Beneficient (BENF) Risk Analysis

As discussed above, effective December 15, 2025, the Company effected the 2025 Reverse Stock Split at a ratio of eight (8) to one (1) and a simultaneous proportionate reduction in the authorized shares of each class of its Class A common stock and Class B common stock as required by NRS Section 78.207. Although we believe that a higher market price of our Class A common stock resulting from the Reverse Stock Split may help generate greater or broader investor interest, there can be no assurance that such higher market price will attract new investors, including institutional investors. Additionally, it cannot be assured that the 2025 Reverse Stock Split will result in any sustained proportionate increase in the market price of our Class A common stock, which is dependent upon many factors, including our business and financial performance, general market conditions and prospects for future success, which are unrelated to the number of shares of our Class A common stock outstanding. It is not uncommon for the market price of a company's common stock to decline in the period following a reverse stock split. If the market price of our Class A common stock falls below $1.00 per share for a period of at least 30 trading days, our Class A common stock may be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market.

On November 4, 2025, our former Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO, Brad K. Heppner was indicted by the United States Southern District of New York charging Mr. Heppner with various counts comprised of securities fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud, false statements to auditors, and falsification of records. As previously disclosed, Beneficient parted ways with Mr. Heppner earlier this year promptly after the Company learned of credible evidence of his fraud on the Company and others. The Company will continue to vigorously pursue its own potential claims against Mr. Heppner and entities associated with him on behalf of its shareholders. The Company has and will continue to cooperate with the government's investigation of Mr. Heppner. Although the Company is not a party to this case, the ongoing matter has resulted in negative publicity and may impact the willingness of our customers and other parties to transact business with us, which could adversely affect our reputation, operations and financial condition. In addition, if the case is decided against Mr. Heppner, Mr. Heppner could be considered a "bad actor" under federal securities laws, and as a result, the Company may be unable to utilize certain exemptions for private securities sales, which could negatively impact the ability of the Company to raise capital and conduct its ordinary course liquidity transactions.

The businesses that AltAccess Securities conducts is limited by its agreements with, and its oversight by, FINRA, other regulatory authorities and federal and state law. Currently, AltAccess Securities is permitted to only conduct private placements of securities and if it has the appropriate licensed persons, investment banking-related activities. Participation in new business lines, including trading of new products, often requires governmental and/or regulatory approvals, which may take significant time and resources, and is generally negatively affected by adverse litigation, bankruptcy and similar events involving its affiliates, including the Company. As a result, AltAccess Securities may be prevented from entering new businesses that may be profitable in a timely manner, if at all.

Our broker-dealer business is subject to uncertainties that are common in the securities industry. These uncertainties include, among others: - intense competition in the securities industry;- the volatility of domestic and international financial, bond and stock markets, including changing interest rates;- extensive or changing governmental regulation;- regulatory exams, investigations and enforcement proceedings, investor complaints and civil litigation; and - substantial fluctuations in the volume and price level of securities. As a result of such uncertainties, the revenues and operating results of AltAccess Securities may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year. Unfavorable financial or economic conditions could reduce the number and size of transactions in which we provide services. Disruptions in fixed income and equity markets and changes in interest rates could lead to a decline in the volume of transactions executed for customers and, therefore, to declines in revenues from transactions.

We offer broker-dealer services to the Company through a subsidiary of Ben Markets, AltAccess Securities. We expect that operational efficiencies created by having an in-house broker-dealer will allow us to streamline our ExAlt Plan liquidity transactions and reduce certain transaction and other third-party costs, although, there is no assurance that this will occur. The broker-dealer industry is heavily regulated and has regulatory and business barriers to entry. Entering into the broker-dealer business subjects us to additional laws and regulations and involves additional risks, including risks relating to regulatory oversight and examinations and increased risks of enforcement proceedings and litigation. Although certain of our directors and management have experience operating and advising broker-dealer businesses, we have limited experience in operating a subsidiary broker-dealer to help the Company issue its securities, which enhances these risks. To the extent we expand our broker-dealer business, particularly if we expand our broker-dealer business to serve third parties in addition to our subsidiaries and affiliates, it could involve a number of risks, including risk of denial or delay in regulatory approval, the required investment of capital and other resources, increasing demands on our operational and management systems and controls, the diversion of management's attention from our core business, risks when dealing with third-parties (based on their actions, omissions or disclosures), and our ability to implement an effective marketing strategy to promote awareness of and sell our broker-dealer products, including in conjunction with our ExAlt Plan. There can be no assurance that our entrance into, and ongoing efforts involving, the broker-dealer market will be successful. The regulatory environment in which our broker-dealer business operates is continually evolving, and the level of financial regulation to which we are subject has generally increased in recent years, which generally results in increased costs of compliance and operations. Regulators have adopted, proposed to adopt, and may in the future adopt regulations that could impact the manner in which we will market products and services, conduct compliance and operations, interact with regulators and manage our business. Our broker-dealer is also not a full-service broker-dealer and pursuant to its agreement with FINRA conducts only private placements of securities and if it in the future has the appropriately licensed persons, it may also conduct investment banking-related activities. If our broker-dealer business does not generate sufficient revenue, source a sufficient number or type of investors or purchasers, or provide expected efficiencies and third-party cost reduction, or if we are unable to efficiently manage the existing and future regulatory environment, or our existing or expanded operations, our business and financial condition will be adversely affected.

