TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
SCHHSchwab U.S. REIT ETF$23.31$26.14(12.13% Upside)0.07%11.12B
REETiShares Global REIT ETF$26.72$29.92(11.98% Upside)0.14%4.81B
USRTiShares Core U.S. REIT ETF$64.59$72.01(11.49% Upside)0.08%4.28B
ICFiShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF$67.16$75.15(11.89% Upside)0.32%2.01B
RWRSPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF$109.80$122.00(11.11% Upside)0.25%1.82B
BBREJPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI U.S. REIT ETF$104.43$116.03(11.11% Upside)0.11%1.25B
CSRECohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF$28.36$31.67(11.67% Upside)0.70%677.27M
JPREJPMorgan Realty Income ETF$52.09$58.41(12.13% Upside)0.50%468.65M
KBWYInvesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF$16.54$19.66(18.84% Upside)0.35%288.64M
FRIFirst Trust S&P REIT Index Fund$30.90$34.29(10.96% Upside)0.50%203.47M

Performance Comparison

0%10%20%30%Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26Nov '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
SCHHSchwab U.S. REIT ETF23.312.8714.02%
REETiShares Global REIT ETF26.722.429.97%
USRTiShares Core U.S. REIT ETF64.598.5215.20%
ICFiShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF67.168.1413.79%
RWRSPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF109.8014.6615.41%
BBREJPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI U.S. REIT ETF104.4313.5514.90%
CSRECohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF28.363.2212.80%
JPREJPMorgan Realty Income ETF52.096.0613.16%
KBWYInvesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF16.542.8420.75%
FRIFirst Trust S&P REIT Index Fund30.903.9814.80%

ETFs Similar to RDOG FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to RDOG?
Among the ETFs similar to RDOG, SCHH (Schwab U.S. REIT ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.07% a year, compared with 0.35% for RDOG.
RDOG vs. SCHH: what is the difference?
SCHH (Schwab U.S. REIT ETF) is the first ETF in RDOG's similar-ETF list. It has $11.12B in assets under management and a 0.07% expense ratio, against $10.66M and 0.35% for RDOG. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.