TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
SCHHSchwab U.S. REIT ETF$23.05$25.65(11.28% Upside)0.07%10.90B
REETiShares Global REIT ETF$26.43$29.52(11.68% Upside)0.14%4.76B
USRTiShares Core U.S. REIT ETF$63.85$70.76(10.82% Upside)0.08%4.25B
ICFiShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF$66.57$73.87(10.96% Upside)0.32%1.95B
RWRSPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF$108.32$119.73(10.53% Upside)0.25%1.80B
BBREJPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI U.S. REIT ETF$103.12$113.75(10.31% Upside)0.11%1.27B
CSRECohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF$28.15$31.33(11.30% Upside)0.70%657.11M
JPREJPMorgan Realty Income ETF$51.50$57.25(11.17% Upside)0.50%468.24M
KBWYInvesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF$16.52$19.09(15.55% Upside)0.35%282.24M
SRETGlobal X SuperDividend REIT ETF$20.04$23.18(15.69% Upside)0.58%200.66M

Performance Comparison

0%10%20%30%Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
SCHHSchwab U.S. REIT ETF23.052.6613.07%
REETiShares Global REIT ETF26.432.148.82%
USRTiShares Core U.S. REIT ETF63.858.0014.32%
ICFiShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF66.577.7313.15%
RWRSPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF108.3213.4314.16%
BBREJPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI U.S. REIT ETF103.1212.4713.75%
CSRECohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF28.153.2413.02%
JPREJPMorgan Realty Income ETF51.505.4911.92%
KBWYInvesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF16.522.7620.08%
SRETGlobal X SuperDividend REIT ETF20.040.361.81%

ETFs Similar to RITA FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to RITA?
Among the ETFs similar to RITA, SCHH (Schwab U.S. REIT ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.07% a year, compared with 0.50% for RITA.
RITA vs. SCHH: what is the difference?
SCHH (Schwab U.S. REIT ETF) is the first ETF in RITA's similar-ETF list. It has $10.90B in assets under management and a 0.07% expense ratio, against $6.56M and 0.50% for RITA. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.