Our ability to issue shares of our Class A common stock to provide liquidity for holders of alternative assets are subject to Nasdaq's listing rules and stockholder approvals may be required for (a) certain issuances of equity in connection with the acquisition of stock or assets of another company or (b) any transaction for cash that is not considered a public offering (as defined in Nasdaq listing rules). Shareholder approval is required prior to the issuance of securities in connection with the acquisition of the stock or assets of another company if: (1) where, due to the present or potential issuance of common stock, including shares issued pursuant to an earn-out provision or similar type of provision, or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, other than a public offering for cash: (A) the common stock has or will have upon issuance voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance of stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock; or (B) the number of shares of common stock to be issued is or will be equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding before the issuance of the stock or securities; or (2) any director, officer or substantial shareholder of the Company (as defined in the Nasdaq listing rules) has a 5% or greater interest (or such persons collectively have a 10% or greater interest), directly or indirectly, in the Company or assets to be acquired or in the consideration to be paid in the transaction or series of related transactions and the present or potential issuance of common stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, could result in an increase in outstanding common shares or voting power of 5% or more. For transactions other than public offerings, Nasdaq also requires stockholder approval prior to the issuance or potential issuance of common stock (or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock) at a price per share that is less than the "Minimum Price" if the issuance (together with sales by our officers, directors and substantial shareholders (as defined in Nasdaq listing rules)) would equal 20% or more of our Class A common stock outstanding before the first issuance in the transaction. Under Nasdaq rules, the "Minimum Price" means a price that is the lower of (i) the closing price of our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market immediately preceding the signing of the binding agreement; or (ii) the average closing price of our Class A common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market for the five trading days immediately preceding the signing of the binding agreement. If we are required to seek stockholder approval for our liquidity transactions, it would require substantial resources and could delay such transactions, which may materially and adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan, and there is no guarantee our stockholders ultimately would approve a proposed transaction. We have been notified by Nasdaq that based on the Company's non-compliance with the Bid Price and the Company's non-compliance with the Periodic Filing Requirement, the Company's securities were subject to delisting. The Company subsequently requested a hearing before the Panel to appeal such delisting determination, which was held on August 26, 2025. The Panel granted the Company an extension to regain compliance with the Bid Price Requirement and the Periodic Filing Requirement. Although the Company is taking definitive steps to evidence compliance with all applicable criteria for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to timely regain compliance with the Periodic Filing Requirement and the Bid Price Requirement within the extension period granted by the Panel. If we are delisted from Nasdaq, our securities may be eligible for trading on an over-the-counter market. If we are not able to obtain a listing on another stock exchange or quotation service for our securities, we may not be able to utilize our securities as consideration in our liquidity transactions. See the risk factor titled "We have been notified by Nasdaq of our failure to comply with certain continued listing requirements and, if we are unable to regain compliance with all applicable continued listing requirements and standards of Nasdaq, our Class A common stock could be delisted from Nasdaq" for more information.

Historically, we have been dependent upon the services of John Stahl, an individual who, prior to our receipt of the operating TEFFI charter in Kansas, served as trustee of most of our Customer ExAlt Trusts, excluding the custody trusts that are Delaware statutory trusts, which are trusts with the Delaware Trust Company serving as trustee. Mr. Stahl continued to serve as trustee of the Customer ExAlt Trusts established in our formative transactions until July 7, 2024, at which point BFF began the process of accepting such trusts as the successor trustee. BFF completed the trust acceptance process for certain trusts on each of September 19, 2024 and November 1, 2024 and, as such, currently serves as successor trustee of all of the Customer ExAlt Trusts, excluding the custody trusts that are Delaware statutory trusts, for which the Delaware Trust Company continues to serve as trustee. Previously, we replaced Mr. Stahl as trustee on certain other trusts, and BFF was appointed as trustee of the Customer ExAlt Trusts following the receipt of BFF's TEFFI charter. Accordingly, BFF will be, subject to fiduciary duties and other restrictions included in our trust agreements and as a matter of law, as a trustee, BFF will have broad discretion and authority to take actions permitted by the trust agreements and applicable law. Accordingly, decisions made by BFF could materially affect our business and the assets held in such trusts. It is impossible to determine how these decisions may affect the value of the Company and therefore our securities.

Since becoming a public company, we have issued shares of our Class A common stock and various series of our convertible preferred stock as consideration in our liquidity financing transactions. To the extent the Customer ExAlt Trusts utilize our Class A common stock or securities convertible into Class A common stock as consideration for investments in alternative asset funds, our investment income and the price of Class A common stock may become more volatile. In the event the value of our securities becomes a larger portion of the total assets of the alternative asset funds with which we transact, distributions from such funds may be affected by changes in value of our Class A common stock. As a result, while an increase in the price of our Class A common stock may result in additional distributions and investment income to us as a result of an increase in the aggregate value of the assets held by alternative asset funds with which we transact, a decline in our Class A common stock price could result in significant decreases in the aggregate value of the assets held by such alternative asset funds with which we transact, resulting in fewer distributions to us and/or a decrease in investment income, which could even further depress the trading price of our Class A common stock.

If the Company calls the Public Warrants for redemption after the redemption criteria described elsewhere in Annual Report on Form 10-K have been satisfied, we have the option to require any holder that wishes to exercise their Public Warrants to do so on a "cashless basis." If the Company's management chooses to require holders to exercise their Public Warrants on a cashless basis, the number of Class A common stock received by a holder upon exercise will be fewer than it would have been had such holder exercised the Public Warrant for cash. This will have the effect of reducing the potential "upside" of the holder's investment in the Company.

We have the ability to redeem the outstanding Warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.80 per Warrant, if, among other things, the Reference Value equals or exceeds $1,440.00 per share (as adjusted for adjustments to the number of shares issuable upon exercise or the exercise price of a Warrant as described in Exhibit 4.3.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K). If and when the Warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. As a result, we may redeem the Warrants listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (the "Public Warrants") as set forth above even if the holders are otherwise unable to exercise the Warrants. Redemption of the outstanding Warrants as described above could force holders to (i) exercise your Warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for holders to do so, (ii) sell the Warrants at the then-current market price when holders might otherwise wish to hold the Warrants or (iii) accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding Warrants are called for redemption, we expect would be substantially less than the market value of the Warrants. None of the warrants issued by Avalon in a private placement completed in connection with Avalon's initial public offering, which were assumed in connection with the closing of the Business Combination, will be redeemable by us so long as they are held by our sponsor or their permitted transferees. In addition, we have the ability to redeem the outstanding Warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $8.00 per Warrant if, among other things, the Reference Value equals or exceeds $800.00 per share (as adjusted for adjustments to the number of shares issuable upon exercise or the exercise price of a Warrants). In such a case, the holders will be able to exercise their Warrants prior to redemption for a number of shares of Class A common stock determined based on the redemption date and the fair market value of Class A common stock. The value received upon exercise of the Warrants (1) may be less than the value the holders would have received if they had exercised their Warrants at a later time where the underlying share price is higher and (2) may not compensate the holders for the value of the Warrants, including because the number of common stock received is capped at 0.361 shares of Class A common stock per Warrant (subject to adjustment) irrespective of the remaining life of the Warrants.

As of the date of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company has issued shares of its Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock pursuant to their respective certificates of designation. Beneficient's board of directors has the power, subject to applicable law, to issue additional series of preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of the series, impede the completion of a merger, tender offer or other takeover attempt, including Series A and Series B preferred stock. For instance, subject to applicable law, a series of preferred stock or other securities may impede a business combination by including class voting rights, which would enable the holder or holders of such series to block a proposed transaction. Furthermore, Beneficient's subsidiaries could also issue securities. Beneficient's board of directors will make any determination to issue shares of preferred stock based on its judgment as to our and our stockholders' best interests. Beneficient's board of directors, in so acting, could issue shares of preferred stock having terms which could discourage an acquisition attempt or other transaction that some, or a majority, of the stockholders may believe to be in their best interests or in which stockholders would have received a premium for their stock over the then-prevailing market price of the stock.

