significantlyglobal interruptions and delays involving freight carriers and other third parties have adversely impacted, and may once again adversely impact our supply chain and distribution network, and, consequently, frustrate our ability to sell our 3d printing systems, especially those systems that are based on newly acquired technologies that we have recently launched.adversely impact our supply chainif we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets or know-how, such proprietary information may be used by others to compete against us, for instance, in developing consumables that could be used with our printing systems in place of our proprietary consumables.confidentiality of our trade secretscalculating our income tax rate is complex and subject to uncertainty. we are currently eligible for israeli government tax benefits in respect of our israeli operations. if we do not meet several conditions for receipt of those benefits, or if the israeli government otherwise decides to eliminate those benefits, they may be terminated or reduced, which would impact our income tax rate and increase our costs.calculating our income tax rateif we are unable to obtain patent protection for our products or to otherwise protect our intellectual property rights, our business could suffer.unable to obtain patent protectionthe focused restructuring actions that we have implemented to streamline operations and enhance our go-to-market strategy have not yielded, thus far, and may not yield, in the short-term future, an increase to our revenues.enhance our go-to-market strategydefects in new products or in enhancements to our existing products could give rise to product returns or product liability, warranty or other claims that could result in material expenses, diversion of management time and attention, and damage to our reputation.give rise to product returnssignificant cybersecurity disruptions of our information technology systems or breaches of our data security could adversely affect our business.breaches of our data securitycalculating our income tax rate is complex and subject to uncertainty. we are currently eligible for israeli government tax benefits in respect of our israeli operations. if we do not meet several conditions for receipt of those benefits, or if the israeli government otherwise decides to eliminate those benefits, they may be terminated or reduced, which would impact our income tax rate and increase our costs.impact our income tax ratewe may experience significant delays or obstacles to realizing the success of our product offerings.success of our product offerings

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 53

Share Price & Shareholder Rights8 | 15.1%
  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1Changed
    Potential hostile actions by a shareholder or other third party, including a potential unsolicited tender offer, or a potential attempt to remove and replace our directors with its own nominees, as occurred in the recent past, could materially adversely impact our shareholders' investment in our company and could also strain our cash resources.

