OIH - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH)
OIH, the VanEck Oil Services ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, diversified oilfield service leaders like Schlumberger, Baker Hughes, and TechnipFMC, which show healthy financial performance, positive momentum, and strategic growth initiatives. The fund’s score is held back somewhat by weaker names such as Transocean and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, where profitability, cash flow, and valuation concerns are more pronounced. The main risk for investors is the ETF’s heavy concentration in the oil services sector, which makes it sensitive to energy market cycles and industry-specific challenges.
OIH vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
- AUM
- 1.77B
- Region
- Global
- Expense Ratio
- 0.35%
- Beta
- 0.81
- Issuer
- VanEck
- Inception Date
- Dec 20, 2011
- Dividend Yield
- 1.27%
- Asset Class
- Equity
- Index Tracked
- MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25
OIH Summary
The VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) is a fund that tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, focusing on companies that support the oil and gas industry with equipment and services. It holds well-known names like Schlumberger and Baker Hughes, which help with drilling, exploration, and production. Investors might consider OIH if they want targeted exposure to the energy sector and believe oil and gas activity will grow, potentially boosting these service companies. However, this ETF is heavily tied to the energy industry, so its price can swing a lot with oil prices and overall energy demand.
How much will it cost me?
The VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is a sector-focused ETF, which often requires more active management compared to broad market index funds.
What would affect this ETF?
The VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) could benefit from rising global energy demand and increased investment in oil exploration and production, which would drive growth for its top holdings like Schlumberger and Baker Hughes. However, it may face challenges from regulatory shifts toward renewable energy, geopolitical tensions affecting oil supply, or declining oil prices, which could negatively impact the profitability of the energy equipment and services sector.
OIH Top 10 Holdings
OIH is essentially a bet on the global oil services playbook, with SLB and Baker Hughes steering the ship. SLB has been rising over the year but recently losing steam, while Baker Hughes is more steady, giving the fund a solid core. TechnipFMC and Tenaris add extra punch with stronger momentum, helping offset lagging names like Halliburton and Weatherford, which have seen more mixed trading lately. With a heavy tilt toward energy equipment and services and a global footprint, this ETF lives and dies by the health of the oilfield cycle.
| Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 SLB | SLB | 19.14% | $339.53M | $72.86B | 49.51% | 75Outperform |
 BKR | Baker Hughes Company | 11.62% | $206.14M | $55.40B | 20.25% | 76Outperform |
 FTI | TechnipFMC | 6.66% | $118.17M | $27.40B | 88.80% | 80Outperform |
 HAL | Halliburton | 6.38% | $113.21M | $27.48B | 48.50% | 72Outperform |
 TS | Tenaris SA | 5.66% | $100.40M | $31.31B | 67.74% | 75Outperform |
 CH:TOJ | Transocean | ― | ― | ― | ― | 60Neutral |
 SEI | Solaris Energy Infrastructure | 4.47% | $79.38M | $5.27B | 23.81% | 69Neutral |
 WFRD | Weatherford International | 4.16% | $73.81M | $5.60B | 22.21% | 72Outperform |
 NOV | NOV | 4.02% | $71.38M | $6.68B | 48.59% | 72Outperform |
OIH Technical Analysis
Price Trends
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OIH, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 384.89 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 386.45, below the 50-day MA of 403.85, and below the 200-day MA of 394.20, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -5.08 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 44.54 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 58.09 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for OIH.
OIH Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
| Name | Price | Price Target | AUM | Expense Ratio | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OIH | $384.89 | $420.00(9.12% Upside) | $1.77B | 0.35% | 70Neutral |
 IXN | $138.77 | $184.80(33.17% Upside) | $9.19B | 0.37% | 66Neutral |
 GUNR | $54.29 | $60.62(11.67% Upside) | $7.12B | 0.46% | 59Neutral |
 COPX | $79.15 | $98.35(24.26% Upside) | $6.85B | 0.65% | 69Neutral |
 IXC | $62.65 | $66.39(5.97% Upside) | $3.35B | 0.37% | 71Outperform |
 EIPI | $22.36 | $25.23(12.83% Upside) | $1.09B | 1.11% | 68Neutral |
Performance Comparison
| Show on chart | Ticker | Company Name | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OIH | VanEck Oil Services ETF | 384.89 | 124.06 | 47.56% | |
| IXN | iShares Global Tech ETF | 138.77 | 34.95 | 33.66% | |
| GUNR | FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 54.29 | 11.89 | 28.06% | |
| COPX | Global X Copper Miners ETF | 79.15 | 21.66 | 37.67% | |
| IXC | iShares Global Energy ETF | 62.65 | 22.68 | 56.75% | |
| EIPI | FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF | 22.36 | 3.86 | 20.87% |
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.