The Charter requires, unless Beneficient consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, that (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on Beneficient's behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee to Beneficient or its stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against Beneficient, our directors, officers or employees arising pursuant to any provision of NRS Chapters 78 or 92A or the Charter or Bylaws, (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Charter or Bylaws, and any action asserting a claim against us, our directors, officers or employees governed by the internal affairs doctrine may be brought only in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada. In the event that the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada does not have jurisdiction over any such action, then any other state district court located in the State of Nevada shall be the exclusive forum for such action. In the event that no state district court in the State of Nevada has jurisdiction over any such action, then a federal court located within the State of Nevada shall be the exclusive forum for such action. Although we believe this provision benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Nevada law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, the provision may limit a stockholder's ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our stockholders are not be deemed to have waived our compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and the Charter provides that the exclusive forum provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.

Since becoming a public company, Beneficient has in the past and expects in the future to issue additional capital stock. Such issuances result in dilution to all other stockholders. In the future, Beneficient may issue additional stock, including as a part of its ordinary course of business of financing liquidity transactions, as a grant of equity awards to employees, directors and consultants under our equity incentive plans, to raise capital through equity financings or to acquire or make investments in companies, products or technologies for which we may issue equity securities to pay for such acquisition or investment. Any such issuances of additional capital stock may cause stockholders to experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the per share value of Class A common stock to decline. Additionally, as part of our business plan, our subsidiaries including Ben LLC and BCH may issue additional securities, which would be structurally senior to Beneficient common stock, which could have a dilutive effect.

Prior to the Business Combination, there was no public market for Class A common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in us will lead to the development of a trading market on Nasdaq or otherwise, how liquid that market might become, nor how long, such an active trading market, to the extent it does develop, will last. If an active market does not develop or develops only for a limited time, you may have difficulty selling any Class A common stock. An inactive market may also impair Beneficient's ability to raise capital by selling Class A common stock and may impair our ability to acquire or make investments in companies, products or technologies for which we may issue equity securities to pay for such acquisition or investment. We have been notified by Nasdaq that based on the Company's non-compliance with the Bid Price and the Periodic Filing Requirement, the Company's securities were subject to delisting. As described above, the Panel granted the Company an extension to regain compliance with the Bid Price Requirement and the Periodic Filing Requirement. Although the Company is taking definitive steps to evidence compliance with all applicable criteria for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to timely regain compliance with the Periodic Filing Requirement and the Bid Price Requirement within the extension period granted by the Panel. See the risk factor titled "We have been notified by Nasdaq of our failure to comply with certain continued listing requirements and, if we are unable to regain compliance with all applicable continued listing requirements and standards of Nasdaq, our Class A common stock could be delisted from Nasdaq" for more information.

The trading market for Beneficient securities is influenced by the research and reports that any industry or securities analysts may publish about Beneficient, its business, market or competitors. Securities and industry analysts may never engage in, or may discontinue, research on Beneficient. If no securities or industry analysts cover Beneficient, Beneficient's share price and trading volume would likely be negatively impacted. If any of the analysts covering the Company change their recommendation regarding Class A common stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about its competitors, the price of Class A common stock would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover the Company were to cease coverage or fail to regularly publish reports, the Company could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause its share price or trading volume to decline.

The Company is party to the Stockholders Agreement, which provides that, among other things, BHI, an entity directly owned by The Highland Business Holdings Trust, of which Mr. Heppner, our former CEO, is the trustee and his family are the beneficiaries, has the right to designate up to three individuals to serve on the Board, depending on the size of the Board. On June 19, 2025, Mr. Heppner resigned from his position as CEO and Chairman of the Board. As a result, at the next annual meeting of stockholders, if Mr. Heppner determines to nominate candidates for election to our board, the Company could become involved in a proxy contest. A proxy contest with Mr. Heppner for the election of directors could result in the Company incurring substantial costs, including proxy solicitation, public relations and legal fees. Further, such a proxy contest could divert the time and attention of our Board and management from our business, interfere with our ability to execute our strategic plan, give rise to perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, adversely affect our relationships with customers, investors, lenders, prospective and current employees and others, result in the loss of potential business opportunities or make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel. Furthermore, a proxy contest also could impact the market price and the volatility of our common stock.