    We have in the recent past been subject to litigation in Israel and other hostile actions initiated by our shareholder, Nano Dimension Ltd., or Nano, which challenged the validity, under Israeli law, of our then-current limited-duration shareholder rights plan, which expired on December 19, 2025. Our shareholder rights plan was designed to give all shareholders (other than an offeror) a way to voice their position directly to our board of directors on certain types of offers and whether the plan should apply to those offers, and in other circumstances, to exempt an offer from the applicability of the rights altogether. We agreed to an exemption from the applicability of our former shareholder rights plan for Fortissimo Capital's (which, together with its affiliates, is referred to as Fortissimo) acquisition of a significant equity stake in our company (in connection with our private investment in public equity (PIPE) agreements with Fortissimo), which acquisition was completed in April 2025. Pursuant to Fortissimo's shareholder agreement with us, Fortissimo is subject to certain standstill and voting limitations and a required advisory vote of our shareholders (other than Fortissimo and any shareholders affiliated with it) if it were to seek to acquire more than 24.99% of the outstanding ordinary shares of our company, which acquisition would be required to be accomplished by way of a special tender offer under Israeli law in which Fortissimo acquires at least 15% of our outstanding shares. While we do not currently have a shareholder rights plan in place, if our board of directors were to seek to reinstate such a plan, there is no guarantee that it would be legally upheld. The Israeli courts have not formally ruled on the legality of a shareholder rights plan or so-called "poison pill" under the Companies Law. On July 18, 2023, in the context of an interim procedural decision in a litigation initiated by Nano against our company, the court expressed its preliminary view that: it is inclined to rule that rights plans are permissible under Israeli law; the adoption of a rights plan by a board should be viewed "with suspicion"; and a board bears the burden of proving that it was informed, that it acted in good faith, that experts were consulted, and that it considered the interests of the company and its shareholders, rather than acting for the sake of entrenching itself, when adopting a shareholder rights plan. On December 19, 2023, the court issued an order noting that, from the parties' written submissions, it is appropriate to rule upon one critical question: whether, under Israeli law, a company can adopt a ‘poison pill'. However, the court never rendered such a ruling, as on July 1, 2024, following a request submitted by Nano, which was unopposed by our company, the court dismissed Nano's claim without prejudice. While the court's interim ruling opened the way for a potential final court ruling that our shareholder rights plan was valid and validly adopted (before it expired in December 2025), there can be no assurance that an Israeli court will determine that our board of directors actually meets the requisite burden of proof for upholding the validity of any future shareholder rights plan that we may adopt. In addition to a legal challenge to our shareholder rights plan, a shareholder or other third party may also launch, in the future, a hostile tender offer that may be similar to the Nano tender offer that it launched on May 25, 2023 and that expired (without any purchase of our ordinary shares) on July 31, 2023, pursuant to which any such shareholder or other third party may seek to acquire our ordinary shares which, together with any ordinary shares that it already owns, may represent a majority or, even if less than a majority, a significant percentage of the outstanding ordinary shares. Nano had furthermore followed up on its uncompleted tender offer by announcing on December 23, 2023 a preliminary proposal to purchase all outstanding shares of our company that it did not then own for $16.50 per share in cash. Our board of directors acknowledged receipt of, and considered, Nano's offer, but ultimately determined not to proceed with any particular strategic transaction when exploring strategic alternatives for our company, instead opting in August 2024 to adopt a restructuring plan. There can be no assurances that any shareholder or other third party will not once again disregard a determination by our board of directors not to proceed with a coordinated transaction with it and instead attempt a hostile tender offer or other action to attempt to take over our company in a manner that our board of directors believes would not maximize shareholder value. Any major shareholder (as Nano did in 2023) may also utilize its rights pursuant to the provisions of the Companies Law to demand, as a greater-than 10% shareholder, to call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders at which the removal of some or all of our then-incumbent directors and the election of its nominees in their stead would be on the agenda. The relevant majority for approval of any such proposal would be an ordinary majority of shares represented in person or by proxy and voting at a general meeting, without excluding the shares of interested shareholders. If a major shareholder were to hold a substantial portion of our ordinary shares when doing so, its votes in favor of such a proposal would give it an advantage in having the proposal approved. To the extent that an Israeli court would invalidate any shareholder rights plan that we may have in place, or declare or provide any remedies to a hostile shareholder that facilitate, and thereby allow, such a shareholder to launch a tender offer that is similar to the Nano tender offer, that may result in that shareholder having an opportunity to attempt to become a majority or significant shareholder of our company. Such a shareholder would then have significant ability to impact the operations of Stratasys. Similarly, if any such hostile shareholder would succeed in replacing any of our directors, that would also give it significant influence over the management and policies of our company. Either or both of those outcomes would enable the hostile shareholder to influence the operations of our company for its own interests, which may be to the detriment of our public/minority shareholders. Such a shareholder could use its voting power, whether as a substantial (or even controlling) shareholder or on the Stratasys board, to significantly influence the policies of our company in a manner that benefits it and adversely impacts our company and our results of operations in a material way. Such a shareholder's possession of a substantial or controlling interest in Stratasys could also adversely impact trading in our ordinary shares and liquidity for our public/minority shareholders, potentially causing a decline in the value of public shareholders' investment in our company.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
    Your rights and responsibilities as a shareholder are governed by Israeli law, which differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies.

    We are organized under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our amended and restated articles of association and Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in typical U.S.-based corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at the general meeting of shareholders on matters such as amendments to a company's articles of association, increases in a company's authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and interested party transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a shareholder who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or executive officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company. There is limited case law available to assist us in understanding the implications of these provisions that govern shareholders' actions. These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
    Provisions of Israeli law may delay, prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, our company, which could prevent a change of control, even when the terms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders.

    Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to such types of transactions. For example, a merger may not be consummated unless at least 50 days have passed from the date on which a merger proposal is filed by each merging company with the Israel Registrar of Companies and at least 30 days have passed from the date on which the shareholders of both merging companies have approved the merger. In addition, a majority of each class of securities of the target company must approve a merger. Moreover, a tender offer for all of a company's issued and outstanding shares can only be completed if the acquirer receives positive responses from the holders of at least 95% of the issued share capital. Completion of the tender offer also requires approval of a majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in the tender offer, unless, following consummation of the tender offer, the acquirer would hold at least 98% of the company's outstanding shares. Furthermore, the shareholders, including those who indicated their acceptance of the tender offer, may, at any time within six months following the completion of the tender offer, petition an Israeli court to alter the consideration for the acquisition, unless the acquirer stipulated in its tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek such appraisal rights. Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders whose country of residence does not have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example, Israeli tax law does not recognize tax-free share exchanges to the same extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers, Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral in certain circumstances but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfillment of a number of conditions, including a holding period of two years from the date of the transaction during which sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are subject to certain restrictions. Moreover, with respect to certain share swap transactions, the tax deferral is limited in time, and when such time expires, the tax becomes payable even if no disposition of the shares has occurred. These and other similar provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition of our company or our merger with another company, even if such an acquisition or merger would be beneficial to us or to our shareholders.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4
    It may be difficult to enforce a U.S. judgment against us and our officers and directors in Israel or the United States, or to serve process on our officers and directors.

    We are organized in Israel. Most of our officers and most of our directors (as of December 31, 2025) reside outside of the United States, and a majority of our assets are located outside of the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us or any of our executive officers and directors in the United States, including one based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult for you to effect service of process on these persons in the United States or to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions instituted in Israel.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5
    The market price of our ordinary shares may be subject to fluctuation, regardless of our operating results and financial condition. As a result, our shareholders could incur substantial losses.

    The market price of our ordinary shares since the Stratasys, Inc.- Objet Ltd. merger has been subject to substantial fluctuation. From the start of 2020 through the early part of 2026 (through February 17, 2026), our ordinary shares have traded with closing prices that have ranged from $6.16 to $54.37, which low price was recorded during 2024, evidencing a trend towards the weakening of our share price during the last two-plus fiscal years, although it rebounded beginning later in 2024. The price of our ordinary shares may continue to be subject to substantial fluctuation regardless of our operating results or financial condition due to a number of factors, including, among others: - the extent of growth of the 3D printing market generally;- changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;- developments involving our company and/or other companies in the 3D printing industry;- development of new competitive systems and services by others;- success or failure of research and development projects of our company or our competitors;- developments concerning our or our competitors' intellectual property rights;- successes or failures of the acquisitions or dispositions that we consummate, as perceived by financial or industry analysts;- the general tendency towards volatility in the market prices of shares of technology companies; and - general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance. These factors and any corresponding price fluctuations may materially and adversely affect the market price of our ordinary shares and result in substantial losses being incurred by our shareholders. Market prices for securities of technology companies historically have been very volatile. The market for these securities has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of any one company. In the past, following periods of market volatility, public company shareholders have often instituted securities class action litigation, as was the case in February and March, 2015, when class actions of our shareholders, alleging violations of the Exchange Act, were initiated against the Company and certain of our officers as defendants. Any such additional securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert the resources and attention of our management from our business.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 6
    Raising additional capital by issuing securities or issuing securities pursuant to acquisitions of other companies or technologies may cause dilution to our shareholders, and may furthermore be difficult under certain market conditions.

