Bloom Energy Corporation (NYSE: BE) is facing a federal securities lawsuit alleging that the company misled investors about its exposure to China in its supply chain, including for scandium used in its fuel cells. Investors are watching the case because the complaint links the alleged disclosures to a July 8, 2026, stock decline.
Summer Sale - Claim 70% Off TipRanks
Two ETFs for long or short leverage on BEThe complaint alleges that Bloom Energy repeatedly stated that its supply chain was not dependent on China, while allegedly obtaining scandium through intermediaries that sourced the metal from China. After Hunterbrook Media published a report on July 8, 2026 alleging China-linked routes into Bloom Energy’s scandium supply chain, BE fell $15.28, or 5.7%, to close at $254.29 per share.
The complaint seeks to represent persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Bloom Energy securities from February 27, 2025 through July 8, 2026, inclusive. The complaint alleges that the July 8, 2026 report served as an alleged corrective disclosure by revealing supply chain information that had allegedly been concealed from investors.
Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Bloom Energy securities during the class period can check whether they may be eligible.
Bloom Energy’s Business and Scandium Supply Chain
Bloom Energy designs, manufactures, sells, and installs solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation in the United States and internationally. According to the complaint, scandium is a rare earth metal used as a dopant to stabilize the zirconia-based ceramic electrolyte in the company’s solid oxide fuel cells.
The complaint frames scandium as central to the alleged disclosure issue because Bloom Energy allegedly told investors that it was not dependent on China, including for this material. The case focuses on whether the company’s statements about its supply chain accurately reflected its alleged sourcing relationships and exposure.
Alleged China Exposure at the Center of the Case
The lawsuit alleges that Bloom Energy and certain senior executives made materially false and misleading statements about the company’s supply chain during the February 27, 2025 to July 8, 2026 period. The complaint alleges that the company publicly minimized or denied China exposure while allegedly obtaining scandium through intermediaries that sourced the metal from China.
The core allegation is that investors were told Bloom Energy’s supply chain was not significantly exposed to China and that the company was not dependent on China for scandium. The complaint alleges that those statements omitted material facts about alleged China-linked routes into the company’s scandium supply chain.
For investors, the overarching issue is whether Bloom Energy’s supply chain statements gave the market an incomplete picture of risk tied to a key input used in its fuel cell systems. The complaint alleges that the market reacted when Hunterbrook Media published information and allegations that the complaint says contradicted the company’s prior statements.
Investors can follow the case and check whether their Bloom Energy transactions may fall within the class period.
Executive Statements Cited in the Complaint
The complaint cites statements by Chief Executive Officer KR Sridhar beginning on February 27, 2025, when Bloom Energy hosted an earnings call for its fourth quarter and full year 2024 results. Sridhar allegedly stated that the company was “not dependent on China for a supply chain.”
On April 30, 2025, Sridhar allegedly told investors that Bloom Energy imported materials and components from abroad, “but not from China.” He also allegedly said “there is no China supply chain for us” and stated, “we are not dependent on China for scandium.”
The complaint also cites a September 12, 2025 Semafor interview in which Sridhar allegedly said Bloom Energy had decided in 2004 not to depend on a Chinese supply chain. In a June 10, 2026 Wall Street Journal video interview, Sridhar allegedly answered “yes” when asked whether China was a notable country the company was not sourcing from and said Bloom Energy had avoided China since 2005.
July 2026 Report and Stock Price Reaction
The alleged corrective disclosure occurred on July 8, 2026, when Hunterbrook Media published a report titled “Bloom’s Big Lie.” According to the complaint, the report alleged that Bloom Energy was “reliant on Chinese scandium” based on global trade data, Chinese corporate filings, satellite imagery, and communications with Bloom Energy suppliers in China.
The report allegedly traced four separate China-linked routes into Bloom Energy’s supply chain. These allegedly included scandium oxide shipped directly to the company’s Delaware plant and scandium-bearing ceramics and powders moving through Thailand, Japan, and South Korea.
The complaint states that the report identified Hunan Oriental Scandium as a major Chinese scandium producer and quoted a representative saying, “We are also BE’s largest supplier of scandium.” Hunterbrook also allegedly claimed that trade data showed Hunan Oriental shipped scandium oxide directly to Bloom Energy in Newark, Delaware at least four times between August 2023 and May 2024.
Following the Hunterbrook Media report on July 8, 2026, Bloom Energy’s stock price fell $15.28, or 5.7%, to close at $254.29 per share. The complaint states that the decline occurred on unusually heavy trading volume and followed the report’s allegations about China-linked routes into the company’s scandium supply chain.
Investor Takeaways From the Bloom Energy Allegations
The lawsuit centers on whether Bloom Energy’s statements about China exposure and scandium sourcing were accurate and complete. The complaint alleges that the company said it was not dependent on China while allegedly obtaining scandium through intermediaries connected to Chinese sources.
According to the complaint, the alleged investor losses are tied to the July 8, 2026 report, which the plaintiff alleges revealed information that contradicted prior company statements. The complaint alleges that BE’s 5.7% stock decline that day reflected the market’s reaction to those disclosures.
This case may matter to shareholders who bought or acquired Bloom Energy securities during the February 27, 2025 to July 8, 2026 period. The key investor question in the complaint is whether the market price of BE securities was affected by allegedly misleading supply chain statements before the July 2026 report.
Securities Law Claims Against Bloom Energy and Executives
The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The named defendants are Bloom Energy, Chief Executive Officer KR Sridhar, Chief Financial Officer Simon Edwards, former Acting Principal Financial Officer Maciej Kurzymski, and former Chief Financial Officer Daniel Berenbaum.
The complaint alleges that the defendants made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts about Bloom Energy’s business, operations, and prospects. The challenged statements include alleged representations that the company’s supply chain did not have significant exposure to China, that it was not dependent on China, and that it was not dependent on China for scandium.
Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Bloom Energy securities during the class period can check whether they may be eligible and learn more about their potential rights.
About Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP is a nationally recognized securities litigation firm representing investors in complex shareholder actions. The firm has extensive expertise and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, 33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10004; (212) 363-7500.
Disclaimer: Attorney advertising. This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this article. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.