Our former CEO, who served in such a role from inception of the Company through June 19, 2025, may face conflicts of interest as a result of (i) his equity interests in the Company and its subsidiaries and (ii) certain related party transactions between the Company and entities in which Mr. Heppner has a financial interest, including HCLP, an entity that has outstanding loans to the Company for which a notice of events of default was received on July 30, 2025, certain of each of which are structurally senior to the interests of the holders of our shares of Class A common stock. As of March 31, 2025, through BHI, an entity directly owned by The Highland Business Holdings Trust, of which Mr. Heppner, our former CEO, is the trustee and his family are the beneficiaries, Mr. Heppner beneficially owned approximately 92.6% of the Company's Class B common stock and held 20.4% of the total voting power of the Class A and Class B common stock based on the shares outstanding for each class of common stock as of that date. The Class B common stock is entitled to 10 votes per share on all matters on which stockholders are generally entitled to vote. Pursuant to our Charter, if the Class B Threshold is met, the (i) holders of shares of Class B common stock, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect that number of directors that constitutes 51% (rounded up to the nearest whole number) of the total number of authorized directors and (ii) holders of shares of Common Stock, voting as a single class, are entitled to elect all remaining directors that are not otherwise entitled to be elected by a series of preferred stock, but in no event shall they not be entitled to elect at least one director. Accordingly, so long as the Class B Threshold is met, holders of shares of Class A common stock only have the ability, voting together with the holders of the Class B common stock as a single class (with each holder of the Class B common stock having 10 votes per share of the Class B common stock), to vote on the election of a minority of the Board. If, on the applicable record date, the Class B Threshold is not met, then holders of Common Stock will vote together as a single class with respect to the election of all directors, with each holder of the Class B common stock having 10 votes per share of Class B common stock. This concentration of voting power may present a conflict of interest by delaying, deterring or preventing acts that would be favored by our other stockholders. Furthermore, through BHI, Mr. Heppner is an indirect holder of equity interests in our subsidiary, BCH, and, as of March 31, 2025, held 79.5% of the capital accounts of securities of BCH. Such holdings include BCH Preferred A-0 Unit Accounts, BCH Preferred A-1 Unit Accounts, BCH Class S Ordinary Units, BCH Class S Preferred Units, BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts and BCH FLP-3 Unit Accounts. Additionally, Hicks Holdings, an entity associated with Thomas O. Hicks, one of Ben's current directors, is one of the owners and serves as the manager of a limited liability company (the "SPV") in which BHI also has an ownership interest. The SPV holds BCH Preferred A-0 Unit Accounts and BCH Preferred A-1 Unit Accounts among its investment holdings. BHI is entitled to various payments and allocations as a result of its ownership of BCH securities. As a holder of the BCH Preferred A-0 Unit Accounts, BHI is entitled to receive quarterly guaranteed cash payments equal to 1.50% per fiscal quarter (or 6.0% per annum) of its BCH Preferred A-0 Unit Accounts capital account balance on an annual basis, subject to the terms of an agreement to defer delivery of such payments until November 15, 2024. As part of the proposed transactions to revise BCH's liquidation priority described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the guaranteed payment would be further deferred until November 15, 2025 on terms consistent with the deferral through November 15, 2024 if the proposed transactions are completed. As a result of the resignation of Brad K. Heppner, who controls BHI, from his role as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors on June 19, 2025, we do not expect the transaction to be consummated on the terms set forth in the Master Agreement. Accordingly, the Company is exploring available alternative options, including renegotiating terms or not proceeding with the transaction. Additionally, as a holder of the BCH Preferred A-1 Unit Accounts, BHI is entitled to (i) a quarterly preferred return equal to the hypothetical capital account balance of such BCH Preferred A-1 Unit Accounts multiplied by the most recent 90-Day Average Secured Overnight Financing Rate as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York prior to each fiscal quarter plus 0.5% (2.0% per annum) and allocable by a corresponding increase to the BCH Preferred A-1 Unit Accounts capital account, subject to an agreement to waive and defer the accrual of such payments that expired on December 31, 2024, (ii) tax distributions for any period in which there is an allocation of income related to the quarterly preferred return and (iii) allocations from sale proceeds of BCH in an amount up to its hypothetical BCH Preferred A-1 capital account. Furthermore, as a holder of BCH Class S Units, following certain allocations of income to the BCH Class S Units, the capital account balance associated with such BCH Class S Units shall be reduced by the amount so allocated and, in exchange, the holders shall be issued an equal number of BCH Class S Ordinary Units and BCH Class S Preferred Units equal to the amount of the reduction in the capital account divided by a price, which we refer to as the unit price, that will equal to the closing price of the Class A common stock on the primary exchange on which the shares of Class A common stock are listed on the date of such exchange or, if the Class A common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange, the closing price on the date of such exchange as quoted on the automated quotation system on which the Class A common stock is quoted. Such provisions result in the holders of the BCH Class S Ordinary Units and BCH Class S Preferred Units receiving additional limited partner interests in BCH as a result of the allocation of income of BCH while retaining the BCH Class S Units. In addition, BCH Class S Ordinary Units have the distribution and exchange features and rights as described in "Description of Securities – BCH Class S Ordinary Units," which is filed as Exhibit 4.11 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Holders of the BCH Class S Preferred Units are entitled to receive a quarterly preferred return (the "Quarterly Class S Preferred Unit Return") equal to the hypothetical capital account balance of such BCH Class S Preferred Units multiplied by the base rate and allocable by a corresponding increase to the BCH Class S Preferred Unit capital account. Pursuant to the terms of the previous BCH Seventh A&R LPA, the Quarterly Class S Preferred Unit Return is only allocable to the capital account for any quarterly period to the extent of the amount of income available to be allocated with respect to BCH Class S Preferred Units; provided that, amounts not allocated to the capital account during a given quarterly period as a result of insufficient income are added pro rata to a hypothetical BCH Class S Preferred Unit capital account for each holder and become allocable to the capital account in the next quarterly period of which sufficient income is available for allocation with respect to BCH Class S Preferred Units (with respect to the aggregate amounts so accrued as of any given date, such amount, the "Accrued Quarterly Class S Preferred Unit Return"). Holders of the BCH Class S Preferred Units are entitled to receive, following the allocation of certain excluded amounts pursuant to Section 5.04(c) of the BCH A&R LPA and certain other required allocations pursuant to Section 5.04(a) of the BCH A&R LPA, allocations until the Quarterly Class S Preferred Unit Return and any Accrued Quarterly Class S Preferred Unit Return have been allocated. The hypothetical BCH Class S Preferred Unit capital account is used for purposes of calculating the Quarterly Class S Preferred Unit Return and, as a result, increases in the hypothetical BCH Class S Preferred Unit capital account result in increased returns in the future. Holders of the BCH Class S Preferred Units are also entitled to receive allocations of sale proceeds of BCH in an amount up to their hypothetical BCH Class S Preferred Unit capital account, thereby increasing such holder's BCH Class S Preferred Unit capital account and resulting distributions. As a result, the hypothetical BCH Class S Preferred Unit capital balance represents a significant implicit value to any holder of the BCH Class S Preferred Units. As a holder of the BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts, BHI is also entitled to quarterly issuances of an equal amount of BCH Class S Ordinary Units and BCH Class S Preferred Units that in aggregate is equal to the income allocated to BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts pursuant to the BCH A&R LPA. BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts are allocated income equal to 50.5% of: (1) fifteen percent (15%) of the profits from financing activities of BCH and its subsidiaries, exclusive of profits from other activities such as fees or reimbursement of expenses in connection with trustee or custodial services and insurance and insurance-related activities (this will generally include revenues from Ben Liquidity subsidiaries), and (2) the Excess EBITDA Margin, which generally relates to the fee-generating businesses of Beneficient, exclusive of financing activity revenues. The Excess EBITDA Margin for an applicable entity is equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the revenues of BCH and its tax pass-through subsidiaries, excluding revenues from financing activities, and (ii) an amount of revenues that will cause the EBITDA of such entity divided by the gross revenues of such entity to equal 20% (this will generally include the subsidiaries of Ben Custody and Ben Insurance Services). BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts are also entitled to receive annual tax distributions. Such provisions result in BHI, as the holder of the BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts, receiving additional limited partner interests in BCH as a