    We may need or desire to raise additional substantial capital in the future. Most recently, in April 2025, we completed a PIPE transaction with Fortissimo Capital, whereby we raised $120 million and Fortissimo Capital acquired 11,650,485 newly-issued ordinary shares at a price of $10.30 per share, which reflected a premium of 10.6% over the closing market price of the ordinary shares on January 31, 2025, the last trading day before the agreement was signed. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, among others: - the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies (as we did in acquiring Origin in December 2020, RPS in February 2021, Xaar 3D in November 2021, Riven in 2022, Covestro AG in April 2023, Arevo's technology portfolio in March 2024, key assets and operations of Forward AM Technologies GmbH in May 2025, and assets (including the IP portfolio) of Nexa3D in June 2025) and other strategic relationships;- our degree of success in capturing a larger portion of additive manufacturing demand;- the costs of establishing or acquiring sales, marketing and distribution capabilities for our products;- the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our issued patents and defending intellectual property-related claims; and - the costs of financing unanticipated working capital requirements and responding to competitive pressures. We may also desire to issue additional shares in the future as consideration for the acquisition of other companies or technologies. If we raise funds or pay for acquisitions of other entities by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, it will reduce the percentage ownership of our then-existing shareholders, and the holders of such new securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those possessed by our then-existing shareholders. If such fundraising or share issuance in a transaction is being conducted at an effective price or valuation per ordinary share that is lower than the price per share at which our existing shareholders acquired their ordinary shares, it would be dilutive to those shareholders. Our ability to raise money by offering and selling our shares in a private or public offering, or to use our shares as consideration in an acquisition or other transaction, may be hurt if the market price of our ordinary shares is low, and even if we succeed at effecting such an offering or other transaction, that could further dilute our existing shareholders.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 7
    The market price of our ordinary shares has experienced significant decline over time, and we cannot guarantee when and whether it will recover, which could have adverse consequences for our company and our shareholders.

    The market price for our ordinary shares, which had declined significantly from its all-time high in periods following the Stratasys, Inc.- Objet Ltd. merger and had vacillated in recent years, including in 2023 due to potential merger and acquisition activity, fell over the course of 2024 to all-time lows before slowly recovering towards the end of 2024. We cannot guarantee when and whether our share price will return to its previous levels, as that is dependent on numerous factors, including factors that are beyond our control and unrelated to our results of operations and financing condition, such as the health of the 3D printing industry as a whole and the state of the U.S. capital markets more generally. Should our share price remain at relatively low levels, that would adversely impact our ability to raise funds in the capital markets or to utilize our securities as payment in a value-adding acquisition or other strategic transaction. It could also cause us to be vulnerable to an undesirable, hostile takeover attempt that could benefit an acquirer to the detriment of our public/minority shareholders, who would not receive fair consideration or a control premium for their ordinary shares.

  • Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 8
    There are risks associated with our share repurchase program.

    Our board of directors approved our current share repurchase program in September 2024, under which we can repurchase up to $50 million of our outstanding ordinary shares. Under the new program, purchases can be made by way of a variety of methods, including open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, all in accordance with U.S. securities laws and regulations, including Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act. Our share repurchase program may reduce the public float of shares available for trading on a daily basis, and may cause volatility in the price of our ordinary shares. Our repurchases may be limited, suspended, or terminated at any time without prior notice. There can be no assurance that we will repurchase any specific amount of ordinary under our share repurchase program or that any repurchases will have a positive impact on our share price or profitability. Important factors that could cause us to discontinue or decrease our share repurchases include, among others, unfavorable market conditions, the market price of our ordinary shares, the nature of other investment or strategic opportunities presented to us, the rate of dilution of our equity compensation programs, our ability to make appropriate, timely, and beneficial decisions as to when, how, and whether to purchase shares under the share repurchase program, the tax consequences of any repurchases (including the potential impact of the 1% excise tax on certain share repurchases), and the availability of funds necessary to continue purchasing shares. By reducing our outstanding share capital, our share repurchase plan may furthermore enable an opportunistic significant shareholder to more easily accumulate a controlling stake in our company, without having to purchase as many shares from public shareholders and without having to pay a control premium (assuming that, as is the case currently, we do not then have a shareholder rights plan in effect to effectively prevent such an accumulation). Furthermore, if we curtail or suspend our repurchase program, our share price may be negatively affected.

See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment. They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result. It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process. Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”. Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report. According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing. You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector. Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements. A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below. 1. Financial & Corporate Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results. Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing. Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments. Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances. 2. Legal & Regulatory Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company. Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation. Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy. Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives. 3. Production Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory. Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers. Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls. Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation. 4. Technology & Innovation Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development. Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology. Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks. Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying. 5. Ability to Sell Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers. Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes. Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration. Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation. 6. Macro & Political Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions. Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19. International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company. Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.