TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
HK:3066CSOP Bitcoin Futures ETFHKD 25.26―2.00%34.59M
HK:3068CSOP Ether Futures ETFHKD 10.12―2.00%13.64M
HK:3135Samsung Bitcoin Futures Active ETFHKD 25.82――9.31M
HK:2818Pando Bitcoin ETFHKD 5.22―2.00%274.66M
HK:3042ChinaAMC Bitcoin ETF HKD CounterHKD 9.88――207.50M
HK:3085Pando Virtual Assets ETF Series OFC - Pando Ethereum ETFHKD 6.46――51.21M
HK:3046ChinaAMC Ether ETF HKD CounterHKD 5.53―1.99%41.14M
HK:3460ChinaAMC Solana ETFHKD 4.07―1.99%3.24M

Performance Comparison

-60%-40%-20%0%Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
HK:3066CSOP Bitcoin Futures ETF25.26-12.32-32.78%
HK:3068CSOP Ether Futures ETF10.12-8.73-46.31%
HK:3135Samsung Bitcoin Futures Active ETF25.82-11.96-31.66%
HK:2818Pando Bitcoin ETF5.21-2.28-30.42%
HK:3042ChinaAMC Bitcoin ETF HKD Counter9.88-4.09-29.26%
HK:3085Pando Virtual Assets ETF Series OFC - Pando Ethereum ETF6.46-1.97-23.37%
HK:3046ChinaAMC Ether ETF HKD Counter5.53-4.21-43.23%
HK:3460ChinaAMC Solana ETF4.07-4.07-50.00%

ETFs Similar to HK:2831 FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to HK:2831?
None of the similar ETFs listed here costs less than HK:2831, whose expense ratio is 1.60% a year. The lowest-cost alternative is HK:3046 (ChinaAMC Ether ETF HKD Counter), at 1.99%.
HK:2831 vs. HK:3066: what is the difference?
HK:3066 (CSOP Bitcoin Futures ETF) is the first ETF in HK:2831's similar-ETF list. It has $34.59M in assets under management and a 2.00% expense ratio, against $64.44M and 1.60% for HK:2831. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.
How is HK:2831 different from HK:2818?
HK:2818 (Pando Bitcoin ETF) comes from the same fund family as HK:2831 (Pando). HK:2818 charges 2.00% a year, against 1.60% for HK:2831. HK:2818 manages $274.66M in assets, against $64.44M for HK:2831. Both funds are in the comparison table above.