result of the allocation of income of BCH while retaining such BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts. For fiscal year 2024 and 2025, BHI did not receive any BCH S Ordinary Units or BCH S Preferred Units in connection with certain income allocations as a holder of the BCH FLP-1 Units Accounts. In addition, BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts are entitled to the allocation of a portion of any upward carrying value adjustment as calculated pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 704(b). Commencing with the effectiveness of the BCH Eighth A&R LPA on June 7, 2023, BMP, as the holder of the BCH FLP-2 Unit Accounts, is also entitled to receive an allocation of a portion of any upward carrying value adjustment as calculated pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 704(b). In the event of an upward carrying value adjustment, the BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts (50.5%) and the FLP-2 Unit Accounts (49.5%) are entitled to first be allocated gains associated with such carrying value adjustment equal to 15% of the value of the capital accounts of all Class A Units and Class S Units, calculated based on the post-adjusted capital accounts of the then outstanding Class A Units and Class S Units. Immediately following any such allocation, the amount allocated is converted in BCH Class S Ordinary Units at the unit price, which is determined by the closing price of a share of the Class A common stock on the primary exchange on which such shares are listed. The carrying value adjustments described above will be impacted by the proposed transactions to revise BCH's liquidation priority, if completed. We do not expect the transaction to be consummated on the terms set forth in the Master Agreement. Accordingly, the Company is exploring available alternative options, including renegotiating terms or not proceeding with the transaction. Additionally, as the holder of BCH FLP-3 Unit Accounts, BHI is entitled to quarterly tax and other distributions equal to 100% of the amount of profit allocated to BHI's BCH FLP-3 Unit Accounts capital account. BCH's obligations to make such distributions are not subject to available cash. BCH FLP-3 Unit Accounts are allocated profits from net financing revenues on a quarterly basis equal to the lesser of (i) 5% of the quarterly net financing revenues, or (ii) 10% of the average annualized stated interest (to the extent constituting net financing revenue) of the quarterly average of new ExAlt Loans issued by any subsidiaries of Beneficient during the previous twelve fiscal quarters. As of March 31, 2025, neither BHI nor Mr. Heppner held an interest in BMP, however, in the event that an employee forfeits their interest in BMP, BHI would hold such interest until they are reissued to a participant. As a result, BHI may occasionally hold the forfeited interests of a former employee in BMP. As the holder of BCH FLP-2 Unit Accounts, BMP is entitled to quarterly issuances of an equal amount of BCH Class S Ordinary Units and BCH Class S Preferred Units that in aggregate is equal to the income allocated to BCH FLP-2 Unit Accounts pursuant to the BCH A&R LPA. BCH FLP-2 Unit Accounts are allocated income equal to 49.5% of: (1) fifteen percent (15%) of the profits from financing activities of BCH and its subsidiaries, exclusive of profits from other activities such as fees or reimbursement of expenses in connection with trustee or custodial services and insurance and insurance-related activities (this will generally include revenues from Ben Liquidity subsidiaries), and (2) the Excess EBITDA Margin, which generally relates to the fee-generating businesses of Beneficient, exclusive of financing activity revenues. The Excess EBITDA Margin for an applicable entity is equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the revenues of BCH and its tax pass-through subsidiaries, excluding revenues from financing activities, and (ii) an amount of revenues that will cause the EBITDA of such entity divided by the gross revenues of such entity to equal 20% (this will generally include the subsidiaries of Ben Custody and Ben Insurance Services). BCH FLP-2 Unit Accounts are also entitled to receive annual tax distributions. Such provisions result in BMP, as the holder of the BCH FLP-2 Unit Accounts, and possibly BHI, receiving additional limited partner interests in BCH as a result of the allocation of income of BCH while retaining such BCH FLP-2 Unit Accounts. For FY2024 and FY2025, BMP did not receive any BCH S Ordinary Units or BCH S Preferred Units in connection with certain income allocations as a holder of the BCH FLP- 2 Units Accounts. In addition, commencing with the effectiveness of the BCH Eighth A&R LPA on June 7, 2023, BMP, as the holder of the BCH FLP-2 Unit Accounts, is also entitled to receive an allocation of a portion of any upward carrying value adjustment as calculated pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 704(b). In the event of an upward carrying value adjustment, the BCH FLP-1 Unit Accounts (50.5%) and the FLP-2 Unit Accounts (49.5%) are entitled to first be allocated gains associated with such carrying value adjustment equal to 15% of the value of the capital accounts of all Class A Units and Class S Units, calculated based on the post-adjusted capital accounts of the then outstanding Class A Units and Class S Units. Immediately following any such allocation, the amount allocated is converted in BCH Class S Ordinary Units at the unit price, which is determined by the closing price of a share of the Class A common stock on the primary exchange on which such shares are listed. Because the Company has a holding company structure, any equity securities the Company has issued or will issue, including our Class A common stock, Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock, are and will be structurally subordinated to interests in BCH, including those of creditors of and holders of certain equity interests in BCH. However, such structural subordination will be impacted, to a limited extent, by the transactions to revise BCH's liquidation priority, if completed. Such creditors include HCLP, which provided the Company with an events of default notice on July 30, 2025, that holds approximately $94.5 million in secured debt of BCH as of March 31, 2025, and the holders of such equity interests include BHI which holds preferred equity interests in BCH ranking senior to the equity interests the Company holds in BCH. Therefore, in any bankruptcy, liquidation or similar proceeding, all claims of creditors (including HCLP) of BCH will have priority over the Company's equity interests in BCH (and therefore the claims of the Class A common stock and any preferred stock the Company issues) with respect to the assets of BCH. In addition, the holders of the preferred equity interests in BCH, including BHI as described above, currently have, and may in the future have, priority over the Company's equity interests in BCH. These priority claims and interests may present a conflict of interest with respect to the interests of the Company and our stockholders with respect to the assets of BCH and its subsidiaries. Additionally, we have entered into certain related party transactions with entities in which Mr. Heppner has a financial interest, including the HCLP Loan Agreement, for which a notice of events of default was received on July 30, 2025. As of March 31, 2025, we had approximately $94.5 million of debt (including unamortized premium thereon), which is derived from BCH's secured loans with HCLP, an indirect subsidiary of Highland Consolidated, LP. The majority of HCLP is indirectly owned by The Highland Investment Holdings Trust, of which Mr. Heppner and his family are the beneficiaries. In addition to our payments on the principal balance of the HCLP Loan Agreement, pursuant to the terms of the HCLP Loan Agreement, we are required to make certain payments to HCLP for interest and fees. For the years ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, we have not made payments to HCLP for principal or interest payments under the terms of an agreement HCLP. We have also paid in the past, and may be required in the future to pay, extension fees to extend the maturity dates of the HCLP Loan Agreement. The HCLP Loan Agreement is collateralized by substantially all income producing assets of BCH, as well as the loans originated by the Customer ExAlt Trusts and custody trusts, excluding the ExAlt Participation Loans. If we do not raise enough capital to fully repay such obligations, HCLP's collateral interest will remain in place, and the value of the collateral security of the HCLP Loan Agreement may significantly exceed amounts owed under the HCLP Loan Agreement. In the event of default on the HCLP Loan Agreement, HCLP shall have the right to, among other things, transfer the collateral in the name of HCLP, enforce collection of the collateral or take possession or control of any proceeds of the collateral. As a result, the terms of repayment of the principal balance of the HCLP Loan Agreement and the additional interest and fee payments as well as HCLP's collateral interest in the assets of BCH may present conflicts of interests between Mr. Heppner, the Company and its stockholders. As noted above, the HCLP Loan purportedly matured on April 14, 2025, and on July 30, 2025, HCLP delivered written notice that events of default occurred with respect to the HCLP Loan Agreement. Due to the Company identifying credible evidence that Mr. Heppner participated in fabricating and delivering fake documents to the Company regarding his and others' relationships to HCLP, among other items, the Company is evaluating the validity of its obligations under the HCLP Loan Agreement and the liens securing the HCLP Loan and is considering all options that it may pursue related to this conduct, including litigation against Mr. Heppner, HCLP and any direct or indirect control parties of HCLP. See the Risk Factor entitled "The HCLP Loan Agreement is collateralized by all of the assets of BCH and the loans, excluding the ExAlt Participation Loans, originated by the Customer ExAlt Trusts and certain of the custody trusts, and the Term Loan under the HH-BDH Credit Agreement is collateralized by pledges of substantially all of the assets of Beneficient Financing, BCH's equity interests in Beneficient Financing, certain equity interests in the Custody Trust and certain deposit accounts" for additional information.

