TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
HK:3066CSOP Bitcoin Futures ETFHKD 24.34―2.00%35.27M
HK:3068CSOP Ether Futures ETFHKD 9.60―2.00%13.93M
HK:3135Samsung Bitcoin Futures Active ETFHKD 24.86――9.31M
HK:2818Pando Bitcoin ETFHKD 5.04―2.00%277.58M
HK:3042ChinaAMC Bitcoin ETF HKD CounterHKD 9.50――207.50M
HK:2831Pando Virtual Assets ETF Series OFC - Pando Solana ETFHKD 6.79―1.60%65.22M
HK:3085Pando Virtual Assets ETF Series OFC - Pando Ethereum ETFHKD 6.10――51.98M
HK:3046ChinaAMC Ether ETF HKD CounterHKD 5.24―1.99%41.14M

Performance Comparison

-40%-20%0%Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
HK:3066CSOP Bitcoin Futures ETF24.34-11.00-31.13%
HK:3068CSOP Ether Futures ETF9.60-7.40-43.53%
HK:3135Samsung Bitcoin Futures Active ETF24.86-10.72-30.13%
HK:2818Pando Bitcoin ETF5.04-2.04-28.83%
HK:3042ChinaAMC Bitcoin ETF HKD Counter9.50-3.60-27.48%
HK:2831Pando Virtual Assets ETF Series OFC - Pando Solana ETF6.79-0.71-9.41%
HK:3085Pando Virtual Assets ETF Series OFC - Pando Ethereum ETF6.09-2.33-27.70%
HK:3046ChinaAMC Ether ETF HKD Counter5.24-3.55-40.39%

ETFs Similar to HK:3460 FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to HK:3460?
Among the ETFs similar to HK:3460, HK:2831 (Pando Virtual Assets ETF Series OFC - Pando Solana ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 1.60% a year, compared with 1.99% for HK:3460.
HK:3460 vs. HK:3066: what is the difference?
HK:3066 (CSOP Bitcoin Futures ETF) is the first ETF in HK:3460's similar-ETF list. It has $35.27M in assets under management and a 2.00% expense ratio, against $3.20M and 1.99% for HK:3460. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.
How is HK:3460 different from HK:3042?
HK:3042 (ChinaAMC Bitcoin ETF HKD Counter) comes from the same fund family as HK:3460 (ChinaAMC). HK:3042 manages $207.50M in assets, against $3.20M for HK:3460. Both funds are in the comparison table above.