TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
NASATema Space Innovators ETF$20.42―0.75%983.61M
UFOProcure Space ETF$40.24$61.25(52.20% Upside)0.75%469.83M
ROKTSPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF$103.24$138.51(34.16% Upside)0.45%153.71M
MARSRoundhill Space & Technology ETF$22.29$37.94(70.22% Upside)0.75%42.11M
ORBXGlobal X Space Tech ETF$36.56$64.23(75.69% Upside)0.50%37.48M
SPCITuttle Capital Space Industry Income Blast ETF$15.42―0.99%6.72M
GALXVistaShares Space Supercycle ETF$20.84$31.93(53.23% Upside)0.75%2.83M
UFODTuttle Capital UFO Disclosure ETF$21.23$33.43(57.48% Upside)0.99%2.45M
XSPCVegaShares Space & AI ETF$18.31$32.62(78.18% Upside)0.75%1.95M
SPCLDefiance Pure Space Daily 2X Strategy ETF$13.11―1.31%10.42M

Performance Comparison

-50%0%50%100%150%Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
NASATema Space Innovators ETF20.42-4.75-18.89%
UFOProcure Space ETF40.243.579.72%
ROKTSPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF103.2423.0728.78%
MARSRoundhill Space & Technology ETF22.29-2.49-10.05%
ORBXGlobal X Space Tech ETF36.56-15.90-30.30%
SPCITuttle Capital Space Industry Income Blast ETF15.42-4.58-22.92%
GALXVistaShares Space Supercycle ETF20.84-2.59-11.05%
UFODTuttle Capital UFO Disclosure ETF21.23-3.41-13.84%
XSPCVegaShares Space & AI ETF18.31-6.86-27.27%
SPCLDefiance Pure Space Daily 2X Strategy ETF13.11-13.69-51.08%

ETFs Similar to WARP FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to WARP?
Among the ETFs similar to WARP, ROKT (SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.45% a year, compared with 0.50% for WARP.
WARP vs. NASA: what is the difference?
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) is the first ETF in WARP's similar-ETF list. It has $983.61M in assets under management and a 0.75% expense ratio, against $39.97M and 0.50% for WARP. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.