The Charter and Bylaws contain, and Nevada law contains, provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the bidder and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others, those establishing: - holders of our Class B common stock have the ability to elect the majority of the board of directors until the Class B Threshold is no longer met;- holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to 10 votes per share with respect to all matters on which stockholders generally are entitled to vote;- the inability of holders of our Class A common stock to call a special meeting;- authorizing the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;- prohibiting the use of cumulative voting for the election of directors;- removal of incumbent directors only by the vote of stockholders with not less than two-thirds of the voting power of the applicable class of our outstanding common stock;- requiring that our board of directors adopt a resolution in order to propose any amendment to our articles of incorporation before it may be considered for approval by our stockholders; and - requiring all actions of holders of Class A common stock to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders. The Stockholders Agreement also contains certain provisions that may prevent or delay attempts to acquire a controlling interest in Beneficient. These include the following provisions: - Beneficient has agreed not to authorize, approve or ratify certain matters without the approval of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of Class B common stock, including (but not limited to) certain actions related to Ben LLC, Beneficient, and the BCH A&R LPA, and certain additional issuances of shares of Class B common stock.

We have historically and plan to continue to offer our common equity, or a security convertible into our common equity, to provide our customers with liquidity as one of our primary product offerings. As customers decide whether to exchange their alternative investments for our stock, of primary concern will be whether the stock price is stable and whether there is sufficient public float and trading activity. If we have a low public float or a liquid trading market does not develop for Class A common stock, our stock will be more susceptible to volatility. This could limit the marketability of our stock, and potential customers may choose to not participate in our liquidity products or take advantage of our other services. We have been notified by Nasdaq that based on the Company's non-compliance with the Bid Price and the Periodic Filing Requirement, the Company's securities were subject to delisting. As described above, the Panel granted the Company an extension to regain compliance with the Bid Price Requirement and the Periodic Filing Requirement. Although the Company is taking definitive steps to evidence compliance with all applicable criteria for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to timely regain compliance with the Periodic Filing Requirement and the Bid Price Requirement within the extension period granted by the Panel. See the risk factor titled "We have been notified by Nasdaq of our failure to comply with certain continued listing requirements and, if we are unable to regain compliance with all applicable continued listing requirements and standards of Nasdaq, our Class A common stock could be delisted from Nasdaq" for more information.

The Company is an "emerging growth company," as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the "JOBS Act"). The Company could continue to be considered an emerging growth company for up to five years, although the Company would lose that status sooner if the Company's gross revenues exceed $1.235 billion, if it issues more than $1 billion in nonconvertible debt in a three-year period, or if the fair value of Class A common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter. For as long as the Company continues to be an emerging growth company, the Company may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that apply to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in the Company's periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. It is unclear whether investors will find Class A common stock less attractive because the Company may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find Class A common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for Class A common stock, and the Company's stock price may be more volatile. In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. The Company has elected to avail itself of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, while the Company is an emerging growth company, the Company will not be subject to new or revised accounting standards at the same time that they become applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. As a result, the Company's financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates, and the Company will incur additional costs in connection with complying with the accounting standards applicable to public companies at such time or times as they become applicable to the Company. Additionally, the Company is a "smaller reporting company" as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. The Company will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $250 million as of the prior September 30, or (2) our annual revenues exceeded $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior September 30. It is unclear whether investors will find Class A common stock less attractive because the Company may rely on these reduced disclosure requirements. If some investors find Class A common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for Class A common stock, and the Company's stock price may be more volatile. To the extent the Company takes advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.

The market price of Class A common stock has been, and may continue to be highly volatile, which may make it difficult for you to sell your shares at the volumes, prices and times desired. Some factors that may have a significant effect on the market price of Class A common stock include: - actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or those of our competitors;- changes in economic or business conditions;- changes in governmental regulation; and - publication of research reports about us, our competitors, or our industry, or changes in, or failure to meet, estimates made by securities analysts or ratings agencies of our financial and operating performance, or lack of research reports by industry analysts or ceasing of analyst coverage. During certain periods we have received, and may continue to receive, a high degree of media coverage that is published or otherwise disseminated by third parties, including blogs, articles, message boards and social and other media. This may include coverage that is not attributable to statements made by the Company or our Board of Directors. Information provided by third parties may not be reliable or accurate and could materially impact the trading price of our common stock which could cause stockholders to lose their investments.

We have registered for resale a significant amount of our Class A common stock pursuant to the SEPA, which could result in further substantial dilution and depressed trading prices of our Class A common stock. Pursuant to the SEPA, we may issue and sell up to $250 million of shares of Class A common stock to the Yorkville Investor. The price at which we may issue and sell shares may be at either (i) 95% of the daily VWAP of the Class A common stock for any period commencing on the receipt of the advance notice by the Yorkville Investor and ending on 4:00 p.m. on the applicable advance notice date ("Pricing Option 1") or (ii) 97% of the lowest daily VWAP of the Class A common stock during the three trading days following a notice to sell to the Yorkville Investor, provided that we are subject to certain caps on the amount of shares of Class A common stock that we may sell on any single day ("Pricing Option 2"). Through September 22, 2025, the Company had offered and sold 4,911,775 shares of Class A common stock to the Yorkville Investor pursuant to the SEPA for net proceeds of approximately $9.3 million. On June 20, 2024, the Company obtained stockholder approval pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d) for the issuance of shares of Class A common stock to the Yorkville Investor in excess of the Exchange Cap. As a result, the Company may issue up to an aggregate of approximately $246.3 million shares of Class A common stock with the SEC. As of September 22, 2025, approximately $240.7 million worth of shares of Class A common stock remains available under the terms of the SEPA. The issuance of additional shares of Class A common stock to the Yorkville Investor will dilute the percentage ownership interest of all stockholders, could dilute the book value per share of the Class A common stock and will increase the number of the Company's outstanding shares, which could cause the market price of our Class A common stock to decrease. Subsequent to the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we will need to file an post-effective amendment to Form S-1 and have the post effective amendment to Form S-1 declared effective by the SEC in order to continue to transact under the SEPA.

