TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
MAGSRoundhill Magnificent Seven ETF$70.70―0.30%5.49B
FEPIREX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF$40.55$55.12(35.92% Upside)0.65%707.42M
FNGSMicroSectors FANG+ ETN$78.61―0.58%588.65M
YMAGYieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs$10.87―1.34%281.33M
MAGYRoundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF$42.03―0.99%94.39M
BULZMicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN$33.49―0.95%2.76B
FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ 3 Leveraged ETNs$29.47―2.60%2.35B
FNGOMicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETNs$143.71―0.95%713.84M
FNGGDirexion Daily Select Large Caps & FANGs Bull 2X Shares$249.97―0.97%107.21M
QQQUDirexion Daily Concentrated Qs Bull 2X Shares$59.88$72.29(20.72% Upside)0.98%72.99M

Performance Comparison

-50%0%50%Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
MAGSRoundhill Magnificent Seven ETF70.704.206.31%
FEPIREX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF40.552.376.21%
FNGSMicroSectors FANG+ ETN78.616.088.38%
YMAGYieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs10.870.484.64%
MAGYRoundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF42.03-0.65-1.53%
BULZMicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN33.491.946.14%
FNGUMicroSectors FANG+ 3 Leveraged ETNs29.47-2.39-7.50%
FNGOMicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETNs143.719.807.32%
FNGGDirexion Daily Select Large Caps & FANGs Bull 2X Shares249.9715.436.58%
QQQUDirexion Daily Concentrated Qs Bull 2X Shares59.881.993.43%

ETFs Similar to MN FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to MN?
None of the similar ETFs listed here costs less than MN, whose expense ratio is 0.20% a year. The lowest-cost alternative is MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF), at 0.30%.
MN vs. MAGS: what is the difference?
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is the first ETF in MN's similar-ETF list. It has $5.49B in assets under management and a 0.30% expense ratio, against $68.53M and 0.20% for MN. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.