TipRanks
Go Ultimate55% OFF

Comparison Results

Comparison results
NamePricePrice ChangePrice TargetSmart ScoreExpense RatioAsset Under ManagementFollow
HK:3404ChinaAMC MSCI India ETF HKD CounterHKD 5.93―0.60%33.92M
HK:3109CSOP STAR 50 Index ETFHKD 12.88―1.80%434.44M
HK:2839ChinaAMC MSCI China A 50 Connect ETF HKD counterHKD 27.82―0.30%88.00M
HK:3118Harvest MSCI China A Index ETF HKDHKD 16.54―0.49%34.22M
HK:3003CSOP MSCI China A 50 Connect ETFHKD 6.59―1.50%33.06M
HK:3010iShares Core MSCI Asia ex Japan ETFHKD 81.86―0.28%30.54B
HK:3416Global X HSCEI Components Covered Call Active ETF HKD CounterHKD 7.82―0.75%20.54B
HK:3443CSOP FTSE Hong Kong Equity ETFHKD 8.38――17.54B
HK:3432CSOP ETF Series - CSOP MSCI HK China Connect Select ETF UnitsHKD 101.10―1.20%10.11B
HK:2802CSOP ETF Series - CSOP HSCEI Covered Call Active ETFHKD 6.55――9.08B

Performance Comparison

-20%0%20%40%Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26
Performance comparison by fund
TickerCompany NamePriceChange% Change
HK:3404ChinaAMC MSCI India ETF HKD Counter5.92-1.20-16.78%
HK:3109CSOP STAR 50 Index ETF12.88-0.80-5.85%
HK:2839ChinaAMC MSCI China A 50 Connect ETF HKD counter27.82-1.38-4.73%
HK:3118Harvest MSCI China A Index ETF HKD16.54-1.30-7.29%
HK:3003CSOP MSCI China A 50 Connect ETF6.58-0.18-2.73%
HK:3010iShares Core MSCI Asia ex Japan ETF81.8610.2814.35%
HK:3416Global X HSCEI Components Covered Call Active ETF HKD Counter7.82-1.23-13.61%
HK:3443CSOP FTSE Hong Kong Equity ETF8.38-1.23-12.81%
HK:3432CSOP ETF Series - CSOP MSCI HK China Connect Select ETF Units101.10-12.20-10.77%
HK:2802CSOP ETF Series - CSOP HSCEI Covered Call Active ETF6.55-0.88-11.78%

ETFs Similar to HK:2805 FAQ

What is the cheapest alternative to HK:2805?
Among the ETFs similar to HK:2805, HK:3010 (iShares Core MSCI Asia ex Japan ETF) has the lowest expense ratio, at 0.28% a year.
HK:2805 vs. HK:3404: what is the difference?
HK:3404 (ChinaAMC MSCI India ETF HKD Counter) is the first ETF in HK:2805's similar-ETF list. It has $33.92M in assets under management and a 0.60% expense ratio. Compare their performance, price targets and Smart Scores in the table above.