Our Charter provides that, subject to limited exceptions, the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada (or, if such court does not have jurisdiction, any other state district court located in the State of Nevada, or, if no state court located within the State of Nevada has jurisdiction, a federal court located in the State of Nevada) will be the sole and exclusive forum for any or all actions, suits and proceedings, other than actions, suits and proceedings brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction, (i) brought in the name or right of the Company or on its behalf, (ii) asserting a claim for breach of any fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, employee or agent of the Company to the Company or the Company's stockholders, (iii) arising or asserting a claim pursuant to any provision of the NRS Chapters 78 or 92A or any provision of the Company's organizational documents, (iv) to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Company's organizational documents or (v) asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. In addition, the Charter provides that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. These provisions may limit a stockholder's ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with the Company or the Company's directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against the Company and the Company's directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more covered proceedings, the Company may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect the Company's business and financial condition.

Ben Liquidity has sold participation interests in certain ExAlt Loans to certain investors and may continue to offer and sell to certain investors the opportunity to acquire participation interests in ExAlt Loans. This participation has allowed, and may allow in the future, these investors to purchase, on a pro rata basis, interests in these loans resulting in their receipt of a portion of the amounts payable under such loans. This may result in our receipt of less fees on such ExAlt Loans compared to what we would receive if we did not sell participation interests in such ExAlt Loans. Our right to receive payment of our fees as they relate to the portions of the ExAlt Loans sold as participation interests will be subordinate to the amounts due under such participation interests.

On June 6, 2023, in connection with the Business Combination, certain holders of Class B common stock entered into that certain Stockholders Agreement, which includes certain protective provisions on behalf of the holders of the Class B common stock (the "Stockholders Agreement"). Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, Beneficient agreed not to authorize, approve or ratify certain matters without the approval of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of Class B common stock, including (but not limited to) certain actions related to Ben LLC, Beneficient, and the BCH A&R LPA, and certain additional issuances of shares of Class B common stock (the "Protective Provisions"). These Protective Provisions vest control over certain matters to the holders of Class B common stock and may have an unintended "anti-takeover" effect if the holders of Class B common stock do not approve such a transaction, which could cause the value of the Class A common stock to suffer. The majority of the Company's Class B common stock is owned by Beneficient Holdings, Inc., which is owned by The Highland Business Holdings Trust, of which Brad Heppner, our former CEO, is the trustee, and Mr. Heppner and his family are the beneficiaries.

As a part of its business plan, the Company expects to issue additional equity securities in capital raising transactions or otherwise, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of its present stockholders. The Charter, as amended, authorizes the issuance of 5,250,250,000 shares of capital stock, consisting of: 5,000,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, 250,000 shares of Class B common stock and 250,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with 50,000,000 shares being shares of Series A preferred stock and 4,464,408 shares of Series B preferred stock, which consist of 3,542,063 shares of Series B-1 preferred stock, 200,000 shares of Series B-2 preferred stock, 20,000 shares of Series B-3 preferred stock, 6,932 shares of Series B-4 preferred stock, and 468,481 shares of Series B-5 preferred stock as of March 31, 2025 pursuant to the respective the respective certificates of designation. Subsequent to March 31, 2025, the Company issued 965,576 shares of its Series B-6 preferred stock, 23,333 shares of its Series B-7 preferred stock and 191,037 shares of Series B-8 preferred stock pursuant to the respective certificates of designation. Additionally, in order to effect the transactions to revise BCH's liquidation priority, assuming that is pursued, the Company would need to seek stockholder approval to amend its Charter and increase the number of authorized shares of Class B common stock. If additional shares of the Class B common stock are authorized and issued pursuant to the proposed transactions to revise BCH's liquidation priority, this will result in additional dilution to the Company's present stockholders. We do not expect the transaction to be consummated on the terms set forth in the Master Agreement. Accordingly, the Company is exploring available alternative options, including renegotiating terms or not proceeding with the transaction. The Company may in the future raise additional capital through public or private offerings of its common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for its common stock. Additionally, the Board approved the launch of the ExchangeTrust Product Plan to complete up to $5 billion of fiduciary financings to Customer ExAlt Trusts through ExchangeTrust transactions, which would be priced using the Formula-Based Financing. We believe completing ExchangeTrust transactions is critical for the long-term success of the Company. Any future issuance of the Company's equity or equity-linked securities may dilute then-current stockholders' ownership percentages and could also result in a decrease in the fair market value of the Company's equity securities, because the Company's assets would be owned by a larger pool of outstanding equity. As a result of the Formula-Based Financing for transactions pursuant to the ExchangeTrust Product Plan, dilution to existing stockholders may be substantially increased if the trading price of our Class A common stock is lower at the time of any ExchangeTrust transaction. Given the importance of ExchangeTrust transactions, the Company may enter into such transactions even if the trading price of our Class A common stock is significantly lower than historic prices. In addition, the implementation of Formula-Based Financing introduces risks that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. These risks include that the formula is based on certain assumptions that may not accurately or reliably predict market outcomes, our cost of capital, or the present value of the Collateral backing a fiduciary financing, potentially leading to mispricing of fiduciary financings and financial losses. Despite our efforts to monitor and mitigate these risks, there can be no assurance of success, and any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The Company may also issue such securities in connection with hiring or retaining employees and consultants, as payment to providers of goods and services, in connection with future acquisitions and investments, development, redevelopment and repositioning of assets, or for other business purposes. Subject to the rights of certain holders of preferred stock, the Company's board of directors may at any time authorize the issuance of additional common stock without stockholder approval, unless the approval of its common stockholders is required by applicable law, rule or regulation, including Nasdaq regulations, or the Company's Charter. The terms of preferred or other equity or equity-linked securities we may issue in future transactions may be more favorable to new investors, and may include dividend and/or liquidation preferences, anti-dilution protection, pre-emptive rights, superior voting rights and the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities, among other terms, which may have a further dilutive effect. Also, the future issuance of any such additional shares of common stock or other securities may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that any such future issuances will not be at a price or have conversion or exercise prices below the price at which shares of the common stock are then traded.

Beneficient's Charter and Bylaws provide for the indemnification of our officers and directors at our expense to the fullest extent allowed by Nevada law and include provisions that eliminate the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent possible under Nevada law. Nevada law generally permits a corporation to indemnify any director or officer who acted in good faith and in a manner in which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Under Nevada law, the person seeking indemnity may also be indemnified if he or she is not liable for his or her actions under Nevada law. Furthermore, under Nevada law, a director or officer is not liable for damages as a result of an act or failure to act in his or her capacity as a director or officer unless a statutory presumption that such person acted in good faith, on an informed basis and with a view to the interests of the corporation, has been rebutted. For a director or officer to be personally liable, it must be proven that (i) the act or omission constituted a breach of the director's or officer's fiduciary duties and (ii) the act or omission involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law. Subject to our obligations to indemnify our directors and officers, these provisions do not affect a director's or officer's liabilities under the federal securities laws or the recovery of damages by third parties.

The Company's indirect interest in BCH is structurally subordinate to certain outstanding classes of limited partner interests in BCH that have priority over the BCH Class A Units the Company indirectly owns in BCH with respect to any distributions made by BCH. The distributions payable to such senior non-controlling equity interests in BCH are based, in part, upon the capital accounts of the holders of such senior equity interests, which in turn may be increased by the preferred returns that accrue with respect to certain senior limited partner interests and the amount included in the hypothetical capital account with respect to such senior limited partner interests. Pursuant to the terms of the Eighth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of BCH (the "BCH Eighth A&R LPA") that became effective on June 7, 2023 in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, the preferred returns on the BCH Class S Preferred Units and the BCH Preferred A-1 Unit Accounts have been waived and shall not accrue until December 31, 2024, unless there are allocations of income up to the amount of such quarterly returns, in which event such returns have not be waived. This waiver continued under the terms of the BCH Ninth A&R LPA. As of March 31, 2025, there are substantial amounts in the capital accounts and hypothetical capital accounts of the senior limited partner interests in BCH that continue to exist and have priority over the BCH Class A Units indirectly held by the Company. As of March 31, 2025, the estimated capital account balances and the estimated hypothetical capital account balances of the limited partner interests entitled to preferred returns are as follows: BCH Class S Preferred Units – capital account nominal and hypothetical capital account $0.2 million; and BCH Preferred A-1 Unit Accounts – capital account $813.5 million and hypothetical capital account $935.0 million. In addition, the aggregate estimated capital account balance as of March 31, 2025 for the remaining limited partner interests (BCH Preferred A-0 Unit Accounts) that are senior to the BCH Class A Units indirectly held by the Company is $252.8 million. The estimated capital account balances and estimated hypothetical capital account balances disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared and disclosed for informational purposes only to provide an indication of the amounts that will have priority over the BCH Class A Units that are held indirectly by Beneficient. The estimates are based upon a deemed liquidation value of $1.1 billion as of March 31, 2025 and are subject to adjustment based upon actual results of operations, including the financial performance of BCH's underlying investments and an adjustment to the carrying value of the assets of BCH in connection with Beneficient's Business Combination. The holders of these senior limited partner interests in BCH with such capital account and hypothetical capital account balances will have priority over any distributions payable to the Company as the indirect holder of the BCH Class A Units. If the proposed transactions to revise BCH's liquidation priority are completed, the priority of the Class A Units will be modified. However, with the resignation of Brad Heppner from his position as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors on June 19, 2025, we do not expect the transaction to be consummated on the terms set forth in the Master Agreement. Accordingly, the Company is exploring available alternative options, including renegotiating terms or not proceeding with the transaction. Entities related to Mr. Heppner own the majority of the BCH securities.

Because the Company has a holding company structure, as an interest in the Company, Class A common stock, Series A preferred stock, Series B preferred stock and any additional series of preferred stock we issue are and will be structurally subordinated to interests in BCH, including creditors and holders of certain equity interests. With respect to BCH, upon its sale, liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Class A Units the Company indirectly owns in BCH will be entitled to distributions ranking junior to all other currently issued and outstanding classes and series of BCH's preferred units. If the proposed transactions to revise BCH's liquidation priority are completed, certain of the distributions that the Class A Units are entitled to will no longer rank junior to BCH's preferred units. However, with the resignation of Brad Heppner from his position as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors on June 19, 2025, we do not expect the transaction to be consummated on the terms set forth in the Master Agreement. Accordingly, the Company is exploring available alternative options, including renegotiating terms or not proceeding with the transaction. Entities related to Mr. Heppner own the majority of the BCH securities. As of March 31, 2025, the BCH interests had an aggregate estimated capital account balance determined in accordance with Section 704 of the Internal Revenue Code of $1.1 billion, other than the BCH Class S Ordinary Units, which will share any such distributions with the Class A Units held by the Company on a pro rata basis, other than those distributions specifically contemplated to the Class A Units held by the Company under the terms of the proposed transactions to revised BCH's liquidation priority. In addition, BCH or Ben LLC could issue securities in the future that have a senior preference on payment to the BCH Class A Units indirectly owned by the Company or that are otherwise structurally senior to Class A common stock or any preferred stock we issue. Therefore, in any bankruptcy, liquidation or similar proceeding, all claims of creditors (including trade creditors) of BCH will have priority over the Company's equity interests in BCH (and therefore the claims of the Class A common stock and any preferred stock we issue) with respect to the assets of BCH. Even if the Company is recognized as a creditor of BCH, the Company's claims would still be effectively subordinated to any security interests in the assets of BCH and to any indebtedness or other liabilities of BCH senior to the Company's claims. Consequently, Class A common stock, Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities (including trade payables) of BCH and any subsidiaries that we may in the future acquire or establish as financing vehicles or otherwise. In addition, future debt and security agreements entered into by BCH may contain various restrictions, including restrictions on payments by BCH to the Company and the transfer by BCH of assets pledged as collateral.

As part of its business plan, the Company intends to engage in transactions that may be deemed to represent a conflict of interest, including transactions between Beneficient and its non-wholly owned subsidiary, BCH. Certain officers and directors of Beneficient hold interests in BCH, directly or indirectly, in different proportions than they hold in Beneficient. Therefore, they could be seen as benefiting from transactions that will invest money in the Company's operating subsidiaries. Beneficient is a Nevada corporation, and under Nevada law, the statutory liability standard of the Nevada business judgment rule codified in Chapter 78.138 of the NRS is the principal avenue to hold directors and officers individually liable for damages arising from official conduct. Nevada does not use the "entire fairness" doctrine in evaluating transactions, which doctrine may be applicable if Beneficient was incorporated in another jurisdiction, and the Nevada Supreme Court has rejected the "entire fairness" doctrine, even when the challenged transaction involves a controlling stockholder and there are allegations of conflicts of interest. In Nevada, the existence of a conflict of interest, in and of itself, does not rebut the codified business judgment rule and shifts the burden of proof to directors.